, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 999–1018 | Cite as

Tree Species Effects on Soil Organic Matter Dynamics: The Role of Soil Cation Composition

  • Sarah E. Hobbie
  • Megan Ogdahl
  • Jon Chorover
  • Oliver A. Chadwick
  • Jacek Oleksyn
  • Roma Zytkowiak
  • Peter B. Reich


We studied the influence of tree species on soil carbon and nitrogen (N) dynamics in a common garden of replicated monocultures of fourteen angiosperm and gymnosperm, broadleaf and needleleaf species in southwestern Poland. We hypothesized that species would influence soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition primarily via effects on biogeochemical recalcitrance, with species having tissues with high lignin concentrations retarding rates of decomposition in the O and A horizons. Additionally, because prior work demonstrated substantial divergence in foliar and soil base cation concentrations and soil pH among species, we hypothesized that species would influence chemical stabilization of SOM via cation bridging to mineral surfaces in the A-horizon. Our hypotheses were only partially supported: SOM decomposition and microbial biomass were unrelated to plant tissue lignin concentrations, but in the mineral horizon, were significantly negatively related to the percentage of the cation exchange complex (CEC) occupied by polyvalent acidic (hydrolyzing) cations (Al and Fe), likely because these cations stabilize SOM via cation bridging and flocculation and/or because of inhibitory effects of Al or low pH on decomposers. Percent CEC occupied by exchangeable Al and Fe was in turn related to both soil clay content (a parent material characteristic) and root Ca concentrations (a species characteristic). In contrast, species influenced soil N dynamics largely via variation in tissue N concentration. In both laboratory and in situ assays, species having high-N roots exhibited faster rates of net N mineralization and nitrification. Nitrification:mineralization ratios were greater, though, under species with high exchangeable soil Ca2+. Our results indicate that tree species contribute to variation in SOM dynamics, even in the mineral soil horizons. To our knowledge the influence of tree species on SOM decomposition via cation biogeochemistry has not been demonstrated previously, but could be important in other poorly buffered systems dominated by tree species that differ in cation nutrition or that are influenced by acidic deposition.

Key words

aluminum; carbon; decomposition; microbial biomass; nitrogen; Poland; respiration; soil organic matter; trees 


  1. Alban DH. 1982. Effects of nutrient accumulation by aspen, spruce and pine on soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:853–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alban DH, Berry EC. 1994. Effects of earthworm invasion on morphology, carbon, and nitrogen of a forest soil. Appl Soil Ecol 1:243–9.Google Scholar
  3. Amacher MC, Hendersen RE, Breithaupt MD, Seale CL, LaBauve JM. 1990. Unbuffered and buffered salt methods for exchangeable cations and effective cation-exchange capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1036–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A. 2002. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci 59:233–53.Google Scholar
  5. Binkley D, Giardina C. 1998. Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42:89–106.Google Scholar
  6. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. 2004. A global relationship between heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? Glob Change Biol 10:1756–66.Google Scholar
  7. Booth MS, Stark JM, Rastetter EB. 2005. Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: a synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr 75:139–57.Google Scholar
  8. Bossuyt H, Six J, Hendrix PF. 2005. Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biol Biochem 37:251–8.Google Scholar
  9. Boudot J.-P, Bel Hadj Brahim A, Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F. 1989. Biodegradation of synthetic organo-metallic complexes of iron and aluminium with selected metal to carbon ratios. Soil Biol Biochem 21:961–6.Google Scholar
  10. Briggs JM, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Heisler JL, Hoch GA, Lett MS, McCarron JK. 2005. An ecosystem in transition: causes and consequences of the conversion of mesic grassland to shrubland. Bioscience 55:243–54.Google Scholar
  11. Broadley MR, Bowen HC, Cotterill HL, Hammong JP, Meacham MC, Mead A, White PJ. 2003. Variation in the shoot calcium content of angiosperms. J Exp Bot 54:1431–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–42.Google Scholar
  13. Brynhildsen L, Rosswall T. 1997. Effects of metals on the microbial mineralization of organic acids. Water Air Soil Pollut 94:45–57.Google Scholar
  14. Burke IC, Yonker CM, Parton WJ, Cole CV, Flach K, Schimel DS. 1989. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:800–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callesen I, Raulund-Rasmussen K. 2004. Base cation, aluminum, and phosphorus release potential in Danish forest soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 167:169–76.Google Scholar
  16. Chen J, Stark JM. 2000. Plant species effects and carbon and nitrogen cycling in a sagebrush-crested wheatgrass soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:47–57.Google Scholar
  17. Chorover J, Amistadi MK. 2001. Reaction of forest floor organic matter at goethite, birnessite, and smectite surfaces. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:95–109.Google Scholar
  18. Clough A, Skjemstad J. 2000. Physical and chemical protection of soil organic carbon in three agricultural soils with different contents of calcium carbonate. Aust J Soil Res 38:1005–16.Google Scholar
  19. Craine J, Wedin DA, Chapin FS III, Reich PB. 2002. Relationship between the structure of root systems and resource use for 11 North American grassland plants. Plant Ecol 168:85–100.Google Scholar
  20. De Boer W, Kowalchuk GA. 2001. Nitrification in acid soils: micro-organisms and mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 33:853–66.Google Scholar
  21. Dijkstra FA. 2003. Calcium mineralization in the forest floor and surface soil beneath different tree species of the northeastern US. For Ecol Manag 175:185–94.Google Scholar
  22. Dijkstra FA, Smits MM. 2002. Tree species effects on calcium cycling: the role of calcium uptake in deep soils. Ecosystems 5:385–98.Google Scholar
  23. Dijkstra FA, Fitzhugh RD. 2003. Aluminum solubility and mobility in relation to organic carbon in surface soils affected by six tree species of the northeastern United States. Geoderma 114:33–47.Google Scholar
  24. Dijkstra FA, Van Breemen N, Jongmans AG, Davies GR, Likens GR. 2002. Calcium weathering in forested soils and the effect of different tree species. Biogeochemistry 62:253–75Google Scholar
  25. Dijkstra FA, Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Knops JMH. 2005. Divergent effects of elevated CO2, N fertilization, and plant diversity on soil C and N dynamics in a grassland field experiment. Plant and Soil 272:41–52.Google Scholar
  26. Dijkstra FA, Hobbie SE, Reich PB. 2006. Soil processes affected by sixteen grassland species grown under different environmental conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:770–7.Google Scholar
  27. Eviner VT, Chapin FS III. 2003. Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:455–85.Google Scholar
  28. Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Nat Acad Sci 103:626–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Finzi AC, Canham CD, Van Breemen N. 1998a. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cation. Ecol Appl 8:447–54.Google Scholar
  30. Finzi AC, Van Breemen N, Canham CD. 1998b. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–6.Google Scholar
  31. Gärdenäs AI. 1998. Soil organic matter in European forest floors in relation to stand characteristics and environmental factors. Scand J For Res 13:274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gee GW, Or D. 2002. Particle size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, Eds. Methods of soil analysis, Part 4. Physical methods. Soil Sci. Am. Book Series No. 5. Madison: ASA and SSSA. pp 272–8Google Scholar
  33. Giesler R, Högberg M, Högberg P. 1998. Soil chemistry and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest as exemplified by a local gradient. Ecology 79:119–37.Google Scholar
  34. Gower ST, Son Y. 1992. Differences in soil and leaf litterfall nitrogen dynamics for five forest plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1959–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Groffman PM, Fisk MC, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Fahey TJ, Eagar C, Pardo LH. 2006. Calcium additions and microbial nitrogen cycle processes in a northern hardwood forest. Ecosystems 9:1289–1305.Google Scholar
  36. Gundale MJ. 2002. Influence of exotic earthworms on the soil organic horizon and the rare fern Botrychium mormo. Conserv Biol 16:1555–61.Google Scholar
  37. Hale CM, Frelich LE, Reich PB, Pastor J. 2005. Effects of European earthworm invasion on soil characteristics in northern hardwood forests of Minnesota, USA. Ecosystems 8:911–27.Google Scholar
  38. Harder W, Dijkhuizen L. 1983. Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu Rev Microbiol 37:1–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart SC, Nason GE, Myrold DD, Perry DA. 1994. Dynamics of gross nitrogen transformations in an old-growth forest: the carbon connection. Ecology 75:880–91.Google Scholar
  40. Hedges JI, Ertel JR. 1982. Characterization of lignin by gas capillary chromatography of cupric oxide oxidation products. Anal Chem 54:174–8.Google Scholar
  41. Hobbie SE. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7:336–9.Google Scholar
  42. Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, Karolewski P. 2006. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87:2288–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Högberg M, Myrold DD, Giesler R, Högberg P. 2006. Contrasting patterns of soil N-cycling in model ecosystems of Fennoscandian boreal forests. Oecologia 147:96–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hooper DU, Vitousek PM. 1998. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol Monogr 68:121–49.Google Scholar
  45. Hsieh YP. 1992. Pool size and mean residence time of stable soil organic carbon in cropland. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:460–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Illmer P, Schinner F. 1997. Influence of aluminum on motility and swarming of Pseudomonas sp. and Arthrobacter sp. FEMS Microbiol Lett 155:121–4.Google Scholar
  47. Illmer P, Ulrike O, Schinner F. 2003. Microbiological properties in acidic forest soils with special consideration of KCl extractable Al. Water Air Soil Pollut 148:3–14.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbagy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH. 2002. Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jastrow JD, Miller RM, Lussenhop J. 1998. Contributions of interacting biological mechanisms to soil aggregate stabilization in restored prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 30:905–16.Google Scholar
  50. Johansson M.-B, Kögel I, Zech W. 1986. Changes in the lignin fraction of spruce and pine needle litter during decomposition as studied by some chemical methods. Soil Biol Biochem 18:611–9.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson D, Booth RE, Whiteley AS, Bailey MJ, Read DJ, Grime JP, Leake JR. 2003. Plant community composition affects the biomass, activity and diversity of microorganisms in limestone grassland soil. Eur J Soil Sci 54:671–7.Google Scholar
  52. Kiem R, Kögel-Knabner I. 2003. Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 35:101–18.Google Scholar
  53. Kögel-Knabner I. 2002. The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 34:139–62.Google Scholar
  54. Kramer MG, Sollins P, Sletten RS, Swart PK. 2003. N isotope fractionation and measures of organic matter alteration during decomposition. Ecology 84:2021–25.Google Scholar
  55. Kuzyakov Y. 2002. Review: factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–96.Google Scholar
  56. Ladegaard-Pedersen P, Elberling B, Vesterdal L. 2005. Soil carbon stocks, mineralization rates, and CO2 effluxes under 10 tree species on contrasting soil types. Can J For Res 35:1277–84.Google Scholar
  57. Lelong F, Dupraz C, Durand P, Didon-Lescot JF. 1990. Effects of vegetation type on the biogeochemistry of small catchments (Mont Lozere, France). J Hydrol 116:125–45.Google Scholar
  58. Likens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC. 1996. Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272:244–6.Google Scholar
  59. Likens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC, Siccama TG, Johnson CE, Lovett GM, Fahey TJ, Reiners WA, Ryan DF, Martin CW, Bailey SW. 1998. The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 41:89–173.Google Scholar
  60. Loeppert RH, Inskeep WP 1996. Iron In: Sparks DL, Ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Sci. Am. Book Series, No. 5. Madison: ASA and SSSA. pp 632–50.Google Scholar
  61. Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Arthur MA, Schultz JC. 2004. Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter? Biogeochemistry 67:289–308.Google Scholar
  62. Mack MC, D’Antonio CM. 2003. Exotic grasses alter controls over soil nitrogen dynamics in a Hawaiian woodland. Ecol Appl 13:154–66.Google Scholar
  63. Mack MC, D’Antonio DM, Ley RE. 2001. Alteration of ecosystem nitrogen dynamics by exotic plants: A case study of C4 grasses in Hawaii. Ecol Appl 11:1323–35.Google Scholar
  64. Mulder J, De Wit HA, Boonen HWJ, Bakken LR. 2001. Increased levels of aluminium in forest soils: effects on the stores of soil organic carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:989–94.Google Scholar
  65. Muneer M, JM Oades. 1989. The role of Ca-organic interactions in soil aggregate stability. II. Field studies with 14C-labelled straw, CaCO3 and CaSO42H2O. Aust J Soil Res 27:401–9.Google Scholar
  66. Munter RC, Grande RA. 1981. Plant tissue and soil extract analysis by ICP-AES. In: Barnes RM, ed. Developments in atomic plasma spectrochemical analysis. Philadephia: Heydon and Son. pp 653–73.Google Scholar
  67. Muys B, Lust N. 1992. Inventory of earthworm communities and the state of litter decomposition in the forests of Flanders, Belgium, and its implications for forest management. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1677–81.Google Scholar
  68. Neff JC, Asner GP. 2001. Dissolved organic carbon in terrestrial ecosystems: synthesis and a model. Ecosystems 4:29–48.Google Scholar
  69. Nihlgård B. 1971. Pedological influence of spruce planted on former beech forest soils in Scania, South Sweden. Oikos 22:302–14.Google Scholar
  70. Oades JM. 1988. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70.Google Scholar
  71. Oades JM, Waters AG. 1991. Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Aust J Soil Res 29:815–28.Google Scholar
  72. Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–31.Google Scholar
  73. Oostra S, Majdi H, Olsson M. 2006. Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 21:364–71.Google Scholar
  74. Oste LA, Temminghoff EJM, Van Riemsdijk WH. 2002. Solid-solution partitioning of organic matter in soils as influenced by an increase in pH or Ca concentration. Environ Sci Technol 36:208–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ovington JD. 1958. Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees: VII. Soil calcium and magnesium. J Ecol 46:391–405.Google Scholar
  76. Park J-H, Kalbitz K, Matzner E. 2002. Resource control on the production of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a deciduous forest floor. Soil Biol Biochem 34:813–22.Google Scholar
  77. Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Schimel DS. 1988. Dynamics of C, N, P, and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5:109–31.Google Scholar
  78. Paul EA, Morris SJ, Six J, Paustian K, Gregorich EG. 2003. Interpretation of soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in agricultural and afforested soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1620–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Percival HJ, Parfitt RL, Scott NA. 2000. Factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand grasslands: is clay content important? Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1623–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Preston CM, Trofymow JA. 2000. Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests. Can J Bot 78:1269–87Google Scholar
  81. Preston CM, Trofymow JA, Sayer BG, Nui J. 1997. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies. Can J Bot 75:1601–13Google Scholar
  82. Raulund-Rasmussen K, Vejre H. 1995. Effect of tree species and soil properties on nutrient immobilization in the forest floor. Plant Soil 168–169:345–52Google Scholar
  83. Reich PB, Grigal DF, Aber JD, Gower ST. 1997. Nitrogen mineralization and productivity in 50 hardwood and conifer stands on diverse soils. Ecology 78:335–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Reich PB, Peterson DW, Wedin DA, Wrage K. 2001. Fire and vegetation effects on productivity and nitrogen cycling across a forest-grassland continuum. Ecology 82:1703–19Google Scholar
  85. Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG. 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett 8:811–8Google Scholar
  86. Rhoades JD. 1996. Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL, Ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Sci. Am. Book Series, No. 5. Madison: ASA and SSSA. pp 417–35Google Scholar
  87. Robertson GP. 1982. Nitrification in forested ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biol Sci 296:445–57Google Scholar
  88. Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC, Broderson WD. 1998. Field book for describing and sampling soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  89. Scott NA, Binkley D. 1997. Foliage litter quality and annual net N mineralization: comparison across North American forest sites. Oecologia 111:151–9Google Scholar
  90. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–76Google Scholar
  91. Skjemstad JO. 1992. Genesis of podzols on coastal dunes in Southern Queensland. III. The role of aluminium-organic complexes in profile development. Aust J Soil Res 30:645–65Google Scholar
  92. Sollins P, Homann P, Caldwell BA. 1996. Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma 74:65–105Google Scholar
  93. Staff SS. 1999. Taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey, 2nd edn. Washington: US Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  94. Staff SSL. 1992. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report 42:USDAGoogle Scholar
  95. Stevenson FJ. 1994. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, and reactions, 2nd edn. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  96. Thomas KD, Prescott CE. 2000. Nitrogen availability in forest floors of three tree species on the same site: the role of litter quality. Can J For Res 30:1698–706Google Scholar
  97. Trumbore S. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol Appl 10:399–411Google Scholar
  98. Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edn. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  99. van Vuuren MMI, Aerts R, Berendse F, de Visser W. 1992. Nitrogen mineralization in heathland ecosystems dominated by different plant species. Biogeochemistry 16:151–66Google Scholar
  100. Varadachari C, Mondal AH, Ghosh K. 1991. Some aspects of clay-humus complexation: effect of exchangeable cations and lattice charge. Soil Sci 151:220–7Google Scholar
  101. Venterea RT, Lovett GM, Groffman PM, Schwarz PA. 2003. Landscape patterns of net nitrification in a northern hardwood-conifer forest. Soil Biol Biochem 67:527–39Google Scholar
  102. Vinton MA, Burke IC. 1997. Contingent effects of plant species on soils along a regional moisture gradient in the Great Plains. Oecologia 110:393–402Google Scholar
  103. Walters MB, Reich PB. 1997. Growth of Acer saccharum seedlings in deeply shaded understories of northern Wisconsin: effects of nitrogen and water availability. Can J For Res 27:237–47Google Scholar
  104. Wang W, Smith CJ, Chalk PM, Chen D. 2001. Evaluating chemical and physical indices of nitrogen mineralization capacity with an unequivocal reference. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:368–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wedin DA, Tilman D. 1990. Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–41Google Scholar
  106. Weisberg S. 2005. Applied linear regression, 3rd edn. Hoboken: WileyGoogle Scholar
  107. Withington JM, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM. 2006. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecol Monogr 76:381–97Google Scholar
  108. Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC, Peacock AD, Tilman D. 2003. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84:2042–50Google Scholar
  109. Zak DR, Tilman D, Parmenter RR, Rice CW, Fisher FM, Vose J, Milchunas D, Martin CW. 1994. Plant production and soil microorganisms in late-successional ecosystems: a continental-scale study. Ecology 75:2333–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Hobbie
    • 1
  • Megan Ogdahl
    • 1
  • Jon Chorover
    • 2
  • Oliver A. Chadwick
    • 3
  • Jacek Oleksyn
    • 4
    • 5
  • Roma Zytkowiak
    • 4
  • Peter B. Reich
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Soil, Water and Environmental ScienceUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Polish Academy of SciencesInstitute of DendrologyKornikPoland
  5. 5.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations