Warming and Elevated CO2 Interact to Alter Seasonality and Reduce Variability of Soil Water in a Semiarid Grassland
Global changes that alter soil water availability may have profound effects on semiarid ecosystems. Although both elevated CO2 (eCO2) and warming can alter water availability, often in opposite ways, few studies have measured their combined influence on the amount, timing, and temporal variability of soil water. Here, we ask how free air CO2 enrichment (to 600 ppmv) and infrared warming (+ 1.5 °C day, + 3 °C night) effects on soil water vary within years and across wet-dry periods in North American mixed-grass prairie. We found that eCO2 and warming interacted to influence soil water and that those interactions varied by season. In the spring, negative effects of warming on soil water largely offset positive effects of eCO2. As the growing season progressed, however, warming reduced soil water primarily (summer) or only (autumn) in plots treated with eCO2. These interactions constrained the combined effect of eCO2 and warming on soil water, which ranged from neutral in spring to positive in autumn. Within seasons, eCO2 increased soil water under drier conditions, and warming decreased soil water under wetter conditions. By increasing soil water under dry conditions, eCO2 also reduced temporal variability in soil water. These temporal patterns explain previously observed plant responses, including reduced leaf area with warming in summer, and delayed senescence with eCO2 plus warming in autumn. They also suggest that eCO2 and warming may favor plant species that grow in autumn, including winter annuals and C3 graminoids, and species able to remain active under the dry conditions moderated by eCO2.
Keywordselevated carbon dioxide warming climate change free air CO2 enrichment, evapotranspiration soil moisture seasonality phenology mixed-grass prairie northern Great Plains
We thank David Smith and Erik Hardy for help constructing the experiment, Terry Booth and Larry Griffith for digital imagery used to measure greenness, and David Augustine, Laura Perry, and David Hoover for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the USDA-ARS Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems Program, the USDA-CSREES Soil Processes Program (Grant No. 2008-35107-18655), the US DOE Office of Science (Biological and Environmental Research) through the Western Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research at Northern Arizona University, and the US NSF (DEB no. 1021559).
- Campbell Scientific, Inc. 2009. EnviroSMART Soil Water Content Profile Probes. Logan, Utah. 48 pp.Google Scholar
- Dieleman WIJ, Vicca S, Dijkstra FA, Hagedorn F, Hovenden MJ, Larsen KS, Morgan JA, Volder A, Beier C, Dukes JS, King J, Leuzinger S, Linder S, Luo Y, Oren R, De Angelis P, Tingey D, Hoosbeek MR, Janssens IA. 2012. Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature. Global Change Biology 18:2681–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunne T, Leopold LB. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman Co. p 818P.Google Scholar
- Fatichi S, Leuzinger S, Paschalisc A, Langley JA, Barraclough AD, Hovenden MJ. 2016. Partitioning direct and indirect effects reveals the response of water-limited ecosystems to elevated CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:12757–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirtman B, Power SB, Adedoyin JA, Boer GJ, Bojariu R, Camilloni I, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Fiore AM, Kimoto M, Meehl GA, Prather M, Sarr A, Schar C, Sutton R, van Oldenborgh GJ, Vecchi G, Wang HJ. 2013. Near-term climate change: Projections and predictability. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 76p.Google Scholar
- Kunkel KE, Stevens LE, Stevens SE, Sun L, Janssen E, Wuebbles D, Kruk MC, Thomas DP, Shulski M, Umphlett N, Hubbard KG, Robbins K, Romolo L, Akyuz A, Pathak TB, Bergantino TR, Dobson JG. 2013. Regional climate trends and scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment. Part 4. Climate of the U.S. Great Plains., Washington D.C.: NOAA. 82p.Google Scholar
- Ponce-Campos GE, Moran MS, Huete A, Zhang YG, Bresloff C, Huxman TE, Eamus E, Bosch DD, Buda AR, Gunter SA, Heartsill Scalley T, Kitchen SG, McClaran MP, McNab WH, Montoya DS, Morgan JA, Peters DP, Sadler EJ, Seyfried MS, Starks PJ. 2013. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature 494:349–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin GH, Pockman WT, Shaw R, Small EE, Smith MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC. 2003. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. BioScience 53:941–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar