Ecosystems

, Volume 8, Issue 8, pp 871–884 | Cite as

N Retention in Urbanizing Headwater Catchments

  • Wilfred M. Wollheim
  • Brian A. Pellerin
  • Charles J. Vörösmarty
  • Charles S. Hopkinson
Original Articles

Abstract

Urbanization can potentially alter watershed nitrogen (N) retention via combined changes in N loading, water runoff, and N processing potential. We examined N export and retention for two headwater catchments (∼4 km2) of contrasting land use (16% vs. 79% urban) in the Plum Island Ecosystem (PIE-LTER) watershed, MA. The study period included a dry year (2001–2002 water year) and a wet year (2002–2003 water year). We generalized results by comparing dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) concentrations from 16 additional headwater catchments (0.6–4.2 km2) across a range of urbanization (6–90%). Water runoff was 25–40% higher in the urban compared to the forested catchment, corresponding with an increased proportion of impervious surfaces (25% vs. 8%). Estimated N loading was 45% higher and N flux 6.5 times higher in the urban than in the forested catchment. N retention (1 − measured stream export / estimated loading) was 65–85% in the urban site and 93–97% in the forested site, with lower retention rates during the wetter year. The mechanisms by which N retention stays relatively high in urban systems are poorly known. We show that N retention is related to the amount of impervious surface in a catchment because of associated changes in N loading (maximized at moderate levels of imperviousness), runoff (which continues to increase with imperviousness), and biological processes that retain N. Continued declines in N retention due to urbanization have important negative implications for downstream aquatic systems including the coastal zone.

Keywords

watershed nitrogen retention export loading urban residential impervious 

References

  1. Aber JD, Goodale CL, Ollinger SV, Smith ML, Magill AH, Martin ME, Hallett RA, Stoddard JL. 2003. Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? Bioscience 53:375–89Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold CL, Gibbons CJ. 1996. Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Asso 62:243–58Google Scholar
  4. Baker J, Healy H, Hackett OM. 1964. Geology and Ground-Water Conditions in the Wilmington-Reading Area of Massachusetts. USGS, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker L, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L. 2001. Nitrogen balance for the central Arizone-Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Ecosystems 4:582–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer EW, Goodale CL, Jaworsk NA, Howarth RW. 2002. Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 57:137–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burges SJ, Wigmosta MS, Meena JM. 1998. Hydrological effects of land-use change in a zero-order catchment. J Hydrol Eng 3:86–97Google Scholar
  8. Caraco NF, Cole JJ. 1999. Human impact on nitrate export: An analysis using major world rivers. Ambio 28:167–70Google Scholar
  9. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Likens GE, Lovett GM, Weathers KC. 2003. Variation in NO3 export from flowing waters of vastly different sizes: Does one model fit all? Ecosystems 6:344–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbett CW, Wahl M, Porter DE, Edwards D, Moise C. 1997. Nonpoint source runoff modeling: A comparison of a forested watershed and an urban watershed on the South Carolina coast. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 213:133–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creed IF, Band LE, Foster NW, Morrison IK, Nicolson JA, Semkin RS, Jeffries DS. 1996. Regulation of nitrate–N release from temperate forests: a test of the N flushing hypothesis. Water Resour Res 32:3337–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creed IF, Band LE. 1998. Export of nitrogen fomr catchments within a temperate forest: Evidence of a unifying mechanism regulated by variable source area dymanics. Water Resour Res 34:3105–20Google Scholar
  13. DEP M. 2002. Ipswich River Watershed Assessment Report. Wilmington (MA). Massachesetts Department of Environmental ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  14. Donner S, Coe M, Lenters J, Twine T, Foley J. 2002. Modeling the impact of hydrologic changes on nitrate transport in the Mississippi. Global Biogeochem Cycles 16:1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driscoll CT, Whitall D, Aber J, Boyer E, Castro M, Cronan C, Goodale CL, Groffman P, Hopkinson C, Lambert K, Lawrence G, Ollinger S. 2003. Nitrogen pollution in the northeastern United States: sources, effects, and management options. Bioscience 53:357–74Google Scholar
  16. Dunne T, Leopold LB. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W.H. Freeman and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Green PA, Vörösmarty CJ, Meybeck M, Galloway JN, Peterson BJ, Boyer EW. 2004. Pre-industrial and contemporary fluxes of nitrogen through rivers: a global assessment based on typology. Biogeochemistry 68:71–105Google Scholar
  18. Groffman PM, Howard G, Gold AJ, Nelsar WM. 1996. Microbial nitrate processing in shallow groundwater in a riparian forest. J Environ Qual 25:1309-1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groffman PM, Boulware NJ, Zipperer WC, Pouyat RV, Band LE, Colosimo MF. 2003. Soil nitrogen cycle processes in Urban riparian forest. Environ Sci Technol 36:4547-4552Google Scholar
  20. Groffman P, Law N, Belt K, Band L, Fisher G. 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7:393–403Google Scholar
  21. Grove M, Harbor J, Engel B, Muthukrishnan S. 2001. Impacts of urbanization on surface hydrology, Little Eagle Creek, Indiana, and analysis of LTHIA model sensitivity to data resolution. Physical Geography 22:135–153Google Scholar
  22. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jarworski N, Lathja K, Downing JA, Elmgren R, Caraco N, Jordan T, Berendse F, Freney J, Kudeyarov V, Murdoch P, Zhao-liang Z. 1996. Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine inputs of N and P for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35:75–9Google Scholar
  23. Jaworski NA, Groffman PM, Keller AA, Prager JC. 1992. A watershed nitrogen and phosphorus balance: the upper Potomac River basin. Estuaries 15:83–95Google Scholar
  24. Jennings DB, Jarnagian ST. 2002. Changes in anthropogenic impevious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecol 17:471–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jordan TE, Correll DL, Weller DE. 1997. Effects of agriculture on discharges of nutrients from coastal plain watersheds of Chesapeake Bay. J Environ Qual 26:836–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lerner D. 2002. Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: a review. Hydrogeol J 10:143–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Likens GE, Bormann FH. 1995. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Berlin Heidelberg New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  28. Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Sobczak WV. 2000. Nitrogen saturation and retention in forested watersheds of the Catskill Mountains, New York. Ecol Appl 10:73–84Google Scholar
  29. Morton TG, Gold AJ, Sullivan WM. 1998. Influence of overwatering and fertilization on nitrogen losses from home lawns. J Environ Qual 17:124–130Google Scholar
  30. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Lovett GM, Milham SE, Lathrop RE, Ellis JM. 1993. A spatial model of atmospheric deposition for the northeastern US. Ecol Appl 3:959–972Google Scholar
  31. Omernik JM. 1976. The influence of land use on stream nutrient levels. EPA-600/2–76–014, Washington (DC): Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  32. Paul MJ, Meyer JL. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peierls BL, Caraco NF, Pace ML, Cole JJ. 1991. Human influence on river nitrogen. Nature 350:386–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pellerin BA. 2004. The influence of urbanization on runoff generation and stream chemistry in Massachusetts watersheds. PhD Dissertation. Durham: University of New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  35. Pellerin BA, Wollheim WM, Hopkinson CS, McDowell WH, Williams MR, Vorosmarty CJ, Daley ML. 2004. Role of wetlands and developed land use on dissolved organic nitrogen concentration and DON/TDN in northeastern U.S. rivers and streams. Limnol and Oceanogr 49:910–8Google Scholar
  36. Peterson BJ, Wollheim WM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Marti E, Bowden WB, Valett HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WH, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory S, Morrall DD. 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Petrovic AM. 1990. The fate of nitrogenous fertilizers applied to turfgrass. Environ Qual 19:1–14Google Scholar
  38. Schueler TR. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Prot Tech 1:100–11Google Scholar
  39. Seitzinger SP, Styles RV, Boyer EW, Alexander RB, Billen G, Howarth RW, Mayer B, Van Breemen N. 2002. Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 57:199–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stoddard JL. 1994. Long-term changes in watershed retention of nitrogen. In: Environmental Chemistry of Lakes and Reservoirs. American Chemical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  41. Urbonas, BR, Roesner, LA 1992

    Hydrologic design for urban drainage and flood control

    Maidment, DR eds. Hand book of HydrologyMcGraw-HillNew York28012852
    Google Scholar
  42. Valiela I, Bowen JL. 2002. Nitrogen sources to watersheds and estuaries: role of land cover mosaics and losses within-watersheds. Environ Pollut 118:239–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Valiela I, Collins G, Kremer J, Lajtha K, Geist M, Seely B, Brawley J, Sham CH. 1997. Nitrogen loading from coastal watersheds to receiving estuaries: New method and application. Ecol Appl 7:358–80Google Scholar
  44. Wahl M, McKellar H, Williams T. 1997. Patterns of nutrient loading in forested and urbanized coastal streams. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 213:111–31Google Scholar
  45. Wahl M, McKellar H, Williams T. 1997. Patterns of nutrient loading in forested and urbanized coastal streams. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 213:111–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams M, Hophinson C, Rastetter E, Vallino J. 2004. N budgets and aquatic uptake in the Ipswich River basin, northeastern Massachusetts. Water Resour Res 40:w11201Google Scholar
  47. Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Deegan LA, Hobbie JE, Hooker B, Bowden WB, Edwardson KJ, Arscott DB, Hershey AE. 2001. Influence of stream size on ammonium and suspended particulate nitrogen processing. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zarriello PJ, Barlow LK. 2002. Measured and Simulated Runoff to the Lower Charles River, Massachussetts, October 1999–September 2000. 02–4129, U.S.G.S, Northborough, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Zarriello PJ, Ries KG. 2000. A precipitation-runoff model for analysis of the effects of water withdrawals on streamflow, Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts. Water-Resources Investigation Report 00–4029, United States Geological Survey, Northborough, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfred M. Wollheim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brian A. Pellerin
    • 1
  • Charles J. Vörösmarty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Charles S. Hopkinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Water Systems Analysis Group, Complex Systems Research Center, Institute for Earth, Ocean, and SpaceUniversity of New HampshireDurham, New HampshireUSA
  2. 2.Earth Sciences DepartmentUniversity of New HampshireDurham, New HampshireUSA
  3. 3.Marine Biological LaboratoryEcosystems CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations