Plant Invasions or Fire Policy: Which Has Altered Fire Behavior More in Tallgrass Prairie?
Human behavior has rapidly evolved from fire-promoting to aggressively attempting to minimize its magnitude and variability. This global shift in human behavior has contributed to the adoption of strict policies that govern the purposeful and planned use of fire in ecosystem science and management. However, it remains unclear the extent to which modern-day prescribed fire policies are altering the potential magnitude and variation of fire behavior in scientific investigations and ecosystem management. Here, we modeled the theoretical historical range of variability (ROV) in fire behavior for the tallgrass prairie ecosystem of North America. We then compared sensitivities in the magnitude and variation in the historical ROV in fire behavior as a result of (1) policies governing prescribed fire and (2) woody and herbaceous plant invasions. Although considerably more attention has focused on changes in fire behavior as a result of biological invasions, our model demonstrates that contemporary fire management policies can meet or surpass these effects. Policies governing prescribed fire management in tallgrass prairie reduced the magnitude and variability of surface fire behavior more than tall fescue invasion and rivaled reductions in fire behavior from decades of Juniperus encroachment. Consequently, fire and its potential as a driver of ecosystem dynamics has been simplified in the study and management of this system, which may be contributing to misleading conclusions on the potential responses of many highly researched environmental priorities. We emphasize the need to study changes in fire dynamics as a function of both social and ecological drivers, in an effort to advance our basic understanding of the role of fire in nature and its potential usefulness in ecosystem management.
Keywordsanthropogenic change community assembly disturbance regime historical range of variability (ROV) environmental policy exotic species invasion ecosystem management global environmental change social-ecological system
- Albini FA (1983) Potential spotting distance from wind-driven surface fires. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station. Research sPaper INT-309. p 32.Google Scholar
- Andrews PL (2007) BehavePlus fire modeling system: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings, 7th conference on fire and forest meteorology, Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. pp 18–21.Google Scholar
- Andrews PL, Rothermel RC (1982) Charts for interpreting wildland fire behavior characteristics. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station. Research Paper INT-131. p 22.Google Scholar
- Bowman DM, Balch JK, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Carlson JM, Cochrasne MA, D’Antonio CM, Defries RS, Doyle JC, Harrison SP, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Marston JB, Mortiz MA, Prentice IC, Roos CI, Scott AC, Swetnam TW, van der Werf GR, Pyne SJ. 2009. Fire in the earth system. Science 324:481–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman DM, Balch J, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries R, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Mack M, Moritz MA, Pyne S, Ross CI, Scott AC, Sodhi NS, Swetnam TW. 2011. The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. J Biogeogr 38:2223–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brown JK. 1970. Ratios of surface area to volume for common fine fuels. For Sci 16:101–5.Google Scholar
- Brown JK. 1971. A planar intersect method for sampling fuel volume and surface area. For Sci 17:96–102.Google Scholar
- Carlson JD, Bradshaw LS, Nelson RM Jr, Bensch R, Jabrzemski R. 2007. Application of the nelson model to four timelag fuel classes using Oklahoma field observations: model evaluation and comparison with National Fire Danger Rating System algorithms. Int J Wildland Fire 16:204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB, Bennett AF, Bode M, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Clarke MF, Dexter N, Fensham R, Friend G, Gill M, James S, Kay G, Keith DA, MacGregor C, Russell-Smith J, Salt D, Watson JEM, Williams RJ, York A. 2010. Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them. Biol Conserv 143:1928–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuhlendorf SD, Limb RF, Engle DM, Miller RF (2011). Assessment of prescribed fire as a conservation practice. In: Briske DD, Ed. Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps. USDA-NRCS. pp 75–104.Google Scholar
- Goldammer JG, de Ronde C (2004) Wildland fire management handbook for sub-Sahara Africa. Freiburg: Global Fire Monitoring Center.Google Scholar
- Heinsch FA, Andrews PL (2010) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 5.0: design and features. Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR-249, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
- Luke RH, McArthur AG. 1978. Bushfires in Australia. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Forest Research, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
- McWethy DB, Higuera PE, Whitlock C, Veblen TT, Bowman DMJS, Cary GJ, Haberle SG, Keane RE, Maxwell BD, McGlone MS, Perry GLW, Wilmshurst JM, Holz A, Tepley AJ. 2013. A conceptual framework for predicting temperate ecosystem sensitivity to human impacts on fire regimes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:900–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NOAA (2009) Wildfires in the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles. national weather service. Amarillo, TX: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ama/?n=march2006_wildfire. Accessed 3 October 2013.
- NOAA (2010) Top 10 Texas and Oklahoma Panhandles Weather Events of the Decade (2000–2009). Amarillo, TX: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ama/?n=top10_events_decade. Accessed 3 October 2013.
- OK-FIRE (2013a) Basics for prescribed burning. http://okfire.mesonet.org/sub_info/OK-FIRE%20Basics%20for%20PRESCRIBED%20BURNING.pdf.
- OK-FIRE (2013b) Basics for fire danger. http://okfire.mesonet.org/sub_info/OK-FIRE%20Basics%20for%20FIRE%20DANGER.pdf.
- OK-FIRE (2013c) County burn ban criteria. http://okfire.mesonet.org/sub_info/County%20Burn%20Ban%20Criteria.pdf.
- Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper INT-115. p 52.Google Scholar
- Scott JH, Burgen RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. p 72.Google Scholar
- Smith D (2011) Map of the mid-continent tallgrass prairie. In: Tallgrass prairie (map by D. Smith and B. Bultler). p 4.Google Scholar
- TNC (2001) Tallgrass remnants. The Nature Conservancy, Central U.S. Conservation Region, GIS Lab.Google Scholar
- van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG, Prins P. 2012. The management of fire-adapted ecosystems in an urban setting: the case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa. Ecol Soc 17:8–18.Google Scholar
- Weir JR (2009) Conducting prescribed fires: a comprehensive manual. College Station: Texas A&M Press.Google Scholar
- Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and Southern Canada. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar