, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 341–357 | Cite as

Effects of Local Deforestation on the Diversity and Structure of Southern California Giant Kelp Forest Food Webs

  • Michael H. Graham
Special Feature


It has been hypothesized that the high diversity of giant kelp forests is due primarily to the provision of energy and habitat by the giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera). In this article, I use a 19-year-long kelp forest-monitoring data set from the Channel Islands National Park (a) to identify associations between subtidal species and forested or deforested habitats, (b) to generate an idealized food web for Southern California giant kelp forests in order to identify the primary conduits of energy flow through the system, and (c) to determine changes in the diversity and complexity of this food web due to localized giant kelp deforestation. A total of 275 common species were observed in the park between 1982 and 2000, of which 36% occurred significantly more often in kelp-forested areas than in deforested areas (that is, sea urchin barrens); 25 species were found exclusively in forested areas. Most of these associations were clearly identified as trophic and/or structural associations with giant kelp itself. The producer level of the food web was diverse, although giant kelp apparently represents the greatest single source of fixed carbon through either direct grazing or the production of phytodetritus. Primary, secondary and tertiary consumer levels were also represented by numerous species, and generalist consumers were common. With deforestation, the source of primary production shifts from primarily kelps to ephemeral microalgae, macroalgae, and phytoplankton. These results support the reliance of giant kelp forest food-web structure and diversity on the presence of the forest itself.


giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera kelp forests deforestation sea urchin barrens habitat association food web foundation species 



I thank D. Kushner of the CINP kelp forest-monitoring program for providing the CINP species lists, and M. Behrens and K. Lafferty for generously providing me with their unpublished identification of CINP forested and deforested sites. Thanks also to M. Behrens, M. Carr, P. Dayton, M. Edwards, J. Estes, L. Ferry-Graham, M. Foster, R. Grosberg, B. Kinlan, J. Pearse, P. Raimondi, K. Riser, E. Sala, J. Stachowicz, M. Tegner, and numerous others for their discussions of the natural history of giant kelp forest organisms. L. Ferry-Graham, M. Foster, B. Santelices and an anonymous reviewer provided critical reviews of this article. A University of California Faculty Fellowship supported this research.


  1. 1.
    Ambrose, RF 1984Food preferences, prey availability and the diet of Octopus bimaculatus.J Exp Mar Biol Ecol772944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambrose, RF, Swarbrick, SL 1989Comparison of fish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs off the coast of Southern California.Bull Mar Sci4471833Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, TW 1994Role of macroalgal structure in the distribution and abundance of a temperate reef fish.Mar Ecol Prog Ser11327990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, TW 2001Predator responses, prey refuges, and density-dependent mortality of a marine fish.Ecology8224557Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, TW, Sabado, BD 1995Correspondence between food availability and growth of a planktivorous temperate reef fish.J Exp Mar Biol Ecol1896576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Angel, A, Ojeda, FP 2001Structure and trophic organization of subtidal fish assemblages on the northern Chilean coast: the effect of habitat complexity.Mar Ecol Prog Ser2178191Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnes, RSK, Hughes, RN 1988An introduction to marine ecology. 2nd ed.BlackwellOxford351 pGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernstein, BB, Jung, N 1979Selective pressures and co-evolution in a kelp canopy community in Southern California, USA.Ecol Monogr4933555Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bray, RN, Ebeling, AW 1975Food activity and habitat of three “picker-type” micro-carnivorous fishes in the kelp forests off Santa Barbara, California, USA.Fish Bull7381529Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carr, MH 1989Effects of macroalgal assemblages on the recruitment of temperate zone reef fishes.J Exp Mar Biol Ecol1265976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castilla, JC 1985Food webs and functional aspects of the kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, community in the Beagle Channel, Chile.Siegfried, WRCondy, PRLaws, RM eds. Antarctic nutrient cycles and food websSpringer-VerlagGermany40714Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clarke, WD 1971Mysids of the southern kelp region.Nova Hedwigia3236980Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowen, RK 1983The effect of sheephead, Semicossyphus pulcher, predation on red sea-urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, populations: an experimental analysis.Oecologia (Berl)5824955Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cowen, RK 1986Site-specific differences in the feeding ecology of the California sheephead, Semicossyphus pulcher (Labridae).Environ Biol Fishes16193203Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coyer, JA 1985The invertebrate assemblage associated with the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera at Santa Catalina Island, California, USA: a general description with emphasis on amphipods, copepods, mysids and shrimps.Fish Bull825566Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coyer, JA 1987The mollusk assemblage associated with the fronds of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera at Santa Catalina Island, California, USA.Bull South Calif Acad Sci8512938Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis GE, Richards DV, Kushner DJ. 1996. Kelp forest monitoring design review. Technical report CHIS-96-01. Ventura (CA): Channel Islands National Park. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dayton, PK 1985Ecology of kelp communities.Annu Rev Ecol Syst1621545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dayton, PK, Tegner, MJ, Edwards, PB, Riser, KL 1998Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities.Ecol Appl830922Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dayton, PK, Tegner, MJ, Edwards, PB, Riser, KL 1999Temporal and spatial scales of kelp demography: the role of oceanographic climate.Ecol Monogr6921950Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dayton, PK, Tegner, MJ, Parnell, PE, Edwards, PB 1992Temporal and spatial patterns of disturbance and recovery in a kelp forest community.Ecol Monogr6242145Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeMartini, EE, Roberts, DA 1990Effects of giant kelp (Macrocystis) on the density and abundance of fishes in a cobble-bottom kelp forest.Bull Mar Sci46287300Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duggins, DO, Simenstad, CA, Estes, JA 1989Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems.Science2451703Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunton, KH, Schell, DM 1987Dependence of consumers on macroalgal (Laminaria solidungula) carbon in an arctic kelp community: δ13C evidence.Mar Biol9361525Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ebeling, AW, Larson, RJ, Alevizon, BS 1980Habitat groups and island–mainland distribution of kelp-bed fishes off Santa Barbara, California.Power, DM eds. The California Islands: proceedings of a multidisciplinary symposiumSanta Barbara Museum of Natural HistorySanta Barbara (CA)40331Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edwards MS. 2001. Scale-dependent patterns of community regulation in giant kelp forests [PhD dissertation]. Santa Cruz: University of California. 140 p. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ellison, JP, Terry, C, Stephens, JS 1979Food resource utilization among five species of embiotocids at King Harbor, California, with preliminary estimates of caloric intake.Mar Biol521619Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Estes, JA 1996The influence of large, mobile predators in aquatic food webs: examples from sea otters and kelp forests.Greenstreet, SPRTasker, ML eds. Aquatic predators and their preyBlackwellLondon6572Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feder, HM, Turner, CH, Limbaugh, C 1974Observations on fishes associated with kelp beds in Southern California.Calif Dep Fish Game Fish Bull1601144Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Foster, MS, De Vogelaere, AP, Oliver, JS, Pearse, JS, Harrold, C 1991Open coast intertidal and shallow subtidal ecosystems of the northeast Pacific.Mathieson, ACNienhuis, PH eds. Ecosystems of the world: intertidal and littoral ecosystemsElsevierAmsterdam23572Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Foster, MS, Schiel, DR 1985The ecology of giant kelp forests in California: a community profile.US Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep851152Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foster, MS, Schiel, DR 1988Kelp communities and sea otters: keystone species or just another brick in the wall?VanBlaricom, GREstes, JA eds. The community ecology of sea ottersSpringer-VerlagBerlin92115Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gerard VA. 1976. Some aspects of material dynamics and energy flow in a kelp forest in Monterey Bay, California [PhD dissertation]. Santa Cruz: University of California. p 173. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graham, MH 2002Prolonged reproductive consequences of short-term biomass loss in seaweeds.Mar Biol14090111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Graham, MH, Dayton, PK, Erlandson, JM 2003Ice ages and ecological transition on temperate coasts.Trends Ecol Evol183340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Graham, MH, Harrold, C, Lisin, S, Light, K, Watanabe, JM, Foster, MS 1997Population dynamics of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera along a wave exposure gradient.Mar Ecol Prog Ser14826979Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harrold, C, Pearse, JS 1987The ecological role of echinoderms in kelp forests.Echinoderm Stud2137233Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harrold, C, Reed, DC 1985Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure.Ecology6611609Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hobson, ES, Chess, JR. 2001Influence of trophic relations on form and behavior among fishes and benthic invertebrates in some California marine communities.Environ Biol Fishes6041157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hobson, KA, Piatt, JF, Pitocchelli, J 1994Using stable isotopes to determine seabird trophic relationships.J Anim Ecol6378698Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Holbrook, SJ, Carr, MH, Schmitt, RJ, Coyer, JA 1990Effect of giant kelp on local abundance of reef fishes: the importance of ontogenetic resource requirements.Bull Mar Sci4710414Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jackson, GA 1977Nutrients and production of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off Southern California.Limnol Oceanogr2297995Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jackson, GA 1987Modeling the growth and harvest yield of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.Mar Biol9561124Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jones, LG 1971Studies on selected small herbivorous invertebrates inhabiting Macrocystis canopies and holdfasts in Southern California kelp beds.Nova Hedwigia3234367Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jones, RE 1981Food habits of smaller marine mammals from Northern California.Proc Calif Acad Sci4440933Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaehler, S, Pakhmov, EA, McQuaid, CD 2000Trophic structure of the marine food web at the Prince Edward Islands (Southern Ocean) determined by δ13C and δ15N analysis.Mar Ecol Prog Ser2081320Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Laur, DR, Ebeling, AW 1983Predator–prey relationships in surf-perches.Environ Biol Fishes821729Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lawrence, JM 1975On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins.Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev1321386Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leet WS, Dewees CM, Klingbeil R, Johnson EJ, editors. 2001. California’s living marine resources: a status report. Sacramento: State of California Resources Agency and Fish and Game. 593 p.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leighton, DL 1971Grazing activities of benthic invertebrates in Southern California kelp beds.Nova Hedwigia3242153Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mann, KH 1973Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth.Science18297581Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mitchell, CT, Turner, CH, Strachan, AR 1969Observations on the biology and behavior of the California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus (Randall).Calif Fish Game5512131Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morris, RH, Abbott, DP, Haderlie, EC 1980Intertidal invertebrates of CaliforniaStanford University PressStanford104 pGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    North, WJ 1971The biology of giant kelp beds (Macrocystis) in California: introduction and background.Nova Hedwigia32168Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    North, WJ 1994Review of Macrocystis biology.Akatsuka, I eds. Biology of economic algaeAcademicThe Hague447527Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    North WJ, Hubbs CL, editors. 1968. Utilization of kelp-bed resources in Southern California. Calif Dep Fish Game Fish Bull 139. Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    North, WJ, Pearse, JS 1970Sea urchin population explosion in Southern California coastal waters.Science167209Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    O’Connell, CP 1953The life-history of the cabezon.Calif Fish Game93176Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Paine, RT 1969A note on trophic complexity and community stability.Am Nat103913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Parker, BC 1963Translocation in the giant kelp Macrocystis.Science1408912Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pinnegar, JK, Polunin, NVC 2000Contributions of stable-isotope data to elucidating food webs of Mediterranean rocky littoral fishes.Oecologia (Berl)122399406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Quast, JC 1971aFish fauna of the rocky inshore zone.Nova Hedwigia32481507Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Quast, JC 1971bObservations on the food of the kelp bed fishes.Nova Hedwigia3254179Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Riedman, ML, Estes, JA 1990The sea otter Enhydra lutris: behavior, ecology and natural history.US Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep901126Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Robles, C 1987Predator foraging characteristics and prey population structure on a sheltered shore.Ecology68150214Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rosenthal, RJ, Clarke, WD, Dayton, PK 1974Ecology and natural history of a stand of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off Del Mar, California.Fish Bull7267084Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sala, E, Graham, MH 2002Community-wide distribution of predator–prey interaction strength in kelp forests.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA99367883Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schmitt, RL 1982Consequences of dissimilar defenses against predation in a subtidal marine community.Ecology631588601Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Stebbins, TD 1986Density distribution and feeding of the marine snail Norrisia norrisi (Mollusca, Gastropoda) on the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyta, Laminariales).Bull South Calif Acad Sci856973Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Steneck, RS, Graham, MH, Bourque, BJ, Corbett, D, Erlandson, JM, Estes, JA, Tegner, MJ 2002Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future.Environ Conserv2943659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tegner, MJ, Dayton, PK 1981Population structure, recruitment and mortality of two sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in a kelp forest.Mar Ecol Prog Ser525568Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tegner, MJ, Dayton, PK 1987El Niño effects on Southern California kelp forest communities.Adv Ecol Res1724379Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Tegner, MJ, Levin, LA 1983Spiny lobsters and sea urchins: analysis of a predator–prey interaction.J Exp Mar Biol Ecol7312550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Towle, DW, Pearse, JS 1973Production of the giant kelp, Macrocystis, estimated by in situ incorporation of 14C in polyethylene bags.Limnol Oceanogr181559Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wakefield, RL, Murray, SN 1998Factors influencing food choice by the seaweed-eating marine snail Norrisia norrisi (Trochidae).Mar Biol13063142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Watanabe, JM 1984aFood preference, food quality and diets of three herbivorous gastropods (Trochidae: Tegula) in a temperate kelp forest habitat.Oecologia (Berl)624752Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Watanabe, JM 1984bThe influence of recruitment, competition, and benthic predation on spatial distributions of three species of kelp forest gastropods (Trochidae: Tegula).Ecology6592036Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Watanabe, JM, Harrold, C 1991Destructive grazing by sea urchins Strongylocentrotus spp. in a Central California kelp forest: potential roles of recruitment, depth, and predation.Mar Ecol Prog Ser7112541Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zimmerman, RC, Kremer, JN 1986In situ growth and chemical composition of the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera: response to temporal changes in ambient nutrient availability.Mar Ecol Prog Ser2727785Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zimmerman, RC, Robertson, DL 1985Effects of El Niño on local hydrography and growth of the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, at Santa Catalina Island, California.Limnol Oceanogr301298302Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zobell, CE 1971Drift seaweeds on San Diego County beaches.Nova Hedwigia32269314Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Population BiologyUniversity of California, Davis, California 95616USA
  2. 2.Current address: Moss Landing Marine LabsB272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, California 95039USA

Personalised recommendations