Century-Scale Responses of Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Flux to Multiple Environmental Changes in the Southern United States
- First Online:
- 643 Downloads
Terrestrial ecosystems in the southern United States (SUS) have experienced a complex set of changes in climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, tropospheric ozone (O3), nitrogen (N) deposition, and land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) during the past century. Although each of these factors has received attention for its alterations on ecosystem carbon (C) dynamics, their combined effects and relative contributions are still not well understood. By using the Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model (DLEM) in combination with spatially explicit, long-term historical data series on multiple environmental factors, we examined the century-scale responses of ecosystem C storage and flux to multiple environmental changes in the SUS. The results indicated that multiple environmental changes shifted SUS ecosystems from a C source of 1.20 ± 0.56 Pg (1 Pg = 1015 g) during the period 1895 to 1950, to a C sink of 2.00 ± 0.94 Pg during the period 1951 to 2007. Over the entire period spanning 1895–2007, SUS ecosystems were a net C sink of 0.80 ± 0.38 Pg. The C sink was primarily due to an increase in the vegetation C pool, whereas the soil C pool decreased during the study period. The spatiotemporal changes of C storage were caused by changes in multiple environmental factors. Among the five factors examined (climate, LULCC, N deposition, atmospheric CO2, and tropospheric O3), elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration was the largest contributor to C sequestration, followed by N deposition. LULCC, climate, and tropospheric O3 concentration contributed to C losses during the study period. The SUS ecosystem C sink was largely the result of interactive effects among multiple environmental factors, particularly atmospheric N input and atmospheric CO2.
Keywordsclimate change carbon storage and flux land use change Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model (DLEM) southern United States
- Alexander RB, Smith RA. 1990. County-level estimates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use in the United States, 1945 to 1985. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 90-130.Google Scholar
- Birdsey RA, Lewis BM. 2003. Carbon in U.S. forests and wood products, 1987–1997: state-by-state estimates. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-310, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
- Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ. 2009. Global, regional, and National fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA. doi:10.3334/CDIAC/00001.
- Curtis PS, Wang X. 1998. A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113:299–313.Google Scholar
- Dentener FJ. 2006. Global maps of atmospheric nitrogen deposition, 1860, 1993, and 2050. Available online http://daac.ornl.gov/ from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
- Enting IG, Wigley TML, Heimann M. 1994. Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: key ocean/atmosphere/land analyses. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research Tech Paper No. 31, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Ellsworth DS. 1999. CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ 22:461–72.Google Scholar
- Felzer B, Kicklighter DW, Melillo JM, Wang C, Zhuang Q, Prinn R. 2004. Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the Conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model. Tellus 56B:230–48.Google Scholar
- Hansen C, Yonavjak L, Clarke C, Minnemeyer S, Boisrobert L, Leach A, Schleeweis K. 2010. Southern forests for the future. World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/project/southern-forests.
- Heck WW, Cure WW, Rawlings JO, Zaragoza LJ, Heagle AS, Heggestad HE, Kohut RJ, Kress LW, Temple PJ. 1984. Assessing impacts of ozone on agricultural crops: II. Crop yield functions and alternative exposure statistics. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 34:810–17.Google Scholar
- Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Coan M, Hossain N, Larson C, Herold N, McKerrow A, VanDriel JN, Wickham J. 2007. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 73:337–41.Google Scholar
- Houghton RA. 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus 55B:378–90.Google Scholar
- Huntzinger DN, Post WM, Wei Y, Michalak AM, West TO, Jacobson AR, Baker IT, Chen JM, Davis KJ, Hayes DJ, Hoffman FM, Jain AK, Liu S, McGuire AD, Neilson RP, Poulter B, Raczka BM, Tian HQ, Thornton P, Tomelleri E, Viovy N, Xiao J, Zeng N, Zhao M, Cook R. 2012. North American Carbon Project (NACP) regional interim synthesis: terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison. Ecol Model 232:144–57. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC. 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Luo Y, Gerten D, le Maire G, Parton WJ, Weng ES, Zhou XH, Keough C, Beier C, Ciais P, Cramer W, Dukes JS, Emmett B, Hanson PJ, Knapp A, Linder S, Nepstad D, Rustad L. 2008. Modelled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and CO2 on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Glob Change Biol 14:1986–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J. 2008. Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J Forestry 106:115–73.Google Scholar
- McGuire AD, Sitch S, Clein JS, Dargaville R, Esser G, Foley J, Heimann M, Joos F, Kaplan J, Kicklighter DW, Meier RA, Melillo JM, Moore IIIB, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Reichenau T, Schloss A, Tian H, Williams LJ, Wittenberg U. 2001. Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: analyses of CO2, climate and land-use effects with four process-based ecosystem models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Norby RJ, DeLucia EH, Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Giardina CP, King JS, Ledford J, McCarthy HR, Moore DJP, Ceulemans R, De Angelis R, Finzi AC, Karnosky DF, Kubiske ME, Lukac M, Pregitzer KS, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Schlesinger WH, Oren R. 2005. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:18052–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pacala S, Birdsey R, Bridgham S, Conant RT, Davis K, Hales B, Houghton RA, Jenkins JC, Johnston M, Marland G, Paustian K. 2007. The North American carbon budget past and present. In: King AW, Dilling L, Zimmerman GP, Fairman DM, Houghton RA, Marland G, Rose AZ, Wilbanks TJ, Eds. The first state of the carbon cycle report (SOCCR): the North American carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle. Asheville: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. p 29–36.Google Scholar
- Pardo LH, Templer PH, Goodale C, Duke S, Groffman P, Adams MB, Boeckx P, Boogs J, Campbell J, Colman B, Compton J, Emmett B, Gundersen P, Kjonaas J, Lovett G, Mack M, Magill A, Mbila M, Mitchell M, McGee G, McNulty S, Nadelhoffer K, Ollinger S, Ros D, Rueth H, Rustad L, Shaberg P, Schiff S, Schleppi P, Spoelstra J, Wessel W. 2006. Regional assessment of N saturation using foliar 15N. Biogeochemistry 80:143–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peters W, Jacobson AR, Sweeney C, Andrews E, Conway TJ, Masarie K, Miller JB, Bruhwiler LMP, Pétron G, Hirsch I, Worthy DEJ, van der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Wennberg PO, Krol MC, Tans PP. 2007. An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:18925–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Popper KR. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
- Pye JM 1988. Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of tress: a review. J Environ Qual 17:347–60.Google Scholar
- Rastetter EB, Ågren GI, Shaver GR. 1997. Responses of N-limited ecosystems to increased CO2: a balanced-nutrition, coupled-element-cycles model. Ecol Appl 7:444–60.Google Scholar
- Reay DS, Dentener F, Smith P, Grace J, Feely RA. 2008. Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks. Nat Geosci 430:1–7.Google Scholar
- Ren W, Tian H, Liu M, Zhang C, Chen G, Pan S, Felzer B, Xu X. 2007b. Effects of tropospheric ozone pollution on net primary productivity and carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China. J Geophys Res 112:D22S09. doi:10.1029/2007JD008521.
- Ren W, Tian H, Tao B, Chappelka A, Sun G, Lu C, Liu M, Chen G, Xu X. 2011a. Impacts of tropospheric ozone and climate change on net primary productivity and net carbon exchange of China’s forest ecosystems assessed with the dynamic land ecosystem model (DLEM). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruddy BC, Lorenz DL, Mueller DK. 2006. County-level estimates of nutrient inputs to the land surface of the conterminous United States, 1982–2001. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5012. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5012/.
- Schimel D, House J, Hibbard K, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Apps M, Baker D, Bondeau A, Brasswell R, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning S, Field C, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo J, Moore BIII, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala S, Prentice C, Raupach M, Rayner P, Scholes B, Steffen W, Wirth C. 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414:169–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schimel D, Melillo JM, Tian H, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Kittel T, Rosenbloom N, Running SW, Thornton P, Ojima D, Parton W, Kelly R, Sykes M, Neilson R, Rizzo B. 2000. Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science 287:2004–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwalm CR, Williams CA, Schaefer K, NACP participants. 2010. A model-data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: results from the North American carbon program site synthesis. J Geophys Res 115:G00H05. doi:10.1029/2009JG001229.
- Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA. 2009. Forest Resources of the United States, 2007. General Technical Report WO-78. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Sulman B, Desai A, Schroeder N, Ricciuto D, Barr A, Richardson A, Flanagan L, Lafleur P, Tian H, Chen G, Grant R, Poulter B, Verbeeck H, Ciais P, Ringeval B, Baker I, Schaefer K, Luo Y, Weng E. 2012. Impact of hydrological variations on modeling of peatland CO2 fluxes: results from the North American carbon program site synthesis. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2011JG001862.
- Thenkabail PS, Biradar CM, Turral H, Noojipady P, Li YJ, Vithanage J, Dheeravath V, Velpuri M, Schull M, Cai XL, Dutta R. 2006. An irrigated area map of the world (1999) derived from remote sensing. Research Report 105, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
- Tian H, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW, McGuire AD, Helfrich J. 1999. The sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to historical atmospheric CO2 and climate variability in the United States. Tellus 51B:414–52.Google Scholar
- Tian H, Xu X, Lu C, Liu M, Ren W, Chen G, Melillo J, Liu J. 2011a. Net exchanges of CO2, CH4, and N2O between China’s terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere and their contributions to global climate warming. J Geophys Res G02011, doi:10.1029/2010JG001393.
- Tian H, Melillo J, Lu C, Kicklighter D, Liu M, Ren W, Xu X, Chen G, Zhang C, Pan S, Liu J, Running S. 2011b. China’s terrestrial carbon balance: contribution of multiple global change factors. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 25, GB1007, doi:10.1029/2010GB003838.
- Wear DN. 2002. Land use. In: Wear DN, Greis JG, Eds. Southern forest resource assessment. pp. 153–174. Tech. Rep. GTR SRS-53. USDA, Forest Service, Washington, DC. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/sustain/report/.
- Woodwell GM, Mackenzie FT, Houghton RA, Apps MJ, Gorham E, Davidson EA. 1995. Will the warming speed the warming? In: Woodwell GM, MacKenzie FT, Eds. Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system: will the warming feed the warming?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 393–411.Google Scholar
- Zhou XH, Weng ES, Luo YQ. 2008. Modeling patterns of nonlinearity in ecosystem responses to temperature, CO2, and precipitation changes. Ecol Appl 18:453–66.Google Scholar