Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 848–866 | Cite as

Ecosystem Development After Mangrove Wetland Creation: Plant–Soil Change Across a 20-Year Chronosequence

  • Michael J. Osland
  • Amanda C. Spivak
  • Janet A. Nestlerode
  • Jeannine M. Lessmann
  • Alejandro E. Almario
  • Paul T. Heitmuller
  • Marc J. Russell
  • Ken W. Krauss
  • Federico Alvarez
  • Darrin D. Dantin
  • James E. Harvey
  • Andrew S. From
  • Nicole Cormier
  • Camille L. Stagg
Article

Abstract

Mangrove wetland restoration and creation efforts are increasingly proposed as mechanisms to compensate for mangrove wetland losses. However, ecosystem development and functional equivalence in restored and created mangrove wetlands are poorly understood. We compared a 20-year chronosequence of created tidal wetland sites in Tampa Bay, Florida (USA) to natural reference mangrove wetlands. Across the chronosequence, our sites represent the succession from salt marsh to mangrove forest communities. Our results identify important soil and plant structural differences between the created and natural reference wetland sites; however, they also depict a positive developmental trajectory for the created wetland sites that reflects tightly coupled plant-soil development. Because upland soils and/or dredge spoils were used to create the new mangrove habitats, the soils at younger created sites and at lower depths (10–30 cm) had higher bulk densities, higher sand content, lower soil organic matter (SOM), lower total carbon (TC), and lower total nitrogen (TN) than did natural reference wetland soils. However, in the upper soil layer (0–10 cm), SOM, TC, and TN increased with created wetland site age simultaneously with mangrove forest growth. The rate of created wetland soil C accumulation was comparable to literature values for natural mangrove wetlands. Notably, the time to equivalence for the upper soil layer of created mangrove wetlands appears to be faster than for many other wetland ecosystem types. Collectively, our findings characterize the rate and trajectory of above- and below-ground changes associated with ecosystem development in created mangrove wetlands; this is valuable information for environmental managers planning to sustain existing mangrove wetlands or mitigate for mangrove wetland losses.

Keywords

functional equivalency carbon accumulation succession facilitation wetland restoration wetland creation mangrove forest salt marsh Tampa Bay Florida 

References

  1. Alongi DM. 2009. The energetics of mangrove forests. Dordrecht: Springer. 216 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Alongi DM. 2011. Carbon payments for mangrove conservation: ecosystem constraints and uncertainties of sequestration potential. Environ Sci Policy 14:462–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alongi DM, Sasekumar A, Chong VC, Pfitzner J, Trott LA, Tirendi F, Dixon P, Brunskill GJ. 2004. Sediment accumulation and organic material flux in a managed mangrove ecosystem: estimates of land–ocean–atmosphere exchange in peninsular Malaysia. Mar Geol 208:383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alongi DM, Trott LA, Rachmansyah TF, Tirendi F, McKinnon AD, Undu MC. 2008. Growth and development of mangrove forests overlying smothered coral reefs, Sulawesi and Sumatra, Indonesia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 370:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alongi DM, Wattayakorn G, Pfitzner J, Tirendi F, Zagorskis I, Brunskill GJ, Davidson A, Clough BF. 2001. Organic carbon accumulation and metabolic pathways in sediments of mangrove forests in southern Thailand. Mar Geol 179:85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson CJ, Mitsch WJ. 2006. Sediment, carbon, and nutrient accumulation at two 10-year-old created riverine marshes. Wetlands 26:779–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballantine K, Schneider R. 2009. Fifty-five years of soil development in restored freshwater depressional wetlands. Ecol Appl 19:1467–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR. 2010. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A. 1999. Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertness MD. 1985. Fiddler crab regulation of Spartina alterniflora production on a New England salt marsh. Ecology 66:1042–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blake GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A, Eds. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy. pp 363–75.Google Scholar
  12. Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR, Field C, Kairo JG, Koedam N. 2008. Functionality of restored mangroves: a review. Aquat Bot 89:251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouillon S, Rivera-Monroy V, Twilley RR, Kairo JG. 2009. Mangroves. In: Laffoley D, Grimsditch G, Eds. The management of natural coastal carbon sinks. Gland: IUCN. pp 13–20.Google Scholar
  14. Brady NC, Weil RR. 1996. The nature and properties of soils. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall. 960 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Bruland GL. 2004. An observational, geostatistical, and experimental assessment of edaphic properties and processes in created, restored, and natural wetlands of the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Ph.D. Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  16. Bruland GL, Richardson CJ. 2006. Comparison of soil organic matter in created, restored and paired natural wetlands in North Carolina. Wetlands Ecol Manag 14:245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC. 2003. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17:1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Craft C, Broome S, Campbell C. 2002. Fifteen years of vegetation and soil development after brackish water marsh creation. Restor Ecol 10:248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craft C, Megonigal P, Broome S, Stevenson J, Freese R, Cornell J, Zheng L, Sacco J. 2003. The pace of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes. Ecol Appl 13:1417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Craft C, Reader J, Sacco JN, Broome SW. 1999. Twenty-five years of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) marshes. Ecol Appl 9:1405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crewz DW, Lewis RR. 1991. An evaluation of historical attempts to establish emergent vegetation in marine wetlands in Florida. Florida Sea Grant Publication No. 60. Gainesville (FL): Florida Sea Grant College. 79 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Danone Fund for Nature. 2010. Achieving carbon offsets through mangroves and other wetlands. Gland: Danone Group/IUCN/Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 87 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M. 2011. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doolittle JA, Schellentrager G, Ploetz S. 1989. Soil survey of Hillsborough County. La Belle: Soil Conservation Service. 168 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Duarte CM, Cebrián J. 1996. The fate of marine autotrophic production. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1758–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards KR, Proffitt CE. 2003. Comparison of wetland structural characteristics between created and natural salt marshes in southwest Louisiana, USA. Wetlands 23:344–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellison AM. 2000. Mangrove restoration: do we know enough? Restor Ecol 8:219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eshel G, Levy GJ, Mingelgrin U, Singer MJ. 2004. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:736–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Euliss NH, Gleason RA, Olness A, McDougal RL, Murkin HR, Robarts RD, Bourbonniere RA, Warner BG. 2006. North American prairie wetlands are important nonforested land-based carbon storage sites. Sci Total Environ 361:179–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ewel KC, Twilley RR, Ong JE. 1998. Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FAO. 2007. The world’s mangroves 1980–2005: a thematic study prepared in the framework of the global forest resources assessment 2005. FAO forestry paper 153. Rome: Forestry Department, FAO. 77 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Friess DA, Krauss KW, Hortsman EM, Balke T, Bouma TJ, Galli D, Webb EL. 2011. Are intertidal wetlands created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems. Biol Rev. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00198.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fromard F, Puig H, Mougin E, Marty G, Betoulle JL, Cadamuro L. 1998. Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana. Oecologia 115:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gedan KB, Silliman BR. 2009. Using facilitation theory to enhance mangrove restoration. Ambio 38:109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A, Loveland T, Masek J, Duke N. 2011. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giri C, Zhu Z, Tieszen LL, Singh A, Gillette S, Kelmelis JA. 2008. Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics (1975–2005) of the tsunami-affected region of Asia. J Biogeogr 35:519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hossler K, Bouchard V. 2010. Soil development and establishment of carbon-based properties in created freshwater marshes. Ecol Appl 20:539–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hossler K, Bouchard V, Fennessy MS, Frey SD, Anemaet E, Herbert E. 2011. No-net-loss not met for nutrient function in freshwater marshes: recommendations for wetland mitigation policies. Ecosphere 2: art82.Google Scholar
  39. Huxham M, Kumara MP, Jayatissa LP, Krauss KW, Kairo J, Langat J, Mencuccini M, Skov MW, Kirui B. 2010. Intra- and interspecific facilitation in mangroves may increase resilience to climate change threats. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hyde AG, Huckle HF. 1983. Soil survey of Manatee County. La Belle: Soil Conservation Service. 159 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Inoue T, Nohara S, Matsumoto K, Anzai Y. 2011. What happens to soil chemical properties after mangrove plants colonize? Plant Soil 346:259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaly UL, Jones GP. 1998. Mangrove restoration: a potential tool for coastal management in tropical developing countries. Ambio 27:656–61.Google Scholar
  43. Karam A. 1993. Chemical properties of organic soils. In: Carter MR, for Canadian Society of Soil Science, Eds. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. London: Lewis Publishers. pp 459–71.Google Scholar
  44. Krauss KW, Lovelock CE, McKee KL, López-Hoffman L, Ewe SML, Sousa WP. 2008. Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquat Bot 89:105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kumara MP, Jayatissa LP, Krauss KW, Phillips DH, Huxham M. 2010. High mangrove density enhances surface accretion, surface elevation change, and tree survival in coastal areas susceptible to sea-level rise. Oecologia 164:545–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laffoley D, Grimsditch G. 2009. The management of natural coastal carbon sinks. Gland: IUCN. p 53 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis RR. 1982. Low marshes, Peninsular Florida. In: Lewis RR, Ed. Creation and restoration of coastal plain communities. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p 147–52.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis RR. 1990. Creation and restoration of coastal plain wetlands in Florida. In: Kusler JA, Kentula ME, Eds. Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 73–101.Google Scholar
  49. Lewis RR. 2005. Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecol Eng 24:403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewis RR. 2009. Methods and criteria for successful mangrove forest restoration. In: Perillo GME, Wolanski E, Cahoon DR, Brinson MM, Eds. Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. Oxford: Elsevier. p 787–800.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis RR, Dunstan FM. 1975. The possible role of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. In: Establishment of mangroves in Florida. Proceedings of the second annual conference on restoration of coastal vegetation in Florida. pp 82–100.Google Scholar
  52. Lewis RR, Estevez ED. 1988. The ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: an estuarine profile. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85(7.18): 132 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Lewis RR, Gilmore RG. 2007. Important considerations to achieve successful mangrove forest restoration with optimum fish habitat. Bull Mar Sci 80:823–37.Google Scholar
  54. Lewis RR, Hodgson AB, Mauseth GS. 2005. Project facilitates the natural reseeding of mangrove forests (Florida). Ecol Restor 23:276–7.Google Scholar
  55. Lovelock CE, Ruess RW, Feller IC. 2011. CO2 efflux from cleared mangrove peat. PLoS ONE 6:e21279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lovelock CE, Sorrell BK, Hancock N, Hua Q, Swales A. 2010. Mangrove forest and soil development on a rapidly accreting shore in New Zealand. Ecosystems 13:437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matthews JW, Spyreas G. 2010. Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress. J Appl Ecol 47:1128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software Design. p 300 pp.Google Scholar
  59. McGill WB, Figueiredo CT. 1993. Total nitrogen. In: Carter MR, for Canadian Society of Soil Science, Eds. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. London: Lewis Publishers. pp 201–11.Google Scholar
  60. McKee KL. 2010. Biophysical controls on accretion and elevation change in Caribbean mangrove ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 91:475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Feller IC. 2007a. Caribbean mangroves adjust to rising sea level through biotic controls on change in soil elevation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKee KL, Faulkner PL. 2000. Restoration of biogeochemical function in mangrove forests. Restor Ecol 8:247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Hester MW. 1988. Reexamination of pore water sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans. Am J Bot 75:1352–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McKee KL, Rooth JE. 2008. Where temperate meets tropical: multi-factorial effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen enrichment, and competition on a mangrove–salt marsh community. Glob Change Biol 14:971–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McKee KL, Rooth JE, Feller IC. 2007b. Mangrove recruitment after forest disturbance is facilitated by herbaceous species in the Caribbean. Ecol Appl 17:1678–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Björk M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR. 2011. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9:552–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Middleton BA, McKee KL. 2001. Degradation of mangrove tissues and implications for peat formation in Belizean island forests. J Ecol 89:818–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Milbrandt EC, Tinsley MN. 2006. The role of saltwort (Batis maritima L.) in regeneration of degraded mangrove forests. Hydrobiologia 568:369–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2007. Wetlands. New York: Wiley. 582 pp.Google Scholar
  70. Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R. 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10:e1001247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morrisey DJ, Skilleter GA, Ellis JI, Burns BR, Kemp CE, Burt K. 2003. Differences in benthic fauna and sediment among mangrove (Avicennia marina var. australasica) stands of different ages in New Zealand. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:581–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Murray BC, Jenkins WA, Sifleet S, Pendelton L, Baldera A. 2010. Payments for blue carbon: potential for protecting threatened coastal habitats. Policy brief. Durham: Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. Duke University.Google Scholar
  73. Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pickett STA, Ostfeld RS. 1989. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE, Ed. Long-term studies in ecology: approaches and alternatives. New York: Springer. p 110–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reddy KR, DeLaune RD. 2008. Biogeochemistry of wetlands: science and applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p 774 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ren H, Jian S, Lu H, Zhang Q, Shen W, Han W, Yin Z, Guo Q. 2008. Restoration of mangrove plantations and colonisation by native species in Leizhou bay, South China. Ecol Res 23:401–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shafer DJ, Roberts TH. 2008. Long-term development of tidal mitigation wetlands in Florida. Wetlands Ecol Manag 16:23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith NF, Wilcox C, Lessmann JM. 2009. Fiddler crab burrowing affects growth and production of the white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) in a restored Florida coastal marsh. Mar Biol 156:2255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L. 2010. World atlas of mangroves. London: Earthscan. p 319 pp.Google Scholar
  80. Stagg CL, Mendelssohn IA. 2010. Restoring ecological function to a submerged salt marsh. Restor Ecol 18:10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strangmann A, Bashan Y, Giani L. 2008. Methane in pristine and impaired mangrove soils and its possible effect on establishment of mangrove seedlings. Biol Fertil Soils 44:511–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sutton-Grier AE, Ho M, Richardson CJ. 2009. Organic amendments improve soil conditions and denitrification in a restored riparian wetland. Wetlands 29:343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tiessen H, Moir JO. 1993. Total and organic carbon. In: Carter MR, for Canadian Society of Soil Science, Eds. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. London: Lewis Publishers. pp 187–199.Google Scholar
  84. Tomlinson PB. 1995. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 413 pp.Google Scholar
  85. Vovides AG, Bashan Y, López Portillo JA, Guevara R. 2010. Nitrogen fixation in preserved, reforested, naturally regenerated and impaired mangroves as an indicator of functional restoration in mangroves in an arid region of Mexico. Restor Ecol 19:236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wolf KL, Ahn C, Noe GB. 2011. Development of soil properties and nitrogen cycling in created wetlands. Wetlands 31:699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zedler JB. 1996. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecol Appl 6:33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zedler JB. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:402–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zedler JB, Callaway JC. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zedler JB, Kercher S. 2005. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhang Y, Huang G, Wang W, Chen L, Lin G. 2012. Interactions between mangroves and exotic Spartina in an anthropogenically-disturbed estuary in southern China. Ecology. doi:10.1890/11-1302.1.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Osland
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amanda C. Spivak
    • 1
    • 3
  • Janet A. Nestlerode
    • 1
  • Jeannine M. Lessmann
    • 4
  • Alejandro E. Almario
    • 1
  • Paul T. Heitmuller
    • 2
  • Marc J. Russell
    • 1
  • Ken W. Krauss
    • 2
  • Federico Alvarez
    • 1
  • Darrin D. Dantin
    • 1
  • James E. Harvey
    • 1
  • Andrew S. From
    • 5
  • Nicole Cormier
    • 2
  • Camille L. Stagg
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Ecology DivisionGulf BreezeUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research CenterLafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  4. 4.Galbraith Marine Science LaboratoryEckerd CollegeSt. PetersburgUSA
  5. 5.Five Rivers Services, LLC, U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wetlands Research CenterLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations