Advertisement

Ecosystems

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Topsoil Organic Carbon Concentration in Drylands Have Similar Effects at Regional and Global Scales

  • Juan J. GaitánEmail author
  • Fernando T. Maestre
  • Donaldo E. Bran
  • Gustavo G. Buono
  • Andrew J. Dougill
  • Guillermo García Martínez
  • Daniela Ferrante
  • Reginald T. Guuroh
  • Anja Linstädter
  • Virginia Massara
  • Andrew D. Thomas
  • Gabriel E. Oliva
Article

Abstract

Drylands contain 25% of the world’s soil organic carbon (SOC), which is controlled by many factors, both abiotic and biotic. Thus, understanding how these factors control SOC concentration can help to design more sustainable land-use practices in drylands aiming to foster and preserve SOC storage, something particularly important to fight ongoing global warming. We use two independent, large-scale databases with contrasting geographic coverage (236 sites in global drylands and 185 sites in Patagonia, Argentina) to evaluate the relative importance of abiotic (precipitation, temperature and soil texture) and biotic (primary productivity) factors as drivers of SOC concentration in drylands at global and regional scales. We found that biotic and abiotic factors had similar effects on SOC concentration across regional and global scales: Maximum temperature and sand content had negative effects, while precipitation and plant productivity exerted positive effects. Our findings provide empirical evidence that increases in temperature and reductions in rainfall, as forecasted by climatic models in many drylands worldwide, promote declines in SOC both directly and indirectly via the reduction in plant productivity. This has important implications for the conservation of drylands under climate change; land management should seek to enhance plant productivity as a tool to offset the negative impact of climate change on SOC storage and on associated ecosystem services.

Keywords

climate change precipitation temperature soil texture ecosystem services aboveground net primary productivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all members of the EPES-BIOCOM and MARAS research networks, and all members of the Maestre Lab, for supplying data for this study. This research was supported by INTA, the Project ARG07/G35 of the Global Environment Facility, the Project PICT-2015-0716 and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 242658 (BIOCOM), and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through WASCAL (Grant No. FKZ 01LG1202A). FTM acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC Grant Agreement No. 647038 [BIODESERT]) and of a sabbatical fellowship by sDiv, the synthesis center of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Grant No. FZT 118). AL acknowledges support from the DFG through the TRR 228 (Grant No. 398498378). RTG acknowledges support from the Catholic Academic Exchange Services (KAAD) of the German Catholic church.

Supplementary material

10021_2019_348_MOESM1_ESM.doc (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 21 kb)
10021_2019_348_MOESM2_ESM.doc (44 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 44 kb)

References

  1. Almagro M, Maestre FT, Martínez-López J, Valencia E, Rey A. 2015. Climate change may reduce litter decomposition while enhancing the contribution of photodegradation in dry perennial Mediterranean grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 90:214–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundson RG, Chadwick OA, Sowers JM. 1989. A comparison of soil climate and biological activity along an elevation gradient in the eastern Mojave Desert. Oecologia 80:395–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anadón JD, Sala OE, Maestre FT. 2014. Climate change will increase savannas at the expense of forests and treeless vegetation in tropical and subtropical Americas. J Ecol 102:1363–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson JM, Ingramm JSI. (Eds.). 1993. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. CABI, Wallingford, UK, ed. 2.Google Scholar
  5. Austin AT, Vivanco L. 2006. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai YF, Wu JG, Xing Q, Pan QM, Huang JH, Yang DL, Han XG. 2008. Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology 89:2140–53.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0992.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookshire ENJ, Weaver T. 2015. Long-term decline in grassland productivity driven by increasing dryness. Nature Commun 6:7148.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke IC, Yonker CM, Parton WJ, Cole CV, Schimel DS, Flach K. 1989. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:800–5.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300030029x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkett VR, Wilcox DA, Stottlemyer R, Barrow W, Fagre D, Baron J, … & Ruggerone G. 2005. Nonlinear dynamics in ecosystem response to climatic change: case studies and policy implications. Ecological complexity 2:357–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buschiazzo DE, Quiroga AR, Stahr K. 1991. Patterns of organic matter accumulation in soils of the semiarid Argentinian Pampas. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 154:437–41.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19911540608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held R…, and Dethloff K. 2007. Regional climate projections. Climate Change, 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, University Press, Cambridge, Chapter 11, 847–940.Google Scholar
  12. Conant RT, Klopatek JM, Klopatek CC. 2000. Environmental factors controlling soil respiration in three semiarid ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:383–90.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.641383x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai W, Huang Y. 2006. Relation of soil organic matter concentration to climate and altitude in zonal soils of China. Catena 65:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deb S, Bhadoria PBS, Mandal B, Rakshit A, Singh HB. 2015. Soil organic carbon: Towards better soil health, productivity and climate change mitigation. Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability 3:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-642X.2015.00003.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Frenne P, Graae BJ, Rodríguez-Sánchez F, Kolb A, Chabrerie O, Decocq G, … and Gruwez R. 2013. Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species’ responses to temperature. J Ecol 101:784–95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitán JJ, Campbell C, Singh BK. 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nature Commun 7:10541.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Gallardo A, Bowker MA, Wallenstein MD, Quero JL, … and García-Palacios P. 2013. Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands. Nature 502:672–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Maestre FT, Karunaratne SB, Trivedi P, Hengl T, Reich PB, Singh BK. 2017. Climate legacies drive global soil carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems. Science Advances 3:e1602008.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein HE, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Coffin DP. 1996. Ecological responses of dominant grasses along two climatic gradients in the Great Plains of the United States. J Veg Sci 7:777–88.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3236456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans SE, Burke IC, Lauenroth WK. 2011. Controls on soil organic carbon and nitrogen in Inner Mongolia, China: A cross-continental comparison of temperate grasslands. Global Biogeochem Cycles 25:GB3006.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gb003945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO. 2011. Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands: Manual for Local Level Assessment of Land Degradation and Sustainable Land Management. Part 2: Field Methodology and Tools. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  22. Gaitán JJ, Bran D, Oliva G, Maestre FT, Aguiar MR, Jobbágy EG, Buono G, Ferrante D, Nakamatsu V, Ciari G, Salomone J, Massara V. 2014. Vegetation structure is as important as climate for explaining ecosystem function across Patagonian rangelands. J Ecol 102:1419–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaitán JJ, Maestre FT, Buono G, Bran D, Dougill AJ, García Martínez G, Ferrante D, Guuroh RT, Linstädter A, Massara V, Thomas AD, Oliva G. 2018. Data from “Biotic and abiotic drivers of topsoil organic carbon concentration in drylands have similar effects at regional and global scales”. Figshare,  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6860753
  24. García-Palacios P, Gross N, Gaitán JJ, Maestre FT. 2018. Climate mediates the biodiversity–ecosystem stability relationship globally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201800425.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800425115
  25. Gee GW, Or D. 2002. Particle-Size Analysis. p. 255–293. In: Dane, J., and G. C. Topp (eds.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Book Series: 5. Part 4. Soil Science Society of America.USA.Google Scholar
  26. Gherardi L, Sala OE. 2015. Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass- and increases shrub-productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:12735–40.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506433112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grace JB. 2006. Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grace JB, Anderson MT, Olff H, Scheiner SM. 2010. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecol Monogr 80:67–87.  https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0464.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guuroh RT, Ruppert JC, Ferner J, Čanak K, Schmidtlein S, Linstädter A. 2018. Drivers of forage provision and erosion control in West African savannas - A macroecological perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 251:257–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. He NP, Wang RM, Zhang YH, Chen QS. 2014. Carbon and nitrogen storage in Inner Mongolian grasslands: relationships with climate and soil texture. Pedosphere 24:391–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60025-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrick JE, Wander MM. 1997. Relationships between soil organic carbon and soil quality in cropped and rangeland soils: the importance of distribution, composition, and soil biological activity. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp 405–25.Google Scholar
  32. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–78.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang J, Yu H, Guan X, Wang G, Guo R. 2016. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:166–71.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huenneke LF, Schlesinger WH. 2006. Patterns of net primary production in Chihuahuan Desert ecosystems. Structure and function of a Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem: the Jornada Basin Long-term Ecological Research Site. pp 232–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 492 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Jenny H. 1941. Factors of soil formation. New York: McGraw-Hill. p 281.Google Scholar
  36. Jenkinson DS, Adams DE, Wild A. 1991. Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming. Nature 351:304–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/351304a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jing X, Sanders NJ, Shi Y, Chu H, Classen AT, … and He J. 2015. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above- and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate. Nature Commun 6:8159.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB. 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–36.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kettler TA, Doran JW, Gilbert TL. 2001. Simplified method for soil particle-size determination to accompany soil-quality analyses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:849–52.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.653849x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirschbaum MU. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem 27:753–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lal R. 2004. Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environ Manag 33:528–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Sitch S, Korsbakken JI, Peters GP, … and Keeling RF. 2016. Global carbon budget 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8:605–49.  https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li C, Zhang C, Luo G, Chen X, Maisupova B, Madaminov AA, Han Q, Djenbaev BM. 2015. Carbon stock and its responses to climate change in Central Asia. Glob Chang Biol 21:1951–67.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin L, Gettelman A, Feng S, Fu Q. 2015. Simulated climatology and evolution of aridity in the 21st century. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:5795–815.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luo Y, Zhou XU. 2006. Chapter 2: Importance and roles of soil respiration. pp 17–32. In: Soil Respiration and the Environment. Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego.Google Scholar
  46. Luo Z, Feng W, Luo Y, Baldock J, Wang E. 2017. Soil organic carbon dynamics jointly controlled by climate, carbon inputs, soil properties and soil carbon fractions. Global Change Biol 23:4430–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ma WH, He JS, Yang YH, Wang XP, Liang CZ, Anwar M, Zeng H, Fang JY, Schmid B. 2010. Environmental factors covary with plant diversity-productivity relationships among Chinese grassland sites. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:233–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00508.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maestre FT, Salguero-Gómez R, Quero JL. 2012a. It’s getting hotter in here: determining and projecting the impacts of global change on drylands. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:3062–75.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Maestre FT, Quero JL, Gotelli NJ, Escudero A, Ochoa V, Delgado-Baquerizo M, … and García-Palacios P. 2012b. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335:214–18.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Maestre FT, Eldridge DJ, Soliveres S, Kéfi S, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Bowker MA, Gaitán J, Berdugo M, Gallardo A, Lázaro R, García-Palacios P. 2016. Structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 47:215–37.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Manley JT, Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Hart HR. 1995. Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to grazing. J Soil Water Cons 50:294–8.Google Scholar
  52. McDaniel PA, Munn LC. 1985. Effect of temperature on organic carbon-texture relationships in Mollisols and Aridisols. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1486–9.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900060031x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGill WB, Cole CV. 1981. Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McSherry ME, Ritchie ME. 2013. Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review. Global Change Biology 19:1347–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Desertification Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  56. Mills A, Fey M, Donaldson J, Todd S, Theron L. 2009. Soil infiltrability as a driver of plant cover and species richness in the semi-arid Karoo, South Africa. Plant Soil 320:321–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9904-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. p. 961–1010. In D. L. Sparks and others (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. 3rd ed. SSSA, Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  58. Oades JM. 1988. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ochoa-Hueso R, Eldridge DJ, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Soliveres S, Bowker MA, Gross N, … & Arredondo T. 2018. Soil fungal abundance and plant functional traits drive fertile island formation in global drylands. J Ecol. 106:242–53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliva G, Gaitán JJ, Bran D, Nakamatsu V, Salomone J, Buono G, Escobar J, Ferrante D, Humano G, Ciari G, Suarez D, Opazo W, Adema E, Celdrán D. 2011. Manual para la Instalación y Lectura de Monitores MARAS. Buenos Aires, Argentina: PNUD.Google Scholar
  61. Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS. 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–9.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paruelo JM, Epstein HE, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC. 1997. ANPP estimates from NDVI for the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 78:953–8.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0953:AEFNFT]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Paruelo JM, Jobbágy EG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC. 1998. Functional and structural convergence of temperate grassland and shrubland ecosystems. Ecol Appl 8:194–206.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0194:FASCOT]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Sala OE. 1999. Grassland precipitation use efficiency across a resource gradient. Ecosystems 2:64–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paul EA. 1984. Dynamics of organic matter in soils. Plant Soil 76:275–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plaza C, Zaccone C, Sawicka K, Méndez AM, Tarquis A, Gascó G, Heuvelink GBM, Schuur EAG, Maestre FT. 2018. Soil resources and element stocks in drylands to face global issues. Scientific Reports 8:13788.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32229-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Prăvălie R. 2016. Drylands extent and environmental issues. A global approach. Earth Sci Rev 161:259–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prince SD. 1991. Satellite remote sensing of primary production: comparison of results for Sahelian grasslands 1981–1988. Int J Rem Sens 12:1301–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169108929727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Qin F, Shi X, Xu S, Yu D, Wang D. 2016. Zonal differences in correlation patterns between soil organic carbon and climate factors at multi-extent. Chin Geogra Sci 26:670–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0736-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 44:81–99.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1992.t01-1-00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H. 2003. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116:61–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00094-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF, Turner BL, Mortimore M, Batterbury SP, … & Huber-Sannwald E. 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–51.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–5.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1943158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Saxton KE, Rawls W, Romberger JS, Papendick RI. 1986. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1031–6.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ. 2006. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1569–78.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schimel DS, Stillwell MA, Woodmansee RG. 1985. Biogeochemistry of C, N, and P in a soil catena of the shortgrass steppe. Ecology 66:276–82.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schimel DS, Braswell BH, Holland EA, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Painter TH, … and Townsend AR. 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 8:279–93.  https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb00993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA. 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006247623877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwinning S, Sala OE. 2004. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:211–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1520-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tisdall JM, Oades JM. 1982. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33:141–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tongway DJ, Hindley N. 2004. Landscape Function Analysis: Procedures for Monitoring and Assessing Landscapes with Special Reference to Minesites and Rangelands. 82 pp. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.Google Scholar
  82. Tucker C, Vanpraet C, Boerwinkel E, Gaston A. 1983. Satellite remote sensing of total dry-matter production in the Senegalese Sahel. Remote Sens Environ 13:461–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(83)90053-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vicca S, Bahn M, Estiarte M, van Loon EE, Vargas R, Alberti… and Borken W. 2014. Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments. Biogeosciences 11:2991–3013.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2991-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang MY, Shi XZ, Yu DS, Xu SX, Tan MZ, Sun WX, Zhao YC. 2013. Regional differences in the effect of climate and soil texture on soil organic carbon. Pedosphere 23:799–807.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(13)60071-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Whitford WG. 2002. Ecology of desert systems. Academic Press, an Elsevier Science Imprint, San Diego, California, 343 pp.Google Scholar
  86. Wu H, Guo Z, Peng C. 2003. Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in China. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17:1048.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yang Y, Fang J, Tang Y, Ji C, Zheng C, He J, Zhu B. 2008. Storage, patterns and controls of soil organic carbon in the Tibetan grasslands. Global Change Biology 14:1592–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01591.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales (CIRN), Instituto de SuelosInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Departamento de TecnologíaUniversidad Nacional de LujánLujánArgentina
  3. 3.National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y TecnologíaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstolesSpain
  5. 5.Estación Experimental BarilocheInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)BarilocheArgentina
  6. 6.Estación Experimental ChubutInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)TrelewArgentina
  7. 7.School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  8. 8.Estación Experimental EsquelInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)EsquelArgentina
  9. 9.Estación Experimental Santa CruzInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)Río GallegosArgentina
  10. 10.CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of GhanaKNUSTKumasiGhana
  11. 11.Botanical InstituteUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  12. 12.Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES)University of BonnBonnGermany
  13. 13.Department of Geography and Earth SciencesAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations