Surrogates for Resilience of Social–Ecological Systems
From its roots in ecology, resilience (Holling 1973) has more recently been applied to social–ecological systems, or SES. Theories of changing resilience explicitly address the persistence or breakdown of diverse states of complex systems (Gunderson and Holling 2002). These ideas have attracted interest from interdisciplinary research groups interested in change, conservation or restoration of SES (Berkes and others 2003; Scheffer and others 2003). From a practical standpoint, resilience theory provides a conceptual foundation for sustainable development (Folke and others 2002). The transition from theory to practice, however, requires assessment or estimation of resilience (Carpenter and others 2001). So far, there is little experience with estimating resilience of SES, and little understanding of the sensitivity of resilience measures to changes in SES. This shortage of practical field experience is a barrier to building understanding through empirical study of...
KeywordsTheoretical Notion Practical Field Indirect Inference Resilience Theory Integrate System Model
This Special Feature developed at Resilience Alliance meetings in Madison, Wisconsin, USA and Marenco, Costa Rica in 2002, with sponsorship of the J. S. MacDonnell Foundation. We thank the participants in those meetings, especially the authors of the Special Feature papers and Marty Anderies, Doug Beard, Buz Brock, Thomas Elmquist, Marco Janssen, Don Ludwig, Jon Norberg, Yarden Oren, Allyson Quinlan, Brian Walker and Colleen Webb.
- Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. ed. 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Carpenter SR. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems. Ecology Institute, Germany: Oldendorf/LuheGoogle Scholar
- Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–81Google Scholar
- Folke C, Carpenter SR, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B. 2002a. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–40Google Scholar
- Groffman PM, Baron JS, Blett T, Gold AJ, Goodman I, Gunderson LH, Levinson BM, Palmer MA, Paerl HW, Peterson GD, Poff NL, Rejeski DW, Reynolds JF, Turner MG, Weathers KC, Weins JA. 2005. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems, in pressGoogle Scholar
- Gunderson LH, Holling CS, eds. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council. 2000. Ecological indicators for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
- Pickett STA. 1989. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE, ed. Long-term studies in ecology. Berlin Heidelberg New york: Springer. p 110–35Google Scholar
- Turner MG, Dale VH. 1998. Comparing large, infrequent disturbances: what have we learned? Ecosystems 1:493–6Google Scholar