, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 356–368 | Cite as

Plant Invasions or Fire Policy: Which Has Altered Fire Behavior More in Tallgrass Prairie?

  • Dirac Twidwell
  • Andrew S. West
  • William B. Hiatt
  • Abbey L. Ramirez
  • J. Taylor Winter
  • David M. Engle
  • Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
  • J. D. Carlson


Human behavior has rapidly evolved from fire-promoting to aggressively attempting to minimize its magnitude and variability. This global shift in human behavior has contributed to the adoption of strict policies that govern the purposeful and planned use of fire in ecosystem science and management. However, it remains unclear the extent to which modern-day prescribed fire policies are altering the potential magnitude and variation of fire behavior in scientific investigations and ecosystem management. Here, we modeled the theoretical historical range of variability (ROV) in fire behavior for the tallgrass prairie ecosystem of North America. We then compared sensitivities in the magnitude and variation in the historical ROV in fire behavior as a result of (1) policies governing prescribed fire and (2) woody and herbaceous plant invasions. Although considerably more attention has focused on changes in fire behavior as a result of biological invasions, our model demonstrates that contemporary fire management policies can meet or surpass these effects. Policies governing prescribed fire management in tallgrass prairie reduced the magnitude and variability of surface fire behavior more than tall fescue invasion and rivaled reductions in fire behavior from decades of Juniperus encroachment. Consequently, fire and its potential as a driver of ecosystem dynamics has been simplified in the study and management of this system, which may be contributing to misleading conclusions on the potential responses of many highly researched environmental priorities. We emphasize the need to study changes in fire dynamics as a function of both social and ecological drivers, in an effort to advance our basic understanding of the role of fire in nature and its potential usefulness in ecosystem management.


anthropogenic change community assembly disturbance regime historical range of variability (ROV) environmental policy exotic species invasion ecosystem management global environmental change social-ecological system 



Funds for this project were provided by the Joint Fire Science Program project #11-1-2-19. We thank Trenton Franz, Erica Smithwick, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful contributions that improved this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10021_2015_9937_MOESM1_ESM.docx (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 44 kb)


  1. Albini FA (1983) Potential spotting distance from wind-driven surface fires. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station. Research sPaper INT-309. p 32.Google Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgon P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT. 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews PL (2007) BehavePlus fire modeling system: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings, 7th conference on fire and forest meteorology, Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. pp 18–21.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews PL, Rothermel RC (1982) Charts for interpreting wildland fire behavior characteristics. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station. Research Paper INT-131. p 22.Google Scholar
  5. Balch JK, Bradley BA, D’Antonio C, Gomez-Dans J. 2013. Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980–2009). Glob Change Biol 19:173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bednarek AT. 2001. Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ Manag 27:803–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond WJ, Woodward FI, Midgley GF. 2005. The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. New Phytol 165:525–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond WJ, Keeley JE. 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecol Evol 20:387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman DM, Balch JK, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Carlson JM, Cochrasne MA, D’Antonio CM, Defries RS, Doyle JC, Harrison SP, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Marston JB, Mortiz MA, Prentice IC, Roos CI, Scott AC, Swetnam TW, van der Werf GR, Pyne SJ. 2009. Fire in the earth system. Science 324:481–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman DM, Balch J, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries R, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Mack M, Moritz MA, Pyne S, Ross CI, Scott AC, Sodhi NS, Swetnam TW. 2011. The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. J Biogeogr 38:2223–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradstock RA, Bedward M, Gill AM, Cohn JS. 2005. Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals. Wildl Res 32:409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briggs JM, Hoch GA, Johnson LC. 2002. Assessing the rate, mechanisms, and consequences of the conversion of tallgrass prairie to Juniperus virginiana forest. Ecosystems 5:578–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown JK. 1970. Ratios of surface area to volume for common fine fuels. For Sci 16:101–5.Google Scholar
  15. Brown JK. 1971. A planar intersect method for sampling fuel volume and surface area. For Sci 17:96–102.Google Scholar
  16. Carlson JD, Bradshaw LS, Nelson RM Jr, Bensch R, Jabrzemski R. 2007. Application of the nelson model to four timelag fuel classes using Oklahoma field observations: model evaluation and comparison with National Fire Danger Rating System algorithms. Int J Wildland Fire 16:204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapin FSIII, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Díaz S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR. 1998. Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. Int J Wildland Fire 8:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crockett JS, Engle DM. 1999. Combustion characteristics of bison (Bison bison) fecal pats ignited by grassland fires. Am Midl Nat 141:12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  21. Dellasala DA, Williams JE, Williams CD, Franklin JF. 2004. Beyond smoke and mirrors: a synthesis of fire policy and science. Conserv Biol 18:976–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB, Bennett AF, Bode M, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Clarke MF, Dexter N, Fensham R, Friend G, Gill M, James S, Kay G, Keith DA, MacGregor C, Russell-Smith J, Salt D, Watson JEM, Williams RJ, York A. 2010. Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them. Biol Conserv 143:1928–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engle DM, Stritzke JF, Bidwell TG, Claypool PL. 1993. Late-summer fire and follow-up herbicide treatments in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 46:542–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Kerby J, Hamilton R. 2009. Pyric herbivory: rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conserv Biol 23:588–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuhlendorf SD, Limb RF, Engle DM, Miller RF (2011). Assessment of prescribed fire as a conservation practice. In: Briske DD, Ed. Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps. USDA-NRCS. pp 75–104.Google Scholar
  27. Goldammer JG, de Ronde C (2004) Wildland fire management handbook for sub-Sahara Africa. Freiburg: Global Fire Monitoring Center.Google Scholar
  28. Hawbaker TJ, Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hammer RB, Keuler NS, Clayton MK. 2013. Human and biophysical influence on fire occurrence in the United States. Ecol Appl 23:565–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heinsch FA, Andrews PL (2010) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 5.0: design and features. Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR-249, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holling CS, Meffe GK. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutto RL. 2008. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol Appl 18:1827–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Morais M. 1999. Reexamining fire suppression impacts on brushland fire regimes. Science 284:1829–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ. 1995. Downstream ecological effects of dams. Bioscience 45:183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Limb RF, Engle DM, Alford AL, Hellgren EC. 2010. Tallgrass prairie plant community dynamics along a canopy cover gradient of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.). Rangel Ecol Manag 63:638–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luke RH, McArthur AG. 1978. Bushfires in Australia. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Forest Research, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  37. Mack MC, D’Antonio CM. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13:195–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moritz MA, Hurteau MD, Suding KN, D’Antonio CM. 2013. Bounded ranges of variation as a framework for future conservation and fire management. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1286:92–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Wilsey BJ, Fuhlendorf SD, Miller JR, Debinski DM. 2012. Grazing and an invasive grass confound spatial pattern of exotic and native grassland plant species richness. Basic Appl Ecol 13:654–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Miller JR, Debinski DM. 2013. An invasive grass increases live fuel proportion and reduces fire spread in a simulated grassland. Ecosystems 16:158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McWethy DB, Higuera PE, Whitlock C, Veblen TT, Bowman DMJS, Cary GJ, Haberle SG, Keane RE, Maxwell BD, McGlone MS, Perry GLW, Wilmshurst JM, Holz A, Tepley AJ. 2013. A conceptual framework for predicting temperate ecosystem sensitivity to human impacts on fire regimes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:900–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. NOAA (2009) Wildfires in the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles. national weather service. Amarillo, TX: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Accessed 3 October 2013.
  43. NOAA (2010) Top 10 Texas and Oklahoma Panhandles Weather Events of the Decade (2000–2009). Amarillo, TX: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Accessed 3 October 2013.
  44. Parrott L, Meyer WS. 2012. Future landscapes: managing within complexity. Front Ecol Environ 10:382–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47:769–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reid AM, Fuhlendorf SD, Weir JR. 2010. Weather variables affecting Oklahoma wildfires. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:559–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rideout-Hanzak S, Wester DB, Britton CM, Whitlaw H. 2011. Biomass not linked to perennial grass mortality following severe wildfire in the Southern High Plains. Rangel Ecol Manag 64:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson AI, Bacon P, Heagney G. 2001. The responses of floodplain primary production to flood frequency and timing. J Appl Ecol 38:126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper INT-115. p 52.Google Scholar
  50. Sanders D, Sutter L, Veen FJ. 2013. The loss of indirect interactions leads to cascading extinctions of carnivores. Ecol Lett 16:664–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Scholes RJ, Archer SR. 1997. Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:517–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott JH, Burgen RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. p 72.Google Scholar
  53. Smith D (2011) Map of the mid-continent tallgrass prairie. In: Tallgrass prairie (map by D. Smith and B. Bultler). p 4.Google Scholar
  54. Smucker KM, Hutto RL, Steele BM. 2005. Changes in bird abundance after wildfire: importance of fire severity and time since fire. Ecol Appl 15:1535–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor CA Jr, Twidwell D, Garza NE, Rosser C, Hoffman JK, Brooks TK. 2012. Long-term effects of fire, livestock herbivory removal, and weather variability in Texas semiarid savanna. Rangel Ecol Manag 65:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. TNC (2001) Tallgrass remnants. The Nature Conservancy, Central U.S. Conservation Region, GIS Lab.Google Scholar
  57. Trauernicht C, Brook BW, Murphy BP, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS. 2015. Local and global pyrogeographic evidence that indigenous fire management creates pyrodiversity. Ecol Evol. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1494.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Twidwell D, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Taylor CA Jr. 2009. Surface fuel sampling strategies: linking fuel measurements and fire effects. Rangel Ecol Manag 62:223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Twidwell D, Rogers WE, McMahon EA, Thomas BR, Kreuter UP, Blankenship TL. 2012. Prescribed extreme fire effects on richness and invasion in coastal prairie. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:330–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Twidwell D, Rogers WE, Fuhlendorf SD, Wonkka CL, Engle DM, Weir JR, Kreuter UP, Taylor CA Jr. 2013a. The rising Great Plains fire campaign: citizens’ response to woody plant encroachment. Front Ecol Environ 11:e64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Twidwell D, Fuhlendorf SD, Taylor CA Jr, Rogers WE. 2013b. Refining thresholds in coupled fire-vegetation models to improve management of encroaching woody plants in grasslands. J Appl Ecol 50:603–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turner MG. 2010. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91:2833–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. van Langevelde F, Van De Vijver CA, Kumar L, Van De Koppel J, De Ridder N, Van Andel J, Skidmore AK, Hearne JW, Stroosnijder L, Bond WJ, Prins HHT, Rietkerk M. 2003. Effects of fire and herbivory on the stability of savanna ecosystems. Ecology 84:337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Wilgen BW. 2013. Fire management in species-rich Cape fynbos shrublands. Front Ecol Environ 11:e35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Wilgen BW, Cowling RM, Burgers CJ. 1996. Valuation of ecosystem services. Bioscience 46:184–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG, Prins P. 2012. The management of fire-adapted ecosystems in an urban setting: the case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa. Ecol Soc 17:8–18.Google Scholar
  67. Weir JR (2009) Conducting prescribed fires: a comprehensive manual. College Station: Texas A&M Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wittich KP. 2011. Phenological observations of grass curing in Germany. Int J Biometeorol 55:313–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wootton JT, Parker MS, Power ME. 1996. Effects of disturbance on river food webs. Science 273:1558–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and Southern Canada. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirac Twidwell
    • 1
  • Andrew S. West
    • 2
  • William B. Hiatt
    • 2
  • Abbey L. Ramirez
    • 2
  • J. Taylor Winter
    • 2
  • David M. Engle
    • 2
  • Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
    • 2
  • J. D. Carlson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and HorticultureUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Ecology and ManagementOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations