Ecosystems

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 183–197 | Cite as

A Benchmark Test for Ecohydrological Models of Interannual Variability of NDVI in Semi-arid Tropical Grasslands

Article

Abstract

Pulses of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) in response to discrete precipitation events are an integral feature of ecosystem functioning in arid and semi-arid lands. Yet, the usefulness of nonlinear, ecohydrological pulse response functions to predict regional-scale patterns of annual ANPP at decadal scales remains unclear. Here, we assessed how different pulse response (PR) models compete with simple linear statistical models to capture variability in yearly integrated values of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVIint), a remotely sensed proxy of annual ANPP. We examined 24-year-long time series of NDVIint calculated from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) NDVI for 350,000 km2 of tropical grasslands in northern Australia. Based on goodness-of-fit statistics, PR models clearly outperformed statistical models when parameters were optimized for each site but all models showed the same error magnitude when all sites were combined in ensemble simulations or when the models were evaluated outside the calibration period. PR models were less biased and their performance did not deteriorate in the driest areas compared to linear models. Increasing the complexity of PR models to provide a better representation of soil water balance and its feedback with plant growth did not improve model performance in ensemble simulations. When error magnitude, bias, and sensitivity to parameter uncertainty were all considered, we concluded that a low-dimensional PR model was the most robust to capture NDVIint variability. This study shows the potential of long time series of AVHRR NDVI to benchmark process-oriented models of interannual variability of NDVIint in water-controlled ecosystems. This opens new avenues to examine at the global scale and over several decades the causal relationships between climate and leaf dynamics in the grassland biome.

Keywords

C4 grasslands ecohydrology phenology precipitation pulses semi-arid ecosystems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a Marie-Curie fellowship to Philippe Choler and is part of the project CASOAR (contract MOIF-CT-2006-039688). W. Sea was partially funded by an office of the chief executive post-doctoral CSIRO fellowship. We thank Stephen Roxburgh and Michael Raupach for helpful comments on this work.

References

  1. Abramowitz G. 2005. Towards a benchmark for land surface models. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL024419.
  2. Alewell C, Manderscheid B. 1998. Use of objective criteria for the assessment of biogeochemical ecosystem models. Ecol Model 107:213–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anyamba A, Tucker CJ. 2005. Analysis of Sahelian vegetation dynamics using NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data from 1981–2003. J Arid Environ 63:596–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastin G, ACRIS Management Committee. 2008. Mitchell Grass Downs Bioregion (Queensland and the NT). In: Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System (ACRIS), Ed. Rangelands 2008—taking the pulse. Canberra: National Land & Water Resources Audit, Australian Government. p 151–9.Google Scholar
  5. Bastin GN, Pickup G, Pearce G. 1995. Utility of AVHRR data for land degradation assessment—a case-study. Int J Remote Sens 16:651–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beringer J, Hutley LB, Tapper NJ, Cernusak LA. 2007. Savanna fires and their impact on net ecosystem productivity in North Australia. Glob Change Biol 13:990–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrd RH, Lu PH, Nocedal J, Zhu CY. 1995. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. Siam J Sci Comput 16:1190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson TN, Ripley DA. 1997. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sens Environ 62:241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson TN, Capehart WJ, Gillies RR. 1995. A new look at the simplified method for remote-sensing of daily evapotranspiration. Remote Sens Environ 54:161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caylor KK, Scanlon TM, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2009. Ecohydrological optimization of pattern and processes in water-limited ecosystems: a trade-off-based hypothesis. Water Resources Research 45. doi:10.1029/2008wr007230.
  11. Choler P, Sea W, Briggs P, Raupach M, Leuning R. 2010. A simple ecohydrological model captures essentials of seasonal leaf dynamics in semi-arid tropical grasslands. Biogeosciences 7:907–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choudhury BJ, Ahmed NU, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Daughtry CST. 1994. Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indexes studied by model simulations. Remote Sens Environ 50:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christie EK. 1981. Biomass and nutrient dynamics in a C-4 semi-arid Australian grassland community. J Appl Ecol 18:907–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly E, Porporato A. 2005. A review of soil moisture dynamics: from rainfall infiltration to ecosystem response. Environ Eng Sci 22:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM. 2004. Land surface phenology, climatic variation, and institutional change: analyzing agricultural land cover change in Kazakhstan. Remote Sens Environ 89:497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Michele C, Vezzoli R, Pavlopoulos H, Scholes RJ. 2008. A minimal model of soil water-vegetation interactions forced by stochastic rainfall in water-limited ecosystems. Ecol Model 212:397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donohue RJ, McVicar TR, Roderick ML. 2009. Climate-related trends in Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations, 1981–2006. Glob Change Biol 15:1025–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrar TJ, Nicholson SE, Lare AR. 1994. The influence of soil type on the relationships between NDVI, rainfall, and soil-moisture in semiarid Botswana. 2. NDVI response to soil-moisture. Remote Sens Environ 50:121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fensham RJ, Minchin PR, Fairfax RJ, Kemp JE, Purdie RW, McDonald WJF, Neldner VJ. 2000. Broad-scale environmental relations of floristic gradients in the Mitchell grasslands of Queensland. Aust J Bot 48:U27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foran BD, Bastin G. 1984. The dynamics of a Mitchell grass (Astrebla spp.) rangeland on the Barkly Tableland, Northern Territory. Aust Rangeland J 6:92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goetz SJ, Prince SD, Goward SN, Thawley MM, Small J. 1999. Satellite remote sensing of primary production: an improved production efficiency modeling approach. Ecol Model 122:239–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulden LE, Rosero E, Yang ZL, Wagener T, Niu GY. 2008. Model performance, model robustness, and model fitness scores: a new method for identifying good land-surface. Geophys Res Lett 35. doi:10.1029/2008GL033721.
  23. Hashimoto H, Nemani RR, White MA, Jolly WM, Piper SC, Keeling CD, Myneni RB, Running SW. 2004. El Nino-southern oscillation-induced variability in terrestrial carbon cycling. J Geophys Res-Atmos 109. doi:10.1029/2004JD004959.
  24. Helton JC, Johnson JD, Sallaberry CJ, Storlie CB. 2006. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 91:1175–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hess T, Stephens W, Thomas G. 1996. Modelling NDVI from decadal rainfall data in the north east arid zone of Nigeria. J Environ Manag 48:249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heumann BW, Seaquist JW, Eklundh L, Jonsson P. 2007. AVHRR derived phenological change in the Sahel and Soudan, Africa, 1982–2005. Remote Sens Environ 108:385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hird JN, McDermid GJ. 2009. Noise reduction of NDVI time series: an empirical comparison of selected techniques. Remote Sens Environ 113:248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunter DM. 1989. The response of Mitchell grasses (Astrebla spp.) and Button grass (Dactyloctenium radulans (R Br)) to rainfall and their importance to the survival of the Australian plague locust, Chortoicetes terminifera (Walker), in the arid zone. Aust J Ecol 14:467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KB, Beswick AR. 2001. Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environ Model Softw 16:309–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ji L, Peters AJ. 2004. A spatial regression procedure for evaluating the relationship between AVHRR-NDVI and climate in the northern Great Plains. Int J Remote Sens 25:297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laio F, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2002. On the seasonal dynamics of mean soil moisture. J Geophys Res-Atmos 107. doi:10.1029/2001JD001252.
  32. Liu YQ, Gupta HV. 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resour Res 43. doi:10.1029/2006WR005756.
  33. Lotsch A, Friedl MA, Anderson BT, Tucker CJ. 2003. Coupled vegetation-precipitation variability observed from satellite and climate records. Geophys Res Lett 30:1774. doi:1710.1029/2003GL017506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKenzie NJ, Hook J. 1992. Interpretation of the Atlas of Australian Soils. CSIRO Division of Soils Technical Report 94/1992. CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. McKenzie NJ, Jacquier DW, Ashton LJ, Cresswell HP. 2000. Estimation of soil properties using the Atlas of Australian Soils. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 11/00. CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia, p. 24.Google Scholar
  36. Mebane WR, Sekhon JS. 2009. R-GENetic Optimization Using Derivatives (RGENOUD). http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/rgenoud/.
  37. Montandon LM, Small EE. 2008. The impact of soil reflectance on the quantification of the green vegetation fraction from NDVI. Remote Sens Environ 112:1835–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monteith JL. 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 281:277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mougin E, Loseen D, Rambal S, Gaston A, Hiernaux P. 1995. A regional Sahelian grassland model to be coupled with multispectral satellite data. 1. Model description and validation. Remote Sens Environ 52:181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Myneni RB, Hall FG, Sellers PJ, Marshak AL. 1995. The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33:481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nemani RR, Keeling CD, Hashimoto H, Jolly WM, Piper SC, Tucker CJ, Myneni RB, Running SW. 2003. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300:1560–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nicholson SE, Farrar TJ. 1994. The influence of soil type on the relationships between NDVI, rainfall, and soil-moisture in semiarid Botswana. 1. NDVI response to rainfall. Remote Sens Environ 50:107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noy-Meir I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Connor TG, Haines LM, Snyman HA. 2001. Influence of precipitation and species composition on phytomass of a semi-arid African grassland. J Ecol 89:850–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ogle K, Reynolds JF. 2004. Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays. Oecologia 141:282–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK. 1998. Interannual variability of NDVI and its relationship to climate for North American shrublands and grasslands. J Biogeogr 25:721–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paruelo JM, Epstein HE, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC. 1997. ANPP estimates from NDVI for the Central Grassland Region of the United States. Ecology 78:953–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC. 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pineiro G, Oesterheld M, Paruelo JM. 2006. Seasonal variation in aboveground production and radiation-use efficiency of temperate rangelands estimated through remote sensing. Ecosystems 9:357–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pitman AJ, Henderson-Sellers A, Desborough CE, Yang ZL, Abramopoulos F, Boone A, Dickinson RE, Gedney N, Koster R, Kowalczyk E, Lettenmaier D, Liang X, Mahfouf JF, Noilhan J, Polcher J, Qu W, Robock A, Rosenzweig C, Schlosser CA, Shmakin AB, Smith J, Suarez M, Verseghy D, Wetzel P, Wood E, Xue Y. 1999. Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the project for intercomparison of land-surface parametrization schemes. Climate Dyn 15:673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Porporato A, D’Odorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2002. Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems. Adv Water Resour 25:1335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Potter CS, Brooks V. 1998. Global analysis of empirical relations between annual climate and seasonality of NDVI. Int J Remote Sens 19:2921–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ. 1972. Assessment of surface heat-flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prince SD, Goetz SJ, Goward SN. 1995. Monitoring primary production from Earth observing satellites. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:509–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Propastin PA, Kappas M. 2008. Reducing uncertainty in modeling the NDVI-precipitation relationship: a comparative study using global and local regression techniques. GISci Remote Sens 45:47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  58. Reynolds JF, Kemp PR, Ogle K, Fernandez RJ. 2004. Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. Oecologia 141:194–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richard Y, Poccard I. 1998. A statistical study of NDVI sensitivity to seasonal and interannual rainfall variations in Southern Africa. Int J Remote Sens 19:2907–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rykiel EJ. 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol Model 90:229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Savitzky A, Golay MJE. 1964. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36:1627–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seaquist JW, Olsson L, Ardo J. 2003. A remote sensing-based primary production model for grassland biomes. Ecol Model 169:131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tiver F, Nicholas M, Kriticos D, Brown JR. 2001. Low density of prickly acacia under sheep grazing in Queensland. J Range Manag 54:382–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tucker CJ, Sellers PJ. 1986. Satellite remote-sensing of primary production. Int J Remote Sens 7:1395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tucker CJ, Vanpraet C, Boerwinkel E, Gaston A. 1983. Satellite remote-sensing of total dry-matter production in the Senegalese Sahel. Remote Sens Environ 13:461–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tucker CJ, Pinzon JE, Brown ME, Slayback DA, Pak EW, Mahoney R, Vermote EF, El Saleous N. 2005. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int J Remote Sens 26:4485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker BH, Langridge JL. 1996. Modelling plant and soil water dynamics in semi-arid ecosystems with limited site data. Ecol Model 87:153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willmott CJ. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:1309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Res 30:79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. 2006. On the use of dimensioned measures of error to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolators. Int J Geograph Inf Sci 20:89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang LM, Wylie BK, Tieszen LL, Reed BC. 1998. An analysis of relationships among climate forcing and time-integrated NDVI of grasslands over the US northern and central Great Plains. Remote Sens Environ 65:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric ResearchCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS-UJF 5553Université J. Fourier—Grenoble IGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations