, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–2 | Cite as

Can we be sure that the meshes do improve the recurrence rates?

Invited Commentary


Inguinal Hernia Aortic Aneurysm Incisional Hernia Standard Patient Recurrent Hernia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Schumpelick V, Wantz G (1995) Inguinal hernia repair, 1st edn. Karger Verlag, BaselGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schumpelick V, Nyhus L (2003) Meshes: benefits and risks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansen PL, Mertens PR, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2004) The biology of hernia formation. Surgery 136:1–4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583, discussion 583–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collaboration EH (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surgical Department of the RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations