What Have Stable Isotope Studies Revealed About the Nature and Mechanisms of N Saturation and Nitrate Leaching from Semi-Natural Catchments?
- 682 Downloads
Various studies over the last 15 years have attempted to describe the processes of N retention, saturation and NO3 − leaching in semi-natural ecosystems based on stable isotope studies. Forest ecologists and terrestrial biogeochemists have used 15N labelled NO3 − and NH4 + tracers to determine the fate of atmospheric deposition inputs of N to terrestrial ecosystems, with NO3 − leaching to surface waters being a key output flux. Separate studies by aquatic ecologists have used similar isotope tracer methods to determine the fate and impacts of inorganic N species, leached from terrestrial ecosystems, on aquatic ecosystems, usually without reference to comparable terrestrial studies. A third group of isotopic studies has employed natural abundances of 15N and 18O in precipitation and surface water NO3 − to determine the relative contributions of atmospheric and microbial sources. These three sets of results often appear to conflict with one another. Here we attempt to synthesize and reconcile the results of these differing approaches to identifying both the source and the fate of inorganic N in natural or semi-natural ecosystems, and identify future research priorities. We conclude that the results of different studies conform to a consistent conceptual model comprising: (1) rapid microbial turnover of atmospherically deposited NO3 − at multiple biologically active locations within both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; (2) maximum retention and accumulation of N in carbon-rich ecosystems and (3) maximum leaching of NO3 −, most of which has been microbially cycled, from carbon-poor ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric N inputs.
KeywordsNitrate 15N 18O dual isotopes nitrogen saturation deposition catchment
This study was part funded by the UK Department for Environment, Transport and Rural Affairs (Defra) Contract CPEA17 (CJC, CE and TH). CLG’s contribution was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF-CAREER DEB0845451).
- Burns DA, Kendall C. 2002. Analysis of δ15N and δ18O to differentiate NO3 − sources in runoff at two watersheds in the Catskill Mountains of New York. Water Resour Res 38. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000292.
- Campbell DH, Kendall C, Chang CCY, Silva SR, Tonnessen KA. 2002. Pathways for nitrate release from an alpine watershed: determination using δ15N and δ18O. Water Resour Res 38. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000294.
- Curtis C, Simpson G, Eds. 2007. Freshwater umbrella—the effects of nitrogen deposition and climate change on freshwaters in the UK. Report to DEFRA under Contract CPEA17, July 2007. ECRC Research Report No. 115, Environmental Change Research Centre, University College London, London.Google Scholar
- Evans CD, Reynolds B, Jenkins A, Helliwell RC, Curtis CJ, Goodale CL, Ferrier RC, Emmett BA, Pilkington MG, Caporn SJM, Carroll JA, Norris D, Davies J, Coull MC. 2006. Evidence that soil carbon pool determines susceptibility of semi-natural ecosystems to elevated nitrogen leaching. Ecosystems 9:453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Granger SJ, Heaton THE, Bol R, Bilotta GS, Butler P, Haygarth PM, Owens PN. 2008. Using δ15N and δ18O to evaluate the sources and pathways of NO3 − in rainfall event discharge from drained agricultural grassland lysimeters at high temporal resolutions. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 22:1681–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kämäri J, Jeffries DS, Hessen DO, Henriksen A, Posch M, Forsius M. 1992. In: Grennfelt P, Thörnelöf E, Eds. Nitrogen critical loads and their exceedance for surface waters. Report from a workshop held at Lökeborg, Sweden, 6–10 April 1992, Nord 1992:41. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. pp 161–200.Google Scholar
- Kendall C. 1998. Tracing nitrogen sources and cycling. In: Kendall C, McDonnell JJ, Eds. Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. New York: Elsevier. p 519.Google Scholar
- Kernan M, Battarbee RW, Curtis CJ, Monteith DT, Shilland EM, editors. 2010. UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network 20 Year Interpretive Report. ECRC Research Report #141, University College London. London, UK. 477 pp.Google Scholar
- Monteith DT, Shilland EM, Eds. 2007. United Kingdom acid waters monitoring network: assessment of the first 18 years of data. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Contract EPG 1/3/160). London: Ensis Ltd., University College London.Google Scholar
- Roberts BJ, Mulholland PJ. 2007. In stream biotic control on nutrient biogeochemistry in a forested stream, west fork of Walker Branch. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 112. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000422.
- Sebesteyn SD, Boyer EW, Shanley J, Kendall C, Doctor DH, Aiken GR, Ohte N. 2008. Sources, transformations and hydrological processes that control stream nitrate and dissolved organic matter concentrations during snowmelt in an upland forest. Water Resour Res 44:W12410. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stoddard JL. 1994. Long-term changes in watershed retention of nitrogen: its causes and aquatic consequences. In: Baker LA, Eds. Environmental chemistry of lakes and reservoirs. ACS Advances in Chemistry Series No. 237. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society. pp 223–284.Google Scholar