Long-term Nutrient Fertilization Increased Soil Carbon Storage in California Grasslands
Elevated nutrient deposition often increases primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has the potential to increase the flux of carbon (C) into soils. An important step toward greater understanding of nutrient effects on C storage involves assessing effects on different fractions of the soil C pool across a range of soil types. We quantified the combined effects of 8 years of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and micronutrient fertilization on the C storage in bulk soil and in density fractions at four grassland sites in California. When averaged across sites, fertilization increased soil light fraction C by 64% relative to the control in the 0–10 cm depth. The increase in light fraction C likely resulted from the fertilization-induced increase in plant C input to soil, as aboveground net primary productivity also consistently increased with fertilization across sites. Effects of fertilization on heavy fraction C were highly site specific, having positive, negative, or no effect at individual sites. The response of heavy fraction C to fertilization appeared to be related to mean annual precipitation and soil bulk density. Overall, bulk soil C concentration showed a marginally significant increase of 6% with fertilization when averaged across sites (P = 0.07). Our results indicate that biomass production and soil light fraction are generally sensitive to fertilization across grasslands in California, likely contributing to increases in soil C storage. Responses of heavy fraction C, on the other hand, vary greatly among sites and may depend on climate and soil characteristics.
KeywordsNutrient Network (NutNet) particulate organic matter (POM) mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) priming C/N ratio Mediterranean climate
We thank Summer Ahmed, Heather Dang, Beatrix Jimenez, Keri Opalk, Andrew Saunders, Whendee Silver, Frank Wang, and Kana Yamamoto for their support in field and laboratory work. We thank Elizabeth Borer, Stan Harpole, Anita Krause, Eric Lind, and Eric Seabloom from the NutNet headquarters for facilitating this study. We also appreciate the help from Hannah Bird, Anthony Jackson, Catherine Koehler, and Kate McCurdy for providing access to the sites and logistical support. This study benefited from discussion with Joseph Blankinship, Sarah Hobbie, Peter Homyak, and Charlotte Riggs. We thank the subject-matter editor and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved this manuscript. This project was supported by a Faculty Research Grant to JYK and YL from the Academic Senate, UCSB, and by funding to C. D’Antonio from UCSB and the Schuyler Endowment.
- He YT, Zhang WJ, Xu MG, Tong XG, Sun FX, Wang JZ, Huang SM, Zhu P, He XH. 2015. Long-term combined chemical and manure fertilizations increase soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in aggregate fractions at three typical cropland soils in China. Sci Total Environ 532:635–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hooper DU, Johnson L. 1999. Nitrogen limitation in dryland ecosystems: Responses to geographical and temporal variation in precipitation. Biogeochemistry 46:247–93.Google Scholar
- Kuminoff NV, Sokolow AD, Sumner DA. 2001. Farmland conversion: perceptions and realities. University of California Agricultural Issues Center Issues Brief Number 16, May 2001. Last viewed 03/13/18 at http://aic.ucdavis.edu/pub/briefs/brief16.pdf.
- Mambelli S, Bird JA, Gleixner G, Dawson TE, Torn MS. 2011. Relative contribution of foliar and fine root pine litter to the molecular composition of soil organic matter after in situ degradation. Org Geochem 42:1099–108.Google Scholar
- NRCS. 2004. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report 42, Version 4.0. United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
- Rasmussen C, Heckman K, Wieder WR, Keiluweit M, Lawrence CR, Berhe AA, Blankinship JC, Crow SE, Druhan JL, Hicks Pries CE, Marin-Spiotta E, Plante AF, Schädel C, Schimel JP, Sierra CA, Thompson A, Wagai R. 2018. Beyond clay: towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content. Biogeochemistry 137:297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, Harris IC, Jones PD. 2017. CRU TS4.01: Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) version 4.01 of high-resolution gridded data of month-by-month variation in climate (Jan. 1901–Dec. 2016). Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, 04 December 2017. https://doi.org/10.5285/58a8802721c94c66ae45c3baa4d814d0.
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1998. Soil survey of Yuba County, California (in coorperation with Regents of the University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station and USDA, Forest Service): U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Soil survey of Mendocino County, western part (in cooperation with the California Department of Forestry, Soil Vegetation Survey; Georgia-Pacific Corporation; the Regents of the University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station; and the USDI, Bureau of Land Management): U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1972. Soil survey of northern Santa Barbara area, California (In cooperation with University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station): U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1989. Soil survey of Lake County, California (in cooperation with USDA, Forest Service & USDI, Bureau of Land Management, and the Regents of the University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station): U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar