Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1168–1182 | Cite as

Carbon Storage Declines in Old Boreal Forests Irrespective of Succession Pathway

  • Bilei Gao
  • Anthony R. Taylor
  • Eric B. Searle
  • Praveen Kumar
  • Zilong Ma
  • Alexandra M. Hume
  • Han Y. H. ChenEmail author
Article

Abstract

The boreal forest plays a critical role in regulating global atmospheric carbon dioxide and is highly influenced by wildfire. However, the long-term recovery of forest carbon (C) storage following wildfire remains unclear, especially during late succession. Uncertainty surrounding C storage in old forests largely stems from both a lack of repeated measurements in forest stands older than the longevity of the pioneer cohort and a lack of consideration of multiple succession pathways. In this study, we constructed a replicated chronosequence, which covered a wide range of forest stand age classes (up to 210 years old) following fire in the boreal forest of central Canada. We selected stands of different overstorey types (that is, broadleaf, conifer, or mixedwood) and age classes to account for multiple succession pathways known to occur in our study area. Our results show a strong relationship between total ecosystem C storage and stand age following fire. Broadleaf stands had on average higher total ecosystem C; however, the inferred temporal dynamics of total ecosystem C were similar among all three overstorey types. Importantly, we found that total ecosystem C storage declined from canopy transition to late-succession stages, irrespective of succession pathway, contradicting views that old forests continually accumulate C as they age. Our findings emphasize that further study of stands older than the longevity of the pioneer cohort is critical to better understand the contribution of old forests to the global C cycle.

Key words

boreal forest carbon storage fire forest succession multiple pathways 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Amber Brant for her help in collecting the large tree inventory data. We are also thankful to Le Wang, Sa Xiao, Wanwen Yu, Magali Furlan Nehemy, and Yu Zhang for the assistance with field work and data analysis. Valuable comments from Dr. Rupert Seidl, Caroline Simpson, and the anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated. This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Strategic Grant Project (STPGP428641).

Supplementary material

10021_2017_210_MOESM1_ESM.docx (195 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 194 kb)

References

  1. Alemdag IS. 1984. Wood density variation of 28 tree species from Ontario. Chalk River (ON): Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Natural Resources Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Angers VA, Drapeau P, Bergeron Y. 2010. Snag degradation pathways of four North American boreal tree species. For Ecol Manag 259:246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE and others. 2007. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature 450:89–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. 2002. Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba. Can J For Res 32:1441–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. 2004. Net primary production and net ecosystem production of a boreal black spruce wildfire chronosequence. Glob Change Biol 10:473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brassard BW, Chen HYH. 2008. Effects of forest type and disturbance on diversity of coarse woody debris in boreal forest. Ecosystems 11:1078–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brassard BW, Chen HYH, Bergeron Y and others 2011. Coarse root biomass allometric equations for Abies balsamea, Picea mariana, Pinus banksiana, and Populus tremuloides in the boreal forest of Ontario, Canada. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brassard BW, Chen HYH, Wang JR and others 2008. Effects of time since stand-replacing fire and overstory composition on live-tree structural diversity in the boreal forest of central Canada. Can J For Res 38:52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns RM, Honkala BH. 1990. Silvics of North America. Washington, D.C., USA: United States Government Printing.Google Scholar
  10. Chen HYH, Brant AN, Seedre M and others 2017. The contribution of litterfall to net primary production during secondary succession in the boreal forest. Ecosystems 20:830–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen HYH, Popadiouk RV. 2002. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environ Rev 10:137–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen HYH, Vasiliauskas S, Kayahara GJ and others 2009. Wildfire promotes broadleaves and species mixture in boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 257:343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clemmensen K, Bahr A, Ovaskainen O and others 2013. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest. Science 339:1615–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S and others 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Environment Canada. 2017. Canadian Climate Normals 1981–2010. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html.
  16. Flannigan MD, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM. 2000. Climate change and forest fires. Sci Total Environ 262:221–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao B, Taylor AR, Chen HYH and others 2016. Variation in total and volatile carbon concentration among the major tree species of the boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 375:191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrett LG, Kimberley MO, Oliver GR and others 2012. Decomposition of coarse woody roots and branches in managed Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand—a time series approach. For Ecol Manag 269:116–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gauthier S, Bernier P, Kuuluvainen T and others 2015. Boreal forest health and global change. Science 349:819–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gough CM, Curtis PS, Hardiman BS and others 2016. Disturbance, complexity, and succession of net ecosystem production in North America’s temperate deciduous forests. Ecosphere 7:e01375.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goulden ML, McMillan AMS, Winston GC and others 2011. Patterns of NPP, GPP, respiration, and NEP during boreal forest succession. Glob Change Biol 17:855–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harden JW, O’Neill K, Trumbore S and others 1997. Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest. J Geophys Res Atmos 1984–2012(102):28805–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harmon ME, Bible K, Ryan MG and others 2004. Production, respiration, and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7:498–512.Google Scholar
  25. Hart SA, Chen HY. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecol Monogr 78:123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hume A, Chen HYH, Taylor AR and others 2016. Soil C:N: P dynamics during secondary succession following fire in the boreal forest of central Canada. For Ecol Manag 369:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw JA Jr. 2002. Forest mensuration. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jacob A, Hertel D, Leuschner C. 2014. Diversity and species identity effects on fine root productivity and turnover in a species-rich temperate broad-leaved forest. Funct Plant Biol 41:678–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson EA, Miyanishi K. 2008. Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecol Lett 11:419–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnstone J, Chapin FSIII. 2006. Effects of soil burn severity on post-fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems 9:14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kashian DM, Romme WH, Tinker DB and others 2013. Postfire changes in forest carbon storage over a 300-year chronosequence of Pinus contorta-dominated forests. Ecol Monogr 83:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly R, Chipman ML, Higuera PE and others 2013. Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:13055–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kneeshaw DD, Bergeron Y. 1998. Canopy gap characteristics and tree replacement in the southeastern boreal forest. Ecology 79:783–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar P, Chen HYH, Thomas SC and others. 2017. Linking resource availability and heterogeneity to understorey species diversity through succession in boreal forest of Canada. J Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laganière J, Cavard X, Brassard BW and others 2015. The influence of boreal tree species mixtures on ecosystem carbon storage and fluxes. For Ecol Manag 354:119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laganière J, Paré D, Bergeron Y and others 2012. The effect of boreal forest composition on soil respiration is mediated through variations in soil temperature and C quality. Soil Biol Biochem 53:18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laganière J, Paré D, Bergeron Y and others 2013. Stability of soil carbon stocks varies with forest composition in the Canadian boreal biome. Ecosystems 16:852–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambert MC, Ung CH, Raulier F. 2005. Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Can J For Res 35:1996–2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Klahn T and others 2009. An experimental comparison of chemical traits and litter decomposition rates in a diverse range of subarctic bryophyte, lichen and vascular plant species. J Ecol 97:886–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liang J, Crowther TW, Picard N and others. 2016. Positive biodiversity–productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354:aaf8957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Luo Y, Chen HYH. 2011. Competition, species interaction and ageing control tree mortality in boreal forests. J Ecol 99:1470–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Borner A and others 2008. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455:213–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma Z, Chen HYH. 2016. Effects of species diversity on fine root productivity in diverse ecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:1387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacDonald RL, Burke JM, Chen HYH and others 2012. Relationship between aboveground biomass and percent cover of ground vegetation in canadian boreal plain riparian forests. For Sci 58:47–53.Google Scholar
  46. Moran SR, Clayton L. 1984. Chronology of late Wisconsinan glaciation in Middle North-America—Reply. Quat Sci Rev 3:R1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Olajuyigbe SO, Tobin B, Gardiner P and others 2011. Stocks and decay dynamics of above-and belowground coarse woody debris in managed Sitka spruce forests in Ireland. For Ecol Manag 262:1109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pare D, Bergeron Y. 1995. Above-ground biomass accumulation along a 230-year chronosequence in the southern portion of the Canadian boreal forest. J Ecol 83:1001–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES. 2004. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob Chang Biol 10:2052–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Development Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
  52. Roberts MR, Gilliam FS. 1995. Patterns and mechanisms of plant diversity in forested ecosystems—implications for forest management. Ecol Appl 5:969–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH. 1997. Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. In: Begon M, Fitter AH, Eds. Advances in ecological research, Vol. 27. London: Academic Press Ltd-Elsevier Science Ltd. p 213–62.Google Scholar
  54. Seedre M, Shrestha BM, Chen HYH and others 2011. Carbon dynamics of North American boreal forest after stand replacing wildfire and clearcut logging. J For Res 16:168–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seedre M, Taylor AR, Brassard BW and others 2014. Recovery of ecosystem carbon stocks in young boreal forests: a comparison of harvesting and wildfire disturbance. Ecosystems 17:851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seedre M, Taylor AR, Chen HYH and others 2013. Deadwood density of five boreal tree species in relation to field-assigned decay class. For Sci 59:261–6.Google Scholar
  57. Senici D, Chen HYH, Bergeron Y and others 2010. Spatiotemporal variations of fire frequency in central boreal forest. Ecosystems 13:1227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith WB, Brand GJ. 1983. Allometric biomass equations for 98 species of herbs, shrubs, and small trees.Google Scholar
  59. Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian system of soil classification. Ottawa: NRC Research Press.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor AR, Chen HYH. 2011. Multiple successional pathways of boreal forest stands in central Canada. Ecography 34:208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor AR, Seedre M, Brassard BW and others 2014. Decline in net ecosystem productivity following canopy transition to late-succession forests. Ecosystems 17:778–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor KC, Arnup RW, Meredith MP and others 2000. A field guide to forest ecosystems of Northeastern Ontario: NEST Field Guide FG-01. Timmins(ON): Northeast Science and Technology, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  63. Vasiliauskas S, Chen HYH. 2002. How long do trees take to reach breast height after fire in northeastern Ontario? Can J For Res 32:1889–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wairiu M, Lal R. 2003. Soil organic carbon in relation to cultivation and topsoil removal on sloping lands of Kolombangara, Solomon Islands. Soil Tillage Res 70:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD and others 2010. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang CK, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST. 2003. Carbon distribution of a well- and poorly-drained black spruce fire chronosequence. Glob Change Biol 9:1066–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wirth C, Schulze ED, Lühker B and others 2002. Fire and site type effects on the long-term carbon and nitrogen balance in pristine Siberian Scots pine forests. Plant Soil 242:41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yuan ZY, Chen HYH. 2012. Fine root dynamics with stand development in the boreal forest. Funct Ecol 26:991–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Reich PB. 2012. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J Ecol 100:742–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Taylor AR. 2017. Positive species diversity and above-ground biomass relationships are ubiquitous across forest strata despite interference from overstorey trees. Funct Ecol 31:419–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bilei Gao
    • 1
  • Anthony R. Taylor
    • 2
  • Eric B. Searle
    • 1
  • Praveen Kumar
    • 1
  • Zilong Ma
    • 1
  • Alexandra M. Hume
    • 1
  • Han Y. H. Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Natural Resources ManagementLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada
  2. 2.Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry CentreNatural Resources CanadaFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations