, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 353–357 | Cite as

Poor outcomes in cirrhosis-associated hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study of 32,033 patients

  • Alfredo M. Carbonell
  • Luke G. Wolfe
  • Eric J. DeMaria
Original Article


Cirrhosis is a significant marker of adverse postoperative outcome. A large national database was analyzed for abdominal wall hernia repair outcomes in cirrhotic vs. non-cirrhotic patients. Data from cirrhotics and non-cirrhotics undergoing inpatient repair of abdominal wall hernias (excluding inguinal) from 1999 to 2004 were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database. Differences (P<0.05) were determined using standard statistical methods. Inpatient hernia repair was performed in 30,836 non-cirrhotic (41.5% male) and 1,197 cirrhotic patients (62.7% male; P<0.0001). Cirrhotics had a higher age distribution (P<0.0001), no race differences (P=0.64), underwent ICU admission more commonly (15.9% vs. 6%; P<0.0001), had a longer LOS (5.4 vs. 3.7 days), and higher morbidity (16.5% vs. 13.8%; P=0.008), and mortality (2.5% vs. 0.2%; P<0.0001) compared to non-cirrhotics. Several comorbidities had a higher associated mortality in cirrhosis: functional impairment, congestive heart failure, renal failure, nutritional deficiencies, and peripheral vascular disease. The complications with the highest associated mortality in cirrhotics were aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary compromise, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and metabolic derangements. Cirrhotics underwent emergent surgery more commonly than non-cirrhotics (58.9% vs. 29.5%; P<0.0001), with longer LOS regardless of elective or emergent surgery. Although elective surgical morbidity in cirrhotics was no different from non-cirrhotics (15.6% vs. 13.5%; P=0.18), emergent surgery morbidity was (17.3% vs. 14.5%; P=0.04). While differences in elective surgical mortality in cirrhotics approached significance (0.6% vs. 0.1%; P=0.06), mortality was 7-fold higher in emergencies (3.8% vs. 0.5%; P<0.0001). Patients with cirrhosis carry a significant risk of adverse outcome after abdominal wall hernia repair compared to non-cirrhotics, particularly with emergent surgery. It may, however, be safer than previously thought. Ideally, patients with cirrhosis should undergo elective hernia repair after medical optimization.


Hernia Cirrhosis Ascites Surgery Emergencies Outcomes 


  1. 1.
    Belghiti J, Durand F (1997) Abdominal wall hernias in the setting of cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 17:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hansen JB, Thulstrup AM, Vilstup H, Sorensen HT (2002) Danish nationwide cohort study of postoperative death in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing hernia repair. Br J Surg 89:805–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mansour A, Watson W, Shayani V, Pickleman J (1997) Abdominal operations in patients with cirrhosis: still a major surgical challenge (discussion 735–736). Surgery 122:730–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Hara ET, Oliai A, Patek AJ Jr, Nabseth DC (1975) Management of umbilical hernias associated with hepatic cirrhosis and ascites. Ann Surg 181:85–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hurst RD, Butler BN, Soybel DI, Wright HK (1992) Management of groin hernias in patients with ascites. Ann Surg 216:696–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lemmer JH, Strodel WE, Knol JA, Eckhauser FE (1983) Management of spontaneous umbilical hernia disruption in the cirrhotic patient. Ann Surg 198:30–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonetti JP, Aranha GV, Wilkinson WA, Stanley M, Greenlee HB (1984) Umbilical herniorrhaphy in cirrhotic patients. Arch Surg 119:442–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fagan SP, Awad SS, Berger DH (2004) Management of complicated umbilical hernias in patients with end-stage liver disease and refractory ascites. Surgery 135:679–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP (2001) Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error? Arch Surg 136:1287–1292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. Jama 290:2168–2173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, Kercher K, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2005) National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes. Am Surg (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aranha GV, Sontag SJ, Greenlee HB (1982) Cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a formidable operation. Am J Surg 143:55–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doberneck RC, Sterling WA Jr, Allison DC (1983) Morbidity and mortality after operation in nonbleeding cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 146:306–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pescovitz MD (1984) Umbilical hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis. No evidence for increased incidence of variceal bleeding. Ann Surg 199:325–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirkpatrick S, Schubert T (1988) Umbilical hernia rupture in cirrhotics with ascites. Dig Dis Sci 33:762–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozden I, Emre A, Bilge O, Tekant Y, Acarli K, Alper A, Aryogul O (1998) Elective repair of abdominal wall hernias in decompensated cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1516–1518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cobb WS, Heniford BT, Burns JM, Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Kercher KW (2004) Cirrhosis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19(3):418–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maniatis AG, Hunt CM (1995) Therapy for spontaneous umbilical hernia rupture. Am J Gastroenterol 90:310–312PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfredo M. Carbonell
    • 1
  • Luke G. Wolfe
    • 1
  • Eric J. DeMaria
    • 1
  1. 1.Minimally Invasive Surgery Center Division of General SurgeryVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center RichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations