Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plant Production Responses to Precipitation Differ Along an Elevation Gradient and Are Enhanced Under Extremes

Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity of plant production to precipitation underlies the functioning of ecosystems. Studies that relate long-term mean annual precipitation and production across multiple sites (spatial relationship) or examine interannual linkages within a site (temporal relationship) can reveal biophysical controls over ecosystem function but have limited ability to infer responses to extreme changes in precipitation that may become more common under climate change. To overcome limitations of using a single approach, we integrated satellite- and ground-based estimates of production with a standardized, multi-site precipitation manipulation experiment across a grassland elevation gradient in the southwestern USA. The responsiveness of production to changes in precipitation followed the order: temporal (0.06–0.13 g m−2 mm−1) < spatial (0.21 g m−2 mm−1) < experimental relationship (0.25–0.42 g m−2 mm−1), suggesting that spatial and temporal relationships determined with satellite- and ground-based estimates cannot be extrapolated to determine the effect of extreme events. A strong production response to differences in mean annual precipitation across sites reinforces a regional control of water availability. Interannual sensitivity to precipitation was strongest at the low elevation grasslands, and the high elevation mixed conifer meadow had a large reduction in production in a drought year. Extreme experimental drought strongly reduced production in low elevation grasslands, but water addition had mixed effects. High elevation meadows were insensitive to both extreme drought and water addition. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for extreme climate regimes and site-level factors when scaling climate change effects up to regional and global scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  • Adler PB, Dalgleish HJ, Ellner SP. 2012. Forecasting plant community impacts of climate variability and change: when do competitive interactions matter? J Ecol 100:478–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning DM, Karl JW, Morin D, Richardson AD, Tweedie CE. 2017. Phenocams bridge the gap between field and satellite observations in an arid grassland ecosystem. Remote Sens 9:1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting EL, Munson SM, Villarreal ML. 2017. Climate legacy and lag effects on dryland plant communities in the southwestern U.S. Ecol Ind 74:216–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield BJ, Bradford JB, Munson SM, Gremer JR. 2017. Aridity increases below-ground niche breadth in grass communities. Plant Ecol 218:385–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JA, Saleska SR, Fischer ML, Harte J. 2004. Integrating experimental and gradient methods in ecological climate change research. Ecology 85:904–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estiarte M and others 2016. Few multiyear precipitation–reduction experiments find a shift in the productivity–precipitation relationship. Glob Change Biol 22:2570–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay PA and others 2015. Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat Plants 1:15080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitán JJ and others 2014. Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands. J Ecol 102:1419–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi LA, Sala OE. 2013. Automated rainfall manipulation system: a reliable and inexpensive tool for ecologists. Ecosphere 4:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover DL, Duniway MC, Belnap J. 2015. Pulse-drought atop press-drought: unexpected plant responses and implications for dryland ecosytems. Oecologia 179:1211–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huenneke LF, Clason D, Muldavin E. 2001. Spatial heterogeneity in Chihuahuan Desert vegetation: implications for sampling methods in semi-arid ecosystems. J Arid Environ 47:257–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxman TE and others 2004. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429:651–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Smith MD. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Carroll CJW, Denton EM, La Pierre KJ, Collins SL, Smith MD. 2015. Differential sensitivity to regional-scale drought in six central US grasslands. Oecologia 177:949–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Ciais P, Smith MD. 2017. Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–production relationships: implications for climate change. New Phytol 214:41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth WK, Sala OE. 1992. Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecol Appl 2:397–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munson SM, Belnap J, Okin GS. 2011. Responses of wind erosion to climate-induced vegetation changes on the Colorado Plateau. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:3854–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munson SM and others 2015. Long-term plant responses to climate are moderated by biophysical attributes in a North American desert. J Ecol 103:657–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DPC, Yao J, Sala OE, Anderson JP. 2012. Directional climate change and potential reversal of desertification in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 18:151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Laurance WF, O’Brien TG, Wegmann M, Nagendra H, Turner W. 2014. Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. J Appl Ecol 51:839–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH. 1994. Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI). Remote Sens Environ 48:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org.

  • Sala OE, Lauenroth WK. 1982. Small rainfall events: an ecological role in semiarid regions. Oecologia 53:301–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann LG, Jobbágy E, Peters DPC. 2012. Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:3135–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR. 2001. Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. J Ecol 89:464–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL. 2009. A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations influenced by global change. Ecology 90:3279–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox KR and others 2017. Asymmetric responses of primary productivity to precipitation extremes: a synthesis of grassland precipitation manipulation experiments. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the US Geological Survey National Climate Adaptation Science Center and the Ecosystems Mission Area. We thank Troy Wood, Stella Copeland, Austin Rueda, Kaitlyn Toledo, and Jonathan Paklaian for field assistance. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth M. Munson.

Additional information

Authors contributions

All authors conceived of and designed the experiment, SMM and ERL performed research and analyzed data, SMM wrote the paper with input from all the authors.

Data to this paper are available online here: http://doi.org/10.5066/F7PC31C3.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 626 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munson, S.M., Bunting, E.L., Bradford, J.B. et al. Plant Production Responses to Precipitation Differ Along an Elevation Gradient and Are Enhanced Under Extremes. Ecosystems 22, 699–708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0296-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0296-3

Keywords

Navigation