Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 31–37 | Cite as

Research Frontiers in Ecosystem Service Science

20th Anniversary Paper

Abstract

How are ecosystem services conceptualized, analyzed, and forecast into the future? How can ecosystem service science be advanced to improve environmental decision-making at all scales? In this paper, I focus on three critical challenges in ecosystem service science that must be addressed to better understand, forecast, and manage ecosystem services. These include (1) understanding the role of nonlinearities, feedbacks, and legacies in the sustainable and resilient provision of ecosystem services; (2) understanding the role and interplay of ecological and social components in the provision of ecosystem services; and (3) employing stakeholder knowledge in co-designing research that better addresses decision-makers’ most pressing questions. Addressing these three challenges will advance ecosystem science and improve the use of ecosystem services in understanding and managing ecosystems.

Keywords

ecosystem services research frontiers interdisciplinary science systems ecology co-design social–ecological systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Bennett is supported by an E.W.R. Steacie Fellowship and a Discovery Grant (RGPIN 327077) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. She thanks her lab group, including the past and present members, for many hours of productive, fascinating, and fun conversation about ecosystem services and ES science that has led to some of the ideas presented in this paper.

References

  1. Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Eigenbrod F, Thomas CD, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gaston KJ. 2009. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(4):888–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B. 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9(10):1146–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, EM, W Cramer, A Begossi, G Cundill, B Egoh, IR Geijzendorffer, CB Krug, S Lavorel, L Lebel, B Martin-Lopez, P Meyfroidt, HA Mooney, JL Nel, U Pascual, K Payet-Lebourges, N Perez Harguindeguy, GD Peterson, A-H, Prieur-Richard, B Reyers, P Roebeling, R Seppelt, M Solan, P Tschakert, T Tschntke, BL Turner, PH Verburg, E Viglizzo, P White, and G Woodward. 2015. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being for sustainability: Three Challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:76–85Google Scholar
  4. Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch AM, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards MD, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC. 2012. Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37:421–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Gillon S, Kucharik CJ, Loheide S, Mase AS, Motew M, Qiu J, Rissman AR, Seifert J, Soylu E, Turner MG, Wardropper CB. 2015. Plausible futures of a social-ecological system: Yahara watershed, Wisconsin. USA. Ecology and Society 20(2):10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ. 2006. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs Source: Science (314) 5797: 257–258Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5):1305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaplin-Kramer R, Sharp RP, Mandle L, Sim S, Johnson J, Butnar I, Milà i Canals L, Eichelberger BA, Ramler I, Mueller C, McLachlan N, Yousefi A, King H, Kareiva PM. 2015. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(24): 7402–7407Google Scholar
  9. Chaplin-Kramer R, Hamel P, Sharp R, Kowal V, Wolny S, Sim S, Mueller C. 2016. Landscape configuration is the primary driver of impacts on water quality associated with agricultural expansion. Environmental Research Letters 11(7): 074012Google Scholar
  10. Christensen N, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, D’Antonio C, Francis R, Franklin JF, MacMahon JA, Noss RF, Parsons DJ, Peterson CH, Turner MG, Woodmansee TG. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Naeem S, Limburg K, Paruelo J, O’Neill RV, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cumming GS, Alcamo J, Sala O, Swart R, Bennett EM, Zurek M. 2005. Are existing global scenarios consistent with ecological feedbacks? Ecosystems 8:143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cumming GS, Buerkert A, Hoffmann EM, Schlect E, von Cramon-Taubadel S, Tscharntke T. 2014. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515:50–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daily GC, Ed. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. 1997. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  15. De Groot R, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, Gowdy J, Haines-Young R, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S, Portela R, Ring R. 2010. Chapter 1: Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: Kumar P, Ed. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. London and Washington: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  16. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47(2):377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster DR, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A. 2003. The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation. BioScience 53:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. 1990. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Future Earth 2013. Future Earth Intitial Design: Report of the Transition Team. International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar
  20. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2008. Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 23:211–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guerry, AD, S Polasky, J Lubchenko, R Chaplin-Kramer, GC Daily, R Griffin, M Ruckelshaus, IJ Bateman, A Duraiappah, T Elmqvist, MW Feldman, C Folke, J Hoekstra, PM Kareiva, BL Keeler, S Li, E McKenzie, Z Ouyang, B Reyers, TH Ricketts, J ROckstrom, H Tallia, and B Vira. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7348–7355Google Scholar
  22. Haines-Young R, Potschin M. in press. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli D, Frid C, Eds. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, chap. 7. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  23. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S. 2013. Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38:393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koch, EW, EB Barbier BR Silliman, DJ Reed, GM Perillo, SD Hacker, DF Granek, JH Primavera, N Muthiga, SPolasky, BS Halpern, CJ Kennedy, CV Kappel, and E Wolanski. 2009. Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 29–37.Google Scholar
  25. Kok MTJ, Kok K, Peterson GD, Hill R, Agard J, Carpenter SR. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustainability Science. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8.Google Scholar
  26. Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8(5): 468–479.Google Scholar
  27. Liu, J, HA Mooney, V Hull, SJ Davis, J Gaskell, T Hertel, J Lubchenco, KC Seto, P Gleick, C Kremen, and S Li. 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347: 964Google Scholar
  28. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-layered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27:19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Malinga R, Gordon LJ, Lindborg R, Jewitt G. 2013. Using participatory scenario planning to identify ecosystem services in changing landscapes. Ecology and Society 18(4):10. doi: 10.5751/ES-05494-180410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan BA, Balvanera P, Law EA, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Wilson KA. 2015. Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation 184:229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matson, P, WC Clark, and K Andersson. 2016. Pursuing Sustainability: A Guide to the Science and Practice. Princeton University Press, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M, Schmalzbauer BS, Hackmann H, Leemans R, Moore H. 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5(3–4):420–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. 2013. Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems 16:894–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell MGEEM, Bennett A Gonzalez, Lechowicz M, Rhemtulla J, Cardille JA, Vanderheyden K, Poirier-Ghys G, Renard D, Delmotte S, Albert C, Rayfield B, Dumitru M, Huang H-H, Kipp R, Larouche M, Liss K, Maguire D, Martins K, Terrado M, Ziter C, Taliana L, Dancose K. 2015. Montérégie Connection: Connecting landscape structure, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and stakeholders at multiple scales for decision-making. Ecology and Society 20(4):15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Navarro LM, Pereira HM. 2012. Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15:900–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oteros-Rozas E, Martin-Lopez B, Daw TM, Bohensiy EL, Butler JRA, Hill R, Martin-Ortega J, Quinlan A, Ravera F, Ruiz-Mallen I, Thyresson M, Mistry J, Palomo I, Peterson GD, Plieninger T, Waylen KA, Beach DM, Bohnet IC, Hamann M, Hanspach J, Hubacek K, Lavorel S, Vilardy SP. 2015. Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecology and Society 20(4):32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Posner SM, McKenzie E, Ricketts TH. 2016. Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(7):1760–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Renard D, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM. 2015. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502565112.Google Scholar
  40. Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social– ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ 11:268–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rocha J, Yletyinen J, Biggs R, Blenckner T, Peterson GD. 2015. Marine regime shifts: drivers and impacts on ecosystem services. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 370(1659):1–12.Google Scholar
  42. Rusch A, Chaplin-Kramer R, Gardiner MM, Hawro V, Holland J, Landis D, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Woltz M, Bommarco R. 2016. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 221:198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, Fisher JL, Gret-Regamey A, Lautenbach S, Pert P, Hotes S, Spangenberg J, Verburg PH, Van Oudenhoven APE. 2012. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators 21:145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations (UN). UN (United Nations). The future we want. Conference Outcome A/CONF.216/L.1, United Nations, New York (2012).Google Scholar
  45. Van der Ploeg, S and RS de Groot. 2010. The TEEB Valuation Database—a searchable database of 1310 estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services. Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Available at: http://www.fsd.nl/esp/80763/5/0/50
  46. Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM. 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service delivery. Ecological Complexity 15:114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Sciences and McGill School of EnvironmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations