The Influence of Legacy P on Lake Water Quality in a Midwestern Agricultural Watershed
- 1.4k Downloads
Decades of fertilizer and manure applications have led to a buildup of phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils and sediments, commonly referred to as legacy P. Legacy P can provide a long-term source of P to surface waters where it causes eutrophication. Using a suite of numerical models, we investigated the influence of legacy P on water quality in the Yahara Watershed of southern Wisconsin, USA. The suite included Agro-IBIS, a terrestrial ecosystem model; THMB, a hydrologic and nutrient routing model; and the Yahara Water Quality Model which estimates water quality indicators in the Yahara chain of lakes. Using five alternative scenarios of antecedent P storage (legacy P) in soils and channels under historical climate conditions, we simulated outcomes of P yield from the landscape, lake P loading, and three lake water quality indicators. Legacy P had a significant effect on lake loads and water quality. Across the five scenarios for Lake Mendota, the largest and most upstream lake, average P yield (kg ha−1) varied by −41 to +22%, P load (kg y−1) by −35 to +14%, summer total P (TP) concentration (mg l−1) by −25 to +12%, Secchi depth (m) by −7 to +3%, and the probability of hypereutrophy by −67 to +34%, relative to baseline conditions. The minimum storage scenario showed that a 35% reduction in present-day loads to Lake Mendota corresponded with a 25% reduction in summer TP and smaller reductions in the downstream lakes. Water quality was more vulnerable to heavy rainfall events at higher amounts of P storage and less so at lower amounts. Increases in heavy precipitation are expected with climate change; therefore, water quality could be protected by decreasing P reserves.
Keywordslegacy phosphorus eutrophication nonpoint source pollution watershed modeling agricultural runoff manure
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DEB-1038759.
- Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Eds. 1993. The Trophic Cascade in Lakes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p 385.Google Scholar
- Carpenter SR, Lathrop RC, Nowak P, Bennett EM, Reed T, Soranno PA. 2006. The ongoing experiment: restoration of Lake Mendota and its watershed. In: Magnuson JJ, Kratz TK, Benson BJ, editors. Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape. London: Oxford University Press. pp 236–56.Google Scholar
- Dubrovsky NM, Burow KR, Clark GM, Gronberg JM, Hamilton PA, Hitt KJ, Mueller DK, Munn MD, Nolan BT, Puckett LJ, Others. 2010. The quality of our Nation’s waters-Nutrients in the Nation’s streams and groundwater, 1992–2004. US Geological Survey Circular 1350. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1350/.
- Genskow K, Rumery Betz C. 2012. Farm Practices in the Lake Mendota Watershed: A Comparative Analysis of 1996 and 2011.Google Scholar
- Haygarth PM, Jarvie HP, Powers SM, Sharpley AN, Elser JJ, Shen J, Peterson HM, Chan N-I, Howden NJK, Burt T, Worrall F, Zhang F, Liu X. 2014. Sustainable phosphorus management and the need for a long-term perspective: the legacy hypothesis. Environ Sci Technol 48:8417–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: summary for decision makers. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Nowak P, Shepard R, Madison F, Hatfield JL, Stewart BA, Others. 1998. Farmers and manure management: a critical analysis. In: Hatfield JL, Stewart BA, editors. Animal Waste Utilization: Effective use of manure as a soil resource. Lewis Publishers. pp 1–32.Google Scholar
- Rowe H, Withers PJA, Baas P, Chan NI, Doody D, Holiman J, Jacobs B, Li H, MacDonald GK, McDowell R, Sharpley AN, Shen J, Taheri W, Wallenstein M, Weintraub MN. 2015. Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst:1–20.Google Scholar
- Scott CA, Walter MF, Nagle GN, Todd Walter M, Sierra NV, Brooks ES. 2001. Residual phosphorus in runoff from successional forest on abandoned agricultural land: 1. Biogeochemical and hydrological processes. Biogeochemistry 55:293–310.Google Scholar
- Stigliani WM, Doelman P, Salomons W, Schulin R, Smidt GRB, der Zee SEATMV. 1991. Chemical time bombs: Predicting the unpredictable. Environment 33:4–30.Google Scholar
- Sturgul SJ, Bundy LG. 2004. Understanding Soil Phosphorus. University of Wisconsin-Extension http://ipcm.wisc.edu/download/pubsNM/UnderstandingSoilP04.pdf.
- The MathWorks, Inc. 2015. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox. Natick Massachusetts, USA: The MathWorks Inc.Google Scholar
- Van Meter KJ, Basu NB, Veenstra JJ, Burras CL. 2016. The nitrogen legacy: emerging evidence of nitrogen accumulation in anthropogenic landscapes. Environ Res Lett 11(3):1–12.Google Scholar
- Water Resources Management Practicum. 2015. Assessment of transient sediment in the six-mile creek watershed. https://www.nelson.wisc.edu/docs/WRM2013_report.pdf.
- WICCI. 2011. Wisconsin’s Changing Climate: Impacts and Adaptation. Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar