Ecosystems

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 325–341

Fine Root Dynamics and Forest Production Across a Calcium Gradient in Northern Hardwood and Conifer Ecosystems

  • Byung Bae Park
  • Ruth D. Yanai
  • Timothy J. Fahey
  • Scott W. Bailey
  • Thomas G. Siccama
  • James B. Shanley
  • Natalie L. Cleavitt
Article

Abstract

Losses of soil base cations due to acid rain have been implicated in declines of red spruce and sugar maple in the northeastern USA. We studied fine root and aboveground biomass and production in five northern hardwood and three conifer stands differing in soil Ca status at Sleepers River, VT; Hubbard Brook, NH; and Cone Pond, NH. Neither aboveground biomass and production nor belowground biomass were related to soil Ca or Ca:Al ratios across this gradient. Hardwood stands had 37% higher aboveground biomass (P = 0.03) and 44% higher leaf litter production (P < 0.01) than the conifer stands, on average. Fine root biomass (<2 mm in diameter) in the upper 35 cm of the soil, including the forest floor, was very similar in hardwoods and conifers (5.92 and 5.93 Mg ha−1). The turnover coefficient (TC) of fine roots smaller than 1 mm ranged from 0.62 to 1.86 y−1 and increased significantly with soil exchangeable Ca (P = 0.03). As a result, calculated fine root production was clearly higher in sites with higher soil Ca (P = 0.02). Fine root production (biomass times turnover) ranged from 1.2 to 3.7 Mg ha−1 y−1 for hardwood stands and from 0.9 to 2.3 Mg ha−1 y−1 for conifer stands. The relationship we observed between soil Ca availability and root production suggests that cation depletion might lead to reduced carbon allocation to roots in these ecosystems.

Keywords

aboveground biomass aboveground production acid rain Cone Pond fine root biomass fine root turnover fine root production Hubbard Brook Sleepers River 

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM, Nadelhoffer KJ, McClaugherty CA, Pastor J. 1985. Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: a comparison of two methods. Oecologia 66:317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur MA, Siccama TG, Yanai RD. 1999. Calcium and magnesium in wood of northern hardwood forest species: relations to site characteristics. Can J For Res 29:339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey SW, Horsley SB, Long RP, Hallett RA. 2004. Influence of edaphic factors on sugar maple nutrition and health on the Allegheny plateau. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black KE, Harbron CG, Franklin M, Atkinson D, Hooker JE. 1998. Differences in root longevity of some tree species. Tree Physiol 18:259–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blume LJ, Schumacher BA, Schaffer PW, Cappo KA, Papp ML, van Remortel RD, Coffey DS, Johnson MG, Chaloud DJ. 1990. Handbook or methods for acid deposition studies laboratory analyses for soil chemistry. EPA/600/4–90/023. Las Vegas, NY: USEPA, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory.Google Scholar
  6. Bormann FH, Likens GE. 1994. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem: disturbance, development, and the steady state based on the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Burke MK, Raynal DJ. 1994. Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant Soil 162:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton AJ, Pregiter KS, Hendrick RL. 2000. Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia 125:389–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buso DC, Martin CW, Hornbeck JW. 1984. Potential for acidification of six remote ponds in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Water Resources Research Center, Durham, Research Report 62, Durham, NH, 57 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleavitt NL, Fahey TJ, Groffman PM, Hardy JP, Henry KS, Driscoll CT. 2008. Effects of soil freezing on fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 38:82–91.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman MD, Dickson FE, Isebrands JG. 2000. Contrasting fine-root production, survival and soil CO2 efflux in pine and poplar plantations. Plant Soil 225:129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronan CS, Grigal DF. 1995. Use of calcium/aluminum ratios as indicators of stress in forest ecosystems. J Environ Qual 24:209–26.Google Scholar
  13. Darrall NM. 1989. The effect of air pollutants on physiological processes in plants. Plant Cell Environ 12:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeBoer W, Kowalchuk GA. 2001. Nitrification in acid soils: micro-organisms and mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 33:853–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeHayes DH, Schaberg PG, Hawley GJ, Strimbeck GR. 1999. Acid rain impacts on calcium nutrition and forest health. BioScience 49:789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dijkstra FA, Smits MM. 2002. Tree species effects on calcium cycling: the role of calcium uptake in deep soils. Ecosystems 5:385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD. 1997. The ecology of root lifespan. Adv Ecol Res 27:1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahey TJ, Hughes JW. 1994. Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. Ecology 82:533–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahey TJ, Siccama TC, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Campbell J, Johnson CE, Aber JD, Cole JJ, Fisk MC, Groffman PM, Hamburg SP, Holmes RT, Schwarz PA, Yanai RD. 2005. The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 75:109–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federer AC, Hornbeck JW, Tritton LM, Martin WC, Pierce RS, Smith TC. 1989. Long-term depletion of calcium and other nutrients in eastern US forests. Environ Manage 13:593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finzi AC, Canham CD, Breemen NV. 1998. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecol Appl 8:447–54.Google Scholar
  22. Fisk MC, Fahey TJ, Groffman PM, Bohlen PJ. 2004. Earthworm invasion, fine-root distributions, and soil respiration in North temperate forests. Ecosystems 7:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gale MR, Grigal DF. 1987. Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can J For Res 17:829–34.Google Scholar
  24. Gill RA, Jackson BB. 2000. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 147:13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gower ST, Pongracic S, Landsberg JJ. 1996. A global trend in belowground carbon allocation: can we use the relationship at smaller scales? Ecology 77:1750–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC. 1992. Carbon dynamics of rocky mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological Monogr 61:43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grier CC, Vogt KA, Keyes MR, Edmonds RL. 1981. Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can J For Res 11:155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS. 1992. The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73:1094–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hornbeck JW, Bailey SW, Buso DC, Shanley JB. 1997. Streamwater chemistry and nutrient budgets for forested watersheds in New England: variability and management implications. For Ecol Manage 93:73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingestad T, Agren GI. 1995. Plant nutrition and growth: basic principles. Plant Soil 168–9:15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joslin JD, Henderson GS. 1987. Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine root turnover in a white oak stand. Forest Sci 33:330–46.Google Scholar
  32. Joslin JD, Wolfe MH. 1999. Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:218–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keyes MR, Grier CC. 1981. Above-and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can J For Res 11:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King JS, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P. 2002. Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol 154:389–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knapp AK, Smith MD. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kubiske ME, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Mikan CJ. 1998. Growth and C allocation of Populus tremuloides genotypes in response to atmospheric CO2 and soil N availability. New Phytol 140:251–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauenroth WK, Gill R. 2003. Turnover of root systems. In: deKroon H, Visser EJW (Eds.) Root ecology. New York: Springer. pp 61–90.Google Scholar
  38. Likens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC. 1996. Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272:244–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Long RP, Horsley SB, Lilja PR. 1997. Impact of forest liming on growth and crown vigor of sugar maple and associated hardwoods. Can J For Res 27:1560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McClaugherty CA, Aber JA, Melillo JM. 1982. The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63:1481–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLaughlin SB, Tjoelker MG, Roy WK. 1993. Acid deposition alters red spruce physiology: laboratory studies support field observations. Can J For Res 23:380–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD, Melillo JM. 1983. Leaf-litter production and soil organic matter dynamics along a nitrogen-availability gradient in Southern Wisconsin (U.S.A.). Can J For Res 13:12–21.Google Scholar
  43. Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD, Melillo JM. 1985. Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66:1377–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW. 1992. Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73:1139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Park BB. 2006. Fine root dynamics and tissue chemistry across a calcium gradient in temperate hardwood and softwood forest ecosystems, NY. Ph. D. dissertation, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Park BB, Yanai RD, Vadeboncoeur MA, Hamburg SP. 2006. Estimating root biomass in rocky soils using pits, cores, and allometric equations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Persson H, Ahlstrom K. 2002. Fine-root response to nitrogen supply in nitrogen manipulated Norway spruce catchment areas. For Ecol Manage 168:29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pregitzer KS, King JS, Burton AJ, Brown SE. 2000. Responses of tree fine roots to temperature. New Phytol 147:105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70:1346–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robarge WP, Fernandez I. 1987. Quality assurance methods manual for laboratory analytical techniques. Corvallis, OR: USEPA.Google Scholar
  51. Schwarz PA, Fahey TJ, McCulloch CM. 2003. Factors controlling spatial variation of tree species abundance in a forested landscape. Ecology 84:1862–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shanley JB, Sundquist ET, Kendall C. 1995. Water, energy, and biogeochemical budget research at Sleepers River Research Watershed, Vermont. US geological survey open-file report, 94–475, p 22.Google Scholar
  53. Shortle WC, Smith KT. 1988. Aluminum-induced calcium deficiency syndrome in declining red spruce. Science 240:1017–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siccama TG, Hamburg SP, Arthur MA, Yanai RD, Bormann FH, Likens GE. 1994. Corrections to allometric equations and plant tissue chemistry for Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Ecology 75:246–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silver WL, Miya RK. 2001. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129: 407–19.Google Scholar
  56. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor HM. 1987. Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. Madison, WI, USA: Amer. Soc. Agron. Spec. Publ. No. 50.Google Scholar
  58. Thorne JF, Anderson JE, Horiuchi KM. 1988. Cation cycling in a base-poor and base-rich northern hardwood forest ecosystem. J Environ Qual 17:95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tierney GL, Fahey TJ. 2001. Evaluating minirhizotron estimates of fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Plant Soil 229:167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tierney GL, Fahey TJ. 2002. Fine root turnover in a northern hardwood forest: a direct comparison of the radiocarbon and minirhizotron methods. Can J For Res 32:1692–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tierney GL, Fahey TJ. 2007. Estimating belowground primary productivity. In: Knapp AK, Fahey TJ (Eds.) Principles and standards for measuring net primary production in long-term ecological studies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. pp 120–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vanninen P, Makela A. 1999. Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in Southern Finland. Tree Physiol 19:823–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vogt KA, Grier CC, Vogt DJ. 1986. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv Ecol Res 15:303–77.Google Scholar
  64. Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Palmiotto PA, Boon P, O’Hara J, Asbjornsen H. 1996. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187:159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whittaker RH, Bormann FH, Likens GE, Siccama TG. 1974. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: forest biomass and production. Ecol Monogr 44:233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilmot TR, Ellsworth DS, Tyree MT. 1995. Relationships among crown condition, and stand nutrition in seven northern Vermont sugarbushes. Can J For Res 25:386–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byung Bae Park
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ruth D. Yanai
    • 1
  • Timothy J. Fahey
    • 3
  • Scott W. Bailey
    • 4
  • Thomas G. Siccama
    • 5
  • James B. Shanley
    • 6
  • Natalie L. Cleavitt
    • 3
  1. 1.Forest and Natural Resources ManagementSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Division of Forest EcologyKorea Forest Research InstituteSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.USDA Forest Service, Northern Research StationCamptonUSA
  5. 5.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNew HavenUSA
  6. 6.Water Resources DisciplineUS Geological SurveyMontpelierUSA

Personalised recommendations