A Tale of Two Forest Carbon Assessments in the Eastern United States: Forest Use Versus Cover as a Metric of Change
- 375 Downloads
The dynamics of land-use practices (for example, forest versus settlements) is often a major driver of changes in terrestrial carbon (C). As the management and conservation of forest land uses are considered a means of reducing future atmospheric CO2 concentrations, the monitoring of forest C stocks and stock change by categories of land-use change (for example, croplands converted to forest) is often a requirement of C monitoring protocols such as those espoused by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (that is, Good Practice Guidance and Guidelines). The identification of land use is often along a spectrum ranging from direct observation (for example, interpretation of owner intent via field visits) to interpretation of remotely sensed imagery (for example, land cover mapping) or some combination thereof. Given the potential for substantial differences across this spectrum of monitoring techniques, a region-wide, repeated forest inventory across the eastern U.S. was used to evaluate relationships between forest land-use change (derived from a forest inventory) and forest cover change (derived from Landsat modeling) in the context of forest C monitoring strategies. It was found that the correlation between forest land-use change and cover change was minimal (<0.08), with an increase in forest land use but a net decrease in forest cover being the most frequent observation. Cover assessments may be more sensitive to active forest management and/or conversion activities that can lead to confounded conclusions regarding the forest C sink (for example, decreasing forest cover but increasing C stocks in industrial timberlands). In contrast, the categorical nature of direct land-use field observations reduces their sensitivity to forest management activities (for example, clearcutting versus thinning) and recent disturbance events (for example, floods or wildfire) that may obscure interpretation of C dynamics over short time steps. While using direct land-use observations or cover mapping in forest C assessments, they should not be considered interchangeable as both approaches possess idiosyncratic qualities that should be considered when developing conclusions regarding forest C attributes and dynamics across large scales.
Keywordsforest inventory climate change carbon land use land-use change stock change forest cover
We extend gratitude to participants in initial brainstorming sessions that helped guide formulation of preliminary study objectives: Charlie Paulson, Tony Olsen, Richard Widmann, Randall Morin, Cassie Kurz, Patrick Miles, Dan Kaisershot, and Rachel Riemann. We also wish to thank anonymous reviewers who provided detailed and constructive comments.
- Amichev BY, Galbraith JM. 2004. A revised methodology for estimation of forest soil carbon from spatial soils and forest inventory data sets. Environ Manag 33(Suppl. 1):S74–86.Google Scholar
- Bechtold WA, Patterson PL. (Eds.), 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program—national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
- Brown DG, Robinson DT, French NHF. 2013. Perspectives on land-change science and carbon management. In: Brown, DG and others, Eds. Chapter 22 in land use and the carbon cycle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Coulston JW, Reams GA, Wear DN, Brewer CK. 2014. An analysis of forest land use, forest land cover and change at policy-relevant scales. Forestry 87:267–76.Google Scholar
- Cressie NA. 1993. Statistics for spatial data, revised edition. Wiley. 928 p.Google Scholar
- Domke GM, Walters BF, Perry CH, Woodall CW, Russell MB, Smith JE. In: Review. A framework for estimating litter carbon stocks in forests of the United States. Science of the Total Environment.Google Scholar
- Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:589–606.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) 2016. Forest sections of the land use, land-use change, and forestry chapter, and annex. In: US Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014. EPA 430-R-16-002. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html. Accessed 19 April 2016.
- EOP. 2013. Executive office of the president: the president’s climate action plan. Climate Action Plan. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf. Accessed March, 2015.
- Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL. 2007. The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J Forest 105:337–47.Google Scholar
- GFW. 2015. Global Forest Watch. http://www.globalforestwatch.org/. Accessed November 23, 2015.
- Holmgren P. 2015. Can we trust country-level data from global forest assessments? For Source 20:8–9.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2003. In: Penman J, Gytarsky M, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F, Eds. Intergovernmental panel on climate change: good practice guidance for land use, land-use change, and forestry. IGES, Japan.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2006. Intergovernmental panel on climate change: guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Eds. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Japan.Google Scholar
- Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. 2003. National scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science 49:12–35.Google Scholar
- MacDicken K, Jonsson Ő, Piňa L, Maulo S, Adikari Y, Garzuglia M, Lindquist E, Reams G, D’Annunzio R. 2015. The global forest resources assessment 2015: how are the world’s forests changing?. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- NAIP. 2015. National Agriculture Imagery Program. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/aerial-photography/imagery-programs/naip-imagery/. Accessed November 23, 2015.
- Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Oswalt SN, Smith WB, Miles PD, Pugh SA. 2014. Forest resources of the United States, 2012: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2015 update of the RPA Assessment. General Technical Report WO-91. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office.Google Scholar
- Ridgeway G. 2013. GBM: generalized boosted regression models. R package version 2.1. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gbm.
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2013. Report on the individual review of the inventory submission of the United States of America submitted in 2012. FCCC/ARR/2012/USA.Google Scholar
- USDA 2011. National report on sustainable forests, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington. FS-979.Google Scholar
- USDA 2014a. The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and user guide for phase 2 (version 6.0.1). http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/database-documentation/current/ver6.0/FIADB%20User%20Guide%20P2_6-0-1_final.pdf (2014).
- USDA. 2014b. Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, volume i: field, data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 6.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, D.C.: URL: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/. Accessed February, 2015.
- USDA. 2014c. Forest inventory and analysis national program—data and tools—FIA data mart, FIADB Version 5.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://apps.fs.fed.us/fiadb-downloads/datamart.html. Accessed June 24, 2014.
- Woodall CW, Heath LS, Domke GM, Nichols MC. 2011. Methods and equations for estimating volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the U.S. forest inventory, 2010. US Forest Service General Technical Report NRS-GTR-88.Google Scholar
- Woodall CW. 2012. Where did the U.S. forest biomass/carbon go? J For 110:113–14.Google Scholar
- Woodall CW, Coulston JW, Domke GM, Walters BF, Wear DN, Smith JE, Anderson H-E, Clough BJ, Cohen WB, Griffith DM, Hagan SC, Hanou IS, Nichols MC, Perry CH, Russell MB, Westfall JA, Wilson BT. 2015a. The US Forest Carbon Accounting Framework: Stocks and Stock Change, 1990–2016. US Forest Service General Technical Report NRS-GTR-154.Google Scholar