Bromus tectorum Response to Fire Varies with Climate Conditions
The invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) forms a positive feedback with fire in some areas of western North America’s sagebrush biome by increasing fire frequency and size, which then increases B. tectorum abundance post-fire and dramatically alters ecosystem structure and processes. However, this positive response to fire is not consistent across the sagebrush steppe. Here, we ask whether different climate conditions across the sagebrush biome can explain B. tectorum’s variable response to fire. We found that climate variables differed significantly between 18 sites where B. tectorum does and does not respond positively to fire. A positive response was most likely in areas with higher annual temperatures and lower summer precipitation. We then chose a climatically intermediate site, with intact sagebrush vegetation, to evaluate whether a positive feedback had formed between B. tectorum and fire. A chronosequence of recent fires (1–15 years) at the site created a natural replicated experiment to assess abundance of B. tectorum and native plants. B. tectorum cover did not differ between burned and unburned plots but native grass cover was higher in recently burned plots. Therefore, we found no evidence for a positive feedback between B. tectorum and fire at the study site. Our results suggest that formation of a positive B. tectorum-fire feedback depends on climate; however, other drivers such as disturbance and native plant cover are likely to further influence local responses of B. tectorum. The dependence of B. tectorum’s response to fire on climate suggests that climate change may expand B. tectorum’s role as a transformative invasive species within the sagebrush biome.
KeywordsBromus tectorum cheatgrass fire Idaho National Laboratory positive feedback sagebrush
- Bagchi S, Briske DD, Bestelmeyer BT, Wu XB. 2013. Assessing resilience and state-transition models with historical records of cheatgrass Bromus tectorum invasion in North American sagebrush-steppe. J Appl Ecol 50:1131–41.Google Scholar
- Billings WD. 1994. Ecological affects of cheatgrass and resultant fire on ecosystems in the western Great Basin. In: Monsen SB, Kitchen SG, Eds. Ecology and management of annual rangelands. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station. p. 22–30.Google Scholar
- Blaisdell JP. 1953. Ecological effects of planned burning of sagebrush-grass range on the upper Snake River Plains. Washington, DC: USDA. p 39.Google Scholar
- Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK. 2006. Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. J Veg Sci 17:693–704.Google Scholar
- Carlevaro F, Croissant Y, Hoareau S. 2012. mhurdle: estimation of models with limited dependent variables. R package version 0.1-3.Google Scholar
- Christensen EM. 1964. Changes in composition of a Bromus tectorum–Sporobolus cryptandrus–Aristida longiseta community following fire. Proc Utah Acad Sci Arts Lett 41:53–7.Google Scholar
- Cronquist A, Holmgren AH, Holmgren NH, Reveal JL, Holmgren PK. 1977. Intermountain Flora. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
- D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87.Google Scholar
- Hosten PE, West NE. 1994. Cheatgrass dynamics following wildfire on a sagebrush semidesert site in central Utah. In: Monsen SB, Ketchum SG, Eds. Ecology and management of annual rangelands. Boise, ID: USDA Forest Service. p. 56–62.Google Scholar
- Hunter R. 1991. Bromus invasions on the Nevada Test Site: present status of B. rubens and B. tectorum with notes on their relationship to disturbance and altitude. Great Basin Nat 51:176–82.Google Scholar
- Keane RE, Dickinson LJ. 2007. The photoload sampling technique. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station. p 44.Google Scholar
- Mack RN. 2011. Fifty years of “waging war on cheatgrass”: research advances, while meaningful control languishes. In: Richardson DM, Ed. Fifty years of invasion ecology. Oxford: Wiley. p. 253–65.Google Scholar
- McArthur ED, Blauer AC, Stevens R. 1990. Forage kochia competition with cheatgrass in central Utah. In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith SD, Tueller PT, Eds. Symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management. Las Vegas, NV: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. p. 56–65.Google Scholar
- Menke CA, Muir PS. 2004. Short-term influence of wildfire on canyon grassland plant communities and Spalding’s catchfly, a threatened plant. Northwest Sci 78:192–203.Google Scholar
- Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RG, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2012. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
- Pellant M. 1990. The cheatgrass-wildfire cylce: are there any solutions? In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith SD, Tueller PT, Eds. Symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management. Las Vegas, NV: USDA Forest Service. p. 11–8.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Geneva.Google Scholar
- Roberts DW 2012. labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.5-0. http://cran.rproject.org/package=labdsv.
- Whisenant SG. 1990. Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith SD, Tueller PT, Eds. Symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management. Las Vegas, NV: USDA Forest Service. p. 4–10.Google Scholar