, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 227–241 | Cite as

Was Aldo Leopold Right about the Kaibab Deer Herd?

  • Dan BinkleyEmail author
  • Margaret M. Moore
  • William H. Romme
  • Peter M. Brown


In ecology textbooks prior to the 1970s, Aldo Leopold’s classic story of predator control, overpopulation of deer, and habitat degradation on the Kaibab Plateau during the 1920s epitomized predator regulation of herbivore populations. However, the story disappeared from texts in the late 20th century after several papers noted uncertainties in estimations of the deer population and provided alternative explanations. We re-examined the case study by determining the age structure of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) on the plateau. Aspen comprises the majority of deer browse in the summer, and the absence of a normal cohort of aspen from the 1920s would indicate deer overpopulation. The number of aspen (at 1.4 m) dating to the 1920s was an order of magnitude lower than the null expectation. Other periods of unusual numbers of aspen included high numbers of aspen dating to the 1880s and 1890s (when regular surface fires ceased), few aspen dating from 1953 to 1962 (after a second irruption of the deer population), and very high numbers from 1968 to 1992 (coincident with widespread logging). These convergent lines of evidence support the idea of extreme deer herbivory in the 1920s, consistent with food limitation of deer at high populations (bottom–up control) and predation limitation at low deer populations (top–down control). Some uncertainty remains within the overall story, and this level of ambiguity is common in case studies that involve population ecology, land management, and people at the scale of 1,000 km2 and 100 years. A complete version of the Kaibab deer story and its history would be a valuable, realistic case study for ecology texts.


deer population irruption Kaibab Plateau Grand Canyon fire history 



Funding for this work was provided by McIntire-Stennis appropriations to Colorado State University and by the Ecological Restoration Institute at Northern Arizona University. Field work and core dating were performed by Matt Tuten, Melinda Erickson, Teresa DeKokker, Faith Rudebush, Scott Sink, Chris Hayes, Greg Newman, Joey Blankenship, Geoff Seymour, Jonas Feinstein, Heidi Steltzer, Megan Smith, and Dirk Hobman. We thank Dennis Lund (formerly with the Kaibab National Forest) for his insights and help with relocation of the exclosure study and background information; John Goodwin (of the Arizona Fish and Game Department) for sharing information on deer populations and hunting; and the people of the North Kaibab Ranger District for their logistical help during the field work.


  1. Adams CC. 1925. The conservation of predatory mammals. J Mammal 6:83–96Google Scholar
  2. Avery TC, Burkhart H. 2002. Forest measurements. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow J, McCulloch CY. 1984. Recent dynamics and mortality rates of the Kaibab deer herd. Can J Zool 62:1805–12Google Scholar
  4. Bostick VB. 1949. North Kaibab deer–livestock forage relationship study. Progress report (15 September, 1949), USDA Forest Services, Fredonia, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  5. Botkin D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Burk JC. 1973. The Kaibab deer incident: a long persisting myth. BioScience 9:43–7Google Scholar
  7. Carson R. 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton-MifflinGoogle Scholar
  8. Caughley G. 1970. Eruption of ungulate populations, with emphasis on Himalayan thar in New Zealand. Ecology 51:53–71Google Scholar
  9. Colinvaux P. 1973, 1986. Introduction to ecology. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook ER, Meko DM, Stahle DW, Cleaveland MK. 1999. Drought reconstructions for the continental United States. J Clim 12:1145–62Google Scholar
  11. Dasman RF. 1964. Wildlife biology. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunlap TR. 1988. That Kaibab myth. J For Hist 31:60–8Google Scholar
  13. Elton C. 1927. Animal ecology. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Moore MM, Heinlein TA, Waltz AEM. 2002. Natural variability in forests of the Grand Canyon, USA. J Biogeogr 29:21–47Google Scholar
  15. Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Heinlein TA, Moore MM, Covington WW, Verkamp G. 2003. Mixed-severity fire regime in a high-elevation forest of Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecol 18:465–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasaway WC, Boertje RD, Grangaard DV, Kelleyhouse DG, Stephenson RO, Larsen DG. 1992. The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation. Wildlife Monogr 120:1–59Google Scholar
  17. Grey Z. 1924. The deer stalker. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
  18. Hungerford CR. 1970. Response of Kaibab mule deer to management of summer range. J Wildlife Manage 34:852–62Google Scholar
  19. Joy SM. 2002. Northern goshawk habitat on the Kaibab National Forest in Arizona: factors affecting nest locations and territory quality [dissertation]. Fort Collins (Co): Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimball TL, Watkins AG. 1951. The Kaibab North cooperative deer–livestock forage relationship study. Phoenix: Arizona Game and Fish CommissionGoogle Scholar
  21. Kormandy EJ. 1969. Concepts of ecology. Englewood Cliffs (MJ): Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  22. Krebs CJ. 2001. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. San Francisco: Benjamin CummingsGoogle Scholar
  23. Krebs CJ, Danell K, Angerbjorn A, Agrell J, Berteaux D, Brathen KA, Danell O, and others. 2003. Terrestrial trophic dynamics in the Canadian Arctic. Can J Zool 81:827–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang DM, Stewart SS. 1910. Reconnaissance of the Kaibab National Forest. On file at North Kaibab Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest, Fredonia, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  25. Leopold A. 1943. Deer irruptions. Wisc Conserv Bull 8:3–11Google Scholar
  26. Mann WG. 1931, 1941. The Kaibab deer: a brief history and present plan of management. USDA Forest Service, Kaibab National Forest, Fredonia, Arizona (original 1931 report amended 1934 and 1941)Google Scholar
  27. McHenry DE. 1935. Quaking aspen — its future in the park. Grand Canyon Nat Notes 9:361–5Google Scholar
  28. Merkle J. 1962. Plant communities of the Grand Canyon area, Arizona. Ecology 43:698–711Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell JE, Freeman DR. 1993. Wildlife-livestock-fire interactions on the North Kaibab: a historical overview. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-222. Fort Collins (Co): USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  30. Molles M Jr. 1999. Ecology: concepts and applications. Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore MM, Huffman D. 2004. Tree encroachment on meadows of North Rim, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Arctic Alpine Res 36:474–483Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council. 2002. Ecological dynamics on Yellowstone’s northern range. Washington (DC): National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Owen OS. 1971. Natural resource conservation: an ecological approach. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  34. Paine RT. 2000. Phycology for the mammalogist: marine rocky shores and mammal-dominated communities — how different are the structuring processes? J of Mammal 81:637–48Google Scholar
  35. Rasmussen DI. 1941. Biotic communities of the Kaibab Plateau, Arizona. Ecol Monogr 11:229–75Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds RT, Graham RT, Reiser MH, Bassett RL, Kennedy PL, Boyce DA Jr, Goodwin G, and others. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. USDA Forest Service General. Technical. Report. RM-217. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricklefs RE. 1973. Ecology. Newton (MA): Chrion PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricklefs RE. 2001. The economy of nature. New York: WH FreemanGoogle Scholar
  39. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL. 2003. Wolf reintroduction, predation risk, and cottonwood recovery in Yellowstone National Park. For Ecol Manage 184:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL. 2004. Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience 54:755–66Google Scholar
  41. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL. 2005. Linking wolves and plants: Aldo Leopold on trophic cascades. BioScience 55:613–621Google Scholar
  42. Russo JP. 1964. The Kaibab deer herd: its history, problems, and management. Wildlife Bulletin No. 7. Phoenix (AZ): Arizona Game and Fish DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  43. Schier GA. 1975. Deterioration of aspen clones in the middle Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service Report INT-170. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  44. Sesnie SE, Bailey J. 2003. Using history to plan the future of old-growth ponderosa pine. J For 101:40–7Google Scholar
  45. Shepperd WD, Binkley D, Bartos D, Stohlgren TJ, Eskew LG, Eds. 2001. Sustaining aspen in western landscapes. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. General Technical Report RMRS-P-18. 460 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith RL, Smith TM. 2001. Ecology and field biology. San Francisco: Benjamin CummingsGoogle Scholar
  47. Stiling P. 2002. Ecology: theories and applications. Upper Saddle River (MJ): Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson BH. 1934. National parks and wilderness use. In: Fauna of the national parks of the United States. Fauna Series No. 2. Washington (DC): National Park Service. p 47–55Google Scholar
  49. Young CC. 2000. A textbook history: use of the Kaibab lesson in teaching biology. Am Biol Teach 62:559–64Google Scholar
  50. Young CC. 2002. In the absence of predators: conservation and controversy on the Kaibab Plateau. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Binkley
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Margaret M. Moore
    • 4
  • William H. Romme
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter M. Brown
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed StewardshipColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  5. 5.Rocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research IncFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations