Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 450–461 | Cite as

Anthropogenic N Deposition Increases Soil C Storage by Decreasing the Extent of Litter Decay: Analysis of Field Observations with an Ecosystem Model

  • Kyle A. Whittinghill
  • William S. Currie
  • Donald R. Zak
  • Andrew J. Burton
  • Kurt S. Pregitzer
Article

Abstract

Recent meta-analyses of experimental studies simulating increased anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition in forests reveal greater soil carbon (C) storage under elevated levels of atmospheric N deposition. However, these effects have not yet been included in ecosystem-scale models of soil C and N cycling and it is unclear whether increased soil C storage results from slower decomposition rates or a reduced extent of decomposition (for example, an increase in the amount of litter entering slowly decaying humus pools). To test these alternatives, we conducted a meta-analysis of litter decomposition data. We then used the results from our meta-analysis to model C and N cycling in four sugar maple forests in Michigan using an ecosystem process model (TRACE). We compared model results testing our alternative hypotheses to field data on soil C storage from a 17-year N deposition experiment. Using data from published litter decomposition studies in forests, we determined that, on average, exogenous N inputs decreased lignin decomposition rates by 30% and increased cellulose decomposition by 9%. In the same set of litter decomposition studies increased exogenous N availability increased the amount of litter entering slowly decaying humus pools in a manner significantly related to the lignocellulose index of decaying litter. Incorporating changes to decomposition rates in TRACE did not accurately reproduce greater soil C storage observed in our field study with experimentally elevated N deposition. However, when changes in the extent of decomposition were incorporated in TRACE, the model produced increased soil C storage by increasing the amount of litter entering the humus pool and accurately represented C storage in plant and soil pools under experimental N deposition. Our modeling results and meta-analysis indicate that the extent of litter decay as humus is formed, rather than slower rates of litter decay, is likely responsible for the accumulation of organic matter, and hence soil C storage, under experimental N deposition. This effect should be incorporated in regional to global-scale models simulating the C balance of forest ecosystems in regions receiving elevated N deposition.

Keywords

ecosystem model nitrogen deposition soil carbon storage hardwood forests limit value litter decomposition 

Supplementary material

10021_2012_9521_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA. 1990. Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68:2201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Driscoll CT. 1997. Modeling nitrogen saturation in forest ecosystems in response to land use and atmospheric deposition. Ecol Model 101:61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg B. 2000a. Initial rates and limit values for decomposition of Scots pine and Norway spruce needle litter: a synthesis for N-fertilized forest stands. Can J For Res 30:122–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B. 2000b. Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manag 133:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg B, Ekbohm G, Johansson MB, McClaugherty C, Rutigliano F, DeSanto AV. 1996. Maximum decomposition limits of forest litter types: a synthesis. Can J Bot 74:659–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg B, Johansson MB, Meentemeyer V. 2000. Litter decomposition in a transect of Norway spruce forests: substrate quality and climate control. Can J For Res 30:1136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg B, Matzner E. 1997. Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg B, Meentemeyer V. 2002. Litter quality in a north European transect versus carbon storage potential. Plant Soil 242:83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg B, Staaf H. 1980. Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. In Structure and function of northern coniferous forests. An ecosystem study. Ecol Bull 32:373–90.Google Scholar
  10. Bowden RD, Davidson E, Savage K, Arabia C, Steudler P. 2004. Chronic nitrogen additions reduce total soil respiration and microbial respiration in temperate forest soils at the Harvard Forest. For Ecol Manag 196:43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Crawford JN, Zogg GP, Zak DR. 2004. Simulated chronic NO3 deposition reduces soil respiration in northern hardwood forests. Glob Change Biol 10:1080–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Reed DD. 1991. Leaf area and foliar biomass relationships in northern hardwood forests located along an 800 km acid deposition gradient. For Sci 37:1041–59.Google Scholar
  13. Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Zogg GP, Zak DR. 1996. Latitudinal variation in sugar maple fine root respiration. Can J For Res 26:1761–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF. 2000. Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81:2359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Compton JE, Watrud LS, Porteous LA, DeGrood S. 2004. Response of soil microbial biomass and community composition to chronic nitrogen additions at Harvard forest. For Ecol Manag 196:143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Currie WS, Aber JD, McDowell WH, Boone RD, Magill AH. 1996. Vertical transport of dissolved organic C and N under long-term N amendments in pine and hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 35:471–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Currie WS, Aber JD. 1997. Modeling leaching as a decomposition process in humid montane forests. Ecology 78:1844–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Currie WS, Harmon ME, Burke IC, Hart SC, Parton WJ, Silver W. 2010. Cross-biome transplants of plant litter show decomposition models extend to a broader climatic range but lose predictability at the decadal time scale. Glob Change Biol 16:1744–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1999. Dynamic redistribution of isotopically labeled cohorts of nitrogen inputs in two temperate forests. Ecosystems 2:4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD. 1999. Soil detrital processes controlling the movement of 15N tracers to forest vegetation. Ecol Appl 9:87–102.Google Scholar
  21. Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD. 2004. Redistributions of 15N highlight turnover and replenishment of mineral soil organic N as a long-term control on forest C balance. For Ecol Manag 196:109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeForest JL, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ. 2004. Atmospheric nitrate deposition and the microbial degradation of cellobiose and vanillin in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 36:965–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fog K. 1988. The effect of added nitrogen on the rates of decomposition of organic matter. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 63:433–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT. 2004. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. For Ecol Manag 196:159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallo M, Amonette R, Lauber C, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. 2004. Microbial community structure and oxidative enzyme activity in nitrogen-amended north temperate forest soils. Microb Ecol 48:218–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai ZC, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA. 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, Asner GP, Cleveland CC, Green PA, Holland EA, Karl DM, Michaels AF, Porter JH, Townsend AR, Vorosmarty CJ. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70:153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gough CM, Vogel CS, Harrold KH, George K, Curtis PS. 2007. The legacy of harvest and fire on ecosystem carbon storage in a north temperate forest. Glob Change Biol 13:1935–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harmon ME, Silver WL, Fasth B, Chen H, Burke IC, Parton WJ, Hart SC, Currie WS, Lidet . 2009. Long-term patterns of mass loss during the decomposition of leaf and fine root litter: an intersite comparison. Glob Change Biol 15:1320–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS. 1996. Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J Ecol 84:167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hendricks JJ, Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Hallett RD. 2000. Nitrogen controls on fine root substrate quality in temperate forest ecosystems. Ecosystems 3:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobbie SE. 2000. Interactions between litter lignin and soil nitrogen availability during leaf litter decomposition in a Hawaiian Montane forest. Ecosystems 3:484–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbie SE. 2008. Nitrogen effects on decomposition: a five-year experiment in eight temperate sites. Ecology 89:2633–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbie SE, Vitousek PM. 2000. Nutrient limitation of decomposition in Hawaiian forests. Ecology 81:1867–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hofmockel KS, Zak DR, Blackwood CB. 2007. Does atmospheric NO3 deposition alter the abundance and activity of ligninolytic fungi in forest soils? Ecosystems 10:1278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holland EA, Braswell BH, Sulzman JM, Lamarque JF. 2004. Nitrogen deposition onto the United States and Western Europe. Data set. http://www.daac.ornl.gov, from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
  37. IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 1–22.Google Scholar
  38. Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, Subke JA, Reichstein M, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Grace J, Matteucci G, Papale D, Piao SL, Schulze ED, Tang J, Law BE. 2010. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat Geosci 3:315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keeler BL, Hobbie SE, Kellogg LE. 2009. Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on microbial enzyme activity in eight forested and grassland sites: implications for litter and soil organic matter decomposition. Ecosystems 12:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kittel TGF, Rosenbloom NA, Royle JA, Daly C, Gibson WP, Fisher HH, Thornton P, Yates DN, Aulenbach S, Kaufman C, McKeown R, Bachelet D, Schimel DS, VEMAP2 Participants. 2004. VEMAP Phase 2 bioclimatic database. I. Gridded historical (20th) century climate for modeling ecosystem dynamics across the conterminous USA. Clim Res 27:151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knorr M, Frey SD, Curtis PS. 2005. Nitrogen additions and litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86:3252–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. 2008. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89:371–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu LL, Greaver TL. 2010. A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Lett 13:819–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Arthur MA, Schultz JC. 2004. Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: do species matter? Biogeochemistry 67:289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Magill AH, Aber JD. 1998. Long-term effects of experimental nitrogen additions on foliar litter decay and humus formation in forest ecosystems. Plant Soil 203:301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Borghetti M, Berbigier P, Berninger F, Delzon S, Grelle A, Hari P, Jarvis PG, Kolari P, Kowalski AS, Lankreijer H, Law BE, Lindroth A, Loustau D, Manca G, Moncrieff JB, Rayment M, Tedeschi V, Valentini R, Grace J. 2007. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447:848–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along a decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant Soil 115:189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neff JC, Townsend AR, Gleixner G, Lehman SJ, Turnbull J, Bowman WD. 2002. Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon. Nature 419:915–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nowinski NS, Trumbore SE, Jimenez G, Fenn ME. 2009. Alteration of belowground carbon dynamics by nitrogen addition in southern California mixed conifer forests. J Geophys Res 114:G02005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ, Zak DR, Talhelm AF. 2008. Simulated chronic nitrogen deposition increases carbon storage in Northern Temperate forests. Glob Change Biol 14:142–53.Google Scholar
  51. Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Burton AJ, Ashby JA, MacDonald NW. 2004. Chronic nitrate additions dramatically increase the export of carbon and nitrogen from northern hardwood ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 68:179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Talhelm AF, Burton AJ, Eikenberry JR. 2010. Nitrogen turnover in the leaf litter and fine roots of sugar maple. Ecology 91:3456–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prescott CE. 1995. Does nitrogen availability control rates of litter decomposition in forests. Plant Soil 168–169:83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prescott CE, Kabzems R, Zabek LM. 1999. Effects of fertilization on decomposition rate of Populus tremuloides foliar litter in a boreal forest. Can J For Res 29:393–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/
  56. Roskoski JP. 1980. Nitrogen-fixation in hardwood forests of the northeastern United States. Plant Soil 54:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan MG, Melillo JM, Ricca A. 1990. A Comparison of Methods for Determining Proximate Carbon Fractions of Forest Litter. Can J For Res 20:166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. 2002. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Repert DA. 2002. Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry 60:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo ME, Lauber C, Waldrop MP, Zak DR. 2005. Extracellular enzyme activities and soil organic matter dynamics for northern hardwood forests receiving simulated nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 75:201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staaf H, Berg B. 1982. Accumulation and release of plant nutrients in decomposing scots pine needle litter—long-term decomposition in a scots pine forest. 2. Can J Bot 60:1561–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sutton MA, Simpson D, Levy PE, Smith RI, Reis S, van Oijen M, de Vries W. 2008. Uncertainties in the relationship between atmospheric nitrogen deposition and forest carbon sequestration. Glob Change Biol 14:2057–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thirukkumaran CM, Parkinson D. 2000. Microbial respiration, biomass, metabolic quotient and litter decomposition in a lodgepole pine forest floor amended with nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizers. Soil Biol Biochem 32:59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Townsend AR, Braswell BH, Holland EA, Penner JE. 1996. Spatial and temporal patterns in terrestrial carbon storage due to deposition of fossil fuel nitrogen. Ecol Appl 6:806–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Treseder KK. 2008. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett 11:1111–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Diepen LTA, Lilleskov EA, Pregitzer KS, Miller RM. 2010. Simulated nitrogen deposition causes a decline of intra- and extraradical abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and changes in microbial community structure in northern hardwood forests. Ecosystems 13:683–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C. 2004. Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity. Ecol Appl 14:1172–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waldrop MP, Zak DR. 2006. Response of oxidative enzyme activities to nitrogen deposition affects soil concentrations of dissolved organic carbon. Ecosystems 9:921–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wallenstein MD, McNulty S, Fernandez IJ, Boggs J, Schlesinger WH. 2006. Nitrogen fertilization decreases forest soil fungal and bacterial biomass in three long-term experiments. For Ecol Manag 222:459–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xia JY, Wan SQ. 2008. Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition. New Phytol 179:428–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zak DR, Grigal DF, Ohmann LF. 1993. Kinetics of microbial respiration and nitrogen mineralization in Great Lakes Forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:11000–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zak DR, Holmes WE, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Talhelm AF. 2008. Simulated atmospheric NO3 deposition increases soil organic matter by slowing decomposition. Ecol Appl 18:2016–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zak DR, Holmes WE, Tomlinson MJ, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ. 2006. Microbial cycling of C and N in northern hardwood forests receiving chronic atmospheric NO3 deposition. Ecosystems 9:242–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyle A. Whittinghill
    • 1
    • 4
  • William S. Currie
    • 1
  • Donald R. Zak
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Burton
    • 2
  • Kurt S. Pregitzer
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.School of Forest Resources and Environmental SciencesMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  3. 3.College of Natural ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  4. 4.Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for Earth, Oceans, and SpaceUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations