, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 999–1009

A Meta-analysis of Climatic and Chemical Controls on Leaf Litter Decay Rates in Tropical Forests



Although tropical forests occupy a small fraction of the earth’s total land area, they play a disproportionately large role in regulating the global carbon cycle. Yet controls on both primary productivity and decomposition in tropical forests are not well-studied in comparison with temperate forests and grasslands, despite their extreme biogeochemical heterogeneity. To evaluate the relative importance of climate and foliar chemical variables in driving decomposition in tropical forests, I performed a meta-analysis of reported leaf litter decay rates throughout tropical forest ecosystems. Using a model selection procedure based on Akaike’s Information Criterion, I found that temperature and precipitation played little direct role in regulating decomposition rates, except in montane forests where cool temperatures slowed decay. Foliar concentrations of calcium, magnesium, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were important predictors of mass loss rates, although each of these factors explained a very small amount of variance when considered in isolation. The large amount of unexplained variation in decomposition rates observed both within and across tropical forest sites may be due to other factors not explored here, such as soil biota or complex plant secondary chemistry. Carbon cycling in tropical forests seems to be modulated by the availability of multiple nutrients, underscoring the need for additional manipulative experiments to explore patterns of belowground nutrient limitation across the biome. Because models of decomposition developed in temperate ecosystems do not appear to be generalizable to wet tropical forests, new biogeochemical paradigms should be developed to accommodate their unique combination of climatic, edaphic, and biotic factors.


carbon cycle decomposition meta-analysis nutrient limitation tropical forest 

Supplementary material

10021_2012_9561_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
10021_2012_9561_MOESM2_ESM.docx (88 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)


  1. Aerts R. 1997. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison S, Vitousek PM. 2004. Extracellular enzyme activities and carbon chemistry as drivers of tropical plant litter decomposition. Biotropica 36:285–96.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez-Clare S, Mack M. 2011. Influence of precipitation on soil and foliar nutrients across nine Costa Rican forests. Biotropica 43:433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B, Davey MP, DeMarco A, Emmet B, Faituri M, Hobbie SE et al. 2010. Factors influencing limit values for pine needle litter decomposition: a synthesis for boreal and temperate pine forest systems. Biogeochemistry 100:57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonan G. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford MA, Tordoff GM, Eggers T, Jones TH, Newington JE. 2002. Microbiota, fauna, and mesh size interactions in litter decomposition. Oikos 99:317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookshire E, Gerber S, Menge D, Hedin L. 2012. Large losses of inorganic nitrogen from tropical rainforests suggest a lack of nitrogen limitation. Ecol Lett 15:9–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham K, Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Chadwick O, Derry L, Vitousek P, Huebert B, Hedin L. 1999. Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development. Nature 397:491–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin F, Matson P, Mooney H. 2002. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Cleveland C, Reed S, Townsend A. 2006. Nutrient regulation of organic matter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. Ecology 87:492–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleveland C, Townsend A, Taylor P, Alvarez-Clare S, Bustamante M, Chuyong G. 2011. Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan-tropical analysis. Ecol Lett 14:939–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cleveland C, Wieder W, Reed S, Townsend A. 2010. Experimental drought in a tropical rain forest increases soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere. Ecology 91:2313–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman DC, Crossley DA, Hendrix PF. 2004. Fundamentals of soil ecology. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Coley P, Barone J. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coq S, Souquet J, Meudec E, Cheynier V, Hättenschwiler S. 2010. Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a tropical rain forest of French Guiana. Ecology 91:2080–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coq S, Weigel J, Butenschoen O, Bonal D, Hättenschwiler S. 2011. Litter composition rather than plant presence affects decomposition of tropical litter mixtures. Plant Soil 343:273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornwell W, Cornelissen J, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner V, Godoy O. 2008. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Couteaux M, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuevas E, Medina E. 1988. Nutrient dynamics within Amazonian forests. Oecologia 76:222–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cusack DF, Chou WW, Yang WH, Harmon ME, Silver WL, Team LIDET. 2009. Controls on long-term root and leaf litter decomposition in neotropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 15:1339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dorman H, Deans S. 2000. Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. Appl Microbiol 88:308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galloway J, Dentener F, Capone D, Boyer E, Howarth W. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: past, present and future. Biogeochemistry 70:153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hättenschwiler S, Aeschlimann B, Couteaux M, Roy J, Bonal D. 2008. High variation in foliage and leaf litter chemistry among 45 tree species of a neotropical rainforest community. New Phytol 179:165–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hättenschwiler S, Jørgensen H. 2010. Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:754–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoeksema J, Chaudhary V, Ghering C, Johnson NC, Karst J, Koide R. 2010. A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol Lett 13:394–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jobbágy E, Jackson R. 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaspari M, Yanoviak S. 2009. Biogeochemistry and the structure of tropical brown food webs. Ecology 90:3342–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaspari M, Garcia M, Harms K, Santana M, Wright S, Yavitt J. 2008. Multiple nutrients limit litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest. Ecol Lett 11:35–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lavelle P, Blanchart E, Martin A, Martin S. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25:130–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawrence C, Neff J, Schimel J. 2009. Does adding microbial mechanisms of decomposition improve soil organic matter models? A comparison of four models using data from a pulsed rewetting experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1923–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. 2008. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89:371–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magee L. 1990. R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. American Statistician 44:250–3.Google Scholar
  35. Malhi Y. 2010. The carbon balance of tropical forest regions, 1990–2005. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malhi Y. 2011. The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of tropical forest vegetation. J Ecol 100:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manzoni S, Pineiro G, Jackson RB, Jobbagy EG, Kim JH, Proporato A. 2012. Analytical models of soil and litter decomposition: solutions for mass loss and time-dependent decay rates. Soil Biol Biochem 50:66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marklein A, Houlton B. 2011. Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:676–704.Google Scholar
  39. Matsumura S, Imai K, Yoshikawa S, Kawada K, Uchibor T. 1990. Surface activities, biodegradability and antimicrobial properties of n-alkyl glucosides, mannosides and galactosides. J Am Oil Chem Soc 67:996–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melillo J, Aber J, Muratore J. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milton Y, Kaspari M. 2007. Bottom-up and top-down regulation of decomposition in a tropical forest. Oecologia 153:163–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Day D. 1990. Calcium as an intracellular messenger in eucaryotic microbes. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology. p 418.Google Scholar
  43. Paoli G, Curran L. 2007. Soil nutrients limit fine litter production and tree growth in mature lowland forest of southwestern Borneo. Ecosystems 10:503–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perakis S, Maguire D, Bullen T, Cromack K, Waring R, Boyle J. 2006. Coupled nitrogen and calcium cycles in forests of the Oregon Coast Range. Ecosystems 9:63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team. 2009. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R Package Version 2.9.0Google Scholar
  46. Porder S, Hilley G. 2011. Linking chronosequences with the rest of the world: predicting soil phosphorus content in denuding landscapes. Biogeochemistry 102:153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Powers J, Montgomery R, Adair E, Brearley F, Dewalt S, Castanho C. 2009. Decomposition in tropical forests: a pan-tropical study of the effects of litter type, litter placement and mesofaunal exclusion across a precipitation gradient. J Ecol 97:801–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prescott CE. 2010. Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed S, Cleveland C, Townsend A. 2007. Controls over leaf litter and soil nitrogen fixation in two lowland tropical rain forests. Biotropica 39:585–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salinas N, Malhi Y, Meir P, Silman M, Roman Cuesta R, Huaman J. 2010. The sensitivity of tropical leaf litter decomposition to temperature: results from a large-scale leaf translocation experiment along an elevation gradient in Peruvian forests. New Phytol 189:967–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santiago L, Schuur E, Silvera K. 2005. Nutrient cycling and plant–soil feedbacks along a precipitation gradient in lowland Panama. J Trop Ecol 21:461–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Santiago L. 2007. Extending the leaf economics spectrum to decomposition: evidence from a tropical forest. Ecology 88:1126–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schimel J, Weintraub M. 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuur E. 2001. The effect of water on decomposition dynamics in mesic to wet Hawaiian montane forests. Ecosystems 4:259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silver WL, Miya RK. 2001. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–19.Google Scholar
  56. Sinsabaugh R, Antibus R, Linkins A, McClaugherty C, Rayburn L, Repert D. 1992. Wood decomposition over a first-order watershed: mass loss as a function of lignocellulase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 24:743–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sinsabaugh R, Hill B, Shah J. 2009. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Swift M, Andren O, Brussaard L, Briones M, Couteaux M, Ekschmitt K. 1998. Global change, soil biodiversity, and nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: three case studies. Glob Chang Biol 4:729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Symonds M, Moussalli A. 2011. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tanner E, Vitousek P, Cuevas E. 1998. Experimental investigation of nutrient limitation of forest growth on wet tropical mountains. Ecology 79:10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomma B, Cammue B, Thevissen K. 2002. Plant defensins. Planta 216:193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Townsend A, Asner G, Cleveland C. 2008. The biogeochemical heterogeneity of tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 23:424–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Townsend A, Cleveland C, Houlton B, Alden C, White J. 2011. Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle. Frontiers Ecol Environ 9:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trofymow J, Moore T, Titus B, Prescott C, Morrison I, Siltanen M. 2002. Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate. Can J For Res 32:789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vitousek PM. 1984. Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology 65:285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker T, Syers J. 1976. The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wall D, Bradford M, John M, Trofymow J, Behan-Pelletier V, Bignell D. 2008. Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Glob Chang Biol 14:2661–77.Google Scholar
  69. Wieder W, Cleveland C, Townsend A. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90:3333–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright S, Yavitt J, Wurzburger N, Turner B, Tanner E, Sayer E. 2011. Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology 92:1616–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G. 2008. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at Austin, Section of Integrative BiologyAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations