, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 1363–1379 | Cite as

Predicting Ecosystem Wide Impacts of Wallaby Management Using a Fuzzy Cognitive Map

  • Nick DexterEmail author
  • David S. L. Ramsey
  • Christopher MacGregor
  • David Lindenmayer


At Booderee National Park, south-eastern Australia, the intensive control of the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) resulted in a major increase in the abundance of a browsing macropod, the swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor). This has led to a major decrease in the abundance and biomass of a range of palatable plant species. Fox control has also started a trophic cascade that has resulted in a decline in the abundance of the greater glider (Petauroides volans) a folivorous arboreal marsupial, mediated either through increased predation by owls or increased competition with common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). We identified five potential scenarios for managing the effects of over-abundant swamp wallabies on the ecosystem as a whole. These were (1) the present scenario of continued intensive fox control and four possible scenarios to redress the problem: (2) ceasing fox control; (3) intensive fox control and intensive wallaby control; (4) introducing dingoes and ceasing fox control; and (5) introducing dingoes and maintaining fox control. We used an ecosystem modelling approach based on a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) to predict relative estimates of abundance for each scenario for a wide range of taxa in the Booderee National Park ecosystem likely to be affected by each scenario. We addressed uncertainty in our knowledge of the interactions between species by creating alternative models of the system by removing one or more of the uncertain links between species and varying the strength of the remaining interactions in the FCM and aggregated predictions from 100,000 models to estimate the effect of uncertainty on the predictions from our FCM model. In comparison with the current scenario of intensive fox control, scenario 3 had the greatest likelihood of improving the status of palatable plants. Scenarios 2 and 4 reduced the abundance of a range of medium-sized mammals but improved the status of greater gliders, whereas the predicted effects of scenario 5 were uncertain. The FCM modelling approach developed here provided a valuable tool for managers to learn about the potential ecosystem wide effects of management actions while incorporating the likely effects of uncertain knowledge on system outcomes.


over-abundant herbivores macropod control fuzzy sets ecosystem model browsers Wallabia fox control dingo reintroduction 



We thank Parks Australia for funding this study. Comments from Judy West, Louise Oliver and two anonymous referees improved this study.

Supplementary material

10021_2012_9590_MOESM1_ESM.doc (98 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 97 kb)


  1. Allombert S, Stockton S, Martin J-L. 2005. Natural experiment on the impact of over-abundant deer on forest invertebrates. Conserv Biol 19:1917–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EM. 2007. Changes in bird communities and willow habitats associated with fed Elk. The Wilson J Ornithol 119:400–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balfour D, Dublin HT, Fennessy J, Gibson D, Niskanen L, Whyte IJ. 2007. Review of options for managing the impacts of locally over-abundant African elephants. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  4. Bergstrom DM, Lucieer A, Kiefer K, Wasley J, Belbin L, Pedersen TK, Chown SL. 2009. Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island. J Appl Ecol 46:73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caughley G. 1983. Dynamics of large mammals and their relevance to culling. In: Owen-Smith RN, Ed. Management of large mammals in African conservation areas. Pretoria: HAUM Publishers. p 115–26.Google Scholar
  6. Coulson G. 1998. Management of over-abundant macropods—are there conservation benefits? In: Austin A, Cowan P, Eds. Managing marsupial abundance for conservation benefits. issues in marsupial conservation and management. Occasional Papers of the Marsupial CRC No. 1, Sydney. pp 37–48.Google Scholar
  7. Courchamp F, Langlais M, Sugihara G. 1999. Cats protecting birds: modelling the mesopredator release effect. J Anim Ecol 66:282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dambacher JM, Ramos-Jiliberto R. 2007. Understanding and predicting effects of modified interactions through a qualitative analysis of community structure. Q Rev Biol 82:227–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dexter N, Meek P, Moore S, Hudson M, Richardson H. 2007. Population responses of small and medium sized mammals to fox control at Jervis Bay, south-eastern Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 13:283–92.Google Scholar
  10. Dexter N, Murray A. 2009. The impact of fox control on the relative abundance of forest mammals in East-Gippsland. Victoria Wildl Res 36:252–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dexter N, Hudson M, Carter T, MacGregor C. 2011. Habitat dependent population regulation in an irrupting population of long-nosed bandicoots (Perameles nasuta). Aust Ecol 36:745–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ford HA, Walters JR, Cooper CB, Debus SJS, Doerr VAJ. 2009. Extinction debt or habitat change?—ongoing losses of woodland birds in north-eastern New South Wales. Austral Biol Conserv 142:3182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank KT, Petrie B, Choi JS, Leggett WC. 2005. Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science 308:1621–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB. 2002. Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Glen AS, Dickman CR, Soulé ME, Mackey BG. 2007. Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator in Australian ecosystems. Austral Ecol 32:492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hebblewhite M, White CA, Nietvelt CG, McKenzie JA, Hurd TE, Fryxwell JM, Bayley SE, Paquet PC. 2005. Human activity mediates a trophic cascade caused by wolves. Ecology 86:2135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hobbs BF, Ludsin SA, Knight RL, Ryan PA, Biberhofer J, Ciborowski JJH. 2002. Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecol Appl 12:1548–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horsley SB, Stout SL, de Calesta DS. 2003. White-tailed deer impact on the vegetation dynamics of a northern hardwood forest. Ecol Appl 13:98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson CN, Van Der Wal J. 2009. Evidence that dingoes limit abundance of a mesopredator in eastern Australian forests. J Appl Ecol 46:641–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kavanagh RP. 1988. The impact of predation by the powerful owl Ninox strenua on a population of the greater glider Petauroides volans. Austral J Ecol 13:445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keith D, Pellow B. 2005. Effects of Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis) on native plant species in the Jibbon-Bundeena area, Royal National Park, New South Wales. Proc Linn Soc NSW 126:99–110.Google Scholar
  22. Kinnear JE, Onus ML, Sumner NR. 1998. Fox control and rock-wallaby population dynamics—II an update. Wildl Res 25:81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirby KJ. 2001. The impact of deer on the ground flora of British woodland. Forestry 74:219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kosko B. 1986. Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Letnic M, Koch F, Gordon C, Crowther MS, Dickman CR. 2009. Keystone effects of an alien top predator stem extinctions of native mammals. Proc R Soc B 276:3249–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Letnic M, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR. 2012. Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biol Rev 87:390–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00203.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Felton A, Montague-Drake R, Manning A, Simberloff D, Youngentob K, Saunders D, Blomberg S, Wilson D, Felton AM, Blackmore C, Lowe A, Bond S, Munro N, Elliott CP. 2007. The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research. Oikos 116:1220–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Welsh A, Donnelly C, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Cunningham RB, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill AM. 2008a. Contrasting mammal responses to vegetation type and fire. Wildl Res 35:395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, MacGregor C, Michael DR, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Muntz R, Driscoll DA. 2008b. How predictable are reptile responses to wildfire? Oikos 117:1086–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, MacGregor C, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Muntz R, Gill M. 2008c. Testing hypotheses associated with bird responses to wildfire. Ecol App 18:1967–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill M. 2009. What factors influence rapid post-fire site re-occupancy? A case study of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird in eastern Australia. Int J Wildland Fire 18:84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE, Franklin JF. 2010a. Rapid responses to facilitate ecological discoveries from major disturbances. Front Ecol Environ 8:527–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE, Krebs CJ, Hobbs RJ. 2010b. Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:21957–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, McBurney L, MacGregor C, Youngentob K, Banks SC. 2011. How to make a common species rare: a case against conservation complacency. Biol Conserv 144:1663–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindström ER, Andrén H, Angelstam P, Cederlund G, Hörnfeldt B, Jäderberg L, Lemnell P-A, Martinsson B, Sköld K, Swenson JE. 1994. Disease reveals the predator: sarcoptic mange, red fox predation, and prey populations. Ecology 75:1042–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maguire G, Stojanovic D, Weston MA. 2009. Conditioned taste aversion reduces fox depredation on model eggs on beaches. Wildl Res 36:702–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McLeod, S. 2010. Is kangaroo management justified and humane? What are the concerns and how can they be addressed. In: Proceedings of the RSPCA Australia Scientific Seminar Convergence or conflict: animal welfare in wildlife management and conservation.Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell BD, Banks PB. 2005. Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Austral Ecol 30:581–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montaño-Moctezuma G, Li HW, Rossignol PA. 2007. Alternative community structures in a kelp-urchin community: a qualitative modeling approach. Ecol Model 205:343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murdoch WW. 1969. Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol Monogr 39:335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nilsen EB, Milner-Gulland EJ, Schofield L, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Coulson T. 2007. Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Philos Trans R Soc B 274:995–1003.Google Scholar
  42. Pate J, Manfredo MJ, Bright AD, Tischbein G. 1996. Coloradans’ attitudes toward reintroducing the gray wolf into Colorado. Wildl Soc Bull 24:421–8.Google Scholar
  43. Pople AR, GriggGC Cairns SC, Beard LA, Alexander P. 2000. Trends in the numbers of red kangaroos and emus on either side of the South Australian dingo fence: evidence for predator regulation? Wildl Res 27:269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramsey D, Veltman C. 2005. Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: what can qualitative models offer? J Anim Ecol 74:905–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramsey R, Norbury G. 2009. Predicting the unexpected: using a qualitative model of a New Zealand dryland ecosystem to anticipate pest management outcomes. Austral Ecol 34:409–21.Google Scholar
  46. Raymond B, McInnes J, Dambacher JM, Way S, Bergstrom DM. 2011. Qualitative modelling of invasive species eradication on subantarctic Macquarie Island. J Appl Ecol 48:181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rayner MJ, Hauber ME, Imber MJ, Stamp RK, Clout MN. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity of mesopredator release within an oceanic island system. Proc R Soc Lond B 104:20862–5.Google Scholar
  48. Ripple WJ, Larsen EJ, Renkin RA, Smith DW. 2001. Trophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range. Biol Conserv 102:227–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts MW, Dexter N, Meek PD, Hudson M, Buttemer WA. 2006. Does baiting influence the relative composition of the diet of foxes? Wildl Res 33:481–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertshaw JD, Harden RH. 1986. The ecology of the dingo in north-eastern New SouthWales. IV. Prey selection by dingoes and its effect on the major prey species, the swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor (Desmarest). Aust Wildl Res 13:141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saunders GR, Gentle MN, Dickman CR. 2010. The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia. Mammal Rev 40:181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott LK, Hume ID, Dickman CR. 1999. Ecology and population biology of long-nosed bandicoots (Perameles nasuta) at North Head, Sydney Harbour National Park. Wildl Res 26:805–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez PV, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orihuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler GH, Lambert TD, Balbas L. 2001. Ecological meltdown in predator free forest fragments. Science 294:1924–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilman D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Monographs in Population Biology 17. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Waller DM, Alverson W. 1997. The White-Tailed Deer: a Keystone Herbivore. Wildl Soc Bull 25:217–26.Google Scholar
  56. Walters CJ. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  57. Wardle DA, Bardgett RD. 2004. Human-induced changes in large herbivorous mammal density: the consequences for decomposers. Front Ecol Environ 2:145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmermann HJ. 1996. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Dexter
    • 1
    Email author
  • David S. L. Ramsey
    • 2
  • Christopher MacGregor
    • 3
  • David Lindenmayer
    • 3
  1. 1.Booderee National ParkJervis Bay, Jervis Bay TerritoryAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Sustainability and EnvironmentArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental ResearchHeidelbergAustralia
  3. 3.Fenner School of Environment and Society, Environmental Research ProgramThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations