Materials Research Innovations

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 27–30 | Cite as

Deformation of polyethylene: Monte Carlo simulation

  • Silvio A. Ospina
  • Johans Restrepo
  • Betty L. López
Original Article


We have simulated semi crystalline polyethylene (PE) using Monte Carlo method with the Metropolis dynamics. The mechanical response is evaluated in the first steps of deformation. The simulation results are compared with the experimental curves at different conditions concerning temperature and deformation rate. The obtained results allow us to suggest that the method of MC together with the model and the dynamics employed give a satisfactory description of the mechanical properties of lineal polymers as the polyethylene. The simulations MC allows to differentiate the effect of the diverse parameters as the temperature, the test time, chain length and density which affect the mechanical behavior. The study of the non-reversible strain up to reading the material fracture is projected for future work.


Polyethylene Mechanical properties Monte Carlo simulation 



The present work was supported by the Universidad de Antioquia. One of the authors (J.R) thanks the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales of the Universidad de Antioquia for the assignation of a exclusive dedication time and to Professor Augusto Montes for his great support. We would like to thank Dr. Witold Brostow, Dr Michael Hess and Ricardo Joao Simoes for helpful suggestions and corrections.


  1. 1.
    Holmes M (2001) Plastics, Additives and Compounding 3: 5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schurmann B, Niebergall U, Severin N, Burger Ch, Stocker W (1998) Polymer 39: 5283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrer D, Maspoch M, Martínez A, Santana O (2001) Polymer 42: 1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartczak Z, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M (1999) Polymer 40: 2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Starke J, Michler G, Grellmann W, Seidler S, Gahleitner M, Fiebig J, Nezbedova E (1998) Polymer 39: 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van der Wal A, Mulder J, Gaymans R (1998) Polymer 39: 5467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tselios Ch, Bikiaris D, Maslis V, Panayiotou C (1998) Polymer 39: 6807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anual Book of ASTM Standars 08.01 (2000) West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michaeli W, Glißmann M (2001) Polymer Testing 20: 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brostow W, Donahue M, Karashin CE, Simoes R (2001) Mat Res Innovat 4: 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alberola N, Merle G, Benzarti K (1999) Polymer 40: 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nitta K (1999) Comput Theor Polym Sci 9: 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoolz T, Mesner C, Wittkop M, Kreitmeier S, Kain S, Goritz D (1999) Comput Theor Polym Sci 9: 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohno K, Esfarjani K, Kawazoe Y (1999) Computational materials science: From ab initio to monte carlo methods. Springer-Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newman MEJ, Barkema GT (1999) Monte carlo methods in statiscal physics. Clarendon-Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gould, Tobochnik (1998) An introduction to computer simulation methods: Applications to physical system. Part 2. Addison-Wesley, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharaf MA, Kloczkowski A, Mark JE (2001) Comput Theor Polym Sci 11: 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brostow W, Corneliussen RD (1986) Failure of plastics. Hanser, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brostow W (2000) Performance of Plastics. Hanser, Munich-CincinnatiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvio A. Ospina
    • 1
  • Johans Restrepo
    • 2
  • Betty L. López
    • 3
  1. 1.Grupo de Polímeros, Ingeniería Metalúrgica, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A, 1226, Medellín, Colombia
  2. 2.Grupo de Estado Sólido, Instituto de Física, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A, 1226, Medellín, Colombia
  3. 3.Grupo de Ciencia de los Materiales, Instituto de Química, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A, 1226, Medellín, Colombia

Personalised recommendations