Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 470–482 | Cite as

Soil Diversity and Land Use in the United States

  • Ronald Amundson
  • Y. Guo
  • P. Gong
Article

Abstract

Soils are dynamic components of terrestrial ecosystems that historically have been viewed as economic resources by government and private interests. The large-scale conversion of many sections of the United States to agriculture and urban land uses, combined with the growing awareness of the role of soils in global biogeochemistry and ecology, ultimately requires an assessment of the remaining distribution of undisturbed soils in the country. Here we conduct the first quantitative analysis of disturbed and undisturbed soil distribution in the USA using a GIS-based approach. We find that a sizable fraction (4.5%) of the nation’s soils are in danger of substantial loss, or complete extinction, due to agriculture and urbanization. In the agricultural belt of the country, up to 80% of the soils that were naturally of low abundance are now severely impacted (greater than 50% conversion to agricultural/urban uses). Undisturbed soils provide ecosystem services that warrant their preservation, including a somewhat complex relationship with rare or endangered plants. The known and unknown attributes of undisturbed soils suggests the need for an integrated biogeodiversity perspective in landscape preservation efforts.

Keywords

soils biological diversity land use extinction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Kit Paris and Eric Vinson of the NRCS in California for assistance and advice on the STATSGO database. Stephen Howard at the USGS EROS Data Center provided assistance in describing the NLCD data structure. Mu Lan provided technical assistance, and Cristina Castanha, Stephanie Ewing, and Kyungsoo Yoo provided comments on an earlier draft of the paper. The research was supported by the Kearney Foundation of Soil Science.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, GA, Wall, DH 2000Biodiversity above and below the surface of soils and sediments: linkages and implications for global change.Bioscience5010438Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amundson, R 1998Do soils need our protection?Geotimes March1620Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amundson, R 2000Are Soils Endangered?Schneiderman, J eds. The Earth Around Us, Maintaining a Livable Planet.WH FreemanNew York14453Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amundson, R 2001The carbon budget in soils.Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci2953562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amundson, R, Jenny, H 1997On a state factor model of ecosystems.Bioscience4753643Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenner, DL, Amundson, R, Baisden, WT, Kendall, C, Harden, J 2001Soil N and 15N variation with time in a California annual grassland ecosystem.Geochim Cosmochim Acta65417186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Census of Agriculture. 1997: http://www.census.gov/econ/www/ag0100.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho, J-C, Tiedje, JM 2000Biogeography and degree of endemicity of fluorescent Pseudomonas strains in soil.Appl Envir Microbiol66544856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cincotta, RP, Wisnewski, J, Engelman, R 2000Human population in the biodiversity hotspots.Nature4049902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daily, GC 1997Developing a scientific basis for managing Earth’s life support systems.Conserv Ecol314. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art14Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daily, GC, Matson, PA, Vitousek, PM 1997Ecosystem services supplied by soil.Daily, GC eds. Natures Services.Island PressWashington, DC11332Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daily, GC, Söderqvist, T, Aniyar, S, Arrow, K, Dasgupta, P, Ehrlich, PR, Folke, C, Jansson, A, Jansson, B-O, Kautsky, N, Levin, S, Lubchenco, J, Mäler, K-G, Simpson, D, Starrett, D, Tilman, D, Walker, B 2000The value of nature and the nature of value.Science28939596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dobson, AP, Rodriguez, JP, Roberts, WM, Wilcove, DS 1997Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States.Science2755503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ehrlich, PR, Wilson, EO 1991Biodiversity studies: science and policy.Science275862Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finlay, BJ 2002Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species.Science296106163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flather, CH, Joyce, LA, Bloomgarden, CA 1994Species endangerment in the United States. RM-241. General Technical Report, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station.US Department of AgricultureFt. Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo Y, Amundson R, Gong P, Ahrens R (2003) Taxonomic structure, distribution, and abundance of the soils in the United States (in review)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holland, RF, Dains, VI 1990The edaphic factor in vernal pool vegetation.Ikeda, DHSchlising, RA eds. Vernal Pool Plants: Their Habitat and Biology. Studies from the Herbarium, Number 8.CSUChico, CA3148Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huston, M 1993Biological diversity, soils, and economics.Science262167680Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huston, M 1994Biological diversity and agriculture.Science26545859Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibáñez, JJ, De-Alba, S, Bermúdez, FF, García–Álvarez, A 1995Pedodiversity: concepts and measures.Catena2421532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibáñez, JJ, De-Alba, S, Lobo, A, Zucarello, V 1998Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales.Geoderma8317192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Imhoff, ML, Lawrence, WT, Elvidge, CD, Paul, T, Levine, E, Privalsky, MV, Brown, V 1997Using nighttime DMSP/OLS images of city lights for estimating the impacts of urban land use on soil resources in the United States.Remote Sens Environ5910517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    IPCC. 2000. Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. Summary for Policy Makers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization/United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jenny, H 1941Factors of Soil Formation.McGraw–HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marchand, DE, Allwardt, A 1981Later Cenozoic stratigraphic units in northeastern San Joaquin Valley, California. US Geological Survey Bulletin 170.US G P UWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Margules, CR, Gaston, KJ 1994Biological diversity and agriculture.Science265457Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Myers, N, Mittermier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB, Kent, J 2000Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Nature4038538Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nizeyimana, EL, Peterson, GW, Imhoff, ML, Sinclair Jr, HR, Waltman, SW, Reed– Margetan, DS, Levine, ER, Russo, JM 2001Assessing the impact of land conversion to urban use on soils with different productivity levels in the USA.Soil Sci Soc Am J65391402Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noss, R, O’Connell, MA, Murphy, DD 1997The Science of Conservation Planning. Habitat Conservation Under the Endangered Species ActIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nüsslein, K, Tiedje, JM 1999Soil bacterial community shift correlated with change from forest to pasture vegetation in a tropical soil.Appl Environ Microbiol6536226Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paustian, K, Andrèn, O, Janzen, HH, Lal, R, Smith, P, Tian, G, Tiessen, H, Van Noordwijk, M, Woomer, PL 1997Agricultural soils as a sinck to mitigate CO2 emissions.Soil Use Manage13230244Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pfeifer, BA, Admiraal, SJ, Gramajo, H, Cane, DE, Khosla, C 2000Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli.Science29117902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shrader–Frechette, KS, McCoy, ED 1993Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation.Cambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soil Survey Staff1999Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Agric. Handbk. 436. US Department of Agriculture., Nat Res Cons ServUS GPOWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sorenson, AA, Greene, RP, Russ, K 1997Farming on the edge.American Farmland Trust, Center for Agricultural Development, Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalb, ILGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thoreau HD. 2001. Collected Essay and Poems. Library of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tilman, D, Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R, Polasky, . 2002Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.Nature4186717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vitousek, PM, Mooney, HA, Lubchenco, J, Mellilo, JM 1997aHuman domination of earth’s ecosystems.Science2774949Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vitousek, PM, Aber, JD, Howarth, RW, Likens, GE, Matson, PA, Schindler, DW, Schlesinger, WH, Tilman, DG 1997bHuman alterations of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences.Ecol Appl773750Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vollmar, JE 2002Wildlife and Rare Plant Ecology of Eastern Merced County’s Vernal Pool Grasslands.Vollmar ConsultingBerkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yaalon, D 2000Down to earth. Why soil—and soil science—matters.Nature407301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Ecosystem Sciences, 151 Hilgard HallUniversity of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3110USA
  2. 2.Center for Assessment and Monitoring of Forest and Environmental Resources (CAMFER)University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3110AUSA
  3. 3.International Institute for Earth System Science (ESSI)Nanjing UniversityChina, 210093

Personalised recommendations