Soil Carbon Stocks and Soil Carbon Quality in the Upland Portion of a Boreal Landscape, James Bay, Quebec
- 313 Downloads
As part of a multidisciplinary project on carbon (C) dynamics of the ecosystems characterizing the Eastmain Region Watershed (James Bay, Quebec), the objective of this study is to compare the soil C stocks and soil organic matter quality among the main upland vegetation types in a boreal region subjected to a high fire frequency. On average, the organic layer contained twice the amount of C than the mineral soil. Closed canopy vegetation types had greater C stocks both in the mineral and in the organic layers than the other more open canopy vegetation types. Landscape features such as drainage and surficial deposit could not discriminate between vegetation types although closed vegetation types were on average found on wetter site conditions. Average soil C contents varied more than 2-fold across vegetation types. On the opposite, except for the organic layer C:N ratio, which was smaller in closed vegetation types, other measured soil organic matter properties (namely specific rate of evolved C after a long-term incubation, hydrolysis acid-resistant C as well as the rate of changes in soil heterotrophic respiration with increasing temperature (Q10)) remained within a narrow range between vegetation types. Therefore, total soil C stocks were a major determinant of both labile C and estimated summer soil heterotrophic respiration rate. The homogeneity of soil organic matter quality across the vegetation types could be attributable to the positive relationship between soil C storage and soil C fluxes observed in this landscape experiencing a high fire frequency. The low variability in soil C quality could help simplify the modelling of soil C fluxes in this environment.
Keywordssoil C cycling boreal forest soil organic matter quality scaling landscape fire cycle
This research was conducted in collaboration with the EM-1 Reservoirs’ net greenhouse gas emission group financed by Hydro-Québec and thanks to a graduate scholarship to J. L. Banville from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to GEOTOP UQAM-MCGILL and the Canadian Forest Service for providing technical support as well as field assistants. We thank Jacques Morissette, Robert Boutin, Luc Pelletier and Luc St-Antoine for their advice and precious help and André Robitaille of the Ministère des Resources naturelles et de la faune du Québec for access to the data of the programme d’inventaire écoforestier nordique.
- Bhatti JS, van Kooten GC, Apps MJ, Laird LD, Campbell ID, Campbell C, Turetsky MR, Yu Z, Banfield E. 2003. Carbon balance and climate change in boreal forests. In: Burton PJ, Messier C, Smith DW, Adamowicz WL, Eds. Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. Ottawa: NRC Research Press. p 799–855.Google Scholar
- Carter MR. 1993. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
- CSSC (Canada Soil Survey Committee). 1998. The Canadian System of Soil Classification, 3rd edn, Publ. no 1646e. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/references/1998sc_a.html.
- Grenier M, Labrecque S, Garneau M. 2008. Cartographie des milieux secs pour le territoire de la phase 1 du secteur de la rivière Eastmain. Accord de collaboration entre Hydro-Québec et Environnement Canada 6161-5-0412. p 30.Google Scholar
- Hoey TB. 2004. The size of sedimentary particles. In: Evans DJA, Benn DI, Eds. A practical guide to the study of glacial sediments. London: Oxford University Press. p 54–77.Google Scholar
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2001. Chapter 1: Global perspecives. In: Watson RT, Nobel IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ, Eds. Land use, land-use change and forestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 550.Google Scholar
- Kurz WA, Apps M, Banfield E, Stinson G. 2002. Forest carbon accounting at the operational scale. For Chron 78:672–9.Google Scholar
- Leboeuf A, Létourneau J-P, Robitaille A, Matejek S. 2009. Guide de stratification écoforestière. Programme d’inventaire écoforestier nordique. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec. 29 p.Google Scholar
- Liski J, Ilvesniemi H, Mäkelä A, Westman CJ. 1999. CO2 emissions from soil in response to climate warming are overestimated—The decomposition of old organic matter is tolerant of temperature. Ambio 28:171–4.Google Scholar
- Manies KL, Harden JW, Yoshikawa K, Randerson J. 2001. The effect of soil drainage on fire and carbon cycling in Central Alaska. U.S. Geol Surv Prof Paper 1678:145–52.Google Scholar
- Paul EA, Morris SJ, Böhm S. 2001. The determination of soil C pool sizes and turnover rates: biophysical fractionation and tracers. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA, Eds. Assessment methods for soil carbon. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. p 193–206.Google Scholar
- Robitaille A, Saucier J-P. 1998. Paysages régionaux du Québec méridional. Sainte-Foy (Québec): Les Publications du Québec. p 213.Google Scholar
- Wilson CV. 1971. Le climat du Québec, partie 1: atlas climatique. Service météorologique du Canada, Études climatologiques no 11.Google Scholar
- van Bellen S, Dallaire P-L, Garneau, M, Bergeron, Y. 2011. Quantifying spatial and temporal holocene carbon accumulation in ombrotrophic peatlands of the Eastmain region, Quebec, Canada. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. doi: 10.1029/2010GB003877.