Ecosystems

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 391–400 | Cite as

Landscape Effects on Ecosystems: Birds as Active Vectors of Nutrient Transport to Fragmented Urban Forests Versus Forest-Dominated Landscapes

Article

Abstract

In urban landscapes, nearby birds contribute to allochthonous nutrient flow from residential areas to fragmented forests by consuming food in residential areas and depositing feces in forests. To estimate allochthonous nutrient flow qualitatively, the stable nitrogen (δ15N) and carbon (δ13C) isotope approach is useful. However, the quantitative allochthonous flow rate cannot be estimated by the stable-isotope approach. To quantify allochthonous input, we compare two different landscapes. We assume that the input rate in deep forests in the forest-dominated landscape is the basic autochthonous flow that is common to various forests, and estimate the allochthonous nutrient input by subtracting the autochthonous flow from the total input in urban forests. The observed nutrient-input rate in the forest-dominated landscape as the autochthonous flow is 0.0298 kg P ha−1 y−1 and 0.319 kg N ha−1 y−1. Using these values, the allochthonous P input (kg P ha−1 y−1) is estimated at 0.0307 in urban fragmented forests and 2.31 in forests with crow roosts, whereas N input (kg N ha−1 y−1) is 0.397 in urban fragmented forests and 23.2 in forests with crow roosts. Our estimation shows that, in urban forests with roosts, birds contribute 2.7 times the amount of allochthonous P contributed via other pathways, and in urban forests without roosts they contribute 0.035 times the amount; and in addition, birds contribute 0.66 times the amount of allochthonous N input via other pathways in urban forests with crow roosts and 0.011 times the amount in urban forests without roosts. We also measure stable nitrogen and carbon isotope ratios, %N, %P, and %C to estimate the diet of birds. High δ15N and δ13C values in crow roosts indicate that they eat foods such as livestock meat, C4 maize, or fish. High avian biomass is the major reason for the large nutrient input in urban landscapes, especially in urban forests with crow roosts.

Keywords

phosphorus nitrogen diet analysis bird community structure fragmented forest nutrient flow stable isotope ratio urban ecology allochthonous flow autochthonous flow 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Abe Y. 1989. Pollutant load from atmospheric deposition. In: Kunimatsu T, Muraoka K, editors. Modeling river pollution. Gihodo shuppan, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese), pp 24–34.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Caraco NF. 2001. Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication: a global perspective. BioScience 51:227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boring LR, Swank WT, Waide JB, Henderson GS. 1988. Sources, fates, and impacts of nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems: review and synthesis. Biogeochemistry 6:119–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ. 2006. SMATR: Standardised major axis tests and routines, ver 2.0. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/
  5. Fujita M, Koike F. 2007. Birds transport nutrients to fragmented forests in an urban landscape. Ecological Applications 17:648–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukami T, Wardle DA, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Towns DR, Yeates GW, Bonner KI, Durrett MS, Grant-Hoffman MN, Williamson WM. 2006. Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecology Letters 9:1299–1307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ham YS, Tamiya S, Choi IS. 2006. Contribution of dissolved organic nitrogen deposition to nitrogen saturation in a forested mountainous watershed in Tsukui, Central Japan. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 178:113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilderbrand GV, Hanley TA, Robbins CT, Schwartz CC. 1999. Role of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the flow of marine nitrogen into a terrestrial ecosystem. Oecologia 121:546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill MO. 1979. TWINSPAN – A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, US.Google Scholar
  10. Hobara S, Koba K, Osono T, Tokuchi N, Ishida A, Kameda K. 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment and balance in forests colonized by cormorants: Implications of the influence of soil adsorption. Plant and Soil 268:89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobson KA, Clark RG. 1992. Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes. II: factors influencing diet–tissue fractionation. Condor 94:189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobson KA, Piatt JF, Pitocchelli J. 1994. Using stable isotopes to determine seabird trophic relationships. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:786–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jokimäki J, Suhonen J. 1998. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 39:253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitchell JF, Schindler DE, Herwig BR, Post DM, Olson MH. 1999. Nutrient cycling at the landscape scale: The role of diel foraging migrations by geese at the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico. Limnology and Oceanography 44:828–836.Google Scholar
  15. Kiyosu Y. 1978. The birds of Japan I, II and III. Revised edn. Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Kurosawa R, Matsuo T, Tokunaga T, Kobayashi T, Sato E. 2004. Breeding performances of crows in a park-like sites with rich vegetation in urban areas: A comparison between Sapporo and Tokyo. STRIX 22:109–116.Google Scholar
  17. Lim HC, Sodhi NS. 2004. Responses of avian guilds to urbanisation in a tropical city. Landscape and Urban Planning 66:199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindeboom HJ. 1984. The nitrogen pathway in a penguin rookery. Ecology 65:269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Long JL. 1981. Introduced birds of the world. Reed, Wellington.Google Scholar
  20. Marion L, Clergeau P, Brient L, Bertru G. 1994. The importance of avian-contributed nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to Lake Grand-Lieu, France. Hydrobiologia 279–280:133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyawaki A. 1976. The potential natural vegetation in prefecture Kanagawa. Japan: The Board of Education of the Kanagawa Prefecture (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. Morishita E, Itao K, Sasaki K, Higuchi H. 2003. Movements of crows in urban areas, based on PHS tracking. Global Environmental Research 7:181–191.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27:31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamura T, Nakamura M. 1995. Bird’s life in Japan with color pictures. Birds of mountain, woodland and field. Hoikusha, Osaka, Japan (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  25. Natuhara Y, Imai C. 1996. Spatial structure of avifauna along urban–rural gradients. Ecological Research 11:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newman EI. 1995. Phosphorus inputs to terrestrial ecosystems. J. Ecology 83:713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver JD, Legovic T. 1988. Okefenokee marshland before, during and after nutrient enrichment by a bird rookery. Ecological Modelling 43:195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose MD, Polis GA. 1998. The distribution and abundance of coyotes: the effects of allochthonous food subsidies from the sea. Ecology 79:998–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi L, Costantini ML, Brilli M. 2007. Does stable isotope analysis separate transgenic and traditional corn (Zea mays L.) detritus and their consumers? Applied Soil Ecology 35:449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scharenbroch BC, Lloyd JE, Johnson-Maynard JL. 2005. Distinguishing urban soils with physical, chemical, and biological properties. Pedrobiologia 49: 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoeninger MJ, DeNiro MJ. 1984. Nitrogen and carbon isotopic composition of bone collagen from marine and terrestrial animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48:625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith SV, Swaney DP, Talaue-McManus L, Bartley JD, Sandhey PT, McLaughlin CJ, Dupra VC, Crossland CJ, Buddemeier RW, Maxwell BA, Wulff F. 2003. Humans, hydrology, and the distribution of inorganic nutrient loading to the ocean. BioScience 53:235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Tilman D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  35. Tokeshi M. 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Advances in Ecological Research 24:111–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsutsumi T. 1989. Forest Ecology. Asakura Shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  37. Ueta M, Kurosawa R, Hamao S, Kawachi H, Higuchi H. 2003. Population change of jungle crows in Tokyo. Global Environmental Research 7:131–137.Google Scholar
  38. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7:737–750.Google Scholar
  39. Wild Bird Society of Japan Kanagawa Chapter. 2002. Birds in Kanagawa in the 20th century: list of birds in Kanagawa 4. Yokohama: Wild Bird Society of Japan Kanagawa Chapter (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environment and Information SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Center for Southeast Asian StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations