pp 1–16 | Cite as

Drivers of Boreal Tree Growth and Stand Opening: The Case of Jack Pine on Sandy Soils

  • Marine PacéEmail author
  • Benjamin Gadet
  • Julien Beguin
  • Yves Bergeron
  • David Paré


The increase in open-crown forest stands in the closed-crown boreal forest of Quebec over the last 50 years prompts us to identify and understand the drivers responsible for stand opening. To do so, we studied 37 jack pine plots with varying degrees of canopy opening in the Eastern Canadian boreal forest to answer four questions: (1) Does stand opening result from a deficit in pine regeneration, from poor tree growth, or from both processes simultaneously? (2) In the event that pine stand opening results at least in part from poor tree growth, how early following stand initiation does the tree growth divergence occur between unproductive and productive plots? (3) Is poor tree growth in the unproductive plots related to water stress? Finally, (4) are there predisposing site factors and, if so, what are their contributions versus non-permanent factors such as disturbance history, vegetation, and soil dynamics? In the study area, jack pine stand openings resulted from both a poor regeneration density and weak tree growth. Tree growth divergence between productive and unproductive plots occurred very early during the post-disturbance forest succession and is not likely to result from water limitation during the early development of the trees as revealed by δ13C analysis of tree rings. Low-productivity plots were exclusively found on substrates with low base cation reserves. However, because plots of higher productivity were also found on these substrates, we conclude that stand susceptibility to regeneration failures may be greater on sites with such conditions. Variations in tree cover were mainly related to non-permanent environmental variables, suggesting that restoration of forest productivity is theoretically possible in the low-productivity sites investigated.


ecosystem stability forest management forest productivity jack pine lichen woodland pine regeneration predisposing factors regeneration failure stable alternative state terricolous lichen 



This work was financially supported by a BMP-Innovation grant in partnership with the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies, and the Chair in Sustainable Forest Management (NSERC-UQAT-UQAM), by a Mitacs Accelerate grant in partnership with Chantiers Chibougamau, and a NSERC Collaborative Research and Development UQAT-Tembec-Chantiers Chibougamau grant. We thank S. Laflèche, R. Julien, D. Charron, S. Dagnault, F. Michaud, and J. Morissette for their help and advice in the field, and S. Rousseau for soil analysis. We also acknowledge our industrial partners, Chantiers Chibougamau, and Tembec, for providing us with regional archive data.

Supplementary material

10021_2019_425_MOESM1_ESM.docx (81 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 80 kb)


  1. Bastianelli C, Ali AA, Béguin J, Bergeron Y, Grondin P, Hély C, Paré D. 2017. Boreal coniferous forest density leads to significant variations in soil physical and geochemical properties. Biogeosciences 14:3445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergeron JF, Grondin P, Blouin J. 1999. Rapport de classification écologique du sous-domaine bioclimatique de la pessière à mousses de l’ouest. Forêt Québec, Canada: Ministère des Ressources naturelles.Google Scholar
  3. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Flannigan M, Kafka V. 2004. Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in northwestern Quebec. Ecology 85:19161932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernier PY, Desjardins RL, Karimi-Zindashty Y, Worth D, Beaudoin Y, Luo Y, Wang S. 2011. Boreal lichen woodlands: a possible negative feedback to climate change in eastern North America. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151:521–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum JD, Klaue A, Nezat CA, Driscoll CT, Johnson CE, Siccama TG, Eagar C, Fahey TJ, Likens JE. 2002. Mycorrhizal weathering of apatite as an important calcium source in base-poor forest ecosystems. Nature 417:729–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudreault C, Zouaoui S, Drapeau P, Bergeron Y, Stevenson S. 2013. Canopy openings created by partial cutting increase growth rates and maintain the cover of three Cladonia species in the Canadian boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 304:473–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley RL, Titus BD, Preston CP. 2000. Changes to mineral N cycling and microbial communities in black spruce humus after additions of (NH4)2SO4 and condensed tannins extracted from Kalmia angustifolia and balsam fir. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:1227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown RT, Mikola P. 1974. The influence of fruticose soil lichens upon the mycorrhizae and seedling growth of forest trees. In Suomen metsätieteellinen seura, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  9. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. 2007. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Canadian Society of Soil Sciences, CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Certini G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Côté D, Girard F, Hébert F, Bouchard S, Gagnon R, Lord D. 2013. Is the closed-crown boreal forest resilient after successive stand disturbances? A quantitative demonstration from a case study. Journal of vegetation Science 24:664–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Bergman I, Hörnberg G. 2013. Historical land use and resource depletion in spruce-Cladina forests of subarctic Sweden. Anthropocene 1:14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Girard F, Payette S, Gagnon R. 2008. Rapid expansion of lichen woodlands within the closed-crown boreal forest zone over the last 50 years caused by stand disturbances in eastern Canada. Journal of Biogeography 35:529–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene DF, Noël J, Bergeron Y, Rousseau M, Gauthier S. 2004. Recruitment of Picea mariana, Pinus banksiana, and Populus tremuloides across a burn severity gradient following wildfire in the southern boreal forest of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:1845–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groffman PM, Fisk MC. 2011. Calcium constrains plant control over forest ecosystem nitrogen cycling. Ecology 92:2035–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross J, Ligges U. 2015. nortest: Tests for normality. R package version 1.0-4. Available online at (last access 3 April 2019).
  17. Haughian SR, Burton PJ. 2015. Microhabitat associations of lichens, feathermosses, and vascular plants in a caribou winter range, and their implications for understory development. Botany 93:221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hébert F, Boucher JF, Bernier PY, Lord D. 2006. Growth response and water relations of 3-year-old planted black spruce and jack pine seedlings in site prepared lichen woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 223:226–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C. Available online at (last access 17 October 2018).
  20. Jasinski JP, Payette S. 2005. The creation of alternative stable states in the southern boreal forest, Quebec, Canada. Ecological Monographs 75:561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkby EA, Mengel K. 1975. The role of magnesium in plant nutrition. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 139:209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovács B, Tinya F, Ódor P. 2017. Stand structural drivers of microclimate in mature temperate mixed forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 234:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laflèche V, Bernier S, Saucier JP, Gagné C. 2013. Indices de qualité de station des principales essences commerciales en fonction des types écologiques du Québec méridional. Québec, ministère des ressources naturelles, Direction des inventaires forestiers.Google Scholar
  24. Lafleur PM, Schreader CP. 1994. Water loss from the floor of a subarctic forest. Arctic and Alpine Research 26:152–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leavitt SW, Danzer SR. 1993. Method for batch processing small wood samples to holocellulose for stable-carbon isotope analysis. Analytical Chemistry 65:87–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Goff H, Flannigan MD, Bergeron Y, Girardin M. 2007. Historical fire regime shifts related to climate teleconnections in the Waswanipi area, central Quebec, Canada. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16:607–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mailly D. 2014. Application des modèles de croissance internodale variable au Québec. Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Ressources naturelles, Direction de la recherche forestière.Google Scholar
  28. Mallik AU. 1987. Allelopathic potential of Kalmia angustifolia to black spruce (Picea mariana). Forest Ecology and Management 20:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mallik A, Kayes I. 2018. Lichen mated seedbeds inhibit while moss dominated seedbeds facilitate black spruce (Picea mariana) seedling regeneration in post-fire boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 427:260–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marquis F, Paré D. 2009. The role of permanent site factors in the assessment of soil treatment effects: A case study with a site preparation trial in jack pine plantations on glacial outwashes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 89:81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazerolle MJ. 2017. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.0-1. Available online at (last access 29 October 2018).
  32. McCarrol D, Loader NJ. 2004. Stable isotopes in tree rings. Quaternary Science Reviews 23:771–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McLean DA, Wein RW. 1977. Changes in understory vegetation with increasing stand age in New Brunswick forests: species composition, cover, biomass, and nutrients. Canadian Journal of Botany 55:2818–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec. 2018. Carte écoforestière avec perturbations. Available online at (last accessed on 29 October 2018)
  35. Neary D, Day M, Schneider G. 1972. Density-growth relationships in a nine year-old red pine plantation. Michigan academician 5:219–32.Google Scholar
  36. Newton PF, Amponsah IG. 2006. Systematic review of short-term growth responses of semi-mature black spruce and jack pine stands to nitrogen-based fertilization treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 237:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nezat CA, Blum JD, Yanai RD, Hamburg SP. 2007. A sequential extraction to determine the distribution of apatite in granitoid soil mineral pools with application to weathering at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH, USA. Applied Geochemistry 22:2406–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nimmo DG, Nally RM, Cunningham SC, Haslem A, Bennett AF. 2015. Vive la résistance: reviving resistance for 21st century conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30:516–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ohtonen R, Väre H. 1998. Vegetation composition determines microbial activities in a boreal forest soil. Microbial Ecology 36:328–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oksanen JF, Blanchet G, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2018. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-2. Available online at (last accessed on 29 October 2018).
  41. Ouimet R, Boucher JF, Tremblay P, Lord D. 2018. Comparing soil profiles of adjacent forest stands with contrasting tree densities: lichen woodlands vs. black spruce–feathermoss stands in the continuous boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 98:458–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pacé M, Fenton NJ, Paré D, Bergeron Y. 2017. Ground layer composition affects tree fine root biomass and soil nutrient availability in jack pine and black spruce forests under extreme drainage conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pacé M, Fenton NJ, Paré D, Stefani FOP, Massicotte HB, Tackaberry LE, Bergeron Y. 2018. Lichens contribute to open woodland stability in the boreal forest through detrimental effects on pine growth and root ectomycorrhizal status. Ecosystems . Scholar
  44. Payette S, Bhiry N, Delwaide A, Simard M. 2000. Origin of the lichen woodland at its southern range limit in eastern Canada: the catastrophic impact of insect defoliators and fire on the spruce-moss forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Payette S, Delwaide A. 2003. Shift of conifer boreal forest to lichen–heath parkland caused by successive stand disturbances. Ecosystems 6:540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pinno BD, Errington RC, Thompson DK. 2013. Young jack pine and high severity fire combine to create potentially expansive areas of understocked forest. Forest Ecology and Management 310:517–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pothier D, Savard F. 1998. Actualisation des tables de production pour les principales espèces forestières du Québec. Québec, ministère des Ressources naturelles, Direction de la recherche forestière.Google Scholar
  48. R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
  49. Salo K, Kouki J. 2018. Severity of forest wildfire had a major influence on early successional ectomycorrhizal macrofungi assemblages, including edible mushrooms. Forest Ecology and Management 415–416:70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scheffer M, Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes EH, Chapin FS. 2012. Thresholds for boreal biome transitions. PNAS 109:21384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schimdt MG, Carmean WH. 1988. Jack pine site quality in relation to soil and topography in north central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schweingruber FH. 1988. Tree rings: basics and applications of dendrochronology. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA. 2007. Total and organic carbon. In Carter MR, Gregorich EG, Eds. Soil sampling and methods analysis, 2nd edn. Canadian Society of Soil Sciences, CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  54. Sedia EG, Ehrenfeld JG. 2003. Lichens and mosses promote alternate stable plant communities in the New Jersey Pinelands. Oikos 100:447–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sedia EG, Ehrenfeld JG. 2005. Differential effects of lichens, mosses and grasses on respiration and nitrogen mineralisation in soils of the New Jersey Pinelands. Oecologia 144:137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sedia EG, Ehrenfeld JG. 2006. Differential effects of lichens and mosses on soil enzyme activity and litter decomposition. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43:177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian system of soil classification. 3rd edn. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sinclair WA, Hudler GW. 1988. Tree declines: Four concepts of causality. Journal of Arboriculture 14(29):35.Google Scholar
  59. Stendahl J, Berg B, Lindahl BD. 2017. Manganese availability is negatively associated with carbon storage in northern coniferous forest humus layers. Scientific Reports 7:15487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sulyma R, Coxson DS. 2001. Microsite displacement of terrestrial lichens by feather moss mats in late seral pine-lichen woodlands of north-central British Columbia. The Bryologist 104:505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thiffault N, Titus BD, Munson AD. 2004. Black spruce seedlings in a Kalmia–Vaccinium association: microsite manipulation to explore interactions in the field. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:1657–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thiffault N. 2006. Remise en production des landes à éricacées : résultats de quinze ans d’un essai sylvicole sur la Côte-Nord. Note de recherche forestière no. 132, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la faune du Québec, direction de la recherche forestière, gouvernement du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.Google Scholar
  63. Thiffault N, Picher G, Auger I. 2012. Initial distance to Kalmia angustifolia as a predictor of planted conifer growth. New Forest 43:849–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thiffault E, Paré D, Guindon L, Beaudoin A, Brais S, Leduc A, Michel JP. 2013. Assessing forest soil base cation status and availability using lake and stream sediment geochemistry: A case study in Quebec (Canada). Geoderma 211–212:39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Bogaert R, Gauthier S, Raulier F, Saucier JP, Boucher D, Robitaille A, Bergeron Y. 2015. Exploring forest productivity at an early age after fire: a case study at the northern limit of commercial forests in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45:579–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vijayakumar DBIP, Raulier F, Bernier PY, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y, Pothier D. 2015. Lengthening the historical records of fire history over large areas of boreal forest in eastern Canada using empirical relationships. Forest Ecology and Management 347:30–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Visser S. 1995. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in Jack pine stands following wildfire. New Phytologist 129:389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Von Arx G, Graf Pannatier E, Thimonier A, Rebetez M. 2013. Microclimate in forests with varying leaf area index and soil moisture: Potential implications for seedling establishment in a changing climate. Journal of Ecology 101:1201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wagner S, Fischer H, Huth F. 2011. Canopy effects on vegetation caused by harvesting and regeneration treatments. European Journal of Forest Research 130:17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA. 2001. Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127:476–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wheeler JA, Hermanutz L, Marino PM. 2011. Feathermoss seedbeds facilitate black spruce seedling recruitment in the forest-tundra ecotone (Labrador, Canada). Oikos 120:1263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wickham H. 2016. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New-York, NY, USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yarranton M, Yarranton GA. 1975. Demography of jack pine stand. Canadian Journal of Botany 53:310–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet JM, Tsiatis A, Wong W, Eds. New York, (NY): Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueRouyn-NorandaCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest ServiceLaurentian Forestry CentreQuébecCanada
  3. 3.Université Clermont AuvergneLempdesFrance
  4. 4.Forest Research CentreUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations