Ecosystems

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 670–687 | Cite as

Inter-annual, Annual, and Seasonal Variation of P and N Retention in a Perennial and an Intermittent Stream

  • Daniel von Schiller
  • Eugènia Martí
  • Joan Lluis Riera
  • Miquel Ribot
  • Alba Argerich
  • Paula Fonollà
  • Francesc Sabater
Article

Abstract

Headwater streams represent the key sites of nutrient retention, but little is known about temporal variation in this important process. We used monthly measurements over 2 years to examine variation in retention of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and ammonium (NH4+) in two Mediterranean headwater streams with contrasting hydrological regimes (that is, perennial versus intermittent). Differences in retention between streams were more evident for NH4+, likely due to strong differences in the potential for nitrogen limitation. In both streams, nutrient-retention efficiency was negatively influenced by abrupt discharge changes, whereas gradual seasonal changes in SRP demand were partially controlled by riparian vegetation dynamics through changes in organic matter and light availability. Nutrient concentrations were below saturation in the two streams; however, SRP demand increased relative to NH4+ demand in the intermittent stream as the potential for phosphorus limitation increased (that is, higher dissolved inorganic nitrogen:SRP ratio). Unexpectedly, variability in nutrient retention was not greater in the intermittent stream, suggesting high resilience of biological communities responsible for nutrient uptake. Within-stream variability of all retention metrics, however, increased with increasing time scale. A review of studies addressing temporal variation of nutrient retention at different time scales supports this finding, indicating increasing variability of nutrient retention with concomitant increases in the variability of environmental factors from the diurnal to the inter-annual scale. Overall, this study emphasizes the significance of local climate conditions in regulating nutrient retention and points to potential effects of changes in land use and climate regimes on the functioning of stream ecosystems.

Keywords

nutrient retention nutrient spiralling uptake length temporal variation nitrogen phosphorus intermittent stream 

References

  1. Acuña V, Giorgi A, Muñoz I, Uehlinger U, Sabater S 2004. Flow extremes and benthic organic matter shape the metabolism of a headwater Mediterranean stream. Freshw Biol 49:960–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acuña V, Muñoz I, Giorgi A, Omella M, Sabater F, Sabater S 2005. Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:919–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acuña V, Giorgi A, Muñoz I, Sabater F, Sabater S 2007. Metereological and riparian influences on organic matter dynamics in a forested Mediterranean stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 26:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE 2000. Effects of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allan JD 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman and Hall. 400 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. APHA 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
  7. Argerich A, Martí E, Sabater F, Ribot M, von Schiller D, Riera JL 2008. Combined effects of leaf litter inputs and a flood on nutrient retention in a Mediterranean mountain stream during fall. Limnol Oceanogr 53:631–41Google Scholar
  8. Battin TJ, Kaplan LA, Findlay S, Hopkinson CS, Martí E, Packman AI, Newbold JD, Sabater F 2008. Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. Nat Geosci 1:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernal S, Butturini A, Sabater F 2005 Seasonal variations of dissolved nitrogen and DOC:DON ratios in an intermittent Mediterranean stream. Biogeochemistry 75:351–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borchardt MA 1996. Nutrients. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL, Eds. Algal ecology. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. pp 183–227Google Scholar
  11. Bott TL, Kaplan LA 1985. Bacterial biomass, metabolic state, and activity in stream sediments: relation to environmental variables and multiple assay comparisons. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:508–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butturini A, Sabater F 1998. Ammonium and phosphate retention in a Mediterranean stream: hydrological versus temperature control. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1938–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butturini A, Sabater F 1999. Importance of transient storage zones for ammonium and phosphate retention in a sandy-bottom Mediterranean stream. Freshw Biol 41:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butturini A, Bernal S, Nin E, Hellin C, Rivero L, Sabater S, Sabater F 2003. Influences of the stream groundwater hydrology on nitrate concentration in unsaturated riparian area bounded by an intermittent stream. Water Resour Res 39:1110. doi:10.1029/2001WR001260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahm CN, Baker MA, Moore DI, Thibault JR 2003. Coupled biogeochemical and hydrological responses of streams and rivers to drought. Freshw Biol 48:1219–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeNicola DM 1996. Periphyton responses to temperature at different ecological levels. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL, Eds. Algal ecology. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. pp 149–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doyle MW 2005. Incorporating hydrologic variability into nutrient spiraling. J Geophys Res 110:G01003. doi:10.1029/2005JG000015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elwood JW, Newbold JD, Trimble AF, Stark RW 1981. The limiting role of phosphorus in a woodland stream ecosystem: effects of P enrichment on leaf decomposition and primary producers. Ecology 62:146–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ensign SH, Doyle MW 2006. Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks. J Geophys Res 111:G04009. doi:10.1029/2005JG000114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB 2004. Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85:2369–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francoeur SN, Biggs BJ, Smith RA, Lowe RL 1999. Nutrient limitation of algal biomass accrual in streams: seasonal patterns and a comparison of methods. J North Am Benthol Soc 18:242–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gasith A, Resh VH 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Nathan RJ 2004. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. p 429Google Scholar
  24. Haggard BE, Storm DE 2003. Effect of leaf litter on phosphorus retention and hydrological properties at a first order stream in northeast Oklahoma, USA. J Freshw Ecol 18:557–65Google Scholar
  25. Hall RO, Bernhardt ES, Likens GE 2002. Relating nutrient uptake with transient storage in forested mountain streams. Limnol Oceanogr 47:255–65Google Scholar
  26. Hall RO, Tank JL, Dybdahl MF 2003. Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Front Ecol Environ 1:407–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanafi S, Grace MR, Hart BT 2006. Can nutrient spiraling be used to detect seasonal nutrient uptake in a forested stream? Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 6:403–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanafi S, Grace MR, Webb JA, Hart BT 2007. Uncertainty in nutrient spiraling: sensitivity of spiraling indices to small errors in measured nutrient concentration. Ecosystems 10:477–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoellein TJ, Tank JL, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Entrekin SA, Lamberti GA 2007. Controls on spatial and temporal variation of nutrient uptake in three Michigan headwater streams. Limnol Oceanogr 52:1964–77Google Scholar
  30. Hynes HBN 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19:1–15Google Scholar
  31. Lake PS 2003. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Biol 48:1161–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lillebo AI, Morais M, Guilherme P, Fonseca R, Serafim A, Neves R 2007. Nutrient dynamics in Mediterranean temporary streams: a case study in Pardiela catchment (Degebe River, Portugal). Limnologica 37:337–48Google Scholar
  33. Martí E. 1995. Nutrient dynamics in two Mediterranean streams differing in watershed physiographic features. PhD dissertation. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  34. Martí E., Armengol J, Sabater F 1994. Day and night nutrient uptake differences in a calcareous stream. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 25:1756–60Google Scholar
  35. Martí E, Grimm NB, Fisher SG 1997. Pre- and post-flood retention efficiency of nitrogen in a Sonoran Desert stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:805–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martí E, Sabater F 1996. High variability in temporal and spatial nutrient retention in Mediterranean streams. Ecology 77:854–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Minshall GW 1978. Autotrophy in stream ecosystems. BioScience 28:767–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mulholland PJ 1992. Regulation of nutrient concentrations in a temperate forest stream: roles of upland, riparian, and instream processes. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1512–26Google Scholar
  39. Mulholland PJ, Newbold JD, Elwood JW, Ferren LA, Webster JR 1985. Phosphorus spiralling in a woodland stream: seasonal variations. Ecology 66:1012–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Webster JR, Bowden WD, Dodds WK, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Johnson SL, Martí E, McDowell WH, Merriam JL, Meyer JL, Peterson BJ, Valett HM, Wollheim WM 2002. Can uptake length in streams be determined by nutrient addition experiments? Results from an interbiome comparison study. J North Am Benthol Soc 21:544–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mulholland PJ, Thomas SA, Valett HM, Webster JR, Beaulieu J 2006. Effects of light on NO3 uptake in small forested streams: diurnal and day-to-day variations. J North Am Benthol Soc 25:583–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newbold JD, Elwood JW, O’Neill RV, Van Winkle W 1981. Measuring nutrient spiralling in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:860–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nijboer RC, Johnson RK, Verdonschot PFM, Sommerhäuser M, Buffagni A 2004. Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Brien JM, Dodds WK, Wilson KC, Murdock JN, Eichmiller J 2007. The saturation of N cycling in Central Plains streams: 15N experiments across a broad gradient of nitrate concentrations. Biogeochemistry 84:31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palmer MA, Poff NL 1997. The influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:169–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson BJ, Wollheim WM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Martí E, Bowden WB, Valett HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WH, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory SV, Morral DD 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E, Gale PM 1999. Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 29:83–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sabater F, Butturini A, Martí E, Muñoz I, Romaní A, Wray J, Sabater S 2000. Effects of riparian vegetation removal on nutrient retention in a Mediterranean stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 19:609–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon KS, Townsend CR, Biggs BJ, Bowden WD 2005. Temporal variation of N and P uptake in 2 New Zealand streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stream Solute Workshop 1990. Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems. J North Am Benthol Soc 9:95–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. von Schiller D, Martí E, Riera JL, Sabater F 2007. Effects of nutrients and light on periphyton biomass and nitrogen uptake in Mediterranean streams with contrasting land uses. Freshw Biol 52:891–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward JV 1989. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J North Am Benthol Soc 8:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webster JR, Meyer JL 1997. Organic matter budgets for streams: a synthesis. In: Webster JR, Meyer JL, Eds. Stream organic matter budgets. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:141–61Google Scholar
  54. Webster JR, Patten BC 1979. Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. Ecol Monogr 49:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webster JR, Valett HM 2006. Solute dynamics. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, Eds. Methods in stream ecology. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. pp 169–85Google Scholar
  56. Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Deegan LA, Hobbie JE, Hooker B, Bowden WD, Edwardson KJ, Arscott DB, Hershey AE, Finlay S 2001. Influence of stream size on ammonium and suspended particulate nitrogen processing. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1–13Google Scholar
  57. Wollheim WM, Vorosmarty CJ, Peterson BJ, Seitzinger SP, Hopkinson CS 2006. Relationship between river size and nutrient removal. Geophys Res Lett 33:L06410. doi:10.1029/2006GL025845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel von Schiller
    • 1
  • Eugènia Martí
    • 1
  • Joan Lluis Riera
    • 2
  • Miquel Ribot
    • 1
  • Alba Argerich
    • 2
  • Paula Fonollà
    • 1
  • Francesc Sabater
    • 2
  1. 1.Limnology groupCentre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC)BlanesSpain
  2. 2.Departament d’Ecologia, Facultat de BiologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations