Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 523–535 | Cite as

Unique Similarity of Faunal Communities across Aquatic–Terrestrial Interfaces in a Polar Desert Ecosystem

Soil–Sediment Boundaries and Faunal Community
  • Edward Ayres
  • Diana H. Wall
  • Byron J. Adams
  • John E. Barrett
  • Ross A. Virginia
Article

Abstract

Critical transition zones, such as aquatic–terrestrial interfaces, have been recognized as important features in landscape ecology. Yet changes in the community structure of soil and sediment biota across aquatic–terrestrial boundaries remain relatively unstudied. We investigated the community structure of the dominant fauna, namely nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades, across lake sediment–soil transects in three basins in a species-poor, polar desert ecosystem (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica). We also examined substrate (that is, soil and sediment) properties, including moisture, salinity, carbon, nitrogen and phosphate concentration, across these transects. Differences in faunal community structure and biochemical properties were typically explained by hydrologic basin and the sediment–soil gradient, but not by transects within each basin. Bonney Basin contained the least organic carbon, chlorophyll a, nematodes and taxa, whereas there was little difference in many of these measures between Fryxell and Hoare Basins. Nematode (Scottnema lindsayae and Plectus sp.) and rotifer abundance varied along sediment–soil transects. Scottnema lindsayae, the most abundant and widely distributed soil animal in this ecosystem, increased in abundance from sediments to soils, whereas Plectus sp. and rotifer abundance, and taxa richness (that is, nematodes, rotifers and/or tardigrades), decreased; Eudorylaimus sp. and tardigrade abundance did not differ significantly along the transects. Previous studies of soil biodiversity and faunal abundance in this ecosystem have revealed a positive association between these measures and biogeochemistry, if this holds true for lake sediments, our findings suggest sediments in Lake Bonney experience lower rates of nutrient cycling than either Lakes Fryxell or Hoare. Despite differences in faunal abundances along the sediment–soil transects, taxa occurrence was surprisingly similar in soil and sediment, only S. lindsayae was restricted to soil or the lake shore. In contrast, in other ecosystems, soil community composition differs greatly from lake sediments, suggesting that the observed similarity in species occurrence in both soils and sediments may be unique to Antarctica. This finding might result from the extreme low diversity of this ecosystem, presumably limiting competition among fauna, and thus promoting broad ecological niches. Alternatively, environmental conditions in Antarctica may select for species with broad ecological niches.

Keywords

a nimal diversity biogeochemistry cold desert Nematoda Rotifera Tardigrada Victoria Land 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Andy Parsons, Steve Blecker, Tom Cioppa and Jennifer Mercer for technical/field support, as well as RPSC and PHI Helicopters for logistical support. Margaret Palmer, Richard Bardgett and two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on this manuscript. This research was funded by NSF (OPP 0096250 and ANT 0423595) and is a contribution to the McMurdo Dry Valleys Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams BJ, Bardgett RD, Ayres E, Wall DH, Aislabie J, Bamforth S, Bargagli R, Cary C, Cavacini P, Connell L, Convey P, Fell JW, Frati F, Hogg IH, Newsham KK, O’Donnell A, Russell N, Seppelt RD, Stevens MI 2006. Diversity and distribution of Victoria Land biota. Soil Biol Biochem 10:3003–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrassy I. 1998. Nematodes in the sixth continent. J Nematode Morphol System 1:107–86Google Scholar
  3. Ayres E, Wall DH, Bardgett RD. 2007. Trophic interactions and their implications for soil C fluxes. Bahn M, Heinemeyer A, Kutsch W, Eds. Integrated methodology on soil carbon flux measurements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bardgett RD. 2005. The biology of soil: A community and ecosystem approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardgett RD, Anderson JM, Behan-Pelletier V, Brussaard L, Coleman DC, Ettema C, Moldenke A, Schimel JP, Wall DH 2001. The influence of soil biodiversity on the hydrological pathways and the transfer of materials between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 4:421–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Wall DH 2002. Trends in resin and KCl-extractable soil nitrogen across landscape gradients in Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Ecosystems 5:289–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Wall DH, Parsons AN, Powers LE, Burkins BB 2004. Variation in biogeochemistry and soil biodiversity across spatial scales in a polar desert ecosystem. Ecology 85:3105–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Hopkins DW, Aislabie J, Bargagli R, Bockheim JG, Campbell IB, Lyons WB, Moorhead D, Nkem J, Sletten R, Steltzer H, Wall DW, Wallenstein M 2006. Terrestrial ecosystem processes of Victoria Land, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3019–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Wall DH, Cary SC, Adams BJ, Hacker AL, Aislabie JM. 2006. Covariation in soil biodiversity and biogeochemistry in Northern and Southern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Antarc Sci 18:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bøhn T, Amundsen P-A 2004. Ecological interactions and evolution: forgotten parts of biodiversity? BioScience 54:804–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell IB, Claridge GG 1987. Antarctica: soils, weathering processes and environment. Developments in soil science, vol 16, Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  12. Clow GD, McKay CP, Simmons GM, Wharton RA 1988. Climatological observations and predicted sublimation rates at Lake Hoare, Antarctica. J Clim 1:715–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Courtright EM, Wall DH, Virginia RA 2001. Determining habitat suitability in an extreme environment: the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Antarct Sci 13:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doran PT, McKay CP, Clow GD, Dana GL, Fountain AG, Nylen T, Lyons WB 2002a. Valley floor climate observations from the McMurdo dry valleys, Antarctica. J Geophys Res 107:4772–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doran PT, Priscu JC, Lyons WB, Walsh JE, Fountain AG, McKnight DM, Moorhead DL, Virginia RA, Wall DH, Clow GD, Fritsen CH, McKay CP, Parsons AN 2002b. Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response. Nature 415:517–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foreman CM, Wolf CF, Priscu JC 2004. Impact of episodic warming events on physical, chemical and biological relationships of lakes in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Aquatic Geochem 10:239–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fountain AG, Lyons WB, Burkins MB, Dana GL, Doran PT, Lewis KJ, McKnight DM, Moorhead DL, Parsons AN, Priscu JC, Wall DH 1999. Physical controls on the Taylor Valley ecosystem, Antarctica. BioScience 49:961–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freckman DW, Virginia RA 1993. Extraction of nematodes from Dry Valley Antarctic soils. Polar Biol 13:483–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freckman DW, Virginia RA 1997. Low-diversity Antarctic soil nematode communities: Distribution and response to disturbance. Ecology 78:363–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freckman DW, Virginia RA. 1998. Soil biodiversity and community structure in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Priscu JC, Ed. Ecosystem dynamics in a polar desert: The McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. pp 323–35Google Scholar
  21. Freckman DW, Blackburn TH, Brussaard L, Hutchings P, Palmer MA, Snelgrove PVR. 2001. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem functioning of soils and sediments. Ambio 26:556–62Google Scholar
  22. Frenot Y, Chown SL, Whinam J, Selkirk M, Convey P, Skotnicki M, Bergstrom DM. 2005. Biological invasions in the Antarctic: extent, impacts and implications. Biol Rev 80:45–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodey T. 1963. Soil and freshwater nematodes. London: Butler and TannerGoogle Scholar
  24. Groffman PM, Bohlen J 1999. Soil and sediment biodiversity: Cross-system comparisons and large-scale effects. BioScience 49:139–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, Van Hal JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA 2004. Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeney DR, Nelson DW 1982. Nitrogen — inorganic forms. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, Eds. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. pp 643–98Google Scholar
  27. Liiri M, Setälä H, Haimi J, Pennanen T, Fritze H 2002. Relationship between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed. Oikos 96:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lizotte MP, Priscu JC. 1998. Pigment analysis of the distribution, succession, and fate of phytoplankton in the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes of Antarctica. Priscu JC, Ed. Ecosystem dynamics in a polar desert: The McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. pp 229–39Google Scholar
  29. McCain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Hart SC, Harvey JW, Johnston CA, Mayorga E, McDowell WH, Pinay G 2003. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6:301–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nkem J, Virginia RA, Barrett JE, Wall DW, Li G 2006. Salt tolerance and survival thresholds for two species of Antarctic soil nematodes. Polar Biol 29:643–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Overhoff A, Freckman DW, Virginia RA 1993. Life cycle of the microbivorous Antarctic Dry Valley nematode Scottnema lindsayae (Timm 1971). Polar Biol 13:151–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parsons AN, Barrett JE, Wall DH, Virginia RA 2004. Soil carbon dioxide flux in Antarctic dry valley ecosystems. Ecosystems 7:286–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poage MA, Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Wall DH. 2007. The influence of soil geochemistry on nematode distribution, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antartica. Arct, Antarct Alp Res (in press)Google Scholar
  34. Porazinska DL, Wall DH 2002. Population age structure of nematodes in the Antarctic Dry Valleys: perspectives on time, space, and habitat suitability. Arct Antarct Alp Res 34:159–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Powers LE, Ho M, Freckman DW, Virginia RA 1998. Distribution, community structure, and microhabitats of soil invertebrates along an elevational gradient in Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Arct Alp Res 30:133–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Priscu JC, Wolf CF, Takacs CD, Fritsen CH, Laybourn-Parry J, Roberts EC, Sattler B, Lyons WB 1999. Carbon transformations in a perennially ice-covered Antarctic lake. BioScience 49:997–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts EC, Priscu JC, Wolf C, Lyons WB, Laybourn-Parry J 2004. The distribution of microplankton in the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes, Antarctica: Response to ecosystem legacy or present-day climate controls? Polar Biol 27:238–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Setälä H, McLean MA 2004. Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi. Oecologia 139:98–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sohlenius B, Boström S, Jönsson KI 2004. Occurrence of nematodes, tardigrades and rotifers on ice-free areas in East Antarctica. Pedobiologia 48:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spigel RH, Priscu JC 1998. Physical limnology of the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes. Priscu JC, Ed. Ecosystem dynamics in a polar desert: The McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. pp 153–87Google Scholar
  41. Takacs CD, Priscu JC 1998. Bacterioplankton dynamics in the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes, Antarctica: production and biomass loss over four seasons. Microb Biol 36:239–50Google Scholar
  42. Tenuta M, Ferris H 2004. Sensitivity of nematode life-history groups to ions and osmotic tensions of nitrogenous solutions. J Nematol 36:85–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Treonis AM, Wall DH, Virginia RA 1999. Invertebrate biodiversity in Antarctic dry valley soils and sediments. Ecosystems 2:482–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagener SM, Oswood MW, Schimel JP 1998. Rivers and soils: Parallels in carbon and nitrogen processing. BioScience 48:104–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wall DH, Ed. 2004. Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in soils and sediments. Washington DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Wall DH, Ayres E, Behan-Pelletier V, Covich AP, Snelgrove PVR 2005. Soils, freshwater and marine sediments: the need for integrative landscape science. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 304:302–7Google Scholar
  47. Wall Freckman D, Blackburn TH, Brussaard L, Hutchings P, Palmer MA, Snelgrove PVR 1997. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem functioning of soils and sediments. Ambio 26:556–62Google Scholar
  48. Wardle DA 2002. Communities and ecosystems: Linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeates GW. 1979. Terrestrial nematodes from the Bunger Hills and Gaussberg, Antarctica. N Z J Zool 6:641–3Google Scholar
  50. Yeates GW, Bongers T, Degoede RGM, Freckman DW, Georgieva SS 1993. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera: An outline for soil ecologists. J Nematol 25:315–31PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Ayres
    • 1
  • Diana H. Wall
    • 1
  • Byron J. Adams
    • 2
  • John E. Barrett
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ross A. Virginia
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and Department of BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Microbiology and Molecular Biology Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Studies ProgramDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations