, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–2 | Cite as

Can we be sure that the meshes do improve the recurrence rates?

Invited Commentary


  1. 1.
    Schumpelick V, Wantz G (1995) Inguinal hernia repair, 1st edn. Karger Verlag, BaselGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schumpelick V, Nyhus L (2003) Meshes: benefits and risks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansen PL, Mertens PR, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2004) The biology of hernia formation. Surgery 136:1–4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583, discussion 583–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collaboration EH (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surgical Department of the RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations