Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 578–589 | Cite as

Panarchy: Theory and Application

  • Craig R. AllenEmail author
  • David G. Angeler
  • Ahjond S. Garmestani
  • Lance H. Gunderson
  • C. S. Holling
Article

Abstract

The concept of panarchy provides a framework that characterizes complex systems of people and nature as dynamically organized and structured within and across scales of space and time. It has been more than a decade since the introduction of panarchy. Over this period, its invocation in peer-reviewed literature has been steadily increasing, but its use remains primarily descriptive and abstract. Here, we discuss the use of the concept in the literature to date, highlight where the concept may be useful, and discuss limitations to the broader applicability of panarchy theory for research in the ecological and social sciences. Finally, we forward a set of testable hypotheses to evaluate key propositions that follow from panarchy theory.

Keywords

complex systems discontinuities novelty regime resilience social–ecological systems transformations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this manuscript was improved by comments from K. Nash, T. Spanbauer, and two anonymous reviewers. We also thank Bev Gunderson for graphics support. The Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement between the U.S. Geological Survey, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Wildlife Management Institute. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United States Government or U.S. EPA. We gratefully acknowledge funding from the August T. Larsson Foundation of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, and the U.S. Geological Survey John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis.

References

  1. Allen CR, Holling CS, Eds. 2008. Discontinuities in ecosystems and other complex systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen CR, Holling CS. 2010. Novelty, adaptive capacity, and resilience. Ecol Soc 15(3):24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art24/.Google Scholar
  3. Allen CR, Saunders DA. 2002. Variability between scales: predictors of nomadism in birds of an Australian Mediterranean-climate ecosystem. Ecosystems 5:348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen CR, Saunders DA. 2006. Multimodel inference and the understanding of complexity, discontinuity, and nomadism. Ecosystems 9:694–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen CR, Forys EA, Holling CS. 1999. Body mass patterns predict invasions and extinctions in transforming landscapes. Ecosystems 2:114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen CR, Gunderson L, Johnson AR. 2005. The use of discontinuities and functional groups to assess relative resilience in complex systems. Ecosystems 8:958–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angeler DG, Johnson RK. 2012. Temporal scales and patterns of invertebrate biodiversity dynamics in boreal lakes recovering from acidification. Ecol Appl 22:1172–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Angeler DG, Viedma O, Moreno JM. 2009. Statistical performance and information content of time lag analysis and redundancy analysis in time series modeling. Ecology 90:3245–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Angeler DG, Trigal C, Drakare S, Johnson RK, Goedkoop W. 2010. Identifying resilience mechanisms to recurrent ecosystem perturbations. Oecologia 164:231–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Angeler DG, Drakare S, Johnson RK. 2011. Revealing the organization of complex adaptive systems through multivariate time series modeling. Ecol Soc 16(3):5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04175-160305.Google Scholar
  11. Angeler DG, Allen CR, Johnson RK. 2012. Insights on invasions and resilience derived from spatiotemporal discontinuities of biomass at local and regional scales. Ecol Soc 17(2):32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04928-170232.
  12. Angeler DG, Allen CR, Johnson RK. 2013. Measuring the relative resilience of subarctic lakes to global change: redundancies of functions within and across temporal scales. J Appl Ecol 50:572–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beier C, Lovecraft AL, Chapin T. 2009. Growth and collapse of a resource system: an adaptive cycle of change in public lands governance and forest management in Alaska. Ecol Soc 14(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art5/.
  14. Benson MH, Garmestani AS. 2011. Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrating adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act. J Environ Manag 92:1420–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bessey KM. 2002. Structure and dynamics in an urban landscape: toward a multiscale view. Ecosystems 5:360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bremner AP, Taplin RH. 2004. Performance of localized regression tree splitting criteria on data with discontinuities. Aust N Z J Stat 46:367–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunckhorst DJ. 2002. Institutions to sustain ecological and social systems. Ecol Manag Restor 3:108–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carpenter SR, Brock WA. 2006. Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition. Ecol Lett 9:311–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carreiro MM, Zipperer WC. 2011. Co-adapting societal and ecological interactions following large disturbances in urban park woodlands. Aust Ecol 36:904–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chipman HA, George EI, McCulloch RE. 1998. Bayesian CART model search. J Am Stat Assoc 93:935–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clements FE. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dakos V, Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Brovkin V, Petoukhov V, Held H. 2008. Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. PNAS 105:14308–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diamond JM. 2005. Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Dick JM, Smith RI, Scott ME. 2011. Ecosystem services and associated concepts. Environmetrics 22:598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorren LKA, Berger F, Imeson AC, Maier B, Rey F. 2004. Integrity, stability and management of protected forests in the European Alps. For Ecol Manage 195:165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Downey SS. 2010. Can properties of labor-exchange networks explain the resilience of swidden agriculture? Ecol Soc 15(4):15. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art15/.Google Scholar
  28. Eason T, Garmestani AS. 2012. Cross-scale dynamics of a regional urban system through time. Region et Developement 36-2012.Google Scholar
  29. Eason T, Garmestani AS, Cabezas H. 2014. Managing for resilience: early detection of catastrophic shifts in ecological systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi: 10.1007/s10098-013-0687-2.
  30. Evans GR. 2008. Transformation from “Carbon Valley” to a “Post-Carbon Society” in a climate change hot spot: the coalfields of the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. Ecol Soc 13(1):39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art39/.Google Scholar
  31. Farrell BH, Twining-Ward L. 2004. Reconceptualizing tourism. Ann Tour Res 31:274–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Montague-Drake R. 2008. The role of landscape texture in conservation biogeography: a case study on birds in south-eastern Australia. Divers Distrib 14:38–46.Google Scholar
  33. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forys EA, Allen CR. 2002. Functional group change within and across scales following invasions and extinctions in the Everglades ecosystem. Ecosystems 5:339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fraser EDG. 2003. Social vulnerability and ecological fragility: building bridges between social and natural sciences using the Irish Potato Famine as a case study. Conserv Ecol 7(2):9. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss2/art9/.
  36. Fraser EDG, Stringer LC. 2009. Explaining agricultural collapse: macro-forces, micro-crises and the emergence of land use vulnerability in southern Romania. Glob Environ Change 19:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fraser EDG, Mabee W, Figge F. 2005. A framework for assessing the vulnerability of food systems to future shocks. Futures 37:465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garcia JH, Garmestani AS, Karunanithi AT. 2011. Threshold transitions in a regional urban system. J Econ Behav Organ 78:152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garmestani AS, Benson MH. 2013. A framework for resilience-based governance of social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(1):9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art9/.Google Scholar
  40. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Bessey KM. 2005. Time series analysis of clusters in city size distributions. Urban Stud 42:1507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Mittelstaedt JD, Stow CA, Ward WA. 2006. Firm size diversity, functional richness and resilience. Environ Dev Econ 11:533–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gallagher CM, Mittelstaedt JD. 2007. Departures from Gibrat’s law, discontinuities and city size distributions. Urban Stud 44:1997–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gallagher CM. 2008. Power laws, discontinuities and regional city size distributions. J Econ Behav Organ 68:209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Cabezas H. 2009a. Panarchy, adaptive management and governance: policy options for building resilience. Neb Law Rev 87:1036–54.Google Scholar
  45. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gunderson L. 2009b. Panarchy: discontinuities reveal similarities in the dynamic system structure of ecological and social systems. Ecol Soc 14 (1):15. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art15/.
  46. Gotts NM. 2007. Resilience, panarchy, and world-systems analysis. Ecol Soc 12(1):24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art24/.Google Scholar
  47. Groffman P, Baron J, Blett T, Gold A, Goodman I, Gunderson L, Levinson B, Palmer M, Paerl H, Peterson G, Rejeski D, Reynolds J, Turner M, Weathers K, Wiens J. 2006. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gunderson L. 2010. Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecol Soc 15(2):18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art18/.Google Scholar
  49. Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Eds. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  50. Gunderson LH, Light SS, Holling CS, Eds. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Gunderson L, Allen CR, Wardwell D. 2007. Temporal scaling in complex systems: resonant frequencies and biotic variability. In: Bissonette JA, Storch I, Eds. Temporal dimensions in landscape ecology: wildlife responses to variable resources. New York: Springer. p. 78–89.Google Scholar
  52. Havlicek T, Carpenter SR. 2001. Pelagic size distributions in lakes: are they discontinuous? Limnol Oceanogr 46:1021–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holling CS. 1986. Resilience of ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE, Eds. Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 292–317.Google Scholar
  54. Holling CS. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holling CS, Gunderson LH, Peterson GD. 2002. Sustainability and panarchies. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Eds. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press. p. 63–102.Google Scholar
  56. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Karkkainen BC. 2005. Panarchy and adaptive change: around the loop and back again. Minn J Law Sci Technol 7:59–77.Google Scholar
  58. Karunanithi AT, Cabezas H, Frieden R, Pawlowski C. 2008. Detection and assessment of ecosystem regime shifts from Fisher information. Ecol Soc 13(1):22. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art22/.Google Scholar
  59. Kueker GD, Hall TD. 2011. Resilience and community in the age of world-system collapse. Nat Cult 6:18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leaper R, Raffaelli D, Emes C, Manly B. 2001. Constraints on body-size distributions: an experimental test of the habitat architecture hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 70:248–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leuteritz TEJ, Ekbia HR. 2008. Not all roads lead to resilience: a complex systems approach to the comparative analysis of tortoises in arid ecosystems. Ecol Soc 13(1):1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art1/.
  62. Ludwig D, Jones D, Holling CS. 1978. Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: the spruce budworm and forest. J Anim Ecol 47:315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mhango J, Dick J. 2011. Analysis of fertilizer subsidy programs and ecosystem services in Malawi. Renew Agric Food Syst 26:200–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moen J, Keskitalo ECH. 2010. Interlocking panarchies in multi-use boreal forests in Sweden. Ecol Soc 15(3):17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art17/.Google Scholar
  65. Nash KL, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Bellwood DR. 2013. Cross-scale habitat structure drives fish body size distributions on coral reefs. Ecosystems 16:478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nash KL, Allen CR, Angeler DG, Barichievy C, Eason T, Garmestani AS, Graham NAJ, Granholm D, Knutson M, Nelson RJ, Nyström M, Stow CA, Sundstrom SM. 2014. Discontinuites, cross-scale patterns and the organization of ecosystems. Ecology. doi: 10.1890/13-1315.1.
  67. Nyström M, Folke C. 2001. Spatial resilience of coral reefs. Ecosystems 4:406–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Wade JB, Allen TFH. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. O’Neill RV, Johnson AR, King AW. 1989. A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landsc Ecol 3:193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Odum HT. 1983. Systems ecology: an introduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Peterson GD. 2002. Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6(1):17. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17/.Google Scholar
  72. Peterson GD, Allen CR, Holling CS. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N. 2010. Multi-scale vulnerability of natural capital in a panarchy of social–ecological landscapes. Ecol Complex 7:359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Restrepo C, LM Renjifo, Marples P. 1997. Frugivorous birds in fragmented neotropical montane forests: landscape pattern and body mass distribution. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO, Eds. Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 171–89.Google Scholar
  75. Ruhl JB. 2012. Panarchy and the law. Ecol Soc 17(3):31. doi: 10.5751/ES-05109-170331.Google Scholar
  76. SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user’s guide: statistics. Version 5. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  77. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G. 2009. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skillen JJ, Maurer BA. 2008. The ecological significance of discontinuities in body mass distributions. In: Allen CR, Holling CS, editors. Discontinuities in ecosystems and other complex systems. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 193–218.Google Scholar
  79. Sommer UZ, Gliwicz M, Lampert W, Duncan A. 1986. PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in freshwaters. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 106:433–71.Google Scholar
  80. Sundstrom SM, Allen CR, Barichievy C. 2012. Species, functional groups, and thresholds in ecological resilience. Conserv Biol 26:305–314.Google Scholar
  81. Szabó P, Meszéna G. 2006. Spatial ecological hierarchies: coexistence on heterogeneous landscapes via scale niche diversification. Ecosystems 9:1009–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Apeldoorn DF, Kok K, Sonneveld MPW, Veldkamp TA. 2011. Panarchy rules: rethinking resilience of agroecosystems, evidence from Dutch dairy-farming. Ecol Soc 16(1):39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art39/.Google Scholar
  83. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.Google Scholar
  84. Wardwell D, Allen CR. 2009. Variability in population abundance is associated with thresholds between scaling regimes. Ecol Soc 14(2):42. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art42/.Google Scholar
  85. Wardwell DA, Allen CR, Peterson GD, Tyre AJ. 2008. A test of the cross-scale resilience model: functional richness in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Ecol Complex 5:165–182.Google Scholar
  86. Warner K. 2011. Environmental change and migration: methodological considerations from ground-breaking global survey. Popul Environ 33:3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Hans Riitters K. 2008. Source/sink patterns of disturbance and cross-scale mismatches in a panarchy of social–ecological landscapes. Ecol Soc 13(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art26/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig R. Allen
    • 1
    Email author
  • David G. Angeler
    • 2
  • Ahjond S. Garmestani
    • 3
  • Lance H. Gunderson
    • 4
  • C. S. Holling
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey, Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research UnitUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Aquatic Sciences and AssessmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.National Risk Management Research LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental StudiesEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Resilience CenterNanaimoCanada

Personalised recommendations