Ecosystems

, 12:1222 | Cite as

A Box Model for Ecosystem-Level Management of Mussel Culture Carrying Capacity in a Coastal Bay

Article

Abstract

The carrying capacity of shellfish aquaculture is determined by the interaction of cultured species with the ecosystem, particularly food availability to suspension feeders. A multiple box dynamic ecosystem model was constructed to examine the carrying capacity for mussel (Mytilus edulis) aquaculture in Tracadie Bay, Prince of Edward Island, Canada. Criteria for carrying capacity were based on chlorophyll concentration. The model was run in two different years (1998 and 1999) in which time series for three points inside the bay and a point outside the bay were available. This data set allows spatial validation of the ecosystem model and assessment of its sensitivity to changes in boundary conditions. The model validation process indicated that the differential equations and parameters used in the simulation provided robust prediction of the ecological dynamics within the bay. Results verified that mussel biomass exerts top-down control of phytoplankton populations. The model indicates that conditions observed during 1999 are more sensitive to grazing pressure from aquaculture than was observed during 1998, highlighting the importance of inter-annual variability in carrying capacity of the bay. This result is important from a management perspective because it emphasizes application of a precautionary policy and prediction in regulation of aquaculture activity in the bay. Retrospective scenarios showed that although the bay could yield greater mussel biomass production, stress on the environment would lead the ecosystem outside of its natural range of variation. Despite the spatial simplicity employed in the present model, it provides substantial management capability as well as an ecosystem-oriented approach to shellfish aquaculture.

Keywords

ecosystem model ecosystem management shellfish aquaculture carrying capacity phytoplankton depletion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and a Fundación Juana de Vega fellowship to R.F.

References

  1. Bacher C, Duarte P, Ferreira JG, Héral M, Raillard O. 1998. Assessment and comparison of the Marennes-Oléron Bay (France) and Carlingford Lough (Ireland) Carrying Capacity with ecosystem models. Aquatic Ecol 31:379–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacher C, Grant J, Hawkins A, Fang J, Zhu P, Duarte P. 2003. Modeling the effect of food depletion on scallop growth in Sungo Bay (China). Aquat Living Resour 16:10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bricker SB, Ferreira JG, Simas T. 2003. An integrated methodology for assessment of estuarine trophic status. Ecol Model 169:39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell DE, Newell CR. 1998. MUSMOD, a production model for bottom culture of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 219:171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver CEA, Mallet AL. 1990. Estimating carrying capacity of a coastal inlet for mussel culture. Aquaculture 88:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapelle A, Menesguen A, Deslous-Paoli JM, Souchu P, Mazouni N, Vaquer A, Millet B. 2000. Modelling nitrogen, primary production and oxygen in a Mediterranean lagoon. Impact of oysters farming and inputs from the watershed. Ecol Model 127:161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cloern JE. 1982. Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in southern San Francisco Bay? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cranford PJ, Strain PM, Dowd M, Hargrave BT, Grant J, Archambault MC. 2007. Influence of mussel aquaculture on nitrogen dynamics in a nutrient enriched coastal embayment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 347:61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowder L, Norse E. 2008. Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 32:772–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dame RF, Dankers N, Prins T, Jongsma H, Smaal A. 1991. The influence of mussel beds on nutrients in the West Wadden Sea and Eastern Scheldt estuaries. Estuaries 14:130–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dame RF, Prins TC. 1998. Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems. Aquatic Ecol 31:409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dowd M. 1997. On predicting the growth of cultured bivalves. Ecol Model 104:113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowd M. 2003. Seston dynamics in a tidal inlet with shellfish aquaculture: a model study using tracer equations. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:523–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowd M. 2005. A bio-physical coastal ecosystem model for assessing environmental effects of marine bivalve aquaculture. Ecol Model 183:323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowd M, Page FH, Losier R, McCurdy P, Budgen G. 2001. Physical oceanography of Tracadie Bay, PEI: analysis of sea level, current, wind and drifter data. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2347Google Scholar
  16. Duarte P. 2003. A review of current methods in the estimation of environmental carrying capacity for bivalve culture in Europe. In: Yu H, Bermas N, Eds. Determining environmental carrying capacity of coastal and marine areas: progress, constraints and future options. PEMSEA Workshop Proceedings No. 11. p 37–51Google Scholar
  17. Duarte O, Labarta U, Fernández-Reiriz MJ. 2008. Modelling local food depletion effects in mussel rafts of Galician Rias. Aquaculture 274:300–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duarte P, Meneses R, Hawkins AJS, Zhu M, Fang J, Grant J. 2003. Mathematical modelling to assess the carrying capacity for multi-species culture within coastal waters. Ecol Model 168:109–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira J, Duarte P, Ball B. 1998. Trophic capacity of Carlingford Lough for aquaculture—analysis by ecological modelling. Aquatic Ecol 31:361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira J, Hawkins AJS, Bricker SB. 2007. Management of productivity, environmental effects and profitability of shellfish aquaculture—the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model. Aquaculture 264:160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant J, Bacher C, Cranford PJ, Guyondet T, Carreau M. 2008. A spatially explicit ecosystem model of seston depletion in dense mussel culture. J Mar Syst 73:1555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant J, Cranford P, Hargrave B, Carreau M, Schofield B, Armsworthy S, Burdett-Coutts V, Ibarra D. 2005. A model of aquaculture biodeposition for multiple estuaries and field validation at blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) culture sites in eastern Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant J, Curran KJ, Guyondet TL, Tita G, Bacher C, Koutitonsky V, Dowd M. 2007. A box model of carrying capacity for suspended mussel aquaculture in Lagune de la Grande-Entrée, iles-de-la-Madeleine, Québec. Ecol Model 200:193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grant J, Dowd M, Thompson K, Emerson C, Hatcher A. 1993. Perspectives on field studies and related biological models of bivalve growth. In: Dame R, Ed. Bivalve filter feeders and marine ecosystem processes. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 371–420.Google Scholar
  25. Grant J, Hatcher A, Scott DB, Pocklington P, Schafer CT, Honig C. 1995. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating benthic impacts of shellfish aquaculture. Estuaries 18:124–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Héral M. 1993. Why carrying capacity models are useful tools for management of bivalve molluscs culture. In: Dame R, Ed. Bivalve filter-feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystems. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 455–77.Google Scholar
  27. Kremer J, Nixon SW. 1978. A coastal marine ecosystem: simulation and analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawson SE, Wiberg PL, McGlathery KJ, Fugate DC. 2007. Wind-driven sediment suspension controls light availability in a shallow coastal lagoon. Estuar Coast 30(1):102–12.Google Scholar
  30. Odum HT, Odum EC. 2000. Modeling for all scales. An introduction to system simulation. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pastres R, Solidoro C, Cossarini G, Melaku Canu D, Dejak C. 2001. Managing the rearing of Tapes philippinarum in the lagoon of Venice: a decision support system. Ecol Model 138:231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pouvreau S, Bacher C, Heral M. 2000. Ecophysiological model of growth and reproduction of the black pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera: potential applications for pearl farming in French Polynesia. Aquaculture 186:117–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prins TC, Escaravage V, Smaal AC, Peters JCH. 1995. Nutrient cycling and phytoplankton dynamics in relation to mussel grazing in a mesocosm experiment. Ophelia 41:289–315.Google Scholar
  34. Raillard O, Ménesguen A. 1994. An ecosystem model for the estimating the carrying capacity of a macrotidal shellfish system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 115:117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smaal A, Stralen M, Schuiling E. 2001. The interaction between shellfish culture and ecosystem processes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waite L, Grant J, Davidson J. 2005. Bay-scale spatial growth variation of mussels Mytilus edulis in suspended culture, Prince Edward Island, Canada. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 297:157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker TR, Grant J. 2009. Quantifying erosion rates and stability of bottom sediments at mussel aquaculture sites in Prince Edward Island. J Mar Syst 75:46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zar JH. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Instituto de Investigaciones MarinasVigoSpain
  2. 2.Department of OceanographyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations