pp 1–15 | Cite as

Lake Characteristics, Population Properties and Invasion History Determine Impact of Invasive Bivalves on Lake Nutrient Dynamics

  • Felicia Williamson
  • Ted OzerskyEmail author


Invasive species can have large impacts on ecosystems, including the cycling and distribution of nutrients. To determine the whole-ecosystem effects of invasive zebra mussels on lake nutrient dynamics, we sampled 10 invaded Minnesota lakes spanning a broad trophic status gradient. We conducted N and P excretion and biodeposition rate measurements and determined the C, N and P composition of dreissenid soft tissues and shell material in the study lakes. We also estimated the whole-lake biomass of live dreissenid mussels and their dead shell material, constructing comprehensive nutrient budgets for dreissenid populations in the study lakes. We used the results of our measurements and published data to estimate the contribution of dreissenids to P budgets in 24 additional lakes in Europe and North America. Results show that nutrient cycling rates and composition of soft tissues and shells vary with mussel size and lake trophic status. Zebra mussels made variable, but often large, contributions to cycling and storage of water column standing stocks of POC, PON and TP in the study and literature lakes. In some lakes, the effects of zebra mussels on P dynamics were also considerable in the context of estimated P external and internal loading, sediment sequestration and effects of other biota. We show that the impact of zebra mussels on whole-lake nutrient budgets depends on lake properties, dreissenid population characteristics and invasion history. This information can be used by ecosystem managers to prioritize invasion prevention efforts toward lakes likely to be most strongly impacted by zebra mussel invasions.


dreissenid mussels invasive species nutrient cycling benthic-pelagic coupling nutrient budgets ecological stoichiometry 



We thank Julia Halbur, Sandra Brovold, Alyshia Trost, Michaela Matushak, Ben Block, Shannon McCallum, Karl Osterbauer, Mariah Carlson and Hallee Jorgensen for their assistance in the field and in the lab. We are grateful to the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their time and insightful comments. This research was supported in part by the University of Minnesota Duluth and by the U.S. Geological Survey through the Water Resources Center at the University of Minnesota under Award No. 2015MN360B. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Supplementary material

10021_2019_371_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3482 kb)


  1. Andersen T, Hessen DO. 1991. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of freshwater zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 36:807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnott DL, Vanni MJ. 1996. Nitrogen and phosphorus recycling by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the western basin of Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:646–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bootsma HA, Liao Q. 2013. Nutrient cycling by dreissenid mussels: controlling factors and ecosystem response. In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW, Eds. Quagga and zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control. 2nd edn. London: Taylor & Francis. p 555–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botts-Silver P, Patterson BA, Schloesser DW. 1996. Zebra mussel effects on benthic invertebrates: physical or biotic? J N Am Benthol Soc 15:179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conroy JD, Edwards WJ, Pontius RA, Kane DD, Zhang H, Shea JF, Richey JN, Culver DA. 2005. Soluble nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of exotic freshwater mussels (Dreissena spp.): potential impacts for nutrient remineralisation in western Lake Erie. Freshw Biol 50:1146–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Depew DC, Koehler G, Hiriart-Baer V. 2018. Phosphorus dynamics and availability in the nearshore of eastern Lake Erie: insights from oxygen isotope ratios of phosphate. Front Mar Sci 5:215. Scholar
  7. Fera SA, Rennie MD, Dunlop ES. 2017. Broad shifts in the resource use of a commercially harvested fish following the invasion of dreissenid mussels. Ecology 98:1681–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gergs R, Grey J, Rothhaupt KO. 2011. Temporal variation in zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) density structure the benthic food web and community composition on hard substrates in Lake Constance, Germany. Biol Invasions 13:2727–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gergs R, Rinke K, Rothhaupt KO. 2009. Zebra mussels mediate benthic–pelagic coupling by biodeposition and changing detrital stoichiometry. Freshw Biol 54:1379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginn BK, Bolton R, Coulombe D, Fleischaker T, Yerex G. 2018. Quantifying a shift in benthic dominance from zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) to quagga (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) mussels in a large, inland lake. J Great Lakes Res 44:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goedkoop W, Naddafi R, Grandin U. 2011. Retention of N and P by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas) and its quantitative role in the nutrient budget of eutrophic Lake Ekoln, Sweden. Biol Invasions 13:1077–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson JM, Peters RH. 1984. Empirical prediction of crustacean zooplankton biomass and profundal macrobenthos biomass in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hecky RE, Smith RE, Barton DR, Guildford SJ, Taylor WD, Charlton MN, Howell T. 2004. The nearshore phosphorus shunt: a consequence of ecosystem engineering by dreissenids in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Higgins SN, Vander Zanden MJ. 2010. What a difference a species makes: a meta-analysis of dreissenid mussel impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 80:179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins TM, Grennan JM, McCarthy TK. 2008. Effects of recent zebra mussel invasion on water chemistry and phytoplankton production in a small Irish lake. Aquat Invasions 3:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Izvekova EI, Lvova-Katchanova AA. 1972. Sedimentation of suspended matter by Dreissena polymorpha Pallas and its subsequent utilization by Chironomidae larvae. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 19:203–10.Google Scholar
  17. Jones LA, Ricciardi A. 2005. Influence of physicochemical factors on the distribution and biomass of invasive mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis) in the St. Lawrence River. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1953–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK. 2015. Zebra versus quagga mussels: a review of their spread, population dynamics, and ecosystem impacts. Hydrobiologia 746:97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klerks PL, Fraleigh PC, Lawniczak JE. 1996. Effects of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on seston levels and sediment deposition in western Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2284–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehman JT. 1980. Release and cycling of nutrients between planktonic algae and herbivores. Limnol Oceanogr 25:620–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mellina E, Rasmussen JB. 1994. Patterns in the distribution and abundance of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in rivers and lakes in relation to substrate and other physicochemical factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:1024–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mellina E, Rasmussen JB, Mills EL. 1995. Impact of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on phosphorus cycling and chlorophyll in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2553–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mills EL, Casselman JM, Dermott R, Fitzsimons JD, Gal G, Holeck KT, Hoyle JA, Johannsson OE, Lantry BF, Makarewicz JC, Millard ES, Munawar IF, Munawar M, O’Gorman R, Owens RW, Rudstam LG, Schaner T, Stewart TJ. 2003. Lake Ontario: food web dynamics in a changing ecosystem (1970–2000). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morehouse RL, Dzialowski AR, Jeyasingh PD. 2013. Impacts of excessive dietary phosphorus on zebra mussels. Hydrobiologia 707:73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naddafi R, Blenckner T, Eklöv P, Pettersson K. 2011. Physical and chemical properties determine zebra mussel invasion success in lakes. Hydrobiologia 669:227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naddafi R, Goedkoop W, Grandin U, Eklöv P. 2012. Variation in tissue stoichiometry and condition index of zebra mussels in invaded Swedish lakes. Biol Invasions 14:2117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P. 2008. Effects of the zebra mussel, an exotic freshwater species, on seston stoichiometry. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1973–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nalepa TF, Fanslow DL, Lang GA. 2009. Transformation of the offshore benthic community in Lake Michigan: recent shift from the native amphipod Diporeia spp. to the invasive mussel Dreissena rostriformis bugensis. Freshw Biol 54:466–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nalepa TF, Gardner WS, Malczyk JM. 1991. Phosphorus cycling by mussels (Unionidae: Bivalvia) in Lake St. Clair. Hydrobiologia 219:239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nalepa TF, Wojcik JA, Fanslow DL, Lang GA. 1995. Initial colonization of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron: population recruitment, density, and size structure. J Great Lakes Res 21:417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliver SK, Branstrator DK, Hrabik TR, Guildford SJ, Hecky RE. 2014. Nutrient excretion by crustacean zooplankton in the deep chlorophyll layer of Lake Superior. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:390–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ozersky T, Evans DO, Barton DR. 2012. Invasive mussels alter the littoral food web of a large lake: stable isotopes reveal drastic shifts in sources and flow of energy. PLoS ONE 7(12):e51249. Scholar
  33. Ozersky T, Evans DO, Ginn BK. 2015. Invasive mussels modify the cycling, storage and distribution of nutrients and carbon in a large lake. Freshw Biol 60:827–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozersky T, Malkin SY, Barton DR, Hecky RE. 2009. Dreissenid phosphorus excretion can sustain C. glomerata growth along a portion of Lake Ontario shoreline. J Great Lakes Res 35:321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson MW, Ciborowski JJ, Barton DR. 2005. The distribution and abundance of Dreissena species (Dreissenidae) in Lake Erie, 2002. J Great Lakes Res 31:223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pennuto CM, Howell ET, Lewis TW, Makarewicz JC. 2012. Dreissena population status in nearshore Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 38:161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramcharan CW, Padilla DK, Dodson SI. 1992. Models to predict potential occurrence and density of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2611–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasmussen JB. 1988. Littoral zoobenthic biomass in lakes, and its relationship to physical, chemical, and trophic factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:1436–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowe MD, Anderson EJ, Vanderploeg HA, Pothoven SA, Elgin AK, Wang J, Yousef F. 2017. Influence of invasive quagga mussels, phosphorus loads, and climate on spatial and temporal patterns of productivity in Lake Michigan: a biophysical modeling study. Limnol Oceanogr 62:2629–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudstam LG. 2010. Lakewide zebra and quagga mussel summary, Oneida Lake, New York, 1992–2009. Online: Accessed 4 Sep 2018.
  41. Schloesser DW, Nalepa TF. 1994. Dramatic decline of unionid bivalves in offshore waters of western Lake Erie after infestation by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:2234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwalb AN, Bouffard D, Ozersky T, Boegman L, Smith RE. 2013. Impacts of hydrodynamics and benthic communities on phytoplankton distributions in a large, dreissenid-colonized lake (Lake Simcoe, Ontario, Canada). Inland Waters 3:269–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stańczykowska A, Planter M. 1985. Factors affecting nutrient budget in lakes of the R. Jorka watershed (Masurian Lakeland, Poland): X. Role of the mussel Dreissena Polymorpha (Pall.) in N and P cycles in a lake ecosystem. Ekol Pol 33:345–56.Google Scholar
  44. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Strayer DL, Malcom HM. 2007. Shell decay rates of native and alien freshwater bivalves and implications for habitat engineering. Freshw Biol 52:1611–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turschak BA, Bunnell D, Czesny S, Höök TO, Janssen J, Warner D, Bootsma HA. 2014. Nearshore energy subsidies support Lake Michigan fishes and invertebrates following major changes in food web structure. Ecology 95:1243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tyner EH, Bootsma HA, Lafrancois BM. 2015. Dreissenid metabolism and ecosystem-scale effects as revealed by oxygen consumption. J Great Lakes Res 41:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanderploeg HA, Liebig JR, Carmichael WW, Agy MA, Johengen TH, Fahnenstiel GL, Nalepa TF. 2001. Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) selective filtration promoted toxic Microcystis blooms in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron) and Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1208–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vanderploeg HA, Sarnelle O, Liebig JR, Morehead NR, Robinson SD, Johengen TH, Horst GP. 2017. Seston quality drives feeding, stoichiometry and excretion of zebra mussels. Freshw Biol 62:664–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vanni MJ. 2002. Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vanni MJ, McIntyre PB. 2016. Predicting nutrient excretion of aquatic animals with metabolic ecology and ecological stoichiometry: a global synthesis. Ecology 97:3460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Voets J, Talloen W, de Tender T, Van Dongen S, Covaci A, Blust R, Bervoets L. 2006. Microcontaminant accumulation, physiological condition and bilateral asymmetry in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) from clean and contaminated surface waters. Aquat Toxicol 79:213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Widdows J, Fieth P, Worrall CM. 1979. Relationships between seston, available food and feeding activity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 50:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson AE, Sarnelle O. 2002. Relationship between zebra mussel biomass and total phosphorus in European and North American lakes. Arch Hydrobiol 153:339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Large Lakes ObservatoryUniversity of Minnesota DuluthDuluthUSA
  2. 2.Walla Walla Community CollegeWater and Environmental CenterWalla WallaUSA

Personalised recommendations