Ecosystems

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 1142–1156 | Cite as

Rapid Recovery from Eutrophication of a Stratified Lake by Disruption of Internal Nutrient Load

  • Thomas Mehner
  • Markus Diekmann
  • Thomas Gonsiorczyk
  • Peter Kasprzak
  • Rainer Koschel
  • Lothar Krienitz
  • Marion Rumpf
  • Michael Schulz
  • Gerlinde Wauer
Article

Abstract

Restoration of anthropogenically eutrophied lake ecosystems is difficult due to feedback mechanisms that stabilize the trophically degraded state. Here, we show rapid recovery of a eutrophic stratified lake in response to multiple restoration that targeted the feedback mechanisms of high external and internal nutrient loads, lack of a trophic cascade, and lack of structured littoral habitats. Lake Tiefwarensee (Germany) was exposed to aluminium and calcium treatment and fisheries management over 5 years. Within this period, in-lake phosphorus concentrations declined by more than 80%, and transparency, zooplankton biomass and fish assemblage structure and biomass responded immediately and almost linearly to the reduction in phosphorus concentrations. Phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll a (chl a) concentrations likewise decreased in response to restoration, but the declining trend was interrupted by one recovery year with unusually high phytoplankton biomasses. The zooplankton:phytoplankton biomass ratio and the chl a:phosphorus ratio approached values observed in other stratified lakes during natural recovery from eutrophication. The slow response of Tiefwarensee to the reduction of external load, and the quick response to the chemical treatment suggest that the disruption of internal P recycling and loading was the decisive restoration measure in Tiefwarensee. The external load reduction was a necessary but not sufficient measure, at least in the short-term, whereas the low-effort fisheries management was of minor importance. A comparison with other case studies confirms that measures aiming to inactivate phosphorus are the most efficient approaches to restore stratified lakes in the short-term, but a shift to a permanent near-pristine state is possible only by additional P input control.

Keywords

phosphorus inactivation food web deep lake internal nutrient loading restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Lake restoration and research were financed by the Environmental Ministry of the German Federal State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the city of Waren (Müritz). Technical support during sampling and raw sample analyses was given by J. Dalchow, U. Mallok, R. Rossberg, M. Sachtleben, R. Degebrodt, C. Helms, T. Rohde and A. Türck. K. Kalies counted the phytoplankton and zooplankton samples. Brett Johnson, Erik Jeppesen as subject editor and four anonymous reviewers gave many insightful comments which helped improve the text.

References

  1. Aku PMK, Rudstam LG, Tonn WM. 1997. Impact of hypolimnetic oxygenation on the vertical distribution of cisco (Coregonus artedi) in Amisk Lake, Alberta. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2182–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MA. 2004. Impacts of metal salt addition on the chemistry of Lake Elsinore, California: 2. Calcium salts. Lake Res Manag 20:270–9Google Scholar
  3. Appelberg M. 2000. Swedish standard methods for sampling freshwater fish with multi-mesh gillnets. Fiskeriverket Inf 1:1–32Google Scholar
  4. Asplund T, Cook CE. 1997. Effects of motorboats on submerged aquatic macrophytes. Lake Res Manag 13:1–12Google Scholar
  5. Balk H, Lindem T. 2005. Sonar4 and Sonar5-Pro post-processing system Manual version 5.9.5. Oslo: University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  6. Benndorf J. 1987. Food web manipulation without nutrient control: a useful strategy in lake restoration? Schweiz Z Hydrol 49:237–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benndorf J. 1990. Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe. Hydrobiologia 200–201:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benndorf J, Böing W, Koop J, Neubauer I. 2002. Top-down control of phytoplankton: the role of time scale, lake depth and trophic state. Freshw Biol 47:2282–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman E, Hansson LA, Persson A, Strand J, Romare P, Enell M, Graneli W, Svensson JM, Hamrin SF, Cronberg G, Andersson G, Bergstrand E. 1999. Synthesis of theoretical and empirical experiences from nutrient and cyprinid reductions in Lake Ringsjon. Hydrobiologia 404:145–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierek E, Herzig A, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Kurasawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T. 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw J Zool 24:419–56Google Scholar
  11. Bryhn AC, Hakanson L. 2007. A comparison of predictive phosphorus load-concentration models for lakes. Ecosystems 10:1084–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation. Oldendorf: International Ecology InstituteGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter SR, Cottingham KL. 1997. Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conserv Ecol (online) 1:http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art2
  15. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR. 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience 35:634–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carpenter SR, Ludwig D, Brock WA. 1999. Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecol Appl 9:751–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carvalho L, Beklioglu M, Moss B. 1995. Changes in a deep lake following sewage diversion—a challenge to the orthodoxy of external phosphorus control as a restoration strategy. Freshw Biol 34:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooke GD, Welch EB, Peterson SA, Nichols SA. 2005. Restoration and management of lakes and reservoirs. Boca Raton: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronberg G. 1999. Qualitative and quantitative investigations of phytoplankton in Lake Ringsjön, Sweden. Hydrobiologia 404:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deppe T, Ockenfeld K, Meybohm A, Opitz M, Benndorf J. 1999. Reduction of Microcystis blooms in a hypertrophic reservoir by a combined ecotechnological strategy. Hydrobiologia 409:31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R, Mehner T. 2005. Habitat-specific fishing revealed distinct indicator species in German lowland lake fish communities. J Appl Ecol 42:901–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dittrich M, Koschel R. 2002. Interactions between calcite precipitation (natural and artificial) and phosphorus cycle in the hardwater lake. Hydrobiologia 469:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunalska JA, Wisniewski G, Mientki C. 2007. Assessment of multi-year (1956–2003) hypolimnetic withdrawal from Lake Kortowskie, Poland. Lake Res Manag 23:377–87Google Scholar
  24. Edmondson WT. 1970. Phosphorus, nitrogen, and algae in Lake Washington after diversion of sewage. Science 169:690–1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Field KM, Prepas EE. 1997. Increased abundance and depth distribution of pelagic crustacean zooplankton during hypolimnetic oxygenation in a deep, eutrophic Alberta lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2146–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foy RH. 1986. Suppression of phosphorus release from lake-sediments by the addition of nitrate. Water Res 20:1345–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia X-F, Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R, Mehner T. 2006. Correlations between type-indicator fish species and lake productivity in German lowland lakes. J Fish Biol 68:1144–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Genkai-Kato M, Carpenter SR. 2005. Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86:210–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haney JF, Hall DJ. 1973. Sugar-coated Daphnia: a preservation technique for Cladocera. Limnol Oceanogr 18:331–3Google Scholar
  30. Hanson JM, Leggett WC. 1982. Empirical prediction of fish biomass and yield. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:257–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansson LA, Annadotter H, Bergman E, Hamrin SF, Jeppesen E, Kairesalo T, Luokkanen E, Nilsson PA, Søndergaard M, Strand J. 1998. Biomanipulation as an application of food-chain theory: constraints, synthesis, and recommendations for temperate lakes. Ecosystems 1:558–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hepperle D, Schmidt-Halewicz SE. 2000. Opticount©. A software tool for the enumeration and biomass determination of plankton organisms and other particles. Win32-Version: http://science.do-mix.de
  33. Horppila J, Peltonen H, Malinen T, Luokkanen E, Kairesalo T. 1998. Top-down or bottom-up effects by fish: Issues of concern in biomanipulation of lakes. Restor Ecol 6:20–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. James WF, Barko JW, Taylor WD. 1991. Effects of alum treatment on phosphorus dynamics in a north-temperate reservoir. Hydrobiologia 215:231–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Jensen C, Faafeng B, Hessen DO, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Brettum P, Christoffersen K. 2003. The impact of nutrient state and lake depth on top-down control in the pelagic zone of lakes: a study of 466 lakes from the temperate zone to the arctic. Ecosystems 6:313–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Jensen JP, Havens KE, Anneville O, Carvalho L, Coveney MF, Deneke R, Dokulil MT, Foy B, Gerdeaux D, Hampton SE, Hilt S, Kangur K, Köhler J, Lammens EHHR, Lauridsen TL, Manca M, Miracle MR, Moss B, Noges P, Persson G, Phillips G, Portielje R, Schelske CL, Straile D, Tatrai I, Willen E, Winder M. 2005. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading—an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshw Biol 50:1747–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Søndergaard M, Christoffersen K. 1997. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  38. Kasprzak P. 1984. Bestimmung des Körperkohlenstoffes von Planktoncrustaceen. Limnologica 15:191–4Google Scholar
  39. Kasprzak P, Koschel R, Krienitz L, Gonsiorczyk T, Mehner T, Benndorf J, Hülsmann S, Schultz H, Wagner A. 2007. Reduction of nutrient loading and biomanipulation as tools in water quality management: long-term observations on Bautzen Reservoir and Feldberger Haussee (Germany). Lake Res Manag 23:410–27Google Scholar
  40. Koschel R, Casper P, Gonsiorczyk T, Rossberg R, Wauer G. 2006. Hypolimnetic Al- and CaCO3-treatments and aeration for restoration of a stratified eutrophic hardwater lake in Germany. Verh Int Ver Limnol 29:2165–71Google Scholar
  41. Krienitz L, Kasprzak P, Koschel R. 1996. Long term study on the influence of eutrophication, restoration and biomanipulation on the structure and development of phytoplankton communities in Feldberger Haussee (Baltic Lake District, Germany). Hydrobiologia 330:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larsen DP, Schults DW, Malueg KW. 1981. Summer internal phosphorus supplies in Shagawa Lake, Minnesota. Limnol Oceanogr 26:740–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lathrop RC. 2007. Perspectives on the eutrophication of the Yahara lakes. Lake Res Manag 23:345–65Google Scholar
  44. Lathrop RC, Carpenter SR, Stow CA, Soranno PA, Panuska JC. 1998. Phosphorus loading reductions needed to control blue-green algal blooms in Lake Mendota. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1169–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lathrop RC, Johnson BM, Johnson TB, Vogelsang MT, Carpenter SR, Hrabic TR, Kitchell JF, Magnuson JJ, Rudstam LG, Stewart RS. 2002. Stocking piscivores to improve fishing and water clarity: a synthesis of the Lake Mendota biomanipulation project. Freshw Biol 47:2410–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewandowski J, Schauser I, Hupfer M. 2003. Long term effects of phosphorus precipitations with alum in hypereutrophic Lake Susser See (Germany). Water Res 37:3194–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Love RH. 1971. Dorsal aspect of an individual fish. J Acoust Soc Am 49:816–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lund JWG, Kipling C, LeCren ED. 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11:143–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mehner T, Arlinghaus R, Berg S, Dörner H, Jacobsen L, Kasprzak P, Koschel R, Schulze T, Skov C, Wolter C, Wysujack K. 2004. How to link biomanipulation and sustainable fisheries management: a step-by-step guideline for lakes of the European temperate zone. Fish Manag Ecol 11:261–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mehner T, Benndorf J, Kasprzak P, Koschel R. 2002. Biomanipulation of lake ecosystems: successful applications and expanding complexity in the underlying science. Freshw Biol 47:2453–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mehner T, Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R. 2005. Composition of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human use intensity. Freshw Biol 50:70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mehner T, Padisak J, Kasprzak P, Koschel R, Krienitz L. 2008. A test of food web hypotheses by exploring time series of fish, zooplankton and phytoplankton in an oligo-mesotrophic lake. Limnologica. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2008.05.001
  53. Nürnberg GK. 1984. The prediction of internal phosphorus load in lakes with anoxic hypolimnia. Limnol Oceanogr 29:111–24Google Scholar
  54. Nürnberg GK. 2007. Lake responses to long-term hypolimnetic withdrawal treatments. Lake Res Manag 23:388–409Google Scholar
  55. Persson L, Diehl S, Johansson L, Andersson G, Hamrin SF. 1991. Shifts in fish communities along the productivity gradient of temperate lakes—patterns and the importance of size-structured interactions. J Fish Biol 38:281–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Persson L, Greenberg LA. 1990. Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca fluviatilis)-roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reitzel K, Hansen J, Andersen FO, Hansen KS, Jensen HS. 2005. Lake restoration by dosing aluminum relative to mobile phosphorus in the sediment. Environ Sci Technol 39:4134–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robertson DM, Goddard GL, Helsel DR, MacKinnon KL. 2000. Rehabilitation of Delavan Lake, Wisconsin. Lake Res Manag 16:155–76Google Scholar
  59. Rydin E, Huser B, Welch EB. 2000. Amount of phosphorus inactivated by alum treatments in Washington lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 45:226–30Google Scholar
  60. Sandgren CD. 1991. The ecology of chrysophyte flagellates: their growth and perennation strategies as freshwater phytoplankton. In: Sandgren CD, Ed. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 9–104Google Scholar
  61. Sas H. 1989. Lake restoration by reducing of nutrient loading: expectations, experiments, extrapolations. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag RicharzGoogle Scholar
  62. Schauser I, Chorus I. 2007. Assessment of internal and external lake restoration measures for two Berlin lakes. Lake Res Manag 23:366–76Google Scholar
  63. Skov C, Nilsson PA. 2007. Evaluating stocking of YOY pike Esox lucius as a tool in the restoration of shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 52:1834–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smeltzer E, Kirn RA, Fiske S. 1999. Long-term water quality and biological effects of alum treatment of Lake Morey, Vermont. Lake Res Manag 15:173–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sommer U. 1991. Growth and survival strategies of planktonic diatoms. In: Sandgren CD, Ed. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 227–60Google Scholar
  66. Søndergaard M, Jensen A, Jeppesen E. 2003. Role of sediment and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 506–509:135–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP. 2000. Hypolimnetic nitrate treatment to reduce internal phosphorus loading in a stratified lake. Lake Res Manag 16:195–204Google Scholar
  68. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen TL, Skov C, Van Nes EH, Roijackers R, Lammens E, Portielje R. 2007. Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. J Appl Ecol 44:1095–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vadeboncoeur Y, McCann KS, VanderZanden MJ, Rasmussen JB. 2005. Effects of multi-chain omnivory on the strength of trophic control in lakes. Ecosystems 8:682–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y. 2002. Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83:2152–61Google Scholar
  72. Vanni MJ, Layne CD. 1997. Nutrient recycling and herbivory as mechanisms in the “top-down” effect of fish on algae in lakes. Ecology 78:21–40Google Scholar
  73. Vollenweider RA. 1976. Advances in defining critical loading levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol 33:53–83Google Scholar
  74. Welch EB, Cooke GD. 1999. Effectiveness and longevity of phosphorus inactivation with alum. Lake Res Manag 15:5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Mehner
    • 1
  • Markus Diekmann
    • 1
  • Thomas Gonsiorczyk
    • 2
  • Peter Kasprzak
    • 2
  • Rainer Koschel
    • 2
  • Lothar Krienitz
    • 2
  • Marion Rumpf
    • 1
  • Michael Schulz
    • 1
  • Gerlinde Wauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Ecology of FishesLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Limnology of Stratified LakesLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesStechlin-NeuglobsowGermany

Personalised recommendations