, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 411–415 | Cite as

Dryland Riparian Ecosystems in the American Southwest: Sensitivity and Resilience to Climatic Extremes

  • J. C. StrombergEmail author
  • K. E. McCluney
  • M. D. Dixon
  • T. Meixner


Drylands make up over 40% of the earth’s land surface (Noy-Meir 1973; Reynolds and others 2007). In these arid and semiarid landscapes, surface and subsurface water flows create mesic riparian environments (Kingsford 2006; Stromberg and Tellman 2009). Dryland riparian areas sustain water-limited plants and animals that cannot withstand upland conditions year-round, thereby supporting regional diversity (Sabo and others 2005; Lite and others 2005). Dryland rivers are also characterized by occasional large, high-intensity floods that rework the bed geomorphology and increase riparian heterogeneity. This combined variation in water availability and flood disturbance creates spatiotemporally complex and unique landscapes (Soykan and Sabo 2009; Soykan and others 2012).

The hydrology of desert riparian ecosystems has been extensively altered by human activities including stream diversion and groundwater extraction, and is expected to undergo further change in response to...


Riparian Zone Riparian Plant Riparian Ecosystem Behavioral Coping Riparian Plant Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baillie MN, Hogan JF, Ekwurzel B, Wahi AK, Eastoe CJ. 2007. Quantifying water sources to a semiarid riparian ecosystem, San Pedro River, Arizona. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, G03S02. doi: 10.1029/2006JG000263.
  2. Boudell JA, Stromberg JC. 2008. Propagule banks: potential contribution to restoration of an impounded and dewatered riparian ecosystem. Wetlands 28:656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand LA, Stromberg JC, Goodrich DC, Dixon MD, Lansey K, Kang D, Brookshire DS, Cerasale DJ. 2011. Projecting avian response to linked change in groundwater and riparian floodplain vegetation along a dryland river: a scenario analysis. Ecohydrology 4:130–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand LA, Stromberg JC, Noon BR. 2010. Avian density and nest survival on the San Pedro River: importance of vegetation type and hydrologic regime. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:739–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dominguez F, Rivera E, Lettenmaier DP, Castro CL. 2012. Changes in winter precipitation extremes for the western United States under a warmer climate as simulated by regional climate models. Geophysical Research Letters 39:L05803. doi: 10.1029/2011GL050762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedman JM, Lee VJ. 2002. Extreme floods, channel change, and riparian forests along ephemeral streams. Ecological Monographs 72:409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfin G, Lenart M. 2007. Climate change effects on Southwest water resources. Southwest Hydrology 6(16–17):34.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood MJ, McIntosh AR. 2010. Low river flow alters the biomass and population structure of a riparian predatory invertebrate. Freshwater Biology 55:2062–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirschboeck KK. 2009. Flood flows of the San Pedro River. In: Stromberg JC, Tellman B, Eds. Ecology and conservation of the San Pedro River. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp 300–12.Google Scholar
  10. Huntington TG. 2006. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 319:83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC. 2007. IPCC fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 (AR4). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jobbágy EG, Nosetto MD, Villagra PE, Jackson RB. 2011. Water subsidies from mountains to deserts: their role in sustaining groundwater-fed oases in a sandy landscape. Ecological Applications 21:678–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz G, Denslow MW, Stromberg JC. 2012. The Goldilocks effect: intermittent streams sustain more plant species than those with perennial or ephemeral flow. Freshwater Biology 57:467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kingsford R, Ed. 2006. Ecology of desert rivers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lite SJ, Bagstad KJ, Stromberg JC. 2005. Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 63:785–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lytle DA, Merritt DM. 2004. Hydrologic regimes and riparian forests: a structured population model for cottonwood. Ecology 85:2493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCluney KE, Sabo JL. 2009. Water availability directly determines per capita consumption at two trophic levels. Ecology 90:1463–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCluney KE, Sabo JL. 2012. River drying lowers the diversity and alters the composition of an assemblage of desert riparian arthropods. Freshwater Biology 57:91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller MS, Wilson KR, Andersen DC. 2003. Ord’s kangaroo rats living in floodplain habitats: factors contributing to habitat attraction. Southwestern Naturalist 48:411–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ. 2008. Stationarity is dead: whither water management. Science 319:573–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakano S, Murakami M. 2001. Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:166–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM. 2010. The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biological Reviews 85:837–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Noy-Meir I. 1973. Desert ecosystems. I. Environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer MA, Lettenmaier DP, Poff NL, Postel SL, Richter B, Warner R. 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environmental Management 44:1053–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patten DT. 1998. Riparian ecosystems of semi-arid North America: diversity and human impacts. Wetlands 18:498–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reynolds JF, Smith DM, Lambin EF, Turner BL, Mortimore M, Batterbury SP, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernandez RJ, Herrick JE, Huber-Sannwald E, Jiang H, Leemans R, Lynam T, Maestre FT, Ayarza M, Walker B. 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sabo JL, McCluney KE, Keller AC, Marusenko YY, Soykan CU. 2008. Greenfall links groundwater to aboveground food webs in desert river floodplains. Ecological Monographs 78:615–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sabo JL, Sponseller R, Dixon M, Gade K, Harms T, Heffernan J, Jani A, Katz G, Soykan C, Watts J, Welter A. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology 86:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seager R, Ting MF, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau NC, Li CH, Velez J, Naik N. 2007. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson SC, Meixner T. 2012. The influence of local hydrogeologic forcings on near-stream event water recharge and retention (Upper San Pedro River, Arizona). Hydrological Processes (online early-view publication).Google Scholar
  31. Skagen SK, Melcher CP, Howe WH, Knopf FL. 1998. Comparative use of riparian corridors and oases by migrating birds in southeast Arizona. Conservation Biology 12:896–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sogge M, Sferra S, Paxton E. 2008. Saltcedar as habitat for birds: implications to riparian restoration in the southwestern United States. Restoration Ecology 16:146–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soykan CU, Sabo JL. 2009. Spatiotemporal food web dynamics along a desert riparian/upland transition. Ecography 32:354–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soykan CU, Brand LA, Ries L, Stromberg JC, Hass C, Simmons DA, Patterson WJD, Sabo JL. 2012. Multitaxonomic diversity patterns along a desert riparian–upland gradient. PLoS ONE 7:e28235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stromberg JC, Lite SJ, Dixon MD. 2010. Effects of stream flow patterns on riparian vegetation of a semiarid river: implications for a changing climate. River Research and Applications 26:712–29.Google Scholar
  36. Stromberg JC, Chew MK, Nagler PL, Glenn EP. 2009. Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restoration Ecology 17:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stromberg JC, Tellman B. 2009. Ecology and conservation of the San Pedro River. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stromberg JC, Beauchamp VB, Dixon MD, Lite SJ, Paradzick C. 2007. Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid southwestern United States. Freshwater Biology 52:651–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner RM, Webb RH, Bowers JE, Hastings JR. 2003. The changing mile revisited. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. p 334.Google Scholar
  40. White J, Stromberg JC. 2009. Resilience, restoration, and riparian ecosystems: case study of a dryland, urban river. Restoration Ecology 17:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valeix M, Fritz H, Matsika R, Matsvimbo F, Madzikanda H. 2008. The role of water abundance, thermoregulation, perceived predation risk and interference competition in water access by African herbivores. African Journal of Ecology 46:402–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Stromberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. E. McCluney
    • 1
  • M. D. Dixon
    • 2
  • T. Meixner
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  3. 3.Department of Hydrology and Water ResourcesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations