Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1065–1082 | Cite as

Carbon Accumulation Patterns During Post-Fire Succession in Cajander Larch (Larix cajanderi) Forests of Siberia

  • Heather D. AlexanderEmail author
  • Michelle C. Mack
  • Scott Goetz
  • Michael M. Loranty
  • Pieter S. A. Beck
  • Kamala Earl
  • Sergey Zimov
  • Sergey Davydov
  • Catharine C. Thompson
Article

Abstract

Increased fire activity within boreal forests could affect global terrestrial carbon (C) stocks by decreasing stand age or altering tree recruitment, leading to patterns of forest regrowth that differ from those of pre-fire stands. To improve our understanding of post-fire C accumulation patterns within boreal forests, we evaluated above- and belowground C pools within 17 Cajander larch (Larix cajanderi) stands of northeastern Siberia that varied in both years since fire and stand density. Early-successional stands (<20-year old) exhibited low larch recruitment, and consequently, low density, aboveground larch biomass, and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPPtree). Mid-successional stands (21- to 70-year old) were even-aged with considerable variability in stand density. High-density mid-successional stands had 21 times faster rates of ANPPtree than low-density stands (252 vs. 12 g C m−2 y−1) and 26 times more C in aboveground larch biomass (2,186 vs. 85 g C m−2). Density had little effect on total soil C pools. During late-succession (>70-year old), aboveground larch biomass, ANPPtree, and soil organic layer C pools increased with stand age. These stands were low density and multi-aged, containing both mature trees and new recruits. The rapid accumulation of aboveground larch biomass in high-density, mid-successional stands allowed them to obtain C stocks similar to those in much older low-density stands (~8,000 g C m−2). If fire frequency increases without altering stand density, landscape-level C storage could decline, but if larch density also increases, large aboveground C pools within high-density stands could compensate for a shorter successional cycle.

Keywords

larch Siberia carbon fire succession stand age density climate warming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our collaborators at the Northeast Science Station and members of the Polaris Project for their assistance with travel and research logistics. Special thanks to T. Kajimoto and colleagues for providing raw biomass data for larch trees sampled near Cherskii, which we used to develop our allometric equations. Funding for this research was provided by NASA Ecosystems and Carbon Cycle Grant NNX08AG13G, NOAA Global Carbon Cycle Grant NA080AR4310526, and an international supplement to NSF OPP Grant 0806271.

Supplementary material

10021_2012_9567_MOESM1_ESM.doc (169 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 169 kb)

References

  1. Abaimov AP. 2010. Geographical distribution and genetics of Siberian larch species. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests 209:41–58.Google Scholar
  2. Abaimov AP, Sofronov MA. 1996. The main trends of post-fire succession in near-tundra forests of central Siberia. In: Goldammer JG, Furyaev VV, Eds. Fire in ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 372–86.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander HD, Mack MC, Goetz S, Beck PSA, Belshe F. 2012. Implications of increased deciduous cover on stand structure and aboveground carbon pools of Alaskan boreal forests. Ecosphere 3(5):45. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00364.1.Google Scholar
  4. Amiro BD, Orchansky AL, Barr AG, Black TA, Chambers SD, Chapin FS, Gouldenf ML, Litvakg M, Liu HP, McCaughey JH, McMillan A, Randerson JT. 2006. The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance. Agric For Meteorol 140:41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amiro BD, Cantin A, Flannigan MD, Groot WJD. 2009. Future emissions from Canadian boreal forest fires. Can J For Res 39:383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck PSA, Goetz SJ, Mack MC, Alexander HD, Jin Y, Randerson JT, Loranty MM. 2011. The impacts and implications of an intensifying fire regime on Alaskan boreal forest composition and albedo. Glob Change Biol 17:2853–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang CK, Gower ST. 2004. Net primary production and net ecosystem production of a boreal black spruce wildfire chronosequence. Glob Change Biol 10:473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE, Gower ST. 2007. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature 450:89–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulanger Y, Sirois L. 2006. Postfire dynamics of black spruce coarse woody debris in northern boreal forest of Quebec. Can J For Res 36:1770–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Cherbakov IP. 1979. Forest fire in Yakutia and this influence to forest ecosystem, Nauka, Siberian division, Novosibirsk, Russia.Google Scholar
  12. Climate Reference Book of the USSR. 1966. Vol. 24, 397 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. Englund SR, O’Brien JJ, Clark DB. 2000. Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Can J For Res 30:1999–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flannigan MD, Logan KA, Amiro BD, Skinner WR, Stocks BJ. 2005. Future area burned in Canada. Clim Change 72:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster DR. 1985. Vegetation development following fire in Picea mariana (black spruce)—Pleurozium forests of south-eastern Labrador. Can J Ecol 73:517–34.Google Scholar
  16. Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Stocks BJ, Hirsch A, Gower ST, O’Neill KP, Kasischke ES. 2000. The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Glob Change Biol 6:174–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ito A. 2005. Modeling of carbon cycle and fire regime in an east Siberian larch forest. Ecol Model 187:121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnstone J. 2006. Response of boreal plant communities to variations in previous fire-free interval. Int J Wildland Fire 15:497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnstone JF, Kasischke ES. 2005. Stand-level effects of soil burn severity on post fire regeneration in a recently burned black spruce forest. Can J For Res 35:2151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnstone J, Chapin F. 2006. Effects of soil burn severity on post-fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems 9:14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnstone JF, Chapin FS, Hollingsworth TN, Mack MC, Romanovsky V, Turetsky M. 2010a. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. Can J For Res 40:1302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnstone JF, Hollingsworth TN, Chapin FS, Mack MC. 2010b. Changes in fire regime break the legacy lock on successional trajectories in Alaskan boreal forest. Glob Change Biol 16:1281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonasson S, Chapin FSIII, Shaver GR. 2001. Biogeochemistry in the Arctic: patterns, processes and controls. In: Schulze E-D, Heimann M, Harrison SP, Holland EA, Lloyd JJ, Prentice IC, Schimel D, Eds. Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. San Diego: Academic Press. p 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Sofronov MA, Volokitina AV, Mori S, Osawa A, Abaimov AP. 1999. Above- and belowground biomass and net primary productivity of a Larix gmelinii stand near Tura, central Siberia. Tree Physiol 19:815–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Osawa A, Abaimov AP, Zyryanova OA, Isaev AP, Yefremov DP, Mori S, Koike T. 2006. Size-mass allometry and biomass allocation of two larch species growing on the continuous permafrost region in Siberia. For Ecol Manage 222:314–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kajimoto T, Osawa A, Usoltsev VA, Abaimov AP. 2010. Biomass and productivity of Siberian larch forest ecosystems. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests 209:99–122.Google Scholar
  27. Kane ES, Kasischke ES, Valentine DW, Turetsky MR, McGuire AD. 2007. Topographic influences on wildfire consumption of soil organic carbon in interior Alaska: implications for black carbon accumulation. Journal of Geophysical Research—Biogeosciences 112:G03017. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kashian DM, Tinker DB, Turner MG, Scarpace FL. 2004. Spatial heterogeneity of lodgepole pine sapling densities following the 1988 fires in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. Can J For Res 34:2263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kashian DM, Romme WH, Tinker DB, Turner MG, Ryan MG. 2006. Carbon storage on landscapes with stand-replacing fires. Bioscience 56:598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kasischke ES. 2000. Boreal ecosystems in the global carbon cycle. In: Kasischke ES, Stocks BJ, Eds. Fire, climate change, and carbon cycling in the Boreal Forest, ecological studies. Berlin: Springer. p 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kasischke ES, Johnstone JF. 2005. Variation in postfire organic layer thickness in a blackspruce forest complex in interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 35:2164–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kasischke ES, Christensen NL, Stocks BJ. 1995. Fire, global warming, and the carbon balance of boreal forests. Ecol Appl 5:437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kasischke E, O’neill K, Bourgeau-Chavez L, French N. 2000. Indirect and long-term effects of fire on the Boreal forest carbon budget. In: Beniston M, Ed. Biomass burning and its inter-relationships with the climate system. Dordrecht: Springer. p 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kharuk VI, Dvinskaya ML, Ranson KJ, Im ST. 2005. Expansion of evergreen conifers to the larch dominated zone and climatic trends. Russ J Ecol 36:164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khlynovskaya NI, Nesterenko AI, Podkovyrkina AI. 1988. Total biomass in main vegetative types of landscapes of northern–eastern part of USSR. In: Problems of study and protection of northern–eastern landscapes of USSR. Far-East Scientific Center, Vladivostok. pp. 8–27 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  36. Kobak KI, Turchinovich IYE, Kondrasheva NYU, Schulze E-D, Schulze W, Koch H, Vygodskaya NN. 1996. Vulnerability and adaptation of the larch forest in eastern Siberia to climate change. Water Air Soil Poll 92:119–127.Google Scholar
  37. Lemmon PE. 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. For Sci 2:314–20.Google Scholar
  38. Manies KL, Harden JW, Bond-Lamberty BP, O’Neill KP. 2005. Woody debris along an upland chronosequence in boreal Manitoba and its impact on long-term carbon storage. Can J For Res 35:472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nalder IA, Wein RW. 1999. Long-term forest floor carbon dynamics after fire in upland boreal forests of western Canada. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:951–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nalder IA, Wein RW, Alexander ME, deGroot WJ. 1997. Physical properties of dead and downed round-wood fuels in the boreal forests of Alberta and Northwest Territories. Can J For Res 27:1513–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest stand dynamics (update edition). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Osawa A, Zyryanova OA. 2010. Permafrost ecosystems Siberian larch forests introduction. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests 209:3–15.Google Scholar
  43. Pedlar JH, Pearce JL, Venier LA, McKenney DW. 2002. Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. For Ecol Manage 158:189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson BJ, Holmes RM, McClelland JW, Vorosmarty CJ, Lammers RB, Shiklomanov AI, Shiklomanov IA, Rahmstorf S. 2002. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science 298:2171–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrovsky VV, Koroleva TM. 1979. On the flora Kolyma River Delta. Bot J 64(1):19–40.Google Scholar
  46. Randerson JT, Liu H, Flanner MG, Chambers SD, Jin Y, Hess PG, Pfister G, Mack MC, Treseder KK, Welp LR, Chapin FS, Harden JW, Goulden ML, Lyons E, Neff JC, Schuur EAG, Zender CS. 2006. The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming. Science 314:1130–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52:891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schepaschenko DG, Shvidenko AZ, Shalaev VS. 2008. Biological productivity and carbon budget of larch forests of Northern-East Russia. Moscow: Moscow State Forest University. 296 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
  49. Schoennagel T, Turner MG, Romme WH. 2003. The influence of fire interval and serotinyon postfire lodgepole pine density in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 84:2967–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schulze ED, Schulze W, Kelliher FM, Vygodskaya NN, Ziegler W, Kobak KI, Hoch H, Arneth A, Kusnetsova WA, Sogachev A, Issajev A, Bauer G, Hollinger DY. 1995. Aboveground biomass and nitrogen nutrition in a chronosequence of pristine Dahurian Larix stands in Eastern Siberia. Can J For Res 25:943–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shirota T, Saito H, Maximov TC, Isaev AP, Takahashi K. 2006. Safe sites of larch seedlings in the lightly burnt forest in Eastern Siberia. In: Hatano R, Guggenberger G, Eds. Symptom of environmental change in Siberian permafrost region. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press. p. 159–62.Google Scholar
  52. Shorohova E, Kuuluvainen T, Kangur A, Jogiste K. 2009. Natural stand structures, disturbance regimes and successional dynamics in the Eurasian boreal forests: a review with special reference to Russian studies. Ann For Sci 66(201):1–20.Google Scholar
  53. Shrestha BM, Chen HYH. 2010. Effects of stand age, wildfire and clearcut harvesting on forest floor in boreal mixedwood forests. Plant Soil 336:267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sobachkin RS, Sobachkin DS, Buzykin AI. 2005. The influence of stand density on growth of three conifer species. Tree species effects on soils: Implications for global change. New York, NY: Springer. p. 247–255.Google Scholar
  55. Sofronov MA, Volokitina AV. 2010. Wildfire ecology in continuous permafrost zone. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests 209:59–82.Google Scholar
  56. Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW. 1997. Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ter Mikaelian MT, Colombo SJ, Chen J. 2008. Amount of downed woody debris and its prediction using stand characteristics in boreal and mixedwood forests of Ontario, Canada. Can J For Res 38:2189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thornley HM, Cannell AGR. 2004. Long-term effects of fire frequency on carbon storage and productivity of boreal forests: a modeling study. Tree Physiol 24:765–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turetsky MR, Kane ES, Harden JW, Ottmar RD, Manies KL, Hoy E, Kasischke ES. 2011. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands. Nat Geosci 4:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner MG, Tinker DB, Romme WH, Kashian DM, Litton CM. 2004. Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA). Ecosystems 7:751–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Usoltsev VA, Koltunova AI, Kajimoto T, Osawa A, Koike T. 2002. Geographical gradients of annual biomass production from larch forests in northern Eurasia. Eurasian J For Res 5:55–62.Google Scholar
  62. Valendik EN, and Ivanova GA. 2001. Fire regimes in the forests of Siberia and Far East (Pozharnye rezhimy v lesakh Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka). Russ For Sci (Lesovedenye) 4:69–76 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  63. Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD. 2010. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weir JMH, Johnson EA, Miyanishi K. 2000. Fire frequency and the spatial age mosaic of the mixed-wood boreal forest in western Canada. Ecol Appl 10:1162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White J. 1980. Demographic factors in populations of plants. In: Solbrig OT, Ed. Demography and evolution in plant populations. London: Blackwell. p 21–48.Google Scholar
  66. Wotton BM, Nock CA, Flannigan MD. 2010. Forest fire occurrence and climate change in Canada. Int J Wildland Fire 19:253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zimov SA, Schuur EAG, Chapin FS. 2006. Permafrost and the global carbon budget. Science 312:1612–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zyryanova OA, Abaimov AP, Bugaenko TN, Bugaenko NN. 2010. Recovery of forest vegetation after fire disturbance. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests 209:83–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather D. Alexander
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michelle C. Mack
    • 1
  • Scott Goetz
    • 2
  • Michael M. Loranty
    • 2
  • Pieter S. A. Beck
    • 2
  • Kamala Earl
    • 1
  • Sergey Zimov
    • 3
  • Sergey Davydov
    • 3
  • Catharine C. Thompson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Woods Hole Research CenterFalmouthUSA
  3. 3.Northeast Science StationPacific Institute of Geography, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesCherskiiRepublic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russian Federation
  4. 4.National Park ServicePort AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations