, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 894–908

Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps

  • Matthew G. E. Mitchell
  • Elena M. Bennett
  • Andrew Gonzalez

DOI: 10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2

Cite this article as:
Mitchell, M.G.E., Bennett, E.M. & Gonzalez, A. Ecosystems (2013) 16: 894. doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2


Human activities are rapidly changing ecosystems, landscapes and ecosystem service provision, yet there remain significant gaps in our understanding of the spatial ecology of ecosystem services. These gaps hinder our ability to manage landscapes effectively for multiple ecosystem services. In particular, we do not fully understand how changes in landscape connectivity affect ecosystem service provision, despite theory suggesting that connectivity is important. Here, we perform a semi-quantitative review of the literature that investigates how landscape connectivity affects the provision of specific ecosystem services. The vast majority of studies, including reviews, models, and field studies, suggest that decreased connectivity will have negative effects on ecosystem service provision. However, only 15 studies provided empirical evidence of these effects. Average effect sizes from these 15 studies suggest negative effects of connectivity loss on pollination and pest regulation. We identify a number of significant gaps in the connectivity-ecosystem services literature, including: a lack of multiple service studies, which precludes identification of trade-offs between services as connectivity changes; few studies that directly measure organism movement and its effects on ecosystem services; and few empirical studies that investigate the importance of abiotic flows on service provision. We propose that future research should aim to understand how different aspects of connectivity affect ecosystem service provision; which services are most influenced by connectivity; and how connectivity influences how humans access and benefit from ecosystem services. Studies that answer these questions will advance our understanding of connectivity-ecosystem service provision relationships and allow for better ecosystem and landscape management and restoration.

Key words

biodiversity connectivity ecosystem management ecosystem services fragmentation landscape dispersal 

Supplementary material

10021_2013_9647_MOESM1_ESM.docx (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew G. E. Mitchell
    • 1
  • Elena M. Bennett
    • 2
  • Andrew Gonzalez
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Sciences and School of EnvironmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations