Ecosystems

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 564–576

Spatial Variability of Soil Properties in a Floodplain Forest in Northwest Spain

Original Article

Abstract

Floodplain forests are generally areas of high plant diversity compared with upland forests. Higher environmental heterogeneity, especially variation in belowground properties may help explain this high diversity. However, there is little information available on the spatial scale and pattern of belowground resources in floodplain forests. Geostatistics and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to describe the spatial variability of 20 soil properties ranging from essential plant nutrients, such as NH4 or PO4, to nonessential elements like Ti or V. The spatial variation of Si-to-(Al + Fe) ratio, an index of soil development, was also analyzed. Semivariograms and maps of selected properties were used to discriminate between the effect of flooding (and other mechanisms that may contribute to large scale trends in data) and local heterogeneity. The hypothesis that elements mainly cycled through biological processes (such as N) show different spatial properties than elements cycled through both biological and geological processes (such as P) or elements under strict geological control (such as Ti or V) is also presented. Redox potential was the most variable property (CV = 1.35) followed by mineral N, phosphate, organic matter, and carbon. Nonessential elements for organisms such as Si, Al, Ti, Rh, or V were less variable, supporting the hypothesis that biological control on soil properties leads to higher spatial variability. The range (the average distance within which the samples correlate spatially) varied between 3.89 m for water content to 18.5 m for the Si-to-(Al + Fe) ratio. The proportion of the total variance that can be modeled as spatial dependence (structural variance) was very variable, ranging between 0.34 for Fe and 0.96 for K. The addition of the large trend had a strong influence on the CV of most soil variables and created a gradient in C accumulation and the mineral weathering rate. The results suggest that flooding and other processes that are responsible for large spatial trends in the floodplain forest differentially affect biologically and geologically controlled variables with different turnover rates, thus providing a heterogeneous edaphic environment.

Keywords

flooding effect floodplain forest spatial scale semivariograms kriging redox potential organic matter soil nutrients geostatistics 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Rowland AP. 1986. Chemical analysis. 2nd ed. In: Moore PD, Chapman SB, editors. Methods in Plant Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amador, JA, Glucksman, AM, Lyons, JB, Gorres, JH 1997Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a riparian forest.Soil Sci16280825Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buhrke, VE, Jenkins, R, Smith, DK 1997A practical guide for the preparation of specimens for X-ray fluorescence and X-ray diffraction analysis.Wiley-VCHNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darke, AK, Walbridge, MR 2000Al and Fe biogeochemistry in a floodplain forest: Implications for P retention.Biogeochemistry51132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darke, AK, Walbridge, MR, Lockaby, BG 1997Changes in Al and Fe crystallinity and P sorption capacity in a floodplain forest soil subjected to artificially manipulated flooding regimes in field mesocosms.Wetlands Ecol Manage423544Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ettema, CH, Coleman, DC, Vellidis, G, Lowrance, R, Rathbun, S 1998Spatiotemporal distributions of bacterivorous nematodes and soil resources in a restored riparian wetland.Ecology79272134Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ettema, CH, Wardle, DA 2002Spatial soil ecology.Trends Ecol Evol1717783Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farley, RA, Fitter, AH 1999Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland.J Ecol8768896Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faulkner, SP, Patrick Jr, WH, Gambrell, RP 1989Field techniques for measuring wetland soil parameters.Soil Sci Soc Am J5688390Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gallardo, A, Rodriguez–Saucedo, JJ, Covelo, F, Fernandez–Ales, R 2000Soil nitrogen heterogeneity in a Dehesa ecosystem.Plant Soil2227182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gross, KL, Pregitzer, KS, Burton, AJ 1995Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities.J Ecol8335767Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IGME. 1981. Mapa geológico de España. Hoja n° 261: Tuy. Servicio de Publicaciones. Ministerio de Industria y Energia. MadridGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isaaks, EH, Srivastava, RM 1989An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics.Oxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson, RB, Caldwell, MM 1993aThe scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics.Ecology746124Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson, RB, Caldwell, MM 1993bGeostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants.J Ecol8168392Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeltsch, F, Milton, SJ, Dean, WRJ, Van Rooyen, N, Moloney, KA 1998Modelling the impact of small-scale heterogeneities on tree–grass coexistence in semi-arid savannas.J Ecol8678093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirkman, LK, Sharitz, RR 1993Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of species diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina bays in South Carolina.Ecol App4177188Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lechowicz, MJ, Bell, G 1991The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. II. Microspatial heterogeneity of the edaphic environment.J Ecol7968796Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Legendre, P, Fortin, M-J 1989Spatial pattern and ecological analysis.Vegetatio8010738Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Markewich, HW, Pavich, MJ 1991Soil chronosequence studies in temperate to subtropical, low-latitude, look-relief terrain with data from the eastern United States.Geoderma5121339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Megonigal, JP, Patrick Jr, WH, Faulkner, SP 1993Wetland hydrology, redox potential, and soil O2 content in relation to hydric soil morphology and wetland delineation.Soil Sci Soc Am J571409Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmer, MW 1990Spatial scale and patterns of species–environment relationships in hardwood forest of the north Carolina piedmont.Coenoses57987Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patrick Jr, WH, Gambrell, RP, Faulkner, SP 1996Redox Measurements of Soils. Methods of Soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No. 5.Soil Science Society of America and American Society of AgronomyMadison, WSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson, GP 1987Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with known variance.Ecology687448Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robertson, GP, Huston, MA, Evans, FC, Tiedje, JM 1988Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability.Ecology69151724Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robertson, GP, Crum, JR, Ellis, BG 1993The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance.Oecologia964516Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robertson, GP, Gross, KL 1994

    Assessing the heterogeneity of belowground resources: quantifying pattern and scale.

    Caldwell, MMPearcy, RW eds. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants.Academic PressSan Diego, CA
    Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robertson, GP, Klingensmith, KM, Klug, MJ, Paul, EA, Crum, JR, Ellis, BG 1997Soil resources, microbial activity, and primary production across an agricultural ecosystem.Ecol Appl715870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rossi, RE, Mulla, DJ, Journel, AG, Franz, EH 1992Geostatistical tools for modelling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence.Ecol Monogr62277314Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schlesinger, WH 1997Biogeochemistry. An Analysis of Global Change. 2nd ed.Academic PressSan Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schlesinger, WH, Reynolds, JF, Cunningham, GL, Huenneke, LF, Jarrell, WM, Virginia, RA, Whitford, WG 1990Biological feedbacks in global desertification.Science24710438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schlesinger, WH, Raikes, JA, Hartley, AE, Cross, AF 1996On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems.Ecology7736474Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharitz, RR, Mitsch, WJ 1993

    Southern floodplain forests.

    Martin, WHBoyce, SGEchternacht, AC eds. Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States.WileyNew York31172
    Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Silva–Pando FJ, Garcia Martinez XR, Valdes–Bermejo E. 1988. Vegetación de las Gándaras de Budiño. Diputación Provincial de PontevedraGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sims, GK, Ellsworth, TR, Mulvaney, RL 1995Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts.Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal2630316Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tilman, D 1988Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities.Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trangmar, BB, Yost, RS, Uehara, G 1985Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties.Adv Agron38459Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vitousek, PM, Howarth, RW 1991Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea—how can it occur?Biogeochemistry1387115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Animal Biology, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de Vigo, E-36200 Spain

Personalised recommendations