Ecosystems

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 556–574 | Cite as

Does Soil Organic Layer Thickness Affect Climate–Growth Relationships in the Black Spruce Boreal Ecosystem?

  • Igor Drobyshev
  • Martin Simard
  • Yves Bergeron
  • Annika Hofgaard
Article

Abstract

The observed long-term decrease in the regional fire activity of Eastern Canada results in excessive accumulation of organic layer on the forest floor of coniferous forests, which may affect climate–growth relationships in canopy trees. To test this hypothesis, we related tree-ring chronologies of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) to soil organic layer (SOL) depth at the stand scale in the lowland forests of Quebec’s Clay Belt. Late-winter and early-spring temperatures and temperature at the end of the previous year’s growing season were the major monthly level environmental controls of spruce growth. The effect of SOL on climate–growth relationships was moderate and reversed the association between tree growth and summer aridity from a negative to a positive relationship: trees growing on thin organic layers were thus negatively affected by drought, whereas it was the opposite for sites with deep (>20–30 cm) organic layers. This indicates the development of wetter conditions on sites with thicker SOL. Deep SOL were also associated with an increased frequency of negative growth anomalies (pointer years) in tree-ring chronologies. Our results emphasize the presence of nonlinear growth responses to SOL accumulation, suggesting 20–30 cm as a provisional threshold with respect to the effects of SOL on the climate–growth relationship. Given the current climatic conditions characterized by generally low-fire activity and a trend toward accumulation of SOL, the importance of SOL effects in the black spruce ecosystem is expected to increase in the future.

Keywords

succession dendroecology paludification soil conditions climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this research was provided by Industrial Chair in Sustainable Forest Management and a NSERC strategic grant to YB. I.D. thanks Martin Girardin and Remi St-Amant, Natural Resources Canada, for the help with MDC calculation. We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of MS, Mélanie Desrochers, Université du Québec à Montréal for assistance with digital maps, and Dan McKenney, Canadian Forest Service, for help in obtaining climate data.

References

  1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 16:716–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akinremi OO, Mcginn SM, Barr AG. 1996. Evaluation of the Palmer Drought index on the Canadian prairies. J Clim 9:897–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison SD, Treseder KK. 2008. Warming and drying suppress microbial activity and carbon cycling in boreal forest soils. Glob Change Biol 14:2898–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiro BD, Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Flannigan MD, Wotton BM. 2001. Fire, climate change, carbon and fuel management in the Canadian boreal forest. Int J Wildland Fire 10:405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apps MJ, Kurz WA, Luxmoore RJ, Nilsson LO, Sedjo RA, Schmidt R, Simpson LG, Vinson TS. Boreal forests and tundra. 1993. International workshop on terrestrial biospheric carbon fluxes: quantification of sinks and sources of CO2. Bad Harzburg (FRG), 1–5 March 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Archambault S, Bergeron Y. 1992. An 802-year tree-ring chronology from the Quebec boreal forest. Can J For Res 22:674–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Kafka V, Lefort P, Lesieur D. 2001. Natural fire frequency for the eastern Canadian boreal forest: consequences for sustainable forestry. Can J For Res 31:384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergeron Y, Flannigan M, Gauthier S, Leduc A, Lefort P. 2004a. Past, current and future fire frequency in the Canadian boreal forest: Implications for sustainable forest management. Ambio 33:356–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Flannigan M, Kafka V. 2004b. Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in Northwestern Quebec. Ecology 85:1916–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biondi F, Waikul K. 2004. DENDROCLIM2002: a C++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree-ring chronologies. Comput Geosci 30:303–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Björck A. 1996. Numerical methods for least squares problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.Google Scholar
  12. Bonn S. 2000. Competition dynamics in mixed beech-oak stands and its modifications expected due to climate changes. Allg For Jagdztg 171:81–8.Google Scholar
  13. Brais S, David P, Ouimet R. 2000. Impacts of wild fire severity and salvage harvesting on the nutrient balance of jack pine and black spruce boreal stands. Forest Ecol Manag 137:231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Briffa KR, Osborn TJ, Schweingruber FH, Jones PD, Shiyatov SG, Vaganov EA. 2002. Tree-ring width and density data around the Northern Hemisphere: part 1, local and regional climate signals. Holocene 12:737–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks JR, Flanagan LB, Ehleringer JR. 1998. Responses of boreal conifers to climate fluctuations: indications from tree-ring widths and carbon isotope analyses. Can J For Res 28:524–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chhin S, Wang GG, Tardif J. 2004. Dendroclimatic analysis of white spruce at its southern limit of distribution in the Spruce Woods Provincial Park, Manitoba, Canada. Tree-Ring Res 60:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conard SG, Sukhinin AI, Stocks BJ, Cahoon DR, Davidenko EP, Ivanova GA. 2002. Determining effects of area burned and fire severity on carbon cycling and emissions in Siberia. Clim Change 55:197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook ER. 1985. A time-series analysis approach to tree ring standardization. PhD dissertation edition, The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  19. Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA. 1990. Methods of Dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Cook ER, Krusic PJ. 2005. Program ARSTAN. A tree-ring standardization program based on detrending and autoregressive time series modeling, with interactive graphics. Palisades (NY): Tree-Ring Laboratory, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University.Google Scholar
  21. Crawford R, Jeffree C, Rees W. 2003. Paludification and forest retreat in northern oceanic environments. Ann Bot (Lond) 91:213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dang QL, Lieffers VJ. 1989a. Assessment of patterns of response of tree-ring growth of black spruce following peatland drainage. Can J For Res 19:924–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dang QL, Lieffers VJ. 1989b. Climate and annual ring growth of black spruce in some Alberta peatlands. Can J Bot 67:1885–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deslauriers A, Morin H. 2005. Intra-annual tracheid production in balsam fir stems and the effect of meteorological variables. Trees-Struct Funct 19:402–8.Google Scholar
  25. Desplanque C, Rolland C, Michalet R. 1998. Comparative dendroecology of the silver fir (Abies alba) and the Norway spruce (Picea abies) in an Alpine valley of France. Can J For Res 28:737–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Drobyshev I, Niklasson M, Linderson H, Sonesson K. 2008. Influence of annual weather on growth of pedunculate oak in southern Sweden. Ann For Sci 65: doi: 10.1051/forest:2008033.
  28. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Environment Canada. 2006. Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca.
  30. Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. 2007. Sphagnum community change after partial harvest in of black spruce boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 242:24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fenton N, Lecomte N, Legare S, Bergeron Y. 2005. Paludification in black spruce (Picea mariana) forests of eastern Canada: potential factors and management implications. Forest Ecol Manag 213:151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fenton N, Legare S, Bergeron Y, Pare D. 2006. Soil oxygen within boreal forests across an age gradient. Can J Soil Sci 86:1–9.Google Scholar
  33. Fritts HC. 2001. Tree rings and climate. Caldwell: The Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fritts HC, Guiot J. 1989. Methods of calibration, verification, and reconstruction. In: Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA, Eds. Methods of dendrochronology. Application in the environmental sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 163–217.Google Scholar
  35. Gauthier S, De Grandpré L, Bergeron Y. 2000. Differences in forest composition in two boreal forest ecoregions of Quebec. J Veg Sci 11:781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Girardin MP, Wotton BM. 2009. Summer moisture and wildfire risks across Canada. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Girardin MP, Raulier F, Bernier PY, Tardif JC. 2008. Response of tree growth to a changing climate in boreal central Canada: a comparison of empirical, process-based, and hybrid modelling approaches. Ecol Model 213:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gower ST, Vogel J, Stow TK, Norman JM, Steele SJ, Kucharik CJ. 1997. Carbon distribution and above-ground net primary production of upland and lowland boreal forest in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. J Geophys Res 104:29029–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gray DR. 2008. The relationship between climate and outbreak characteristics of the spruce budworm in eastern Canada. Clim Change 87:361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greene DF, MacDonald SE, Haeussler S, Domenicano S, Noel J, Jayen K, Charron I, Gauthier S, Hunt S, Gielau ET, Bergeron Y, Swift L. 2007. The reduction of organic-layer depth by wildfire in the North American boreal forest and its effect on tree recruitment by seed. Can J For Res 37:1012–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gu L, Hanson PJ, Mac Post W, Kaiser DP, Yang B, Nemani R, Pallardy SG, Meyers T. 2008. The 2007 eastern US spring freezes: Increased cold damage in a warming world? Bioscience 58:253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hanninen H. 2006. Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiol 26:889–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Haurwitz MW, Brier GW. 1981. A critique of the superposed epoch analysis method: its application to solar-weather relations. Mon Weather Rev 109:2074–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hofgaard A, Tardif J, Bergeron Y. 1999. Dendroclimatic response of Picea mariana and Pinus banksiana along a latitudinal gradient in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Can J For Res 29:1333–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holmes RL. 1999. Dendrochronological Program Library (DPL). Users manual. http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/pub/dpl/. Tucson (AZ): Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona.
  46. Huang J, Tardif JC, Bergeron Y, Denneler B, Berningen F, Girardin M. 2009. Radial growth response of four dominant boreal tree species to climate along a latitudinal gradient in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Glob Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01990.x.
  47. Islam MA, MacDonald SE. 2004. Ecophysiological adaptations of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings to flooding. Trees-Stuct Funct 18:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnstone JF, Chapin FS. 2006. Fire interval effects on successional trajectory in boreal forests of northwest Canada. Ecosystems 9:268–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kimball JS, Thornton PE, White ME, Running SW. 1997. Simulating forest productivity and surface-atmosphere carbon exchange in the BOREAS study region. Tree Physiol 17:589–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirdyanov A, Hughes M, Vaganov E, Schweingruber F, Silkin P. 2003. The importance of early summer temperature and date of snow melt for tree growth in the Siberian Subarctic. Trees-Stuct Funct 17:61–9.Google Scholar
  51. Komarov AS, Kubasova TS. 2007. Modeling organic matter dynamics in conifer-broadleaf forests in different site types upon fires: a computational experiment. Biol Bull 34:408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kurbatova J, Li C, Varlagin A, Xiao X, Vygodskaya N. 2008. Modeling carbon dynamics in two adjacent spruce forests with different soil conditions in Russia. Biogeosciences 5:969–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laiho R. 2006. Decomposition in peatlands: reconciling seemingly contrasting results on the impacts of lowered water levels. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2011–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Larsen CPS, MacDonald GM. 1995. Relations between tree-ring widths, climate, and annual area burned in the boreal forest of Alberta. Can J For Res 25:1746–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. LeBarron RK. 1945. Adjustment of black spruce root systems to increasing depth of peat. Ecology 26:309–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lebourgeois F, Cousseau G, Ducos Y. 2004. Climate-tree-growth relationships of Quercus petraea Mill. stand in the Forest of Berce (“Futaie des Clos”, Sarthe, France). Ann For Sci 61:361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lecomte N, Simard M, Bergeron Y, Larouche A, Asnong H, Richard PJW. 2005. Effects of fire severity and initial tree composition on understorey vegetation dynamics in a boreal landscape inferred from chronosequence and paleoecological data. J Veg Sci 16:665–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lecomte N, Simard M, Fenton N, Bergeron Y. 2006. Fire severity and long-term ecosystem biomass dynamics in coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada. Ecosystems 9:1215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Leonelli G, Denneler B, Bergeron Y. 2008. Climate sensitivity of trembling aspen radial growth along a productivity gradient in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 38:1211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Linderholm HW. 2006. Growing season changes in the last century. Agric For Meteorol 137:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Littell JS, Peterson DL, Tjoelker M. 2008. Douglas-fir growth in mountain ecosystems: water limits tree growth from stand to region. Ecol Monogr 78:349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Papadopol P, Hutchinson MF. 2006. The development of 1901–2000 historical monthly climate models for Canada and the United States. Agric Forest Meteorol 138:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McMillan AMS, Winston GC, Goulden ML. 2008. Age-dependent response of boreal forest to temperature and rainfall variability. Glob Change Biol 14:1904–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C. 2007. Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge, New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  65. Mitchell TD, Jones PD. 2005. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peltoniemi M, Thurig E, Ogle S, Palosuo T, Schrumpf M, Wutzler T, Butterbach-Bahl K, Chertov O, Komarov A, Mikhailov A, Gardenas A, Perry C, Liski J, Smith P, Makipaa R. 2007. Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils. Silva Fenn 41:575–602.Google Scholar
  67. Peterson DW, Peterson DL, Ettl GJ. 2002. Growth responses of subalpine fir to climatic variability in the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res 32:1503–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Plummer DA, Caya D, Frigon A, Cote H, Giguere M, Paquin D, Biner S, Harvey R, De Elia R. 2006. Climate and climate change over North America as simulated by the Canadian RCM. J Clim 19:3112–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prescott CE, Maynard DG, Laiho R. 2000. Humus in northern forests: friend or foe? Forest Ecol Manag 133:23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ritchie JC. 2004. Post-glacial vegetation of Canada. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rowe JS. 1972. Forest regions of Canada. Ottawa (ON): Environment Canada.Google Scholar
  72. Sakai A, Larcher W. 1987. Frost survival of plants. Ecological studies 62. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Schwarzel K, Renger M, Sauerbrey R, Wessolek G. 2002. Soil physical characteristics of peat soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci—Z Pflanz Bodenkunde 165:479–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schweingruber FH. 1996. Tree rings and environment. Dendroecology. Berne: Paul Haupt Publishers, p 609Google Scholar
  75. Seljaninov GT. 1966. Agroclimatic map of the world. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat Publishing House.Google Scholar
  76. Silins U, Rothwell RL. 1999. Spatial patterns of aerobic limit depth and oxygen diffusion rate at two peatlands drained for forestry in Alberta. Can J For Res 29:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Simard M, Lecomte N, Bergeron Y, Bernier PY, Pare D. 2007. Forest productivity decline caused by successional paludification of boreal soils. Ecol Appl 17:1619–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sirén G. 1955. The development of spruce forest on raw humus sites in northern Finland and its ecology. Acta Forestalia Fennica 62:1–363.Google Scholar
  79. Smith P, Fang CM, Dawson JJC, Moncrieff JB. 2008. Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv Agron 97:1–43.Google Scholar
  80. Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian system of soil classification. 3rd edn. Ottawa (ON): Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.Google Scholar
  81. Strimbeck GR, Kjellsen TD, Schaberg PG, Murakami PF. 2008. Dynamics of low-temperature acclimation in temperate and boreal conifer foliage in a mild winter climate. Tree Physiol 28:1365–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Tarnocai C. 2006. Classification systems: Canadian. In: Lal R, Ed. Encyclopedia of soil science, 2nd edition, Chap. 1:1. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis. pp 239–244.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson R, Clark RM. 2008. Is spring starting earlier? Holocene 18:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Turner JA. 1972. The drought code component of the Canadian Forest Fire Behaviour System. Canadian Forest Service Publication 1316. Ottawa (ON): Environment Canada.Google Scholar
  85. Ueyama M, Harazono Y, Kim Y, Tanaka N. 2009. Response of the carbon cycle in sub-arctic black spruce forests to climate change: reduction of a carbon sink related to the sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration. Agric For Meteorol 149:582–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vaganov E, Shashkin AV. 2000. Growth and tree-ring structure of conifers. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publishing House.Google Scholar
  87. van Cleve K, Dyrness CT, Viereck LA, Fox J, Chapin FI, Oechel WC. 1983a. Taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska. Bioscience 33:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Cleve K, Viereck LA, Dyrness CT. 1983b. Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Can J For Res 13:747–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Cleve K, Oechel WC, Hom JL. 1990. Response of Black Spruce Picea-Mariana ecosystems to soil temperature modification in interior Alaska, USA. Can J For Res 20:1530–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Viereck LA, Johnston WF. 1990. Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. black spruce. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, Eds. Silvics of North America: vol 1. Conifers. USDA For. Serv. Agri. Handb. 654, Washington (DC). pp 227–237.Google Scholar
  91. Wigley TML, Briffa KR, Jones PD. 1984. On the average value of correlated time series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yamaguchi DK, Filion L, Savage M. 1993. Relationship of temperature and light ring formation at subarctic treeline and implications for climate reconstruction. Quat Res 39:256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Drobyshev
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martin Simard
    • 2
  • Yves Bergeron
    • 1
  • Annika Hofgaard
    • 3
  1. 1.Canada Research Chair in Ecology and Sustainable Forest ManagementUniversity of Québec in Abitibi-TémiscamingueRouyn-NorandaCanada
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Southern Swedish Forest Research CentreSwedish Agricultural University (SLU)AlnarpSweden

Personalised recommendations