, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 590–603 | Cite as

Nitrogen Uptake by Trees and Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Successional Northern Temperate Forest: Insights from Multiple Isotopic Methods

  • Lucas E. Nave
  • Knute J. Nadelhoffer
  • James M. Le Moine
  • Linda T. A. van Diepen
  • Jules K. Cooch
  • Nicholas J. Van Dyke


Forest succession may cause changes in nitrogen (N) availability, vegetation and fungal community composition that affect N uptake by trees and their mycorrhizal symbionts. Understanding how these changes affect the functioning of the mycorrhizal symbiosis is of interest to ecosystem ecology because of the fundamental roles mycorrhizae play in providing nutrition to trees and structuring forest ecosystems. We investigated changes in tree and mycorrhizal fungal community composition, the availability and uptake of N by trees and mycorrhizal fungi in a forest undergoing a successional transition (age-related loss of early successional tree taxa). In this system, 82–96% of mycorrhizal hyphae were ectomycorrhizal (EM). As biomass production of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees increased, AM hyphae comprised a significantly greater proportion of total fungal hyphae, and the EM contribution to the N requirement of EM-associated tree taxa declined from greater than 75% to less than 60%. Increasing N availability was associated with lower EM hyphal foraging and 15N tracer uptake, yet the EM-associated later-successional species Quercus rubra was nonetheless a stronger competitor for 15N than AM-associated Acer rubrum, likely due to the more extensive nature of the persistent EM hyphal network. These results indicate that successional increases in N availability and co-dominance by AM-associated trees have increased the importance of AM fungi in the mycorrhizal community, while down-regulating EM N acquisition and transfer processes. This work advances understanding of linkages between tree and fungal community composition, and indicates that successional changes in N availability may affect competition between tree taxa with divergent resource acquisition strategies.

Key words

mycorrhiza hyphae canopy 15tree competition 



This research is supported by awards from the National Science Foundation (DEB-0911461) and U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FC02-06ER64158). The authors thank R. M. Miller for assistance with hyphal ingrowth methodology, and the following individuals for assistance with fieldwork, sample preparation, and analysis: A. Bajcz, A. Baldick, C. Bogdan, A. Brenske, A. DeGabriele, A. Do, Z. Fortier, A. Gold, M. Grant, J. Halick, S. Liao, K. McClure, J. Pollack, K. Sparks, S. Sheperd, F. Soper, C. Vogel, S. Webster, B. Weiler, S. Yassine, and Z. Zeneberg. Lastly, the authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful feedback that improved this paper from its manuscript form.


  1. Agerer R. 2001. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae—a proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological importance. Mycorrhiza 11:107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bidartondo MI, Ek H, Wallander H, Soderstrom B. 2001. Do nutrient additions alter carbon sink strength of ectomycorrhizal fungi? New Phytol 151:543–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohlen PJ, Groffman PM, Fahey TJ, Fisk MC, Suarez E, Pelletier DM, Fahey RT. 2004. Ecosystem consequences of exotic earthworm invasion of north temperate forests. Ecosystems 7:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brzostek ER, Finzi AC. 2011. Substrate supply, fine roots, and temperature control proteolytic enzyme activity in temperate forest soils. Ecology 92:892–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns RM, Honkala BH. 1990. Silvics of North America. In: Forest service agriculture handbook, vol 654. Washington, DC: U.S.D.A.Google Scholar
  6. Courty PE, Buee M, Diedhiou AG, Frey-Klett P, Le Tacon F, Rineau F, Turpault MP, Uroz S, Garbaye J. 2010. The role of ectomycorrhizal communities in forest ecosystem processes: new perspectives and emerging concepts. Soil Biol Biochem 42:679–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox F, Barsoum N, Lilleskov EA, Bidartondo MI. 2010. Nitrogen availability is a primary determinant of conifer mycorrhizas across complex environmental gradients. Ecol Lett 13:1103–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crumsey J. Exotic earthworm biodiversity across north temperate forest leaf litter gradients: Impacts on soil carbon dynamics. Ecol Appl, in preparation.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrari JB. 1999. Fine-scale patterns of leaf litterfall and nitrogen cycling in an old-growth forest. Can J For Res 29:291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis R, Read DJ. 1994. The contributions of mycorrhizal fungi to the determination of plant community structure. Plant Soil 159:11–25.Google Scholar
  11. Gallet-Budynek A, Brzostek E, Rodgers VL, Talbot JM, Hyzy S, Finzi AC. 2009. Intact amino acid uptake by northern hardwood and conifer trees. Oecologia 160:129–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gough CM, Vogel CS, Hardiman B, Curtis PS. 2010. Wood net primary production resilience in an unmanaged forest transitioning from early to middle succession. For Ecol Manage 260:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendricks JJ, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD. 1997. An N-15 tracer technique for assessing fine root production and mortality. Oecologia 112:300–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbie JE, Hobbie EA. 2006. N-15 in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in Arctic tundra. Ecology 87:816–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbie EA, Macko SA, Williams M. 2000. Correlations between foliar delta N-15 and nitrogen concentrations may indicate plant-mycorrhizal interactions. Oecologia 122:273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, Karolewski P. 2006. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87:2288–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson NC, Zak DR, Tilman D, Pfleger FL. 1991. Dynamics of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae during old field succession. Oecologia 86:349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kranabetter JM, Friesen J, Gamiet S, Kroeger P. 2005. Ectomycorrhizal mushroom distribution by stand age in western hemlock–lodgepole pine forests of northwestern British Columbia. Can J For Res 35:1527–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kranabetter JM, Durall DM, MacKenzie WH. 2009. Diversity and species distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi along productivity gradients of a southern boreal forest. Mycorrhiza 19:99–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Langley JA, Hungate BA. 2003. Mycorrhizal controls on belowground litter quality. Ecology 84:2302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, He L, An L, Helgason T, Feng H. 2009. Arbuscular mycorrhizal dynamics in a chronosequence of Caragana korshinskii plantations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:81–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. 1990. A new method which gives an objective-measure of colonization of roots by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115:495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadelhoffer KJ, Shaver G, Fry B, Giblin A, Johnson L, McKane R. 1996. N-15 natural abundances and N use by tundra plants. Oecologia 107:386–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nadelhoffer KJ, Downs MR, Fry B. 1999. Sinks for N-15-enriched additions to an oak forest and a red pine plantation. Ecol Appl 9:72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nave LE, Vogel CS, Gough CM, Curtis PS. 2009. The contribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to net primary productivity in a northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 39:1108–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nave LE, Gough CM, Maurer KD, Bohrer G, Hardiman BS, Le Moine J, Munoz AB, Nadelhoffer KJ, Sparks JP, Strahm BD, Vogel CS, Curtis PS. 2011. Disturbance and the resilience of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in a north temperate forest. J Geophys Res 116:G04016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nave LE, Sparks JP, Le Moine J, Hardiman BS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Strahm BD, Curtis PS. Soil inorganic nitrogen cycling during successional change in a northern temperate forest. Biogeochemistry, in preparation.Google Scholar
  28. Nave LE, Le Moine J, Nadelhoffer KJ, Crumsey J, Vogel, CS. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen pools during mortality of early-successional hardwoods. Soil Sci Soc Am J, in preparation.Google Scholar
  29. Perala DA, Alban D. 1993. Allometric biomass estimators for aspen-dominated ecosystems in the upper Great Lakes. USDA-Forest Service RP-NC-314.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips RP, Fahey TJ. 2006. Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects. Ecology 87:1302–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips RP, Fahey TJ. 2008. The influence of soil fertility on rhizosphere effects in northern hardwood forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piotrowski JS, Lekberg Y, Harner MJ, Ramsey PW, Rillig MC. 2008. Dynamics of mycorrhizae during development of riparian forests along an unregulated river. Ecography 31:245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Read DJ. 1991. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 47:376–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rillig MC. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 7:740–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith SE, Read DJ. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stephan K, Kavanagh KL. 2009. Suitability of the diffusion method for natural abundance nitrogen-15 analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Treseder KK. 2004. A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol 164:347–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Treseder KK, Mack MC, Cross A. 2004. Relationships among fires, fungi, and soil dynamics in Alaskan Boreal Forests. Ecol Appl 14:1826–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Diepen LTA, Lilleskov EA, Pregitzer KS, Miller RM. 2007. Decline of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in northern hardwood forests exposed to chronic nitrogen additions. New Phytol 176:175–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Diepen LTA, Lilleskov EA, Pregitzer KS, Miller RM. 2010. Simulated nitrogen deposition causes a decline of intra- and extraradical abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and changes in microbial community structure in northern hardwood forests. Ecosystems 13:683–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Visser S. 1995. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in Jack Pine stands following wildfire. New Phytol 129:389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW. 1991. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea—how can it occur. Biogeochemistry 13:87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallander H. 1995. A new hypothesis to explain allocation of dry-matter between mycorrhizal fungi and pine-seedlings in relation to nutrient supply. Plant Soil 168:243–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wallander H, Nilsson LO, Hagerberg D, Baath E. 2001. Estimation of the biomass and seasonal growth of external mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the field. New Phytol 151:753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallander H, Goransson H, Rosengren U. 2004. Production, standing biomass and natural abundance of N-15 and C-13 in ectomycorrhizal mycelia collected at different soil depths in two forest types. Oecologia 139:89–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallander H, Johansson U, Sterkenburg E, Durling MB, Lindahl BD. 2010. Production of ectomycorrhizal mycelium peaks during canopy closure in Norway spruce forests. New Phytol 187:1124–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zogg GP, Zak DR, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS. 1996. Fine root respiration in northern hardwood forests in relation to temperature and nitrogen availability. Tree Physiol 16:719–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas E. Nave
    • 1
    • 2
  • Knute J. Nadelhoffer
    • 1
    • 2
  • James M. Le Moine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Linda T. A. van Diepen
    • 3
  • Jules K. Cooch
    • 1
  • Nicholas J. Van Dyke
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Michigan Biological StationPellstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations