Disease Ecology Meets Ecosystem Science
- 977 Downloads
Growing evidence indicates that parasites—when considered—can play influential roles in ecosystem structure and function, highlighting the need to integrate disease ecology and ecosystem science. To strengthen links between these traditionally disparate fields, we identified mechanisms through which parasites can affect ecosystems and used empirical literature searches to explore how commonly such mechanisms have been documented, the ecosystem properties affected, and the types of ecosystems in which they occur. Our results indicate that ecosystem-disease research has remained consistently rare, comprising less than 2% of disease ecology publications. Existing studies from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems, however, demonstrate that parasites can strongly affect (1) biogeochemical cycles of water, carbon, nutrients, and trace elements, (2) fluxes of biomass and energy, and (3) temporal ecosystem dynamics including disturbance, succession, and stability. Mechanistically, most studies have demonstrated density-mediated indirect effects, rather than trait-mediated effects, or direct effects of parasites, although whether this is representative remains unclear. Looking forward, we highlight the importance of applying traits-based approaches to predict when parasites are most likely to exert ecosystem-level effects. Future research should include efforts to extend host–parasite studies across levels of ecological organization, large-scale manipulations to experimentally quantify ecosystem roles of parasites, and the integration of parasites and disease into models of ecosystem functioning.
Keywordsparasite pathogen infection host ecosystem structure ecosystem function ecosystem dynamics biogeochemistry energy flow stability
We thank S. Collinge, M. Joseph, V. McKenzie, J. Mihaljevic, Y. Springer, and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. This research was supported by a fellowship from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and funds from the University of Colorado and the National Science Foundation (DEB-0841758, DEB-1149308, DEB-1311467, and a Graduate Fellowship to DLP).
- Chapin FSIII, Matson PPA, Vitousek PM, Eds. 2011. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Collinge SK, Ray C, Eds. 2006. Disease ecology: community structure and pathogen dynamics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Connelly S, Pringle CM, Bixby RJ, Brenes R, Whiles MR, Lips KR, Kilham S, Huryn AD. 2008. Changes in stream primary producer communities resulting from large-scale catastrophic amphibian declines: can small-scale experiments predict effects of tadpole loss? Ecosystems 11:1262–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JH, Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, Feld CK, Hering D, da Silva PM, Potts SG, Sandin L, Sousa JP, Storkey J, Wardle DA, Harrison PA. 2010. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:2873–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel DL, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:479–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eviner VT, Likens GE. 2008. Effects of pathogens on terrestrial ecosystem function. In: Ostfeld RS, Keesing F, Eviner V, Eds. Infectious disease ecology: effects of ecosystems on disease and of disease on ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p 260–83.Google Scholar
- Hooper DU, Chapin FSIII, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuris AM, Hechinger RF, Shaw JC, Whitney KL, Aguirre-Macedo L, Boch CA, Dobson AP, Dunham EJ, Fredensborg BL, Huspeni TC, Lorda J, Mababa L, Mancini FT, Mora AB, Pickering M, Talhouk NL, Torchin ME, Lafferty KD. 2008. Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454:515–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato T, Egusa T, Fukushima K, Oda T, Ohte N, Tokuchi N, Watanabe K, Kanaiwa M, Murakami I, Lafferty KD. 2012. Nematomorph parasites indirectly alter the food web and ecosystem function of streams through behavioural manipulation of their cricket hosts. Ecology Letters 15:786–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thieltges DW, Amundsen PA, Hechinger RF, Johnson PTJ, Lafferty KD, Mouritsen KN, Preston DL, Reise K, Zander CD, Poulin R. 2013. Parasites as prey in aquatic food webs: implications for predator infection and parasite transmission. Oikos 10:1473–82.Google Scholar
- Tsao JI, Wootton JT, Bunikis J, Luna MG, Fish D, Barbour AG. 2004. An ecological approach to preventing human infection: vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:18159–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar