Ecosystems

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks and Turnover Following 16 Years of Warming and Litter Addition

  • Carly A. Phillips
  • Bo Elberling
  • Anders Michelsen
Article

Abstract

Soils in northern latitudes store more than twice the amount of carbon (C) currently in the atmosphere and are warming faster than the rest of the globe. Warming has been linked to an expansion of woody vegetation across tundra, raising questions about how these two phenomena interact to modulate C stocks and turnover. We investigated how long-term warming and litter addition have modified microbial processes, soil characteristics, and C and nitrogen (N) stocks. We hypothesized that warming and litter would interact to amplify soil C losses and would be accompanied by increases in microbial activity. Using soil samples from a 16-year warming and litter addition field manipulation, we measured soil C and N stocks, heterotrophic respiration, extracellular enzyme activity, and microbial stoichiometry. We found that warming decreased C and N stocks across the entire soil profile. Depth-specific analyses illustrated that these changes are driven by increasing microbial activity at 5–10 and 10–15 cm depth, and trends toward higher dissolved organic C and N at 5–10 cm depth. This emphasizes the potential for increased leaching losses with warming and additional litter. While litter addition did not change overall C and N stocks, it appears to modify the ecosystem by adding nutrients and C to the soil. Collectively, these findings highlight the vulnerability of northern soils to continued warming with respect to nutrient and C turnover and provide insights into the mechanistic responses of tundra soil to prolonged global change.

Keywords

experimental warming extracellular enzymes tundra litter addition carbon cycling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Aimee Classen and Greg Newman for assistance with extracellular enzyme assays, Esben Nielsen and Gosha Sylvester for assistance with chemical analyses, Kathrin Rousk for comments on early versions of the manuscript, and reviewers and editors for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. This work was funded through the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Graduate Opportunities Worldwide program (through National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program Grant No. 038550-02) in collaboration with the Danish National Research Foundation. Funding was also provided by the Danish National Research Foundation (Center for Permafrost, CENPERM DNRF100). Abisko Scientific Research Station kindly supplied long-term climate data and logistic support.

Supplementary material

10021_2018_256_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (473 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 473 kb)
10021_2018_256_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (69 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 68 kb)

References

  1. Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA. 2010. Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat Geosci 3:336–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardgett RD, Freeman C, Ostle NJ. 2008. Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J 2:805–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell CW, Fricks BE, Rocca JD, Steinweg JM, McMahon SK, Wallenstein MD. 2013. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. J Vis Exp JoVE 81:e50961.Google Scholar
  4. Bliss LC, Matveyeva NV. 1992. Circumpolar arctic vegetation. In: Chapin FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW, Eds. Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. San Diego: Academic Press. p 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonfils CJW, Phillips TJ, Lawrence DM, Cameron-Smith P, Riley WJ, Subin ZM. 2012. On the influence of shrub height and expansion on northern high latitude climate. Environ Res Lett 7:015503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MA, Fierer N, Reynolds JF. 2008. Soil carbon stocks in experimental mesocosms are dependent on the rate of labile carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to soils. Funct Ecol 22:964–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckeridge KM, Zufelt E, Chu HY, Grogan P. 2010. Soil nitrogen cycling rates in low arctic shrub tundra are enhanced by litter feedbacks. Plant Soil 330:407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahoon SMP, Sullivan PF, Shaver GR, Welker JM, Post E. 2012. Interactions among shrub cover and the soil microclimate may determine future Arctic carbon budgets. Ecol letters 15:1415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowther TW, Todd-Brown KEO, Rowe CW, Wieder WR, Carey JC, Machmuller MB, Snoek BL, Fang S, Zhou G, Allison SD, Blair JM, Bridgham SD, Burton AJ, Carrillo Y, Reich PB, Clark JS, Classen AT, Dijkstra FA, Elberling B, Emmett BA, Estiarte M, Frey SD, Guo J, Harte J, Jiang L, Johnson BR, Kroel-Dulay G, Larsen KS, Laudon H, Lavallee JM, Luo Y, Lupascu M, Ma LN, Marhan S, Michelsen A, Mohan J, Niu S, Pendall E, Penuelas J, Pfeifer-Meister L, Poll C, Reinsch S, Reynolds LL, Schmidt IK, Sistla S, Sokol NW, Templer PH, Treseder KK, Welker JM, Bradford MA. 2016. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540:104–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMarco J, Mack MC, Bret-Harte MS, Burton M, Shaver GR. 2014. Long-term experimental warming and nutrient additions increase productivity in tall deciduous shrub tundra. Ecosphere 5:72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eliasson PE, McMurtrie RE, Pepper DA, Stromgren M, Linder S, Agren GI. 2005. The response of heterotrophic CO2 flux to soil warming. Glob Change Biol 11:167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elmendorf SC, Henry GHR, Hollister RD, Björk RG, Bjorkman AD, Callaghan TV, Collier LS, Cooper EJ, Cornelissen JHC, Day TA, Fosaa AM, Gould W, Grétarsdóttir J, Harte J, Hermanutz L, Hik D, Hofgaard A, Jarrad F, Jónsdóttir IS, Keuper F, Klanderud K, Klein J, Koh S, Kudo G, Lang S, Loewen V, May J, Mercado J, Michelsen A, Molau U, Myers-Smith I, Oberbauer S, Pieper S, Post E, Rixen C, Robinson C, Schmidt N, Shaver G, Stenström A, Tolvanen A, Totland O, Troxler T, Wahren C-H, Webber P, Welker J, Wookey P. 2012a. Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time. Ecol Lett 15:164–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmendorf SC, Henry GHR, Hollister RD, Bjork RG, Boulanger-Lapointe N, Cooper EJ, Cornelissen JHC, Day TA, Dorrepaal E, Elumeeva TG, Gill M, Gould WA, Harte J, Hik DS, Hofgaard A, Johnson DR, Johnstone JF, Jonsdottir IS, Jorgenson JC, Klanderud K, Klein JA, Koh S, Kudo G, Lara M, Levesque E, Magnusson B, May JL, Mercado-Diaz JA, Michelsen A, Molau U, Myers-Smith IH, Oberbauer SF, Onipchenko VG, Rixen C, Schmidt NM, Shaver GR, Spasojevic MJ, Porhallsdottir PE, Tolvanen A, Troxler T, Tweedie CE, Villareal S, Wahren CH, Walker X, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wipf S. 2012b. Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nat Clim Change 2:453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Shaver GR, Laundre JA, McKerrow AJ. 1991. Biogeochmiecal diversity along a riverside toposequence. Ecol Monogr 61:415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartley IP, Garnett MH, Sommerkorn M, Hopkins DW, Fletcher BJ, Sloan VL, Phoenix GK, Wookey PA. 2012. A potential loss of carbon associated with greater plant growth in the European Arctic. Nat Clim Change 2:875–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartley IP, Hopkins DW, Garnett MH, Sommerkorn M, Wookey PA. 2008. Soil microbial respiration in arctic soil does not acclimate to temperature. Ecol Lett 11:1092–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartley IP, Hopkins DW, Sommerkorn M, Wookey PA. 2010. The response of organic matter mineralisation to nutrient and substrate additions in sub-arctic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 42:92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hugelius G, Strauss J, Zubrzycki S, Harden JW, Schuur EAG, Ping CL, Schirrmeister L, Grosse G, Michaelson GJ, Koven CD, O’Donnell JA, Elberling B, Mishra U, Camill P, Yu Z, Palmtag J, Kuhry P. 2014. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11:6573–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JI, Holland EA. 2005. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433:298–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuzyakov Y. 2002. Review: factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamb EG, Han S, Lanoil BD, Henry GHR, Brummell ME, Banerjee S, Siciliano SD. 2011. A High Arctic soil ecosystem resists long-term environmental manipulations. Glob Change Biol 17:3187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lett S, Michelsen A. 2014. Seasonal variation in nitrogen fixation and effects of climate change in a subarctic heath. Plant Soil 379:193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loranty MM, Goetz SJ. 2012. Shrub expansion and climate feedbacks in Arctic tundra. Environ Res Lett 7:011005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu M, Zhou X, Yang Q, Li H, Luo Y, Fang C, Chen J, Yang X, Li B. 2013. Responses of ecosystem carbon cycle to experimental warming: a meta-analysis. Ecology 94:726–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mack MC, Schuur EAG, Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Chapin FS. 2004. Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431:440–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McClelland JW, Townsend-Small A, Holmes RM, Pan FF, Stieglitz M, Khosh M, Peterson BJ. 2014. River export of nutrients and organic matter from the North Slope of Alaska to the Beaufort Sea. Water Resour Res 50:1823–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNamara JP, Kane DL, Hobbie JE, Kling GW. 2008. Hydrologic and biogeochemical controls on the spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen and phosphorus in the Kuparuk River, arctic Alaska. Hydrol Process 22:3294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melillo JM, Butler S, Johnson J, Mohan J, Steudler P, Lux H, Burrows E, Bowles F, Smith R, Scott L, Vario C, Hill T, Burton A, Zhou Y-M, Tang J. 2011. Soil warming, carbon-nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9508–12.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Aber JD, Newkirk K, Lux H, Bowles FP, Catricala C, Magill A, Ahrens T, Morrisseau S. 2002. Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Science 298:2173–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Michelsen A, Graglia E, Schmidt IK, Jonasson S, Sleep D, Quarmby C. 1999. Differential responses of grass and a dwarf shrub to long-term changes in soil microbial biomass C, N and P following factorial addition of NPK fertilizer, fungicide and labile carbon to a heath. N Phytol 143:523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moorhead DL, Kroehler CJ, Linkins AE, Reynolds JF. 1993. Extracellular acid-phosphatase activities in Eriophorum vaginatum tussocks—a modeling synthesis. Arct Alp Res 25:50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moorhead DL, Linkins AE. 1997. Elevated CO2 alters belowground exoenzyme activities in tussock tundra. Plant Soil 189:321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers-Smith IH, Forbes BC, Wilmking M, Hallinger M, Lantz T, Blok D, Tape KD, Macias-Fauria M, Sass-Klaassen U, Levesque E, Boudreau S, Ropars P, Hermanutz L, Trant A, Collier LS, Weijers S, Rozema J, Rayback SA, Schmidt NM, Schaepman-Strub G, Wipf S, Rixen C, Menard CB, Venn S, Goetz S, Andreu-Hayles L, Elmendorf S, Ravolainen V, Welker J, Grogan P, Epstein HE, Hik DS. 2011. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ Res Lett 6:045509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naito AT, Cairns DM. 2011. Patterns and processes of global shrub expansion. Prog Phys Geogr 35:423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nottingham AT, Griffiths H, Chamberlain PM, Stott AW, Tanner EVJ. 2009. Soil priming by sugar and leaf-litter substrates: a link to microbial groups. Appl Soil Ecol 42:183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pedersen EP, Elberling B, Michelsen A. 2017. Seasonal variations in methane fluxes in response to summer warming and leaf litter addition in a subarctic heath ecosystem. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122:2137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravn NR, Ambus P, Michelsen A. 2017. Impact of decade-long warming, nutrient addition and shading on emission and carbon isotopic composition of CO2 from two subarctic dwarf shrub heaths. Soil Biol Biochem 111:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Baath E, Jonasson S. 2007. Mineralization and carbon turnover in subarctic heath soil as affected by warming and additional litter. Soil Biol Biochem 39:3014–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Jonasson S. 2008. Effects of litter addition and warming on soil carbon, nutrient pools and microbial communities in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 39:271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rundqvist S, Hedenås H, Sandström A, Emanuelsson U, Eriksson H, Jonasson C, Callaghan TV. 2011. Tree and shrub expansion over the past 34 years at the tree-line near Abisko, Sweden. Ambio 40:683–92.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rustad L, Campbell J, Marion G, Norby R, Mitchell M, Hartley A, Cornelissen J, Gurevitch J. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH. 2008. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sistla SA, Asao S, Schimel JP. 2012. Detecting microbial N-limitation in tussock tundra soil: implications for Arctic soil organic carbon cycling. Soil Biol Biochem 55:78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sistla SA, Moore JC, Simpson RT, Gough L, Shaver GR, Schimel JP. 2013. Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage. Nature 497:615–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sistla SA, Schimel JP. 2013. Seasonal patterns of microbial extracellular enzyme activities in an arctic tundra soil: Identifying direct and indirect effects of long-term summer warming. Soil Biol Biochem 66:119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorensen PL, Lett S, Michelsen A. 2012. Moss-specific changes in nitrogen fixation following two decades of warming, shading, and fertilizer addition. Plant Ecol 213:695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sorensen PL, Michelsen A. 2011. Long-term warming and litter addition affects nitrogen fixation in a subarctic heath. Glob Change Biol 17:528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stow DA, Hope A, McGuire D, Verbyla D, Gamon J, Huemmrich F, Houston S, Racine C, Sturm M, Tape K. 2004. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 89:281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strebel D, Elberling B, Morgner E, Knicker HE, Cooper EJ. 2010. Cold-season soil respiration in response to grazing and warming in High-Arctic Svalbard. Polar Res 29:46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sturm M, Racine C, Tape K. 2001. Climate change—increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411:546–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sturm M, Schimel J, Michaelson G, Welker JM, Oberbauer SF, Liston GE, Fahnestock J, Romanovsky VE. 2005. Winter biological processes could help convert arctic tundra to shrubland. Bioscience 55:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tape K, Sturm M, Racine C. 2006. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob Change Biol 12:686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Gestel N, Shi Z, van Groenigen KJ, Osenberg CW, Andresen LC, Dukes JS, Hovenden MJ, Luo Y, Michelsen A, Pendall E, Reich PB, Schuur EAG, Hungate BA. 2018. Predicting soil carbon loss with warming. Nature 554:E4–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP. 2009. Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Change Biol 15:1631–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weintraub MN, Schimel JP. 2005a. Nitrogen cycling and the spread of shrubs control changes in the carbon balance of arctic tundra ecosystems. Bioscience 55:408–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weintraub MN, Schimel JP. 2005b. The seasonal dynamics of amino acids and other nutrients in Alaskan Arctic tundra soils. Biogeochemistry 73:359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Welker JM, Fahnestock JT, Henry GHR, O’Dea KW, Chimner RA. 2004. CO2 exchange in three Canadian High Arctic ecosystems: response to long-term experimental warming. Glob Change Biol 10:1981–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Welker JM, Fahnestock JT, Jones MH. 2000. Annual CO2 flux in dry and moist arctic tundra: field responses to increases in summer temperatures and winter snow depth. Clim Change 44:139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wookey PA, Aerts R, Bardgett RD, Baptist F, Brathen KA, Cornelissen JHC, Gough L, Hartley IP, Hopkins DW, Lavorel S, Shaver GR. 2009. Ecosystem feedbacks and cascade processes: understanding their role in the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to environmental change. Glob Change Biol 15:1153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Odum School of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Center for Permafrost, Department of Geosciences and Natural ResourcesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Terrestrial Ecology Section, Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations