, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1068–1081 | Cite as

Recurrent Mild Drought Events Increase Resistance Toward Extreme Drought Stress

  • Sabrina BackhausEmail author
  • Juergen Kreyling
  • Kerstin Grant
  • Carl Beierkuhnlein
  • Julia Walter
  • Anke Jentsch


The frequency and magnitude of extreme weather events such as drought are expected to increase in the future. At present, plant responses to recurrent extreme events have been sparsely examined and the role of stress history on subsequent stress response has been widely neglected. In a long-term field experiment, we investigated the response of grassland and heath communities to a very severe drought event, which exceeded the duration of projected drought scenarios. During the preceding 6 years, the plant communities experienced scenarios of varying water supply, including annually recurring drought, heavy rain, regular watering, and natural drought periods. Single species and plant communities that were regularly watered in the preceding years revealed the highest tissue die-back under a very severe drought when compared to plants that experienced mild or severe drought stress before. Contrary to expectations, the root to shoot ratio did not increase due to previous recurrent drought occurrences. Furthermore, pre-exposure effects on Vaccinium myrtillus and Plantago lanceolata tissue die-back and reproductive biomass (P. lanceolata) were altered by community composition. Recurrent mild drought stress seems to improve drought resistance of plant communities and species. Potential reasons could be epigenetic changes or soil biotic legacies. Morphological legacies such as altered root to shoot ratio did not play a role in our study. Imprinting events which trigger this ecological stress memory do not have to be extreme themselves. Thresholds, longevity of effects, and the role of biodiversity shown by the importance of community composition require further attention.


drought memory EVENT-experiment legacy precipitation change pulse pressure resilience resistance 



This study was funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Public Health (ZKL01Abt7 18456). We thank Jordan Vani for language editing, Elke Koenig, Stefan Koenig, Christine Pilsl, and numerous student workers and interns for their outstanding help during the field work.

Supplementary material

10021_2014_9781_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (719 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 719 kb)


  1. Arfin Khan NM, Grant K, Beierkuhnlein C, Kreyling J, Jentsch A. 2014. Climatic extremes lead to species-specific legume facilitation in an experimental temperate grassland. Plant Soil 379:161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beierkuhnlein C, Thiel D, Jentsch A, Willner E, Kreyling J. 2011. Ecotypes of European grass species respond differently to warming and extreme drought. J Ecol 99:703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyko A, Kovalchuk I. 2011. Genome instability and epigenetic modification—heritable responses to environmental stress? Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:260–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce TJ, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. 2007. Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci 173:603–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callaway RM. 1997. Positive interactions in plant communities and the individualistic-continuum concept. Oecologia 112:143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaway RM, Walker LR. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, de Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Flors V, García-Agustín P, Jakab G, Mauch F, Newman M-A, Pieterse CMJ, Poinssot B, Pozo MJ, Pugin A, Schaffrath U, Ton J, Wendehenne D, Zimmerli L, Mauch-Mani B. 2006. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:1062–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuk K, Gogala M, Tkalec M, Vidakovic-Cifrek Z. 2010. Transgenerational stress memory in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.: antioxidative enzymes and HSP70. Acta Bot Croat 69:183–97.Google Scholar
  10. Ehdaie B, Layne AP, Waines JG. 2012. Root system plasticity to drought influences grain yield in bread wheat. Euphytica 186:219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faraway JJ. 2006. Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  12. Gallé A, Haldimann P, Feller U. 2007. Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytol 174:799–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilgen AK, Buchmann N. 2009. Response of temperate grasslands at different altitudes to simulated summer drought differed but scaled with annual precipitation. Biogeosciences 6:2525–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goh C, Nam HG, Park YS. 2003. Stress memory in plants: a negative regulation of stomatal response and transient induction of rd22 gene to light in abscisic acid-entrained Arabidopsis plants. Plant J 36:240–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gumbel EJ. 1958. Statistics of extremes. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gutschick VP, BassiriRad H. 2003. Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences. New Phytol 160:21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC. 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field C, Barros V, Stocker T, Qin D, Dokken D, Ebi K, Mastrandrea M, Mach K, Plattner G-K, Allen S, Tignor M, Midgley P, Eds. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  19. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C. 2007. A new generation of climate change experiments: events, not trends. Front Ecol Environ 5:365–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Böttcher-Treschkow J, Beierkuhnlein C. 2009. Beyond gradual warming: extreme weather events alter flower phenology of European grassland and heath species. Glob Change Biol 15:837–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Elmer M, Gellesch E, Glaser B, Grant K, Hein R, Lara M, Mirzae H, Nadler SE, Nagy L, Otieno D, Pritsch K, Rascher U, Schädler M, Schloter M, Singh BK, Stadler J, Walter J, Wellstein C, Wöllecke J, Beierkuhnlein C. 2011. Climate extremes initiate ecosystem-regulating functions while maintaining productivity. J Ecol 99:689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahmen A, Perner J, Buchmann N. 2005. Diversity-dependent productivity in semi-natural grasslands following climate perturbations. Funct Ecol 19:594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalapos T, van den Boogaard R, Lambers H. 1996. Effect of soil drying on growth, biomass allocation and leaf gas exchange of two annual grass species. Plant Soil 185:137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knapp AK, Beier C, Briske DD, Classen AT, Luo Y, Reichstein M, Smith MD, Smith SD, Bell JE, Fay PA, Heisler JL, Leavitt SW, Sherry R, Smith B, Weng E. 2008. Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 58:811–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreyling J, Wenigmann M, Beierkuhnlein C, Jentsch A. 2008a. Effects of extreme weather events on plant productivity and tissue die-back are modified by community composition. Ecosystems 11:752–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C, Elmer M, Pritsch K, Radovski M, Schloter M, Wöllecke J, Jentsch A. 2008b. Soil biotic processes remain remarkably stable after 100-year extreme weather events in experimental grassland and heath. Plant Soil 308:175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kreyling J, Jurasinski G, Grant K, Retzer V, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C. 2011. Winter warming pulses affect the development of planted temperate grassland and dwarf-shrub heath communities. Plant Ecol Divers 4:13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kreyling J, Jentsch A, Beier C. 2013. Beyond realism in climate change experiments: gradient approaches identify thresholds and tipping points. Ecol Lett 17:125-e1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Larcher W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lloret F, Siscart D, Dalmases C. 2004. Canopy recovery after drought dieback in holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob Change Biol 10:2092–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madlung A, Comai L. 2004. The effect of stress on genome regulation and structure. Ann Bot 94:481–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meisner A, De Deyn GB, de Boer W, van der Putten WH. 2013. Soil biotic legacy effects of extreme weather events influence plant invasiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9835–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. 2006. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature 442:1046–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mueller RC, Scudder CM, Porter ME, Trotter RTIII, Gehring CA, Whitham TG. 2005. Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J Ecol 93:1085–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman GS, Arthur MA, Muller RN. 2006. Above- and belowground net primary production in a temperate mixed deciduous forest. Ecosystems 9:317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noormets A, McNulty SG, DeForest JL, Sun G, Li Q, Chen J. 2008. Drought during canopy development has lasting effect on annual carbon balance in a deciduous temperate forest. New Phytol 179:818–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novoplansky A, Goldberg D. 2001. Interactions between neighbour environments and drought resistance. J Arid Environ 47:11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Otieno D, Kreyling J, Purcell A, Herold N, Grant K, Tenhunen J, Beierkuhnlein C, Jentsch A. 2012. Drought responses of Arrhenatherum elatius grown in plant assemblages of varying species richness. Acta Oecol 39:11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Development Core Team. 2012. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-105.Google Scholar
  41. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. ISBN3-900051-07-0.
  42. Saccone P, Delzon S, Pagès J, Brun J, Michalet R. 2009. The role of biotic interactions in altering tree seedling responses to an extreme climatic event. J Veg Sci 20:403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schär C, Vidale PL, Lüthi D, Frei C, Häberli C, Liniger MA, Appenzeller C. 2004. The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427:332–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schroter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araujo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpaa S, Klein RJT, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabate S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zierl B. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310:1333–7.Google Scholar
  45. Suttle KB, Thomsen MA, Power ME. 2007. Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 315:640–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Peer L, Nijs I, Reheul D, de Cauwer B. 2004. Species richness and susceptibility to heat and drought extremes in synthesized grassland ecosystems: compositional vs physiological effects. Funct Ecol 18:769–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Ruijven J, Berendse F. 2010. Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought. J Ecol 98:81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walter J, Nagy L, Hein R, Rascher U, Beierkuhnlein C, Willner E, Jentsch A. 2011. Do plants remember drought? Hints towards a drought-memory in grasses. Environ Exp Bot 71:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walter J, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C, Kreyling J. 2013. Ecological stress memory and cross stress tolerance in plants in the face of climate extremes. Environ Exp Bot 94:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Y, Yu S, Wang J. 2007. Biomass-dependent susceptibility to drought in experimental grassland communities. Ecol Lett 10:401–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whittle CA, Otto SP, Johnston MO, Krochko JE. 2009. Adaptive epigenetic memory of ancestral temperature regime in Arabidopsis thaliana. Botany 87:650–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zavalloni C, Gielen B, Lemmens CMHM, De Boeck HJ, Blasi S, Van den Bergh S, Nijs I, Ceulemans R. 2008. Does a warmer climate with frequent mild water shortages protect grassland communities against a prolonged drought? Plant Soil 308:119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Backhaus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juergen Kreyling
    • 2
  • Kerstin Grant
    • 1
  • Carl Beierkuhnlein
    • 2
  • Julia Walter
    • 1
  • Anke Jentsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Disturbance EcologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Department of BiogeographyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations