Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 901–916 | Cite as

Soil Fungi Respond More Strongly than Fine Roots to Elevated CO2 in a Model Regenerating Longleaf Pine-Wiregrass Ecosystem

  • M. Luke  McCormack
  • Seth G. Pritchard
  • Sabrie Breland
  • Michael A. Davis
  • Stephen A. Prior
  • G. Brett Runion
  • Robert J. Mitchell
  • Hugo H. Rogers
Article

Abstract

Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration will affect belowground processes and forest function. However, the direction and magnitude of change for many soil processes are unknown. We used minirhizotrons to observe fine root and fungal dynamics in response to elevated CO2 in a model regenerating longleaf pine community in open-top chambers. The model community consisted of five plant species common to xeric sandhills longleaf pine stands: Pinus palustris, Quercus margaretta, Aristida stricta, Crotalaria rotundifolia, and Asclepias tuberosa. Elevated CO2 significantly increased both fine root and mycorrhizal tip standing crop by more than 50% in the deeper soil horizon (17–34 cm). Rhizomorph standing crop was nearly doubled in both deep and shallow soil (P = 0.04). Survivorship results for fine roots and rhizomorphs varied between soil depths. Fine root survivorship was likely influenced more by changes in community composition and species interactions driven by elevated CO2 rather than by direct effects of elevated CO2 on the fine roots of individual species. In this system, it appears that elevated CO2 led to a greater reliance on fungal symbionts to meet additional nutrient requirements rather than substantially increased root growth.

Keywords

elevated CO2 fine roots mycorrhizal fungi longleaf pine wiregrass minirhizotron 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research (BER), US Department of Energy, grants no. DE-FG02-95ER62083 and DE-FC02-06ER64156 and partially supported by NSF grant IOB 0613832. Barry Dorman and Tammy Dorman are thanked for their technical assistance. David Eissenstat is thanked for his support and encouragement.

References

  1. Carney KM, Hungate BA, Drake BG, Megonigal JP. 2007. Altered soil microbial community at elevated CO2 leads to loss of soil carbon. PNAS 104:4990–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis MA, Pritchard SG, Mitchell RJ, Prior SA, Rogers HH, Runion GB. 2002. Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects structure of a model regenerating longleaf pine community. J Ecol 90:130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL. 2000. Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytol 147:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finzi AC, Norby RJ, Calfapietra C, Gallet-Budynek A, Gielen B, Holmes WE, Hoosbeek MR, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Kubiske ME, Ledford J, Liberloo M, Oren R, Polle A, Pritchard S, Zak DR, Schlesinger WH, Ceulemans R. 2007. Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2. PNAS 104:14014–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fransson PM, Taylor AFS, Finlay RD. 2001. Elevated atmospheric CO2 alter root symbiont community structure in forest trees. New Phytol 152:431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fransson PMA, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ. 2007. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in culture respond differently to increased carbon availability. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:246–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, Von Bloh W, Brovkin V, Cadule P, Doney S, Eby M, Fung I, Bala G, John J, Jones C, Joos F, Kato T, Kawamiya M, Knorr W, Lindsay K, Matthews HD, Raddatz T, Rayner P, Reick C, Roeckner E, Schnitzler KG, Schnur R, Strassmann K, Weaver AJ, Yoshikawa C, Zeng N. 2006. Climate carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Clim 19:3337–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadgil RL, Gadgil PD. 1975. Suppression of litter decomposition by mycorrhizal roots of Pinus radiata. New Zealand J For Sci 5:33–41.Google Scholar
  10. Godbold DL, Berntson GM, Bazzaz FA. 1997. Growth and mycorrhizal colonization of three North American tree species under elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol 137:433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA. 2002. Forest carbon sinks in the northern hemisphere. Ecol Appl 12:891–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo D, Mitchell RH, Withington JM, Fan P-P, Hendricks JJ. 2008. Endogenous and exogenous controls of root life span, mortality and nitrogen flux in a longleaf pine forest: root branch order predominates. J Ecol 96:737–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harley JL, Smith SE. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hobbie JE, Hobbie EA. 2006. 15 N in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in arctic tundra. J Ecol 87:816–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iversen CM. 2010. Digging deeper: fine-root responses to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration in forested ecosystems. New Phytol 186:346–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Iversen CM, Ledford J, Norby RJ. 2008. CO2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytol 179:837–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze E-D. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. PNAS 94:7362–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson MG, Meyer PF. 1998. Mechanical advancing handle that simplifies minirhizotron camera registration and image collection. J Environ Qual 27:710–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan EL, Meier P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasurinene AE, Helmisaari H-S, Holopainen T. 1999. The influence of elevated CO2 and O3 on fine roots and mycorrhizas of naturally growing young Scots pine trees during three exposure years. Glob Change Biol 5:771–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimball BA, Idso SB, Johnson S, Rillig MC. 2007. Seventeen years of carbon dioxide enrichment of sour orange trees: final results. Glob Change Biol 13:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koide RT, Malcolm GM. 2009. N concentration controls decomposition rates of different strains of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Fungal Ecol 2:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koide RT, Wu T. 2003. Ectomycorrhizas and retarded decomposition in a Pinus resinosa plantation. New Phytol 158:401–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kubiske M, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Mikan CJ. 1998. Growth and C allocation of Populus tremuloides genotypes in response to atmospheric CO2 and soil N availability. New Phytol 140:250–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biogeochem 132:1485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lal R. 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220:242–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langley JA, Hungate BA. 2003. Mycorrhizal controls on belowground litter quality. J Ecol 84:2302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langley JA, Chapman SK, Hungate BA. 2006. Ecotomycorrhizal colonization slows root decomposition: the post-mortem fungal legacy. Ecol Lett 9:955–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukac M, Calfapietra C, Godbold DL. 2003. Production turnover and mycorrhizal colonization of root systems of three Populus species grown under elevated CO2 (POPFACE). Glob Change Biol 9:838–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malcolm GM, Lopez-Gutierrez JC, Koide RT, Eissenstat DM. 2008. Acclimation to temperature and temperature sensitivity of metabolism by ectomycorrhizal fungi. Glob Change Biol 14:1169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marschner H, Dell B. 1994. Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 159:89–102.Google Scholar
  33. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD and others. 2007. Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK and New York (NY), USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Milchunas DG, Morgan JA, Mosier AR, Lecain DR. 2005. Root dynamics and demography in shortgrass steppe under elevated CO2, and comments on minirhizotron methodology. Glob Change Biol 11:1837–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell RJ, Runion GB, Prior SA, Rogers HH, Amthor JS, Henning FP. 1995. Effects of nitrogen on Pinus palustris foliar respiratory responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. J Exp Bot 46:1561–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norby RJ, Jackson RB. 2000. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytol 147:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EF. 2004. Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. PNAS 101:9689–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Oren R, Ellsworth DS, Johnsen KH. 2001. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Parrent JL, Vilgalys R. 2007. Biomass and compositional responses of ectomycorrhizal fungal hyphae to elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. New Phytol 176:164–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pritchard SG, Davis MA, Mitchell RJ, Prior SA, Boykin DL, Rogers HH, Runion GB. 2001. Root dynamics in an artificially constructed regenerating longleaf pine ecosystem are affected by atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Environ Exp Bot 46:55–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pritchard SG, Strand AE, McCormack ML et al. 2008a. Fine root dynamics in a loblolly pine forest are influenced by free-air-CO2-enrichment: a six-year-minirhizotron study. Glob Change Biol 14:588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pritchard SG, Strand AE, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Oren R. 2008b. Mycorrhizal and rhizomorph dynamics in a loblolly pine forest during five years of Free-Air CO2-enrichment (FACE). Glob Change Biol 14:1252–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Read DJ, Perez-Moreno J. 2003. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems-a journey towards relevance? New Phytol 157:475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400:56–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rillig MC, Field CB, Allen MF. 1999. Soil biota responses to long-term atmospheric CO2 enrichment in two California annual grasslands. Oecologia 119:572–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Runion GB, Mitchell RJ, Rogers HH, Prior SA, Counts TK. 1997. Effects of nitrogen and water limitation and elevated CO2 on ectomycorrhizal of longleaf pine. New Phytol 137:681–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Runion GB, Davis MA, Pritchard SG, Prior SA, Mitchell RJ, Torbert HA, Rogers HH, Dute RR. 2006. Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on biomass and carbon accumulation in a model regenerating longleaf pine community. J Environ Qual 35:1478–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Braswell BH, Apps MJ, Baker D, Bondeau A, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning AS, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo JM, Moore B, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala SW, Prentice IC, Raupach MR, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Steffen WL, Wirth C. 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414:169–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schöning I, Kögel-Knabner I. 2006. Chemical composition of young and old carbon pools throughout Camisol and Luvisol profiles under forests. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2411–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Talbot JM, Allison SD, Treseder KK. 2008. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Funct Ecol 26:955–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas SM, Whitehead D, Reid JB, Cook FJ, Adams JA, Leckie AC. 1999. Growth, loss, and vertical distribution of Pinus radiata fine roots growing at ambient and elevated CO2 concentration. Glob Change Biol 5:107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Torbert HA, Prior SA, Runion GB, Davis MA, Pritchard SG, Rogers HH. 2004. Nitrogen and carbon cycling in a model longleaf pine community as affected by elevated atmospheric CO2. J Environ Manag 33:S132–8.Google Scholar
  54. Treseder KK. 2004. A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol 164:347–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Treseder KK, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL. 2005. Lifespans of fungal rhizomorphs under nitrogen fertilization in a pinyon-juniper woodland. Plant Soil 270:249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trumbore S. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol Appl 10:399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Lear DH, Carroll WD, Kapeluck PR, Johnson R. 2005. History and restoration of the longleaf pine-grassland ecosystem: implication for a species at risk. For Ecol Manag 211:150–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vargas R, Allen MF. 2008. Dynamics of fine root, fungal rhizomorphs, and soil respiration in a mixed temperate forest: Integrating sensors and observations. Vadose Zone J 7:1055–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Gower ST, Grier CC. 1990. Carbon and nitrogen interactions for forests ecosystems. In: P. H. Commission of the European Communities, Ed. Air pollution report 32. Environment Research Programme. Above- and below-ground nitrogen interactions in forest trees in acidified soils. Brussels: Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development. pp 203–35.Google Scholar
  60. Wan S, Norby RJ, Pregitzer KS, Ledford J, O’Neill EG. 2004. CO2 enrichment and warming of the atmosphere enhance both productivity and mortality of maple tree fine roots. New Phytol 162:437–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wells CE, Eissenstat DM. 2001. Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameters. J Ecol 82:882–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. West JB, Espeleta JF, Donovan LA. 2003. Root longevity and phenology differences between two co-occurring savanna bunchgrasses with different leaf habits. Funct Ecol 17:20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Luke  McCormack
    • 1
  • Seth G. Pritchard
    • 2
  • Sabrie Breland
    • 2
  • Michael A. Davis
    • 3
  • Stephen A. Prior
    • 4
  • G. Brett Runion
    • 4
  • Robert J. Mitchell
    • 5
  • Hugo H. Rogers
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of HorticulturePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA
  4. 4.USDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics LaboratoryAuburnUSA
  5. 5.Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research CenterNewtonUSA

Personalised recommendations