, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 820–829 | Cite as

Response of Six Boreal Tree Species to Stand Replacing Fire and Clearcutting



Emulation of natural disturbance processes and their effects is important to maintain the structure and composition of managed forests. To examine whether logging and fire have different effects on natural regeneration, we studied the recruitment of six common boreal tree species (Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera, Pinus banksiana, Picea mariana, Picea glauca, and Abies balsamea) after fire and clearcutting in northern Ontario. Regeneration densities of all studied species, except P. glauca and A. balsamea, were positively related to their respective pre-disturbance basal area. Post-disturbance regeneration densities of P. tremuloides and P. banksiana did not differ between disturbance types, whereas those of B. papyrifera were higher after fire, and those of P. mariana and A. balsamea were higher after clearcutting. Among tree species, the composition of P. tremuloides increased by approximately 35% after both disturbance types, that of B. papyrifera increased by 22% after fire and 11% after clearcutting, whereas those of P. banksiana, P. mariana, P. glauca, and A. balsamea decreased to various extents. Compared with fire, clearcutting significantly increased the post-disturbance presence of A. balsamea, which is attributed to surviving advance regeneration after logging. The natural regeneration process after fire appears to be emulated by clearcutting for P. tremuloides, P. banksiana, P. mariana, and P. glauca, but the increase in B. papyrifera after clearcutting is less pronounced than after fire, whereas the reduction of A. balsamea after clearcutting is less severe than after fire.


tree regeneration fire clearcutting Populus tremuloides Betula papyrifera Pinus banksiana Picea mariana Picea glauca Abies balsamea 


  1. Arseneault D. 2001. Impact of fire behavior on postfire forest development in a homogeneous boreal landscape. Can J For Res 31:1367–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergeron Y, Charron D. 1994. Postfire stand dynamics in a southern boreal forest (Québec): A dendroecological approach. Ecoscience 1:173–184.Google Scholar
  3. Brassard BW, Chen HYH. 2008. Effects of forest type and disturbance on diversity of coarse woody debris in boreal forest. Ecosystems 11:1078–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carleton TJ, MacLellan P. 1994. Woody vegetation responses to fire versus clear cut logging: A comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience 1:141–152.Google Scholar
  5. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM). 2005. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada. National status 2005. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  6. Charron I, Greene DF. 2002. Post-wildfire seedbeds and tree establishment in the southern mixedwood boreal forest. Can J For Res 32:1607–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen HYH, Popadiouk RV. 2002. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environ Rev 10:137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen HYH, Vasiliauskas S, Kayahara GJ, Ilisson T. 2009. Wildfire promotes broadleaves and species mixture in boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 257:343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen HYH, Wang JR. 2006. Post-harvest regeneration of lowland black spruce forests in northeastern Ontario. New Forests 31:115–129.Google Scholar
  10. Ecoregions Working Group. 1989. Ecoclimatic regions of Canada: first approximation. Ecological Land Classification Series 23. Ottawa, ON: Sustainable Development Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Eliasson L. 1971. Growth regulators in Populus tremula III. Variation of auxin and inhibitor level in roots in relation to root sucker formation. Physiol Planta 25:118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Environment Canada (2009) Canadian climate normals 1971–2000., accessed on 10.10.2008
  13. Eyre FH. 1938. Can jack pine be regenerated without fire? J For 36:1067-1072.Google Scholar
  14. Farmer RE. 1962. Aspen root sucker formation and apical dominance. For Sci 8:403–410.Google Scholar
  15. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster DR. 1985. Vegetation development following fire in Picea mariana (black spruce) Pleurozium forests of southeastern Labrador, Canada. J Ecol 73:517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser EC, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM. 2004. Wounding of aspen roots promotes suckering. Can J Bot 82:310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey BR, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM, Comeau PG, Greenway KJ. 2003. An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen. Can J For Res 33:1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene DF, Johnson EA. 1999. Modelling recruitment of Populus tremuloides, Pinus banksiana, and Picea mariana following fire in the mixedwood boreal forest. Can J For Res 29:462–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene DF, Kneeshaw DD, Messier C, Lieffers V, Cormier D, Doucet R, Coates KD, Groot A, Grover G, Calogeropoulos C. 2002. Modelling silvicultural alternatives for conifer regeneration in boreal mixedwood stands (aspen/white spruce/balsam fir). For Chron 78:281–295.Google Scholar
  21. Greene DF, Macdonald SE, Haeussler S, Domenicano S, Noel J, Jayen K, Charron I, Gauthier S, Hunt S, Gielau ET, Bergeron Y, Swift L. 2007. The reduction of organic–layer depth by wildfire in the North American boreal forest and its effect on tree recruitment by seed. Can J For Res 37:1012–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene DF, Noel J, Bergeron Y, Rousseau M, Gauthier S. 2004. Recruitment of Picea mariana, Pinus banksiana, and Populus tremuloides across a burn severity gradient following wildfire in the southern boreal forest of Quebec. Can J For Res 34:1845–1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutsell SL, Johnson EA. 2002. Accurately ageing trees and examining their height–growth rates: implications for interpreting forest dynamics. J Ecol 90:153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haeussler S, Bergeron Y. 2004. Range of variability in boreal aspen plant communities after wildfire and clear–cutting. Can J For Res 34:274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper KA, Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Drapeau P. 2002. Post–fire development of canopy structure and composition in black spruce forests of Abitibi, Quebec: A landscape scale study. Silva Fenn 36:249–263.Google Scholar
  26. Hart SA, Chen HYH. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecol Monogr 78:123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harvey B, Brais S. 2002. Effects of mechanized careful logging on natural regeneration and vegetation competition in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest. Can J For Res 32:653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey BD, Bergeron Y. 1989 Site patterns of natural regeneration following clear–cutting in northwestern Quebec. Can J For Res 19:1458–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hewitt N. 1998. Seed size and shade–tolerance: a comparative analysis of North American temperate trees. Oecologia 114:432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunter ML. 1999. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  31. Johnstone JF, Chapin FS, Foote J, Kemmett S, Price K, Viereck L. 2004. Decadal observations of tree regeneration following fire in boreal forests. Can J For Res 34:267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnstone JF, Kasischke ES. 2005. Stand–level effects of soil burn severity on postfire regeneration in a recently burned black spruce forest. Can J For Res 35:2151–2163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemperman JA, Barnes BV. 1976. Clone size in American aspens. Can J Bot 54:2603–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamont BB, Lemaitre DC, Cowling RM, Enright NJ. 1991. Canopy seed storage in woody–plants. Bot Rev 57:277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lavertu D, Mauffette Y, Bergeron Y. 1994. Effects of stand age and litter removal on the regeneration of Populus tremuloides. J Veg Sci 5:561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lavoie L, Sirois L. 1998. Vegetation changes caused by recent fires in the northern boreal forest of eastern Canada. J Veg Sci 9:483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  38. Mallik AU, Bell FW, Gong Y. 1997. Regeneration behavior of competing plants after clear cutting: implications for vegetation management. For Ecol Manag 95:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marquis DA, Bjorkbom JC, Yelenosky G. 1964. Effect of seedbed condition and light exposure on paper birch regeneration. J For 62:876–881.Google Scholar
  40. McRae DJ, Duchesne LC, Freedman B, Lynham TJ, Woodley S. 2001. Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management. Environ Rev 9:223–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nguyen-Xuan T, Bergeron Y, Simard D, Fyles JW, Pare D. 2000. The importance of forest floor disturbance in the early regeneration patterns of the boreal forest of western and central Quebec: a wildfire versus logging comparison. Can J For Res 30:1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker KR, Wiens JA. 2005. Assessing recovery following environmental accidents: Environmental variation, ecological assumptions, and strategies. Ecol Appl 15:2037–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown–fire ecosystems. Ecology 85:1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perala DA, Alm AA. 1990. Reproductive ecology of birch: A review. For Ecol Manag 32:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodrigo A, Retana J, Pico FX. 2004. Direct regeneration is not the only response of Mediterranean forests to large fires. Ecology 85:716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowe JS. 1972. The forest regions of Canada. Canada: Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Canadian Forest Service, Publication no. 1300Google Scholar
  47. Simon NPP, Schwab FE. 2005. The response of conifer and broad–leaved trees and shrubs to wildfire and clearcut logging in the boreal forests of central Labrador. North J Appl For 22:35–41.Google Scholar
  48. Steneker GA. 1974. Factors affecting the suckering of trembling aspen. For Chron 50:32–34.Google Scholar
  49. St-Pierre H, Gagnon R, Bellefleur P. 1992. Régénération après feu de l’épinette noire (Picea mariana) et du pin gris (Pinus banksiana) dans la forêt boréale. Québec. Can J For Res 22:.474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strong WL, Laroi GH. 1983. Root–system morphology of common boreal forest trees in Alberta, Canada. Can J For Res 13:1164–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW. 1997. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol Monogr 67:411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang GG. 2003. Early regeneration and growth dynamics of Populus tremuloides suckers in relation to fire severity. Can J For Res 33:1998–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiens JA, Parker KR. 1995. Analyzing the effects of accidental environmental impacts – approaches and assumptions. Ecol Appl 5:1069–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Forestry and the Forest EnvironmentLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada

Personalised recommendations