Holocene Carbon Stocks and Carbon Accumulation Rates Altered in Soils Undergoing Permafrost Thaw
Permafrost soils are a significant global store of carbon (C) with the potential to become a large C source to the atmosphere. Climate change is causing permafrost to thaw, which can affect primary production and decomposition, therefore affecting ecosystem C balance. To understand future responses of permafrost soils to climate change, we inventoried current soil C stocks, investigated ∆14C, C:N, δ13C, and δ15N depth profiles, modeled soil C accumulation rates, and calculated decadal net ecosystem production (NEP) in subarctic tundra soils undergoing minimal, moderate, and extensive permafrost thaw near Eight Mile Lake (EML) in Healy, Alaska. We modeled decadal and millennial soil C inputs, decomposition constants, and C accumulation rates by plotting cumulative C inventories against C ages based on radiocarbon dating of surface and deep soils, respectively. Soil C stocks at EML were substantial, over 50 kg C m−2 in the top meter, and did not differ much among sites. Carbon to nitrogen ratio, δ13C, and δ15N depth profiles indicated most of the decomposition occurred within the organic soil horizon and practically ceased in deeper, frozen horizons. The average C accumulation rate for EML surface soils was 25.8 g C m−2 y−1 and the rate for the deep soil accumulation was 2.3 g C m−2 y−1, indicating these systems have been C sinks throughout the Holocene. Decadal net ecosystem production averaged 14.4 g C m−2 y−1. However, the shape of decadal C accumulation curves, combined with recent annual NEP measurements, indicates soil C accumulation has halted and the ecosystem may be becoming a C source. Thus, the net impact of climate warming on tundra ecosystem C balance includes not only becoming a C source but also the loss of C uptake capacity these systems have provided over the past ten thousand years.
Keywordspermafrost thaw carbon accumulation net ecosystem production radiocarbon soil carbon inventory carbon pools tundra
- Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA. 2002. Principles of ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hua Q, Barbetti M. 2004. Review of tropospheric bomb C-14 data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46:1273–98.Google Scholar
- Huemmrich KF, Kinoshita G, Gamon JA, Houston S, Kwon H, Oechel WC. 2010. Tundra carbon balance under varying temperature and moisture regimes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 115.Google Scholar
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Lawrence DM, Slater AG, Romanovsky VE, Nicolsky DJ. 2008. Sensitivity of a model projection of near-surface permafrost degradation to soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 113:14.Google Scholar
- Levin I, Hesshaimer V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42:69–80.Google Scholar
- Lund M, Lafleur PM, Roulet NT, Lindroth A, Christensen TR, Aurela M, Chojnicki BH, Flanagan LB, Humphreys ER, Laurila T, Oechel WC, Olejnik J, Rinne J, Schubert P, Nilsson MB. 2010. Variability in exchange of CO2 across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites. Glob Change Biol 16:2436–48.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.
- Schuur EAG, Bockheim J, Canadell JG, Euskirchen E, Field CB, Goryachkin SV, Hagemann S, Kuhry P, Lafleur PM, Lee H, Mazhitova G, Nelson FE, Rinke A, Romanovsky VE, Shiklomanov N, Tarnocai C, Venevsky S, Vogel JG, Zimov SA. 2008. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: implications for the global carbon cycle. Bioscience 58:701–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Stuiver M, Reimer P. 2010. Calib 14C Calibration Program. http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib.
- Vogel JS, Nelson DE, Southon JR. 1987. C-14 background levels in an accelerator mass-spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29:323–33.Google Scholar