The Role of Eelgrass in Marine Community Interactions and Ecosystem Services: Results from Ecosystem-Scale Food Web Models
- 1.4k Downloads
Eelgrass beds provide valuable refuge, foraging, and spawning habitat for many marine species, including valued species such as Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi), and Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister). We used dynamic simulations in a food web model of central Puget Sound, Washington, USA developed in the Ecopath with Ecosim software, to examine how the marine community may respond to changes in coverage of native eelgrass (Zostera marina), and how these modeled responses can be assessed using an ecosystem services framework, expressing these services with economic currencies in some cases and biological proxies in others. Increased eelgrass coverage was most associated with increases in commercial and recreational fishing with some small decreases in one non-market activity, bird watching. When we considered ecosystem service categories that are aggregations of individual groups of species, we saw little evidence of strong tradeoffs among marine resources; that is, increasing eelgrass coverage was essentially either positive or neutral for all services we examined, although we did not examine terrestrial activities (for example, land use) that affect eelgrass coverage. Within particular service categories, however, we found cases where the responses to changes in eelgrass of individual groups of species that provide the same type of ecosystem service differed both in the magnitude and in the direction of change. This emphasizes the care that should be taken in combining multiple examples of a particular type of ecosystem service into an aggregate measure of that service.
Keywordsecosystem services habitat restoration eelgrass restoration ecosystem models food webs economics
- Anielski M, Wilson S. 2009. Counting Canada’s natural capital: assessing the real value of Canada’s boreal ecosystems. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Boreal Initiative and Pembina Institute. p 78.Google Scholar
- Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012. Endangered and threatened wildlife. Title 50, Pt. 17.11, 2012 ed.Google Scholar
- Essington T, Klinger T, Conway-Cranos T, Buchanan J, James A, Kershner J, Logan I, West J. 2012. The biophysical condition of Puget Sound: biology. Puget Sound Partnership, Tacoma, Washington. http://www.eopugetsound.org/science-review/biophysical-condition-puget-sound-biology. Accessed 8 August 2012.
- Foley M, Halpern B, Micheli F, Armsby M, Caldwell M, Crain C, Prahler E, Rohr N, Sivas D, Beck M, Carr M, Crowder L, Duffy JE, Hacker S, McLeod K, Peterson C, Regan H, Ruckelshaus M, Sandifer P, Steneck R. 2010. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 5:955–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freeman AMIII. 2003. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. p 491p.Google Scholar
- Fresh KL. 2006. Juvenile Pacific salmon in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2006-06. US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. 28 pp.Google Scholar
- Gaeckle, JL, Dowty P, Berry H, Ferrier L. 2009. Puget Sound Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Project: 2008 Monitoring Report, Nearshore Habitat Program. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. 63 pp.Google Scholar
- Guerry A, Plummer M, Ruckelshaus M, Harvey C. 2011. Ecosystem service assessments for marine conservation. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Daily G, Polasky S, Eds. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus MH, Arkema KK, Bernhardt JR, Guannel G, Kim CK, Marsik M, Papenfus M, Toft JE, Verutes G, Wood SA, Beck M, Chan F, Chan KMA, Gelfenbaum G, Gold BD, Halpern BS, Labiosa WB, Lester SE, Levin PS, McField M, Pinsky ML, Plummer M, Polasky S, Ruggiero P, Sutherland DA, Tallis H, Day A, Spencer J. 2012. Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8:107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gustafson RG, Lenarz WH, McCain BB, Schmitt CC, Grant WS, Builder TL, Methot RD. 2000. Status review of Pacific hake, Pacific cod, and walleye pollock from Puget Sound. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-44, Seattle, Washington. 275 pp.Google Scholar
- Harvey CJ, Bartz KK, Davies J, Francis TB, Good TP, Guerry AD, Hanson B, Holsman KK, Miller J, Plummer ML, Reum JCP, Rhodes LD, Rice CA, Samhouri JF, Williams GD, Yoder N, Levin PS, Ruckelshaus MH. 2010. A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-106, Seattle, Washington. 180 pp.Google Scholar
- Lian CE. 2012. West Coast open access groundfish and salmon troller survey: Protocol and results for 2005 and 2006. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-116, Seattle, Washington. 52 pp.Google Scholar
- McConnell KE, Bockstael NE. 2005. Valuing the environment as a factor of production. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent JR, Eds. Handbook of environmental economics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 621–69.Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. 68 pp.Google Scholar
- Mumford TF. 2007. Kelp and eelgrass in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2007-05. US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. 34 pp.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). 2004. Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision making. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 278 pp.Google Scholar
- Penttila D. 2007. Marine forage fishes in Puget Sound. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report 2007-03. US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, Washington. 23 pp.Google Scholar
- Peterson C, Lubchenco J. 1997. Marine ecosystem services. In: Daily G, Ed. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. p 177–94.Google Scholar
- Pew Oceans Commission. 2003. America’s living oceans: charting a course for sea change. Arlington (VA): Pew Oceans Commission. 40 pp.Google Scholar
- Plagányi ÉE. 2007. Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 477. Rome: U.N. Fisheries and Agriculture Organization. 108 pp.Google Scholar
- Postel S, Carpenter S. 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily G, Ed. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. p 195–214.Google Scholar
- Puget Sound Partnership (PSP). 2008. Puget Sound Action Agenda: protecting and restoring the Puget Sound ecosystem by 2020. Olympia, WA: Puget Sound Partnership. 197 pp.Google Scholar
- Puget Sound Partnership (PSP). 2010. Performance Management, Action Item 1: Recovery Targets for Eelgrass. Puget Sound Partnership, Olympia, Washington. http://www.psp.wa.gov/downloads/LC2011/021711/03B_1511Performance_management_Target_Setting-eelgrass.pdf. Accessed 21 August 2012.
- Puget Sound Partnership (PSP). 2011. Puget Sound ecosystem recovery targets. http://www.psp.wa.gov/action_agenda_2011_recovery_targets.php. Accessed 26 July 2011.
- Ruckelshaus MH, McClure MM. 2007. Sound science: synthesizing ecological and socioeconomic information about the Puget Sound ecosystem. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington. 93 pp.Google Scholar
- Shvidenko A, Barber C, Persson R, Gonzales P, Hassoa R, Lakyda P, McCallum I, Milsson S, Pulhin J, van Rosenburg B, Scholes B. 2005. Forest and woodland systems. Chapter 21, millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp 585–621.Google Scholar
- Vörösmarty C, Leveque C, Revenga C, Bos R, Caudill C, Chilton J, Douglas E, Meybeck M, Prager D, Balvanera P, Barker S, Maas M, Nilsson C, Oki T, Reidy C. 2005. Freshwater ecosystem services. Chapter 7, millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp 213–55.Google Scholar
- Washington Birder. 2011. Birds in Washington State: a county comparison. http://www.wabirder.com/docs/biws_1211.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2012.