Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1017–1036 | Cite as

Long-Term Human Impact and Vegetation Changes in a Boreal Forest Reserve: Implications for the Use of Protected Areas as Ecological References

  • Torbjörn Josefsson
  • Greger Hörnberg
  • Lars Östlund
Article

Abstract

Northern boreal forest reserves that display no signs of modern forest exploitation are often regarded as pristine and are frequently used as ecological reference areas for conservation and restoration. However, the long-term effects of human utilization of such forests are rarely investigated. Therefore, using both paleoecological and archaeological methods, we analyzed temporal and spatial gradients of long-term human impact in a large old-growth forest reserve in the far north of Sweden, comparing vegetational changes during the last millennium at three sites with different land use histories. Large parts of the forest displayed no visible signs of past human land use, and in an area with no recognized history of human land use the vegetation composition appears to have been relatively stable throughout the studied period. However, at two locations effects of previous land use could be distinguished extending at least four centuries back in time. Long-term, but low-intensity, human land use, including cultivation, reindeer herding and tree cutting, has clearly generated an open forest structure with altered species composition in the field layer at settlement sites and in the surrounding forest. Our analysis shows that past human land use created a persistent legacy that is still visible in the present forest ecosystem. This study highlights the necessity for ecologists to incorporate a historical approach to discern underlying factors that have caused vegetational changes, including past human activity. It also indicates that the intensity and spatial distribution of human land use within the landscape matrices of any forests should be assessed before using them as ecological references. The nomenclature of vascular plants follows Krok and Almquist (Svensk flora. Fanerogamer och ormbunksväxter, 2001).

Keywords

forest ecosystem disturbance nature reserve land use native people pollen analysis interdisciplinary studies forest history 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Ingela Bergman and Lars Liedgren for archaeological field surveys, Anna Berg for laboratory assistance, John Blackwell for linguistic corrections, two anonymous reviewers, Hanna Karlsson and David Wardle for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript, Henning Rankvist for information regarding the Akkapakte settlement and Björn Helamb at Arctic Air for unsurpassed helicopter transportation to the inaccessible study sites. This study was financially supported by FORMAS.

References

  1. Alexandersson H, Eggertsson Karlström C. 2001. Temperaturen och nederbörden i Sverige 1961–1990: Referensnormaler. Norrköping: SMHI. p 71.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen ST. 1969. Interglacial vegetation and soil development. Meddelelser fra Dansk geologisk Forening 19:90–102.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen ST. 1979. Identification of wild grass and cereal pollen. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse, Årbog 1978:69–92.Google Scholar
  4. Aronsson KA. 1994. Pollen evidence of Saami settlement and reindeer herding in the boreal forest of northernmost Sweden—an example of modern pollen rain studies as an aid in the interpretation of marginal human interference from fossil pollen data. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 82:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aronsson KÅ. 1991. Forest reindeer herding A.D. 1–1800: an archaeological and palaeoecological study in northern Sweden [PhD thesis]. Umeå: University of Umeå. 125 p.Google Scholar
  6. Barret SW, Arno SF. 1982. Indian fires as an ecological influence in the Northern Rockies. J For 80:647–51.Google Scholar
  7. Behre KE. 1981. The interpretation of anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams. Pollen Spores 23:225–45.Google Scholar
  8. Behre KE. 1988. The role of man in European vegetation history. In: Huntley B, Webb TIII, Eds. Handbook of vegetation science. Vol. 7, Vegetation history. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 633–72.Google Scholar
  9. Benitez JA, Fisher TR. 2004. Historical land-cover conversion (1665–1820) in the Choptank watershed, eastern United States. Ecosystems 7:219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergman I. 1995. Från Döudden till Varghalsen—a study of continuity and change in a hunter-gatherer society in the interior of northern Sweden [PhD thesis]. Umeå: University of Umeå. 245 p.Google Scholar
  11. Bergman I. 2007. Vessels and kettles: socio-economic implications of the cessation of asbestos pottery in Northern Sweden. Arkeologi i Norr 10:1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Bergman I, Påsse T, Olofsson A, Zackrisson O, Hörnberg G, Hellberg E, Bohlin E. 2003. Isostatic land uplift and Mesolithic landscapes: lake-tilting, a key to the discovery of Mesolithic sites in the interior of Northern Sweden. J Archaeol Sci 30:1451–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birks HJB. 1986. Late quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In: Berglund BE, Ed. Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology. Chichester: Wiley and Sons. p 3–65.Google Scholar
  14. Black BA, Ruffner CM, Abrams MD. 2006. Native American influences on the forest composition of the Allegheny Plateau, Northwest Pennsylvania. Can J For Res 36:1266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonnicksen TM. 2000. America’s ancient forests: from the ice age to the age of discovery. New York: Wiley. p 608.Google Scholar
  16. Bos JAA, Janssen CR. 1996. Local impact of Palaeolithic man on the environment during the end of the last glacial in the Netherlands. J Archaeol Sci 23:731–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowman S. 1990. Radiocarbon dating. London: British Museum Publications. p 64.Google Scholar
  18. Bradshaw RHW. 1988. Spatially precise studies of forest dynamics. In: Huntley B, Webb TIII, Eds. Vegetation history. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 725–51.Google Scholar
  19. Bradshaw R, Hannon G. 1992. Climatic-change, human influence and disturbance regime in the control of vegetation dynamics within Fiby Forest, Sweden. J Ecol 80:625–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Briggs JM, Spielmann KA, Schaafsma H, Kintigh KW, Kruse M, Morehouse K, Schollmeyer K. 2006. Why ecology needs archaeologists and archaeology needs ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 4:180–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burgi M, Turner MG. 2002. Factors and processes shaping land cover and land cover changes along the Wisconsin River. Ecosystems 5:184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bylund E. 1956. Koloniseringen av Pite lappmark t.o.m. år 1867: the colonization of Pite lappmark until 1867. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. p 447.Google Scholar
  23. Calcote R. 1995. Pollen source area and pollen productivity: evidence from forest hollows. J Ecol 83:591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campbell Å. 1948. Från vildmark till bygd: en etnologisk undersökning av nybyggarkulturen i Lappland före industrialismens genombrott. Uppsala: Landsmåls-och folkminnesarkivet. p 272.Google Scholar
  25. Carcaillet C. 1998. A spatially precise study of Holocene fire history, climate and human impact within the Maurienne valley, North French Alps. J Ecol 86:384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carpelan C, Hicks S. 1995. Ancient Saami in Finnish Lapland and their impact on the forest vegetation. In: Butlin RA, Roberts N, Eds. Ecological relations in historical times: human impact and adaptation. Oxford: Blackwell Science. p 344.Google Scholar
  27. Cronon W. 1983. Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang. p 241.Google Scholar
  28. Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ. 2002. The imprint of land-use history: patterns of carbon and nitrogen in downed woody debris in the Harvard Forest. Ecosystems 5:446–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cyranoski D. 2006. Calls to conserve biodiversity hotspots. Nature 439:774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR. 2004. Prehistoric native Americans and ecological change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 203.Google Scholar
  31. den Herder M, Kytöviita M-M, Niemelä P. 2003. Growth of reindeer lichens and effects of reindeer grazing on ground cover vegetation in a Scots pine forest and a subarctic heathland in Finnish Lapland. Ecography 26:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diamond J. 1982. Man the exterminator. Nature 298:787–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elmore AJ, Mustard JF, Hamburg SP, Manning SJ. 2006. Agricultural legacies in the Great Basin alter vegetation cover, composition, and response to precipitation. Ecosystems 9:1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ewel KC. 2001. Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4:716–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foster DR. 1992. Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in Central New-England, USA. J Ecol 80:753–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foster DR, Zebryk T, Schoonmaker P, Lezberg A. 1992. Postsettlement history of human land-use and vegetation dynamics of a Tsuga-Canadensis (Hemlock) woodlot in Central New-England. J Ecol 80:773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foster DR, Orwig DA, McLachlan JS. 1996. Ecological and conservation insights from reconstructive studies of temperate old-growth forests. Trends Ecol Evol 11:419–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B. 1998. Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:96–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Foster DR, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A. 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM. 2006. Previous land use alters plant allocation and growth in forest herbs. J Ecol 94:548–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fredén C. 1994. National atlas of Sweden/Geology. Italy: Almqvist & Wiksell International. p 208.Google Scholar
  42. Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B, Simonsson P. 1997. Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 94:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fuller TL, Foster DR, McLachlan TS, Drake N. 1998. Impact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gillson L, Willis KJ. 2004. ‘As Earth’s testimonies tell’: wilderness conservation in a changing world. Ecol Lett 7:990–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grimm EC. 1987. CONISS: a Fortran 77 program for stratigraphically constrained cluster analysis by the method of incremental sum of squares. Comput Geosci 13:13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grimm EC. 1991. TILIA v. 2.0.b.4. Springfield (IL): Illinois State Museum, Research and Collections Center.Google Scholar
  47. Grimm EC. 2004. TILIA GRAPH v. 2.0.2. Springfield (IL): Illinois State Museum, Research and Collections Center.Google Scholar
  48. Hall B, Motzkin G, Foster DR, Syfert M, Burk J. 2002. Three hundred years of forest and land-use change in Massachusetts, USA. J Biogeogr 29:1319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heiri O, Lotter AF, Lemcke G. 2001. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J Paleolimnol 25:101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hicks S. 1988. The representation of different farming practices in pollen diagrams from northern Finland. In: Birks HH, Birks HJB, Kaland PE, Moe D, Eds. The cultural landscape: past, present and future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 189–207.Google Scholar
  51. Hicks S. 1993. Pollen evidence of localized impact on the vegetation of northernmost Finland by hunter-gatherers. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 2:137–44.Google Scholar
  52. Hicks S. 1995. The history of a wilderness area in Finnish Lapland as revealed by pollen analysis. Arctic Centre Publ 7:126–40.Google Scholar
  53. Holt EA, McCune B, Neitlich P. 2008. Grazing and fire impacts on macrolichen communities of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. U.S.A. Bryol 111:68–83.Google Scholar
  54. Hotchkiss SC, Calcote R, Lynch EA. 2007. Response of vegetation and fire to Little Ice Age climate change: regional continuity and landscape heterogeneity. Landsc Ecol 22:25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hörnberg G, Zackrisson O, Segerström U, Svensson BW, Ohlson M, Bradshaw R. 1998. Boreal swamp forests: biodiversity “hotspots” in an impoverished forest landscape. Bioscience 48:795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hörnberg G, Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Bergman I. 1999. The genesis of two Picea-Cladina forests in northern Sweden. J Ecol 87:800–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hörnberg G, Bohlin E, Hellberg E, Bergman I, Zackrisson O, Olofsson A, Wallin JE, Påsse T. 2006. Effects of mesolithic hunter-gatherers on local vegetation in a non-uniform glacio-isostatic land uplift area, northern Sweden. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 15:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Iversen J. 1958. The bearing of glacial and interglacial epochs on the formation and extinction of plant taxa. Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 6:210–15.Google Scholar
  59. Jackson ST, Wong A. 1994. Using forest patchiness to determine pollen source areas of closed canopy pollen assemblages. J Ecol 82:89–99.Google Scholar
  60. Josefsson T, Hellberg E, Östlund L. 2005. Influence of habitat history on the distribution of Usnea longissima in boreal Scandinavia: a methodological case study. Lichenologist 37:555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jowsey PC. 1966. An improved peat sampler. New Phytol 65:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kalis AJ, Merkt J, Wunderlich J. 2003. Environmental changes during the Holocene climatic optimum in central Europe: human impact and natural causes. Quatern Sci Rev 22:33–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Karlsson H, Hörnberg G, Hannon G, Nordström EM. 2007. Long-term vegetation changes in the northern Scandinavian forest limit: a human impact-climate synergy? Holocene 17:37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Krok TOBN, Almquist S. 2001. Svensk flora. Fanerogamer och ormbunksväxter. Stockholm: Liber Utbildning. p 586.Google Scholar
  65. Kulling O. 1982. Översikt över södra norrbottenfjällens kaledonberggrund. Stockholm: Liberkartor. p 295.Google Scholar
  66. Laestadius P. 1831. Journal af Petrus Laestadius för första året af hans tjenstgöring såson missionaire i Lappmarken. Stockholm: Haeggström. p 480.Google Scholar
  67. Lähde E, Laiho O, Norokorpi Y. 1999. Diversity-oriented silviculture in the Boreal Zone of Europe. For Ecol Manag 118:223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lane P. 2006. Oral histories and indigenous archaeology: an Africanist perspective. Comments on Charlotte Damm (2005): archaeology, ethnohistory and oral traditions: approaches to the indigenous past. Norwegian Archaeol Rev 39:70–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Liedgren LG, Bergman I, Hörnberg G, Zackrisson O, Hellberg E, Östlund L, DeLuca TH. 2007. Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric hearths in alpine northern Sweden: problems and possibilities. J Archaeol Sci 34:1276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Linder P, Elfving B, Zackrisson O. 1997. Stand structure and successional trends in virgin boreal forest reserves in Sweden. For Ecol Manag 98:17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. MacKenzie MD, DeLuca TH, Sala A. 2006. Fire exclusion and nitrogen mineralization in low elevation forests of western Montana. Soil Biol Biochem 38:952–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Manseau M, Huot J, Crête M. 1996. Effects of summer grazing by caribou on composition and productivity of vegetation: community and landscape level. J Ecol 84:503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Matiskainen H. 1996. Discrepancies in deglaciation chronology and the appearance of man in Finland. In: Larsson L, Ed. The earliest settlement of Scandinavia and its relationship with neighbouring areas. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International. p 251–62.Google Scholar
  74. McLachlan JS, Foster DR, Menalled F. 2000. Anthropogenic ties to late-successional structure and composition in four New England hemlock stands. Ecology 81:717–33.Google Scholar
  75. Meschke C. 1979. Kulturlandskap i älvdalar 3. Underlagsmaterial för Bostadsdepartementets utredning om överledning för vattenkraftsändamål av vatten från Piteälven och Vindelälven. Kulturlandskap i älvdalar. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet och Statens historiska museer. p 256.Google Scholar
  76. Mitchell CE, Turner MG, Pearson SM. 2002. Effects of historical land use and forest patch size on myrmecochores and ant communities. Ecol Appl 12:1364–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moore PD, Webb JA, Collinson ME. 1991. Pollen analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. p 216.Google Scholar
  78. Motta R, Nola P, Piussi P. 2002. Long-term investigations in a strict forest reserve in the eastern Italian Alps: spatio-temporal origin and development in two multi-layered subalpine stands. J Ecol 90:495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Motzkin G, Patterson WAIII, Foster DR. 1999a. A historical perspective on Pitch pine—scrub Oak communities in the Connecticut Valley of Massachusetts. Ecosystems 2:255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Motzkin G, Wilson P, Foster DR, Allen A. 1999b. Vegetation patterns in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of history and environment. J Veg Sci 10:903–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nilsson M, Klarqvist M, Bohlin E, Possnert G. 2001. Variation in C-14 age of macrofossils and different fractions of minute peat samples dated by AMS. Holocene 11:579–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Norton TW. 1996. Conservation of biological diversity in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 85:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. O’Connell M. 1987. Early cereal-type pollen records from Connemara, western Ireland, and their possible significance. Pollen Spores 29:207–29.Google Scholar
  84. Ohlson M, Korbol A, Okland RH. 2006. The macroscopic charcoal record in forested boreal peatlands in southeast Norway. Holocene 16:731–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Östlund L, Ericsson TS, Zackrisson O, Andersson R. 2003. Traces of past Sami forest use: an ecological study of culturally modified trees and earlier land use within a boreal forest reserve. Scand J For Res 18:78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Östlund L, Keane RE, Arno SF, Andersson R. 2005. Culturally scarred trees in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana, USA—interpreting Native American historical forest use in a wilderness area. Nat Area J 25:315–25.Google Scholar
  87. Räsänen S. 2001. Tracing and interpreting fine-scale human impact in northern Fennoscandia with the aid of modern pollen analogues. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 10:211–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rull V. 2007. The Guayana Highlands: a promised (but threatened) land for ecological and evolutionary science. Biotropica 39:31–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ruong I. 1945. Studier i lapsk kultur i Pite lappmark och angränsande områden. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner. p 44.Google Scholar
  90. Russel EWB. 1983. Indian-set fires in the forests of the Northeastern United States. Ecology 64:78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ, Burrows SN, Sickley TA, Nordheim EV. 2005. Spatial controls of Pre-Euro-American wind and fire disturbance in Northern Wisconsin (USA) forest landscapes. Ecosystems 8:73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Segerström U. 1990. The post-glacial history of vegetation and agriculture in the Luleälv river valley. Umeå: Department of Archaeology. p 1–79.Google Scholar
  93. Segerström U, Emanuelsson M. 2002. Extensive forest grazing and hay-making on mires—vegetation changes in south-central Sweden due to land use since Medieval times. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 11:181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Segerström U, von Stedingk H, Hörnberg G. 2008. Long-term sustainability of a northern boreal decidiuous swamp forest in northern Sweden: succession in the absence of fire. Holocene 18:1113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sjörs H. 1963. Amphi-Atlantic zonation, Nemoral to Arctic. In: Löve A, Löve D, Eds. North Atlantic biota and their history. Oxford: Pergamon Press. p 109–25.Google Scholar
  96. Sjörs H. 1965. Forest regions. Acta Phytogeogr Suecica 50:48–63.Google Scholar
  97. Sommerseth I. 2004. Fra fangstbasert reindrift til nomadisme i indre Troms. In: Krogh M, Schanche K, Eds. Samisk forhistorie: Rapport fra konferanse i Lakselv 5.-6 september 2002. Varangerbotn: Várjjat Sámi Musea. p 150–61.Google Scholar
  98. Stark S, Wardle DA, Ohtonen R, Helle T, Yeates GW. 2000. The effect of reindeer grazing on decomposition, mineralization and soil biota in a dry oligotrophic Scots pine forest. Oikos 90:301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stark S, Toumi J, Strömmer R, Helle T. 2003. Non-parallel changes in soil microbal carbon and nitrogen dynamics due to reindeer grazing in northern boreal forests. Ecography 26:51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Storli I. 1993. Sami Viking Age pastoralism—or ‘The fur-trade paradigm’ reconsidered. Norwegian Archaeol Rev 26:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ. 1993. Extended 14C database and revised CALIB 3.2 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35:215–30.Google Scholar
  102. Sugita S. 1994. Pollen representation of vegetation in Quaternary sediments: theory and method in patchy vegetation. J Ecol 82:881–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Suominen O, Olofsson J. 2000. Impacts of semi-domesticated reindeer on structure of tundra and forest communities in Fennoscandia: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 37:233–49.Google Scholar
  104. Telford RJ, Heegaard E, Birks HJB. 2004. All age–depth models are wrong: but how badly? Quatern Sci Rev 23:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tinner W, Hofstetter S, Zeugin F, Conedera M, Wohlgemuth T, Zimmermann L, Zweifel R. 2006. Long-distance transport of macroscopic charcoal by an intensive crown fire in the Swiss Alps—implications for fire history reconstruction. Holocene 16:287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tweddle JC, Edwards KJ, Fieller NRJ. 2005. Multivariate statistical and other approaches for the separation of cereal from wild Poaceae pollen using a large Holocene dataset. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 14:15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vale TR. 1998. The myth of the humanized landscape: an example from Yosemite National Park. Nat Area J 18:231–6.Google Scholar
  108. van der Wal R. 2006. Do herbivores cause habitat degradation or vegetation state transition? Evidence from the tundra. Oikos 114:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. White MA, Mladenoff DJ. 1994. Old-growth forest landscape transition from pre-European settlement to present. Landsc Ecol 9:191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Willis KJ, Birks HJB. 2006. What is natural? The need for a long-term perspective in biodiversity conservation. Science 314:1261–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Väre H. 2001. Mountain birch taxonomy and floristics of mountain birch woodlands. In: Wielgolaski FE, Ed. Nordic mountain birch ecosystems. New York: Partnenon Publishing Group. p 35–46.Google Scholar
  112. Väre H, Ohtonen R, Oksanen J. 1995. Effects of grazing on understory vegetation in dry Pinus sylvestris forests. J Veg Sci 6:523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Väre H, Ohtonen R, Mikkola K. 1996. The effect and the extent of heavy grazing by reindeer in oligotrophic pine heaths in northeastern Fennoscandia. Ecography 19:245–53.Google Scholar
  114. von Post L. 1922. Sveriges Geologiska Undersöknings torvinventering och några av dess hittills vunna resultat. Svenska Mosskulturföreningens tidskrift 36:1–17.Google Scholar
  115. Vorren K-D. 1986. The impact of early agriculture on the vegetation of northern Norway: a discussion of anthropogenic indicators in biostratigraphical data. In: Behre KE, Ed. Anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. p 1–18.Google Scholar
  116. Zackrisson O, Östlund L, Korhonen O, Bergman I. 2000. The ancient use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) inner bark by Sami people in northern Sweden, related to cultural and ecological factors. Vegetat Hist Archaeobot 9:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torbjörn Josefsson
    • 1
  • Greger Hörnberg
    • 2
  • Lars Östlund
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Ecology and ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ResearchUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations